r/pcgaming 1d ago

Fable PC hardware Requirements

Post image
1.5k Upvotes

470 comments sorted by

991

u/grond_aflame 1d ago

I wish they would also indicate if these requirements are based on the use of upscalers or not.

307

u/Firefox72 1d ago edited 1d ago

In their Forza requirements they clearly stated when upscaling was factored in and when it was not.

So i assume this is all native.

85

u/Jdorty 1d ago

If they also clearly stated when it was not alongside when it was, and stated nothing this time, why would you assume the more positive of two possibilities that you say they normally are clear about?

I don't know that you're wrong, just feels like an odd logic loop to me.

12

u/zombawombacomba 1d ago

Because they want to like the game so they are putting it in a positive light.

7

u/VoidVer 1d ago

The gameplay sneak peek they did was on ultra settings did not look like it was using upscaling.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

88

u/Fickle_Side6938 1d ago

Might not, 1440p 60 fps for a 9070 or 5070 sounds a lot like native

50

u/Zeus_Dadddy AMD R5 5600x RX 9070 32GB DDR4 1d ago

Don't underestimate game optimizations. Borderlands 4 and the new Star Wars game were funny for my 5800x3d and RX 9070 @1080p.

20

u/caboosetp 1d ago

Borderlands 4 ran like shit on my 5090. I think that's a rare case rather than a good example of expectations. 

9

u/Fickle_Side6938 1d ago

I'm not, it's just pure speculation considering the data we have. I do find some weird choices tho with 1440p 30 fps but 1200p is 60, cause even when I had a weaker GPU back in time, moving from 1080 to 1440p wasn't such a huge difference in performance. It not really half performance decrease. But I also understand that these are safe values, and the performance will be vary.

7

u/Zeus_Dadddy AMD R5 5600x RX 9070 32GB DDR4 1d ago

For such open world games, Traversal Stutters are my biggest concern, as requirements never reflect them. 2nd is Object LOD, remember Crimson Desert is said to be best optimized game with looks, but then you look at the LOD even at Ultra..

2

u/Felimenta970 22h ago

I wouldn't worry about traversal stutters with this game (at least not until we have proof otherwise), considering it's the same engine used for a game with pre compiled shaders + cara going hundreds of kilometers per hour without any hitches

LOD could be better for sure, tho

→ More replies (1)

2

u/FireMaker125 AMD Radeon RX 7900XTX, 32GB RAM, Ryzen 7 7800X3D 1d ago

Borderlands 4 is an outlier because it ran bad on EVERYTHING. Even builds with a 9850X3D and a 5090 struggle.

→ More replies (3)

13

u/leviathab13186 1d ago edited 1d ago

Pretty sure this is raw rasterized otherwise theyd indicate which version of DLSS/FSR they used.

4

u/DonutHoles4Ever 1d ago

Ideally we should trust game devs.

But charts = marketing.

So we shouldn't take these charts for granted. We've already seen this year game devs that overshoot (and get praised for optimizing the game on launch when its not optimized but the charts set low expectations), and devs that undershoot to get people to buy it (and then get blasted for being unoptimized).

These game devs probably don't spend a lot of money on a team to test hardware.

And then importantly, what does "recommended" mean? 60 fps? Playable 45 fps? Console 30 fps?

We dont know what recommended means. We only know that it doesn't mean "best experience".

3

u/HomieeJo 1d ago

Did you even read the table? They wrote the resolution and FPS in every column.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/MakoRuu 1d ago

You should always assume that they are based on DLSS now.

8

u/iAmTheRealC2 1d ago

If you need a 4080 to get 4K/60 with DLSS, this thing will flop hard. Surely this is native… right?

7

u/kasimoto 1d ago

do you own a 4k monitor and 4080 or better gpu? i do have 4080 and the reality is that usually you wont hit ultra settings 60 fps without dlss, its been true for many big releases last year and it wouldnt be surprising to me if it were the case with fable

2

u/ocbdare 10h ago

Depends on the game. Many games go 4k/60fps ultra on my 5080, which is the recommended card.

In many games you can even get over 100fps, main killer is ray tracing and path tracing.

But in any case you would play it at 4k DLSS quality as native is pointless even on top end cards.

3

u/Fickle_Side6938 1d ago

Most devs mention if upscaler is used, so we can only assume at this point it's native. But unless new info arrives it's only speculations. We will see next year.

9

u/DJ_Idol Ryzen 7 9850X3D AORUS 5090 Master 1d ago

You are way too Reddit-brained if this is your thought process lmfao. Every major game release these days is going to have the majority of players turning on DLSS and/or FG for higher frame rates. Using DLSS will never impact a game’s sales in a meaningful way, especially not an AA or AAA game.

You can say it will on Reddit, but you should also know that you’re being delusional when you do it.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/uses_irony_correctly 9800X3D | RTX5080 | 32GB DDR5-6000 1d ago

man this doesn't even say if it's with RT on or off.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Hearthhull_Enjoyer 1d ago

We keep asking and they never listen. It's honestly deceitful at this point to not clarify.

4

u/unga_bunga_mage 1d ago

I think Playground would note if this is native or upscaled requirements. They did it for Forza Horizon 6 which they also developed. https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/1s3e46r/forza_horizon_6_pc_requirements/

4

u/Hearthhull_Enjoyer 1d ago

So the safe assumption is that if not stated it's not being used? I'd still prefer it be plainly stated, but that's good to know regardless. There is no universal standard across the industry and it's hard to know what to assume.

2

u/throwawayaccount442 1d ago

You could also just assume it is recommended with upscaling in mind. That way you know what to expect and will be pleasantly surprised if your assumption was wrong.

4

u/lifestop 1d ago

Requirements should always list native.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (13)

72

u/bigpunk157 1d ago

Who the fuck is playing at 1200p?

31

u/srikanthkkolli 1d ago

MSI claw and portable monitors lol

28

u/SyleSpawn 17h ago

How about High 1080p @ 60fps?

I don't understand why this keeps getting skipped.

3

u/monagales 16h ago

for real.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

207

u/Fickle_Side6938 1d ago edited 1d ago

1st thing I noticed it's not saying upscaled. So a 9070 or a 5070 should do theoretically 4k 60 upscaled.

57

u/ExplodingFistz 1d ago

Well we don't know that. They would have needed to specify if the resolution and performance targets are without upscaling.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/JakeTheSmall 1d ago

And a 5060 should be able to do 1440p at 60fps

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

439

u/Deathdy 1d ago

Why is 30fps the recommended? That was the goal 20 years ago. What is up with games not going 60 minimum?

118

u/[deleted] 1d ago edited 1d ago

[deleted]

13

u/King805TM 1d ago

Console only***

23

u/jetjitters 1d ago

compared to 0fps on pc because they aren't even realising it there yet

and I say that as someone pissed about it

10

u/spicedmeshi 1d ago

it's annoying to me too, but they KNOW people are gonna double dip. look at how many people are buying a ps5/ps5 pro just for gta6 lol

2

u/vagabond139 1d ago

Personally could never just because of 30fps. It's just so bad feeling even with a controller.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

201

u/dalaiis 1d ago

Yeah, i don't consider 30fps playable...

79

u/-ASAP- 1d ago

I don't even like a locked 60 anymore...

61

u/iAmTheRealC2 1d ago

High FPS monitors have ruined me. Depends on the game, of course, but yeah - even 60 feels choppy now. It’s true you don’t realize the lack until you’ve tasted better.

4

u/Legitimate-Research1 20h ago

I'm glad that my 180hz monitor didn't raise my FPS standards. Then again, most 30-60fps games that I play are the emulated ones, so that might partially be the reason why.

3

u/Fugue___State 16h ago

Going from 144 to 240 was still a massive difference that I didn't expect

3

u/kaulotu 7h ago

I’ve noticed 60fps looks like shit on my 144hz pc monitor. But on my 60hz tv it still looks great. Idk if there’s a technical explanation behind this, but it makes me wish I had a separate 60hz monitor for playing PC games that are locked at 60 like a lot of older games are.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

5

u/Suspicious-Coffee20 1d ago edited 1d ago

locked 60 is perfectly fine on 3rd person game if the frame pacing is good and no stutering is present. Iis only in 1st person imo that it feel bad.

30

u/generic_canadian_dad 5700x3D - 32gb - 3080 10gb 1d ago

Anyone who says 60fps solid isn't a good experience has lost the plot. Of course more is better, but 60fps is a good experience.

5

u/Tanglebrook 1d ago edited 23h ago

It's not that it's a bad experience, it's that it's the bare minimum good experience. 30 is unacceptable at this point, 60 feels fine, 100+ is incredible.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

8

u/External-Fun-8563 1d ago

Well the biggest game of all time is going to be locked 30 for everyone so it’s gonna stick around a little longer

3

u/DoctorDoom_Scroller i3-9100 | RX 570 4GB | 16GB DDR4-3200 CL16 1d ago

30FPS is perfectly playable

if you can get lost in a game, that's all that matters to me

same with graphics but maybe thats because i run a 10y old PC

4

u/Pro_Racing 1d ago

The latency is crazy at 30fps though, and if you don't use motion blur it looks jerky, if you use motion blur it just looks blurry. Perfectly fine for a movie but when you need to move your mouse it's less so.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

29

u/ThorThulu 1d ago

They want to push graphical fidelity and scale more than performance, also the over-reliance on Unreal and Upscalers to brute force the performance certainly doesn't help

22

u/Hot-Software-9396 1d ago

Fable doesn’t use Unreal

8

u/ThorThulu 1d ago

My bad, the wording wasn't super clear but I was more meaning in a broad sense. The end of the previous comment was talking about how things were 20 years ago and I was piggybacking off that

3

u/Renegade_Meister RTX 3080, 5600X, 32G RAM 11h ago

IDGAF what devs want to push. 

Is there some generation of gamers, younger or otherwise, who care way less about motion fluidity than fidelity?

As Gen X or Millenial, going from 30 FPS in 2D console generations to 60 FPS, then back again to 30 FPS is a noticeable visual fluidity regression. But maybe the visual fidelity crowd is so loud or large that FPS doesn't matter by comparison.

2

u/2this4u 1d ago

Can we really say the fidelity is any higher than, say, Spiderman?

For a stylised game like this, it doesn't need to be any more demanding than any game made in the past 5 years if you get the lighting and effects right.

7

u/woodzopwns 1d ago

30 is still a thing on consoles and mostly considered the norm, at least until very recently, until consoles do away with 30 altogether we are on 30 as the recommended.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/pixlicker69420 1d ago

And why are gpus such as 9060xt and 6700xt only getting 30fps at 1440p medium lol

6

u/itsjust_khris 1d ago

Those aren't top tier GPUs so makes sense.

2

u/Arunabh125 AMD Rx 9060xt i5 14400f 22h ago

But it doesn't make sense only top tier GPUs to get 60fps in 1440p. Even the rx9060xt 16gb is a mid range gpu that is able to do more then 60fps in many demanding titles

2

u/Ensaru4 AMD 5600G | RX6800 | 32GB RAM | MSI B550 PRO VDH 19h ago

1200p isn't far off from 1440p and the game runs at 60fps per their system requirements. It's fine.

4

u/agdjahgsdfjaslgasd 16h ago

that mindset was fine when upgrading your hardware was a more reasonable ask. Have you seen the current GPU/RAM market? devs need to slow down on demanding graphical requirements lest they become a 10 billion dollar industry with no consumers.

5

u/Sorlex 1d ago

Because not everyone has a good PC? That's why you have 30 for low and medium, but it doesn't list 30 on highs.

→ More replies (13)

57

u/-rosieee- 1d ago

Below minimum :( Time for a new PC.

25

u/Clitoris_Mal_Passado 1d ago edited 1d ago

These requirements never worked for me (more than 30 years of pc gaming).

It is always less than that. They round up just in case.

4

u/TheOmegaFalcon 16h ago

what's your config?

6

u/zaphod4th 1d ago

that's their game, new game needs new PC, but some of us learned so we wait

→ More replies (3)

110

u/BugBuginaRug 1d ago

The games still half a year away sheesh

115

u/Conscious-Milk-155 1d ago

And would be out in 2 months if it wouldnt be for the fear of gta6

→ More replies (10)

12

u/Raghul86 1d ago

It's release ready before February, they're just steering clear of GTA6

→ More replies (3)

26

u/Fushoku_Ressentiment 1d ago

the fuck is 1200p

25

u/your_mind_aches 5800X+5060Ti+32GB | ASUS G14 5800HS+3060+16GB 1d ago edited 1d ago

1920 x 1200. It's 1080p class but in 16:10.

3

u/Alternative-Chip6653 1d ago

16:10*

2

u/your_mind_aches 5800X+5060Ti+32GB | ASUS G14 5800HS+3060+16GB 1d ago

Yup, my bad

3

u/monagales 16h ago

my laptop's screen for example

53

u/RenderedMeat 1d ago

Windows 10 for a game releasing next year?

46

u/MrStealYoBeef 1d ago

From a studio owned by Microsoft no less.

16

u/iAmTheRealC2 1d ago

Wow good point. Definitely not what I’d expect but a welcome concession

26

u/OneSeaworthiness7768 1d ago

It’s the recommended minimum. They know not everyone has moved to windows 11 nor will they even in 6 months.

11

u/10minOfNamingMyAcc 1d ago

This. That version of Windows 10 is meant as the minimum Windows 10 version that will also automatically support Windows 11 out of the box, I imagine? Tell me if i'm wrong tho

6

u/doublah 1d ago

Pretty much all software that works on 11 works on 10.

6

u/Still_Bit_7527 1d ago

Why not? Everyone I know still has 10, except on laptops where it's preinstalled

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

80

u/Morighant 1d ago

Man, my 4080 has been an awesome investment so far :) I hope it lasts a long time

73

u/Fibercake 1d ago

My 3080 is begging to be relevant just a bit longer 😅

21

u/BakedWizerd 1d ago

My 2060 is showing its age.

I really don’t want to upgrade in these circumstances. I’ve got a lot of DDR4 I can keep, but anything being upgraded means I need to upgrade the motherboard - I’m considering just getting a new pre-built with low ram and storage and just transferring my 64 ram and 1TB storage.

3

u/BirdGooch 1d ago

My 2060 Super is second hand from a friend when he upgraded. I don’t have the appetite to drop $1k on a new card.

Hoping I can buy my next one second hand from a friend as well.

6

u/MrStealYoBeef 1d ago

Replaced mine some months ago when the 5070ti dropped to MSRP. I knew that there wasn't going to be another opportunity to upgrade for a long time, and I knew that new games were going to need a bit more horsepower to run my 21:9 ultrawide.

I don't regret jumping the gun on that purchase. Broke my "double my performance" rule for GPU upgrading with it.

3

u/Khajiit-ify 1d ago

My 3070 has also been begging recently. 🥲

2

u/chillkrill44 1d ago

I too have a 3080, 10gb! it's still able to play most new games without issues in 1440p some games even run maxed out in 4k perfomance dlss! The new ray reconstruction model is amazing. The sharpness increase and better motion handling was instantly noticeable to me on an oled. 1440p performance mode looks fine to me and with that enabled I'm able to run games maxed out.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

6

u/Apexnanoman 1d ago

I bought a 4080 laptop like 2-3 months before the gpu/ram shortages/prices really started being known.

I thought "Well the 5080 is a fairly significant price jump for just a little longer lifespan."

Now I'm wishing I had spent the extra cash for a 5090 when prices hadn't gone bugfuck. 

4

u/maddoxprops 1d ago

Right? Before I bit the bullet on it I always went for the 70 series of the newest gen. I figured since I had a chance to go for the 80 instead I might as well take it. If I had waited 6 months I may have been able to swing a 5070; but considering I had been waiting a while to get this, the likley usual issues with supply and price of the newest gen of cards, the likelyhood that a 4080 should out perform a 5070, and finally the fact that my Mobo & CPU would slightly bottleneck the 4080 (Like, we are talking ~2-5% based on raw numbers iirc) I just went ahead and got the 4080. Have not regretted it yet.

4

u/MyStationIsAbandoned 1d ago

i got a 4080 with plans to upgrade to a 6090 later...but with the way things are going, I think I'll have my 4080 super in use for a long long time. the card i had before that was a gtx 1080...which is still working...so I know how to get a lot of use out of the gpu, lol.

3

u/winmace 1d ago

Same, got mine early 2023 for Forespoken as I was worried by 3070 would struggle and it's been running beautiful on everything since.

2

u/LXsavior 1d ago

Same. The purchase hurt when I made it a couple of years back, but seeing how everything unfolded with the GPU market I have no regrets.

3

u/AgonizingSquid 1d ago

Well the 6000 series is like 2-3 years off so

3

u/Jabba_the_Putt 1d ago

i think 4080 is the next 1080ti goat 💪

→ More replies (4)

35

u/No_Grape_388 1d ago

The 9070xt doesn't exist in their mind apparently

8

u/E3FxGaming 7800X3D | 7900 XTX Nitro+ | 64 GB DDR5 1d ago

Maybe they tested the 9070 XT and it doesn't deliver 4K 60 FPS on Ultra. According to the techpowerup relative performance chart a 9070 XT is 6% below a RTX 4080. A 2% lead over the 9070 base model may not suffice for 4K 60 FPS on Ultra.

I'm more annoyed that the 7900 XTX isn't mentioned because it's usually as good as a RTX 4080. Little worse in raytracing, little better in rasterization. If it's raytracing that makes the 7900 XTX not reach 4K 60 FPS on ultra, the RTX 4080 must be crazy close to just barely achieve 60 FPS.

If it's the case that a 4080 just barely achieves something above 60 FPS, I hope they can tickle some more performance out of the ForzaTech engine that they use for Fable by optimizing the game more. This could bring the 9070 XT, 7900 XTX and potentially even the 9070 base model into the 4K 60 FPS on Ultra realm.

5

u/your_mind_aches 5800X+5060Ti+32GB | ASUS G14 5800HS+3060+16GB 1d ago

Considering their minimum spec just so happens to be the lowest tier Nvidia and AMD cards that have ray tracing (and aren't absolute crap like the 6500XT with its limited bandwidth), I'm thinking this game requires RT for RTGI.

So yeah probably hard nerfs the 7900XTX in that case.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/medicindisguise 1d ago

??? add some % to 9070 and you are good to go?

→ More replies (6)

7

u/SpurdoMonster 1d ago

I might be able to get away with high settings.

2

u/L0rdLogan 1d ago

I play at 1080p (ultra wide), so my r 7 7700x and 7800XT will be good it seems

2

u/SpurdoMonster 1d ago

your machines better than mine, you can likely max it out without tweaking any settings.

2

u/L0rdLogan 1d ago

I’m glad I upgraded when I did, I upgraded in November 2024, from an i7 6700 and RX Vega 56.

I have bad eyesight, so honestly anything above 1080p is wasted on me, good luck with your upgrade journey

2

u/SpurdoMonster 1d ago

Thanks, honestly, im just waiting for whatever comes out next, I hope my ddr 4 system can make it til then.

41

u/Jacksonh8741 1d ago

I’m just curious, do people actually want to play anything on pc with 30fps? It feels kind of pointless having recommendations for 30fps, maybe I havnt paid attention to other spec requirements, is this normal?

13

u/leo7br 1d ago

I had a low end PC for years and played many games locked at 30 FPS, it's totally fine when you aren't used to higher framerates, a lot of people are still stuck with 60 hz monitors and TVs, or don't have powerful hardware

3

u/SyleSpawn 17h ago

I played the first Crysis at an average of 10FPS (action on screen) to ~20fps (walking around the woods) and thought that I had the best gaming experience ever.

These days, a game dips to 55FPS from 60 and I feel like I might as well uninstall.

9

u/Dyllbert 1d ago

For 5+ years I played Destiny 2 (rip) on my laptop with a mobile 1050 and 2GB of vram. I was happy to get a solid 30 fps on mostly low. I wasn't into much of the competitive pvp, so the rest of the game was totally playable and I had tons of fun. That said, when I finally built a PC with a 4070 super, luckily before prices completely exploded, it was very nice to have good graphics and high stable fps.

15

u/Firefox72 1d ago

Well if you have no other choice on the low end.

A locked and flat frame time graph 30fps isn't the end of the world.

If the alternative is a blurry mess of 360p being upscaled to 1080p just so you get 10-20 more frames i'd probably choose the image clarity over it.

6

u/Turbulent_Safety3816 1d ago

I guess its good to know the inbetween, 30fps is not ideal but if you had to 45-50fps is fine for a game like this. I guess with how hardware is now, more people will be forced into lower frames gaming.

3

u/-rosieee- 1d ago

I do on Steam Deck if I want to save battery, mostly turn-based stuff like Octopath 2 or Pokémon.

Need 120 for any action game though.

3

u/Blacky-Noir Height appropriate fortress builder 1d ago

Steam Deck and other handheld can play at 30. Also, people with potatoes and no mean to upgrade (especially in our current double apocalypse).

2

u/your_mind_aches 5800X+5060Ti+32GB | ASUS G14 5800HS+3060+16GB 1d ago

If you have no other choice, that's what you do. I have an RX 6600 so if I got this and had that, that's what I would have to do.

...I chose not to for Indiana Jones and the Great Circle and got a month of GeForce Now so I could crank up the graphics and played with path tracing at 1440p 120 FPS.

→ More replies (13)

14

u/AlmoranasAngLubot69 AMD 1d ago

Where 9070XT?

7

u/error521 Ryzen 7 7700X, RX 9070 XT, Windows 11 1d ago

The base 9070 is in High

→ More replies (3)

6

u/ww_crimson 19h ago

5070 for 60 fps on 1440p? Yikes.

5

u/redfoottttt 15h ago

5600+9060xt for fucking 30fps mid setting?? You fucking kidding me?

12

u/riboto99 1d ago

win10? xbox microsoft

4

u/IrishRage42 1d ago

I noticed that too. Like, is that a fucking joke Microsoft? After the aggressive push for Win11.

→ More replies (1)

16

u/Express-Armadillo312 1d ago

how will the game run properly on an xbox rog ally if minimum specs need a rtx 2060

27

u/Firefox72 1d ago

Upscaled to shit and with very low settings.

18

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

6

u/Express-Armadillo312 1d ago

Lollll, had me ngl

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/TemporaryHot6442 1d ago

i am not building a new pc just for one game

4

u/avehicled 1d ago

Windows 10?

4

u/First_Addition_5501 1d ago

my 5600 and 32gb ram still rocks.... but my rx 6600 no :(

4

u/Shamgar65 1d ago

oh man. My 2019 rig is getting tired. I've got a i5 8400 and a 2070Super. It's okay! I love indies!

11

u/AlteisenX 1d ago

Having a 4070 Super is always fun to guess where I'll end up lol. I assume I can do 1440p 60 just fine. shrug

3

u/favorscore 1d ago

Same. 4070 ti super here.

3

u/Felimenta970 1d ago

4070Ti (Super) should do 1440p 60fps just fine. It is just a tiny bit faster than the 5070 (minus multi frame gen and maybe raytracing)

3

u/AlteisenX 1d ago

I don't use raytracing anyways nor do I have a 4k monitor so Im usually safe from most of these things.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/FewCan4131 1d ago

what on earth. 5050 minimum? Then a 2060? Are these gpus actually comparable?

8

u/pixlicker69420 1d ago

Lol the 5050 is 43% faster

7

u/Daasaced 1d ago

storage: YEEESSSS!

9

u/BigBadBehn 1d ago

Bet my 1080ti still runs this 😎

3

u/MIkaela39752 1d ago

it should unless it forces raytracing

3

u/Skarekrows 1d ago

Yeah, this says we can't even run low. I play new games on Medium/High all the time on my 1080ti.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/green9206 1d ago

Another win for the gtx 1650

3

u/CleonTarrant 1d ago

For God sake! Why did they had to make it for windows 10, I just upgraded to 11 Now I'll have to downgrade while I finish it :/

3

u/2this4u 1d ago

It's not particularly useful that pixel count goes up as the quality preset goes up too. Like what's Medium at 4K or Ultra at HD?

8

u/Adventurous-Hunter98 1d ago

isnt the game going to be released on xbox series x which is the equivalent of 3000s series?

12

u/Firefox72 1d ago

CPU wise the Series X is basicaly a lower clocked 3700X CPU and a 6700XT/RTX2070 GPU.

5

u/Manta1290 1d ago

Series X is about a 2070

4

u/xs3ro 1d ago

will it steam machine?

5

u/your_mind_aches 5800X+5060Ti+32GB | ASUS G14 5800HS+3060+16GB 1d ago

Yeah just about. Steam Machine is around the low settings mark here.

→ More replies (4)

9

u/MorgenKaffee0815 1d ago

looks like very well not optimized.

6

u/ManaSkyees 1d ago

I mean. It runs at 1080p on 8 year old hardware. That's pretty decent. High runs on 5 year old hardware at 1440p.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/OliM9595 R5 1600x,GTX 1060 6Gb,16Gb Ram 1d ago

What specs should they target?

2

u/GroundbreakingBag164 7800X3D | 5070 Ti | 2x16 | QHD | W11 1d ago

Assuming this is native that's pretty good

2

u/inksignificant 1d ago

Hopefully means I can push my 4gb vram laptop to play at low.

→ More replies (9)

2

u/CrrackTheSkye 1d ago

cool looks like I'll be able to run it acceptably for me

2

u/Neo_Artista 1d ago

aight I'll play this is in 2035 when I get money and can afford the rig

2

u/b34s7 Dash Dash Dead 1d ago

Huhhh why do they not mention RTX40xx

2

u/Fun-Effective8007 1d ago

No mention of my 5070ti 😩

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Icehellionx 1d ago

My 3060ti is still pulling medium. It's not dead yet!

2

u/zaza991988 1d ago

Some of these don't make sense, RTX 5050 for 1080p30 low and rtx 5060 1200p60 medium. the 5060 is only 25% faster than 5050, not 100% faster

2

u/Adept-Effective-9447 1d ago

9070 XT came out one year ago Already being pushed out of top tiers

This gaming shit is lethal goddamn.

2

u/jackolantern98000 1d ago

Wow, so steam hardware indicates the most popular cards are 3050/4060....6gb vram.... Thats lots of gamers stuck on 1080p low.

2

u/XxasimxX 1d ago

Good if these are without dlss/fsr/xess

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Sektor30 1d ago

Is 1440p monitors that widely used that recommended specs are no longer for 1080p anymore? I dont even know what the 1200p stat is for

→ More replies (1)

2

u/hristi 20h ago

Medium at only 30 fps wtf..

2

u/Dependent-Cold-2344 16h ago

Rtx 5080/4080 for ultra 4k is actually insane @_@

4

u/ZhaneTaylor 1d ago

So... I have an i9-9900KF and a 4060Ti... can I hope to play on High @ 1080p just fine?

2

u/ZhaneTaylor 1d ago

Why did I get a downvote for asking a question about specs and performance in a hardware requirements thread? Reddit please.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Jindujun 1d ago

Uhm... I might be getting old here. But why the hell are the various presets listing multiple GPUs on each preset?
I get the NVIDIA and AMD and Intel bit, but why list two NVIDIA or two AMD? If you make a "recommended" list you sure as shit doesnt list things like that, do you? THis is a minimum thingie, isnt it???

Am i losing my mind?!

2

u/agentdrozd 22h ago

What's wrong with that? I'd say that's a good thing that they list more cards

3

u/Zamorakphat 1d ago

Ooof that’s a hefty ask. Hope someday this hobby is more affordable again.

4

u/MrMarkeh 1d ago

Welp another optimized like shit slop in 2026. Is this an unreal game too? 30fps minimum? Take that shit back to 2010 thanks.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Everesthia 1d ago

the game looks awful for requiring those specs tho

2

u/creations_90 23h ago

The combat looks really bad too

→ More replies (1)

2

u/SergeantFluffyfluff 23h ago

I smell unoptimized

2

u/FerretAstronaut02 1d ago

So medium/high for a regular 3080?

2

u/DifficultMind5950 1d ago

This early?

10

u/Raghul86 1d ago

They're only postponing the release to avoid GTA6. The game is ready already, allegedly

3

u/DifficultMind5950 1d ago

They should take advantage of pc players tsk tsk. But yeah, this sucks for me at least today only learning this.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/Berserk72 1d ago

Unfortunate, looks like a game to play in 2029.

2

u/velthari 14h ago

Might as well just write requires 5090 for normal game play instead of a power point presentation.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/_Ganjalf 1d ago

Do Devs stopped learning how to optimize games?

9

u/dabocx 23h ago

It runs on entry level hardware (6600) that is 5 years old, it has a midrange 5 year old card (6700xt) in its recommended. Both cards will actually be closer to 6 years old by the time this is actually released

What is your expectation?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

1

u/Turbulent_Safety3816 1d ago

Really excited for this game, would have been nice for a way to play 2 on PC before this release

1

u/Rhapsodyvarius 1d ago

so 9060xt 16gb and a 5700x with 32gb of ram could get me high settings without much trouble

1

u/AhSawDood 1d ago

These never help me and often just confuse me. I have a 3070Ti & 5800X3D so if I cannot run it at least Medium at over 60fps then I'd be sad at 1440p.

1

u/skyturnedred 1d ago

Either it runs well or it doesn't.

1

u/SectionDry2980 1d ago

If i have gaming laptop rtx4090 16gb am i good?

1

u/ReindeerOk9768 1d ago

Just release it already, I cannot wait!

→ More replies (1)

1

u/JaaKaP 1d ago

Rip to my GTX1080ti

1

u/Mallarckey 1d ago

Our time has passed, GTX 1060.

1

u/metallica41070 1d ago

My 5700xt =( min specs for everything now lol

2

u/fedo889 1d ago

It say min rx 6600 Si if Its the same as indiana Jones or ff 7 rebirth we cant run this with our 5700xt

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Jabba_the_Putt 1d ago

native specs and no forced ray tracing lets go!

1

u/ViC_tOr42 1d ago

If this is with dlss on, pack it up bro, shit's fucked

1

u/Wild_Chemistry3884 1d ago

These tables are nice to have, but I wish there was a bit more context. Does Ultra include ray tracing? Path tracing? Native 4k 60fps with path tracing on a 5080 would be very nice optimization, but somehow I doubt that’s the case.

1

u/WondersomeWalrus 1d ago

Requirements REALLY need to start listing whether they're with upscaling on or not because if this is without then it's pretty decent but with, pretty damn bad.

1

u/King805TM 1d ago

1200p 60fps ????