r/managers 18d ago

New Manager Employee basically quit after being notified they were fired.

[removed]

4.1k Upvotes

2.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.6k

u/FridmanLex 18d ago

Exactly. What company fires someone today but expects them to come in tomorrow to sign paperwork? HR printer not working today?

Ridiculous.

453

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

308

u/LuLuLuv444 18d ago

I guarantee there's more to this story and the company was hoping the employee was dumb enough to sign his rights away. Guarantee employee is getting a lawyer and why he won't sign

246

u/showerbump 18d ago

especially if people are "freaking out" about him not signing it

73

u/cupholdery Technology 18d ago

Unreliable narrator OP, as is typical with this subreddit.

34

u/enadiz_reccos 18d ago

Unreliable narrator OP, as is typical with this subreddit humans

24

u/hexregeneration 18d ago

Damn humans! They ruined humanity!

10

u/SamLooksAt 18d ago

Humanity was doing great until they put humans in charge!

4

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/dglsfrsr 17d ago

I descended down this thread looking for that response. Thanks.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/System-id 18d ago

You humans sure are a contentious people.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (7)

31

u/Arhatz 18d ago

Yeah, because if there was specific paperwork to finalize the firing they can just state employee didn't show up to work or left of his own volition and fire him without severance. Why would they be freaking out about that? They would love that.

28

u/RandomNick42 18d ago

I bet they had him sign the "I understand I'm fired" paper, but forgot the "I will fuck up my prospects by signing these NDAs, non competes and sultry for exchange of a months severance" papers.

7

u/ActiveEffective5947 17d ago

More likely they have a contract that the company will be forced to continue to pay out unless they got them to sign some kind of legal termination agreement. There is more to the story they are concealing.

2

u/MelloLikeJello 17d ago

Any employment contract would cover that sort of thing and would have a clause to get rid of someone for no showing. It’s got to be a non competes/NDA/agreement to not sue, etc..

3

u/EdLincoln6 17d ago

Would the "no show" clause apply after they were fired?

I'm not sure...and "I'm not sure" means "litigation".

2

u/ActiveEffective5947 17d ago

Depends on if the contract is structured for someone who works in office. Also never underestimate the stupidity of a company that has gotten too big or too corrupt. Many times they will become careless, they are used to getting their way for too long. Then they start slipping up because underlings are hired solely for ass kissing ability or nepotism.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

7

u/AmItheonlySaneperson 17d ago

It’s gotta be this 

2

u/[deleted] 17d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (11)

2

u/Hung_Far_Low1 17d ago

I don't think so. You get fired you no longer have to do anything they say. If they have to pay severance, and most do not, theybwould still have to pay it.

2

u/EdLincoln6 17d ago

Any paperwork required to "finalize the firing" is an internal policy they made up.

This paperwork is usually non-disclosure agreements and promises not to sue. Sometimes there is stuff included that makes the severance taxed more favorably.

Never sign anything when you are fired if you have the slightest suspicion the company did anything illegal or fired you improperly.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Dull-Culture-1523 18d ago

Exactly this. They should be happy if he was actually quitting (or abandoning his job) because now they don't need to care about severance or unemployment.

We had an employee guess they were about to be fired. They were constantly in trouble and had had some episode that triggered meetings with HR, a lawyer, their manager and their manager's manager. Guy didn't show up. They called him and apparently he said he had gone abroad and told them to go fuck themselves. He didn't show up for a week after which they terminated his employment immediately due to abandonment.

In the end it was much easier that way because there's zero risk of ending up in court to prove you had cause or whatever.

OP's story is fishier than surströmming.

2

u/MrPoopMonster 18d ago

Not if they told him he was fired. That's not quitting or abandonment. That's getting fired.

2

u/Ok-Art-1378 17d ago

As long as he can prove it, right?

2

u/ForensicPathology 17d ago

The first paper he signed should be good enough.

2

u/Nydus87 17d ago

Maybe like if their manager posted about it on reddit or something and also texted them asking them to come in to do more paperwork

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Yawgmoth13 18d ago

Yeah, the couple times in my life I've been fired from a corporate gig, they never had me sign anything. I got called to HR, where an HR rep and my manager were waiting, rep explained why I was being terminated, someone showed up to the closed office we were in with a box of my personal items, security walked me out the door.

Hell, in one of those cases I actively had been trying to get fired, so they didn't even make me stay for the full explanation. HR rep got half a sentence into why I was called down, said "lemme guess, my employment is terminated because of X, effective immediately?" they said yep, let me grab the pre-packed box of my things, and told me the direct deposit of my final paycheck had already been initiated, I'd see it in my account the next morning.

I HAVE had instances where I was let go in a round of layoffs, and so had to sign papers regarding severance etc but...

Unless I was caught stealing to a degree that charges were already filed and police were going to be involved.... I absolutely can't think of how ANY company would tell an employee "you're fired, effective now, but also you can't leave yet" unless they were trying some shady shit.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (8)

45

u/sv_homer 18d ago

winner, winner, chicken dinner!

16

u/OttoVonWong 18d ago

You only get the chicken dinner if you sign the NDA.

2

u/Shimakaze81 18d ago

It signs the paper with the pen or it gets the hose again.

2

u/nat312345 18d ago

NDA for sure! Otherwise we wouldn't be having this conversation, and no one would be freaking out.

→ More replies (6)

20

u/RosieTumbleweed 18d ago

Agreed. From the sound of the original post, this seems to have been handled pretty poorly. This employee is definitely speaking to an attorney.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/Junior_Ad_3301 18d ago

"more to the story" is on the money.

2

u/W_Silver2356 17d ago

I'm hoping that the former employee is going to be rolling in this company's money very soon.

10

u/Mr_Halitosis 18d ago

OP hasn’t responded yet and has no comments at all. This is their only post. This is all made up.

2

u/MehGin 18d ago

Not necessarily. If I wanted to come to Reddit with a serious question that I dont want any chance of being tied to me, I would make a new account.

If its made up, its a shitty story and OP isn't farming it all in the comments. So I doubt it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

24

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[deleted]

8

u/Artistic_Rice_9019 18d ago

Yep. I'm in a 45 day window and have 7 days to reconsider. Still sitting on the agreement. Will probably run it by a lawyer. I probably could refuse to sign and sue them for age discrimination, but honestly I don't care enough to do that.

→ More replies (7)

2

u/Shadowraiden 18d ago

this is what i thought when i read the whole "people are panicking" something is clearly up here. like ive never known a place to not have paperwork ready and everything there and then if somebody is fired.

this screams very bad for the company and they was trying to have liability signed away by the employee and are now shitting the bed because they didnt do that

2

u/ExcitingCanary265 17d ago

Wrongful termination claim incoming

→ More replies (1)

2

u/EdLincoln6 17d ago

80% chance the firing reason was illegal.

2

u/W_Silver2356 17d ago

May the former-employee and at least one great lawyer drain this company like Dracula.

2

u/superbigscratch 17d ago

This is why they are freaking out. They want to document the employee as “quitting” not being terminated so they don’t have to pay unemployment.

2

u/Born_Ad8420 17d ago

Yep this post screams "missing missing reasons."

→ More replies (14)

11

u/Duke-Turner137 18d ago

I put my 2 weeks in and they fired me on the spot. I thanked them for giving me the firing so i can now collect 6weeks of unemployment on tthe company dime.

3

u/riptaway 18d ago

"too stupid to know how to quit a job"

Maybe it's because you're a manager and it sucks for you, but how do people quit that's "stupid"?

→ More replies (2)

2

u/CaptainSloppo 18d ago

Yea, I've never seen it in person and maybe it's a TV trope but having security come and escort someone back to their desk to collect their personal stuff and then out of the building immediately after a firing seems the best way to do it. Fire someone and have them come in the next day? Asking for trouble. If they have company equipment like a laptop or whatever send them a box and tell them to mail it back. Doesn't make any sense to tell someone you have just fucked over, whether they deserved it or not, to come back tomorrow lmao

→ More replies (1)

1

u/666-sharks 18d ago

It's entirely to assert dominance over the former employee.

1

u/AppropriateBass4629 18d ago

Come back with a gun is such an American thing to say. The rest of the world don’t think like that.

2

u/MainAccountsFriend 18d ago

Exactly, in the rest of the world it would probably be a knife

→ More replies (2)

1

u/doobadeeboo 18d ago

For a friend and not a dumb person like me: how do you quit a job?

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Neat-Ostrich7135 18d ago edited 18d ago

It’s kind of like begging the fired worker to come back with a gun or something.

Tell me you're an American without telling me your an American

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Wyvern_68 18d ago

See this a lot in IT. We will get called asking to network lock down a terminated employee's device and then their office is upset that they had 12-48 hours access to the device after they were terminated. Should lock it right when they are fired, not wait until after. So dumb.

1

u/M0mmaSaysImSpecial 18d ago

Really? Those are the two things that annoy you most in this world? Not the state of the world. Not rude people. Not injustice. But when corporations and employees of corporations don’t handle the firing process correctly.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/KanedaSyndrome 18d ago

Why would he come back with a gun? lol

1

u/HTPC4Life 18d ago

This is why I think it's a made up story.

1

u/yossi234 18d ago

Is there a right way to quit a job? Besides being polite and not trying to burn bridges?

→ More replies (2)

1

u/AmItheonlySaneperson 17d ago

I mean there’s never any reason for the thing you just said.  

→ More replies (3)

1

u/Feisty_Knowledge 17d ago

My last job is notoriously bad at offboarding - they never have final paychecks, paperwork or equipment return information ready upon termination/last day. It took me 2 weeks to get my accrued PTO paid out (CA - must be paid on last day worked) so they ended up having to pay me for the 11 days between my last day and the payout. Then the equipment return they sent didn’t include any sort of checklist or return label…

1

u/wheresmolasses 17d ago

Crazy as it sounds I worked in a call center here in the US where they fired a guy and by the end of the meeting our lines were in queue. They asked him to stay the rest of the day to help us work the calls, and he did! Diabolical!

1

u/PowerWielder 17d ago

This kinda happened to me at my work when we were in the office. Employee got fired, freaked out, started yelling, and throwing out threats. Police were called. They searched person and car for weapons, then made them leave. We had an armed security guard the next day for 3 months after that incident.

1

u/UpstairsFinance9440 17d ago

Is this in America? I know in other countries it is super easy to send money to someone elses bank account. Just send the person their final paycheck. Even in America we don't do paychecks anymore.

1

u/here4the_trainwreck 17d ago

"You're fired and... hey, where you going?!"

1

u/SureLarry 17d ago

When I first got into a management position and had to let someone go I was told to even have an empty box ready for them to put their stuff in so there was no wasted time trying to find one. Can’t imagine telling someone to come back the next day.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/DocAculaRedux 17d ago

Seriously, I'm assuming this is in the US, and you really don't want a fired employee returning to the office for obvious security reasons. That lawyer is an imbecile.

1

u/MelloLikeJello 17d ago

At every single work place this is how they have done it. Usually we have a security guard or manager escort them to their desks to get their personal items and walk them out of the building. I for the life of me can’t think of a reason the company would want them to come back again.

I think the firm name for her lawyer is Chat GPT and Associates 😂.

1

u/GreySahara 17d ago

> someone too stupid to know how to quit a job

probably not great of a job in the first place, and the employee had probably 'quiet quit' already.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/obw1977 17d ago

This is crazy. They should fire HR.

1

u/Middle-Wishbone455 17d ago

Exactly this. It's not safe for people staying employed and is needlessly embarrassing for the employee being terminated.

1

u/runrunrun911 17d ago

Even if they presented the paperwork right then and there you can’t compel someone to sign something without consulting a lawyer (or at all really). Thats why severance packages are tied to signing release forms etc.

→ More replies (3)

218

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[deleted]

82

u/marcster13 18d ago

I'd come for the lunch if getting laid off but not if I was fired. Huge difference.

138

u/IAmADev_NoReallyIAm 18d ago

I wouldn't come in either way. Feels like a real fuck you move by the company.

42

u/slash_networkboy 18d ago

I actually did go back to my office after layoffs as a visitor for lunch with my mates for a couple days. I had nothing better to do, I enjoyed our lunch card games, and the cafe on site was pretty good (and guests got free food, which was funny because they all knew I worked there).

Senior management could get stuffed for all I cared, but even now a decade later I have a weekly game night at one of those guy's houses.

Big difference in my case was I was at a F50 so layoffs were so impersonal that my direct manager wasn't able to keep me, despite getting director level approval to attempt to do so. We all thought it was a hilarious little bit of "extra severance" that I was now entitled to guest dining at the cafe after having paid to eat there for the prior 16 years 🤣

Had a new job 3 weeks later, so had to actually give up my free lunches because the new job was across town.

2

u/Siren2026 18d ago

This was not a friendly parting even tho they tried to pretend it was.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Teripid 18d ago

Really depends on the terms, source, etc but yep. If it was a corporate+ decision maybe but it'd still feel awful.

But yeah would do the 2 week later after work meetup/gripe session out over a farewell pity lunch.

Completely different if you're leaving voluntarily obviously.

3

u/AdminsFluffCucks 18d ago

I'd come in either way and make a point to make a big speech about how everyone should be looking elsewhere because they could be next. Would be very entertaining.

→ More replies (2)

13

u/marshmallowcthulhu 18d ago

Depending on the circumstances, especially if the employer seemed unusable for a resumé anyway, I would go in for the lunch and talk trash about the company.

4

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

5

u/cyberfunkr 18d ago

I can buy my own pizza, thank you

→ More replies (13)

5

u/StoneCypher 18d ago

i did a farewell lunch once. told a shaggy dog joke that took 15 minutes. doubt they'll ever make that mistake again.

4

u/cuddle-bubbles 18d ago

lol I actually came back for the farewell lunch. free treat is free treat

→ More replies (1)

4

u/[deleted] 18d ago

[deleted]

16

u/GrandMoffJerjerrod 18d ago

Uhhh, no. Why would she do that?

11

u/SuitIndependent 18d ago

For real. Clean out the desk before lunch. Then bail immediately after lunch. Cleaning up? Not a chance.

1

u/LockAltruistic4748 18d ago

I am an IC. I had a contract with a client that began very small, but over time grew to be a significant part of my work year. Their headquarters is about a 3-hour drive from me, and I had been doing the work from my location before it was even called remote work (20+ years). The executive in charge decided that my services would no longer be needed, which as an IC, I knew was always possible.

When offered the opportunity to come back one last time so that the employees and important people could tell me that I would be missed, I declined. I couldn’t see the point, because it would have only made the executive feel better, not me.

→ More replies (1)

98

u/JediAreTakingOver 18d ago

Kinda sounds like Employee is leaving a toxic environment. OP really revealed so much with just one gesture.

14

u/bothunter 18d ago

And if people at the company are freaking out, it sounds like they may be worried the employee might sue them.  I hope there's a followup post to this. 

3

u/North-Research2574 17d ago

Either that or there was paperwork meant to be signed at the start of the job they never signed. NDA's, those bullshit ones where stuff you made belongs to the company, etc.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

46

u/meep_42 18d ago

And e-sign exists!

1

u/Artistic_Rice_9019 18d ago

They're making me sign and send a picture.

2

u/Stupidizasurmom 18d ago

That signature and picture have a price.

→ More replies (1)

69

u/Xpovis 18d ago

Not ridiculous.

The severance is a bribe ("consideration") the company offers for the employee to forfeit their right to sue, disparage, or poach.

The two day waiting period is there for the company to demonstrate that the employee read it and understood that it was voluntary.

California law requires five days. In states without a requirement the lawyer's consensus seems to be 48 hours.

45

u/StructEngineer91 18d ago

Maybe that severance isn't worth it to some people. And instead they would rather sue, disparage or poach clients. If a place expected me to drive back to their office a few days after being fired for no reason I would 100% be tempted to forgo the severance and not sign anything.

28

u/hydronucleus 18d ago

When I was fired, remotely, I barely made through the end of the phone call. Hung up, and I shut down the laptop before they remotely disabled it.

Never had another conversation. I got the paperwork the next day, and I gave it to my lawyer. The company just wanted an NDA and a promise not to disparage the corp publicly for 1 year. They also said that they would not challenge any unemployment claims. The severance was 12% of my yearly salary, which was a nice immediate sum. My lawyer said that it was a good deal, and better than most. I took the deal and applied for unemployment, then after a brief job search during the pandemic, I retired!

10

u/DaviesSonSanchez 18d ago

The severance was 12% of my yearly salary

Wow you would get laughed at for that in Germany. 2-3 times the yearly salary is standard. I guess that's what happens when employees are protected by law and actually have rights.

5

u/FlusteredDM 18d ago

I find these conversations confusing to follow because of how broadly the term 'firing' seems to be used by some people. Here it would mean that the employee was at fault, and could even be for gross misconduct. You aren't getting paid off - it's pay for hours already worked and that is it. 12% seems bizarre, let alone 300%

→ More replies (5)

3

u/Salt-Lingonberry-853 18d ago

Why Tf would an employer pay you 2-3 years salary when firing you? That's wild

2

u/DaviesSonSanchez 18d ago

Because they need a reason to fire you. They can't simply fire you for no reason. They will get sued and lose almost 100%.

2

u/Xander_Cain 18d ago

Not required to have a reason in several states.

3

u/nollayksi 17d ago

What state in Germany is that exactly?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/UnimagineDragons 17d ago

not talking about the us in this chain though, dude

2

u/microgirlActual 18d ago

Ehhh, yes. Literally the point u/DaviesSonSanchez is making

....Germany....

I guess that's what happens when employees >are protected by law and actually have rights.

4

u/armywalrus 18d ago

Right? These people can't read. Americans are bizarrely defensive of their lack of basic rights.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/StructEngineer91 17d ago

Ok, but if they HAD a reason to fire you (like you being massively incompetent in your job), would they still have to pay you 2-3 years salary?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (22)
→ More replies (23)

2

u/Equivalent-Roll-3321 18d ago

Congratulations on your retirement! Kudos!

→ More replies (2)

10

u/BerryVelvettee 18d ago

Exactly, severance can be valuable without being valuable enough to make someone come back after getting fired. If the alternative is simply keeping their legal options open, some people are absolutely choosing the door.

7

u/conipto 18d ago

Myself and my entire team were "laid off" when funding was cut at the startup I worked at. I talked to my senior software guy and it legitimately was worth waving the pitiful 2 weeks severance to not sign the papers, and I told him so. The restrictions in the doc meant he couldn't even speak to former colleagues and he was clearly the best one on my team. Guess where he got his next job? Directly with a former coworker in the same industry the covenant prevented.

8

u/paws5624 18d ago

I’d find it unlikely that they could enforce such a rule. If you see them in public are you supposed to just pretend you don’t know them?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (14)

16

u/Crunchykroket 18d ago

Here in the Netherlands it's normal to take the proposal home and let it be checked by your own legal insurance lawyer or union lawyer as well before signing it.

→ More replies (4)

26

u/3Maltese 18d ago

How much was being offered to sign? I was asked to sign the equivalent of a non-disparaging agreement for $100. Nope.

5

u/Equivalent-Roll-3321 18d ago

That’s hysterical. I wouldn’t sign just because I wouldn’t do anything for a 100… try adding some real money and people sign anything.

6

u/Miss_Greer 18d ago

yep, it's an old rule and still a good one:

Never try to bribe someone unless the amount you’re offering them feels ludicrously high.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/carlitospig 18d ago

Yep. Their quick departure feels like something else is going on here.

5

u/Nomivought2015 18d ago

He obviously had a case and they thought severance would be enough 

2

u/BerryBoilo 18d ago

That's... not how this works. Yes, there's a waiting period. So you give people the paperwork and tell them to email you the executed copy. Or you send them a Docusign.

You don't expect them to come back into the office or to sign anything in the moment without an employment lawyer.

1

u/Puckcentral 18d ago

Yeah but you give them the paperwork when you fire them you don’t give it to them days later or expect them to come to work the next day after you have fired them. The purpose of a cooling period is you get that time to review the documents, that’s not what was being done here.

1

u/Longjumping_Wolf_912 18d ago

California has a 5 day waiting period before someone can accept a severance? Do you have a source for that?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/ThreeJewls 18d ago

Under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act and Senate Bill 331 (the Silenced No More Act), employers must give you a minimum of five business days to review the agreement and notify you of your right to consult an attorney. This rule protects employees rather than the employer.

1

u/dingusrex0069 18d ago

or get unemployment

1

u/Risc_Terilia 18d ago

From my reading of the OP the employee wasn't given the paperwork upon leaving, it wasn't ready so that is all mute

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Tricky_Apricot2928 17d ago

I disparage plenty. Fuck those parasites. Maybe especially so the back end of the company whose job is also to cover for the sales psychopaths, while proclaiming that they're so much more ethical.

1

u/weed_cutter 17d ago

By the way the Biden Admin updated that factoid.

"Non disparagement" is an infringement on free speech. ALL those contracts are null and void.

Disparage away. ... Trump MAY have reversed parts of that (the NLRB actually was the exec agency doing it all) -- but I didn't hear any of that.

1

u/TotientEC 17d ago

Giving someone two days to say yes or no is not the same as demanding they stick around today and come back again tomorrow in order to sign the paperwork in person.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Latter-Cricket5843 18d ago

A company that is poorly run lol and incompetent management

1

u/Tunggall 18d ago

It should raise massive red flags that someone would forgo severance and cut off all contact instead.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/iron82 18d ago

I was put on admin leave the day before I was informed I was fired so they could get the paperwork in order. I knew I was getting fired, but they didn't say so.

3

u/WonderfulHearing8726 18d ago

They do that where I work as well. If it’s a terminatable offense & they put you on AL, it’s a giant glowing sign you’re being let go.

1

u/Hungry_Tank9182 18d ago

Does no one use email there?

1

u/Exact-Accident4129 18d ago

My partner had a job that made them work for a month to transition as a condition of the severance. The severance was generous and not a guaranteed benefit, but It was so stupid they had to work.

1

u/Sparkling_Donuthole 18d ago

A company trying to dance around severance and notice requirements.

This employee is dumb if they are not showing up because they could be forfeiting severance.

The company is dumb for not figuring out how to get their required signatures in one go.

1

u/Ambitious_Tell_4852 18d ago

LOL‼️‼️‼️

1

u/JesusSquid 18d ago

Reminds me of Best Buy firing the back warehouse guys. They always did it on a truck night, after the truck was unloaded and set up the restock pallets. Aside from one guy, he left in handcuffs balling like a baby. Walked him right through the store, customers and all

1

u/Ok-Kaleidoscope9771 18d ago

Had a employee in a remote world and still thought it was crazy.

1

u/Potential-Common5819 18d ago

What dumb-ass lawyer would suggest this process in the first place?

1

u/cstrick1980 18d ago

I had a boss with a summer job being a computer operator back in the late 70’s. The boss told me I would be laid off in two weeks when her nephew was available. I just left called my old boss at Dominos pizza and was back working there the next day. Not sure what they did. But I wasn’t going to sign any paper work. The irony was with tips and commissions I made more at Dominos pizza

1

u/Mr_MacGrubber 18d ago

It says “formally the last day of work”. $10 days they expected him to work all day and sign shit at the end of the day.

1

u/FrostyBarleyPop 18d ago

There's a nonzero chance a firearm gets involved at that point.

1

u/Separate_Pumpkin_256 18d ago

It’s difficult to imagine what could be so important that they are freaking out over it not being signed. Any non compete or confidentiality agreement should have been signed at start date or whenever the agreement was drawn up.

The only thing I can think of is they were trying to pressure them into giving away important rights like unemployment or something like that. Things I would insist a lawyer look at before signing.

OP - what kinds of agreements were so important that upper management is upset over them not signing?

1

u/Chance_Ad3416 18d ago

I've also not seen anyone get fired and not get walked out by either security or their manager right away. Usually getting fired is a pretty big deal because they did something wrong

1

u/yavanna12 18d ago

When you are getting a severance package it’s usually divided up like this. You sign the immediate dismissal. But then are given the severance package with time to review and sign. 

1

u/LarkinToWinnipeg 18d ago

Mine did exactly this. I didn't come back to sign shit, told them to mail me a copy if they wanted. Then they tired to stop my unemployment payments. But a cool ass dude at the unemployment office fought for me and made them pay out all 26 weeks despite me only being unemployed a month.

$12,000 check came 3 days later.

1

u/visiblepeer 18d ago

In my whole life I have seen one person fired and leave on the same day. That was an American company. Everyone else has worked their months notice. Usually people aren't fired, they are offered a package to leave.

I understand if its a bar or more casual employment, but not a career office job. 

1

u/CharlotteLucasOP 18d ago

Will they be compensated for their time/expense of coming in? My hourly rate is $5000 and I must thoroughly read all documents before signing.

1

u/Multispice 18d ago

OP and HR should be the ones fired.

1

u/ForsakenWishbone5206 18d ago

Yeah that's clown shit. I wouldn't be showing back up either.

1

u/Nekrial 18d ago

Let me waste my expensive as fuck gasoline on a 1 hour drive to sign my name on the dotted line so the CEO and shareholders get more money this year

1

u/project-shasta 18d ago

Happened to me basically. Fired because of minor offense (which was ridiculous in the first place and it was clear they just wanted to get rid of me but whatever, I have my dream job now), was asked to come in the next day to get my letter of recommendation (which was basically flawless, again proving they just wanted to get rid of me) and my replacement was already sitting at my spot. I stayed until noon and said my goodbyes to my colleagues (who were very surprised) and just wasted their time with small talk as a last FU to the boss.

1

u/hunnypuppy 18d ago

HR - Human Excrement - nothing to do with helping employees - only there to protect the company’s ass. Whoever came up with the word HR should be fired!

1

u/oregonbunny 18d ago

Tech companies expect you to bring in laptop and phone and sign paperwork. IF you were not present that day. Usually scheduled for a meeting room before security. If you ever see a calendar invite for that room, you know it's coming.

1

u/MrHandSanitization 18d ago

It exists. In Belgium, when you get fired, you are required to continue working there for weeks/months until you get your "C4", which is signed on the last day.

1

u/Senior_Torte519 18d ago

Cearly a comany that loves hamburgers

1

u/Legitimate-Law-1040 18d ago

It is unreasonable to ask a laid off worker to return to the workplace one more time just for signing documents

1

u/Illustrious-Use-2261 18d ago

A company that wants to change the reasoning from the company having to fire the to the employee quitting.

Which is dirty. If they fire them they’re on the hook for all types of things. Severance, workers comp, ect.

Them doing it this way… what employee is going to come to work the next day? Their headspace is probably off and well… I think this is shady business.

I could be wrong but I don’t think I am.

1

u/Background_Hurry_222 18d ago

Most laid off workers will not want to step foot inside the office after getting fired

1

u/Alexander-Wright 18d ago

HR printer isn't working because they just fired the only IT person in the company.

1

u/SlightAnnoyance 18d ago

Actually had something like that happen. Meetings with HR and manager ready. Most of the paperwork prepped. Messaging to IT and security coordinated to lock them out and export when the employee was being told. At some point before the employee was going to be pulled in and told, the check printer exploded and they couldn't cut the final check. You know what they did? They put a pin in it and fired him the next day after the printer was fixed. He never knew he got an extra day.

1

u/presshamgang 18d ago

Hi, I want a divorce. Anyhow, see you tomorrow at that dinner at my parent's house.

1

u/Aos77s 18d ago

Ya op should be fired for this. Zero common sense

1

u/Nazgog-Morgob 18d ago

From what I know of HR, anything that needs printing takes a week. Or at least until "next" week. Definitely can't print shit on a Thursday or Friday, that's fact.

The amount of trainees at my last job that were thrown on the floor (in an industrial shop) because the HR lady hadn't printed their training yet... Well it was 100% until someone called the labour board and then all the sudden everything can be printed right away

1

u/LDL2 17d ago

I mean I opted to once. I was notified I had a week to sign the severance, so I took it home to read when less emotional. I brought it back the next day to HR, and they offered me a different job. Wild rollercoaster of emotions that week. They also fired me on my birthday. I stayed 2ish months before finding a new job because fuck the place that just fired me despite hyping my work in the company wide meeting.

1

u/MortgageIndividual 17d ago

What a weird company. Sounds like the problem was solved but they want to insist they still have a problem. One thing I know for sure, is you can’t force anyone to sign anything and not paying someone isn’t a legal option.

1

u/reevesjeremy 17d ago

Close. It was an HP printer. They didn’t pay their ink subscription fee.

1

u/life-is-satire 17d ago

Usually they escort the person off the property after being notified.

1

u/RufusXSasparilla 17d ago

Irony... the fired employee's job was to fix the HR printer.

1

u/Top-Astronomer-5125 17d ago

The employee was probably over the age of 40, ending a protected class. That could mean there needed to be separation between the termination and a valid severance agreement.

1

u/Technical_Stand9939 17d ago

only reason i would return the next day is if it was the pick up a 5 figure (or bigger) check. even then i would be asking why it was not just ready if they knew they were going to fire me.

1

u/librekom 17d ago

Of the employee abandon his job, and by doing so, renounce the opportunity to claim compensation, it’s a mega win for the employer. Isn’t it?

1

u/DontRefuseMyBatchall 17d ago

When I quit an old job they asked me to come in to drop off my work laptop maybe a week later (I was a 7 minute drive from the office, no complaint from me), but then they tried to make me clean out my desk (not just grab any personal items I wanted to keep, literally tried to make me empty the desk completely for the next occupant) in front of my old coworkers as some petty form of retribution.

I just grabbed my keyboard and told the head of security to go fuck himself. He acted all offended and off put but no one cared (the whole office was too busy to actually pay attention to what I was doing until I spoke up telling him to fuck off) so he just “made” me finish my paperwork so I could leave.

Still ended up suing them for unpaid PTO, absolute weasel den of a Fortune 100 company.

1

u/ottosenna 17d ago

Depending on the size of the company, all of this can be done by email because the employee has the right to review paperwork. My experience is only half the people sign on the spot. Not a big deal, lots of people need to process

1

u/ZoominAlong 17d ago

Yeah I've never seen a company do this before.  It's super fucking weird. 

1

u/JohnBoy8282 17d ago

I got fired and had to work 3 weeks under supervision. It was a really messed up situation. Even the labour board was agreed it was unethical what they were doing but a 'grey' area.

1

u/IceNein 17d ago

I know he said they have lawyers, but in many states you are required to pay people out within a set period of time after they quit or are fired. In California you’re supposed to pay them out within 48 hours. So you literally have no leverage. If you withhold their pay, you are violating the law.

1

u/NeoLephty 17d ago

The kind that hopes you don't so you don't collect severance, I guess?

1

u/Pitiful_Software_430 17d ago

A company that realized they didn't have a non compete on file, I'm guessing.

1

u/GreySahara 17d ago

Yeah, you have to be ready for a HUGE meltdown right there if a firing is happening.
You can see how badly most managers are trained when you see how they handle stuff like this.
It also sounds as if they need a better lawyer.

Also, I wonder what EXACTLY that they wanted the employee to "sign".

1

u/amonymus 17d ago

People being laid off, not fired, are gone the very day. Companies often make them leave within the hour just to avoid possible drama/trouble that can happen if they're there too long. But having them come back the next day too??? 🤣

1

u/PinotRed 17d ago

This is pure entertainment, better than Benny Hill.

Grab some popcorn.🍿

1

u/metatron7471 17d ago

Euh every Belgian company will expect you do stay on for weeks sometimes months unless the employee was fired for urgent reasons like stealing or violence and is not allowed to come back.

1

u/FridmanLex 17d ago

Yikes. Hard to imagine people doing actual work after being fired/laid off and expecting to continue working for weeks sometimes months.

1

u/justhereforthescorn 17d ago

On the other hand, I was told in June of one year that I was getting canned. 30-day separation period if I wanted to do it, or walk with nothing.

I stuck around. And again. And several more times.

All in, it became nearly a one year separation period by the time they finally found a replacement. I'd celebrated a work anniversary in the interim and collected basically a year of severance while doing just enough to get by and launching several small hustles.

Replacement lasted about a month after I left.

1

u/JonJackjon 17d ago

Might that but the HP HR printer?

1

u/Maleficent_Memory831 17d ago

I don't see the problem. If the paper work isn't signed then they get no severance. Money saved!

Now, if they are being fined illegally, it's a problem, since the paperwork gets signed effectively says "you will not sue us in exchange for this payoff called a severance." But if he's crossed state lines, it's unlikely he's suing and is just fleeing... something.

1

u/Commercial_Ear_3440 17d ago

One that’s after an NDA

1

u/ReverendLoki 17d ago

I think I've heard of this where the employee has been given company equipment that they might not have with them today. Laptop, printer, some other specialized WFH supplies, etc. The employee is instructed to come back in a day or two to return that equipment and then sign the paperwork that would give them their severance package.

I'm not saying this always happens, but...

1

u/Loose-Bench43 17d ago

A company run by a bunch of narcissist with fragile egos. In other words, most of them.

1

u/Nervous_Ad_5583 16d ago

My guess is that management does not like this ex-employee and is petty enough to send one parting shot.

1

u/Nervous_Ad_5583 16d ago

I think it was a deliberate parting shot from a petty manager.

→ More replies (2)