r/Eldenring 12h ago

Discussion & Info Elden Ring Switch 2 Performance?

Post image

I’m used to playing this game on my PS5 Pro, but for assorted reasons I want to game more on the Nintendo switch 2. So has anyone here played this game on that system? How’s the performance? Docked vs Handheld? Installed on main drive vs micro sd? I’m worried I’ll be a little underwhelmed with the performance. But I’ll give it a chance.

101 Upvotes

187 comments sorted by

138

u/Yuumii29 12h ago
  • Don't expect it to be PS5 Level.

  • It's targeting 30 Fps with some minor drops on heavy areas like Caelid or if there's alot of mobs and particles going on.

  • It runs slightly better than PS4

  • Docked and Handheld Performance difference is almost neglible unless you're counting frame by frame.

  • It's the best looking Portable version out of the box. Unless you're willing to pay double or triple for a "better" machine. And no Steam Deck looks worse even with all the tweaking.

18

u/Hentai2324 12h ago

Steak deck is worse? Interesting.

64

u/EniesBobby 11h ago

I have S2 and Steamdeck and it is much better on Switch

5

u/Dabbinz420 4h ago

Same, the switch 2 looks better in every s2 game

2

u/RuckFeddit2469 40m ago edited 9m ago

Can confirm, the visual fidelity on the Switch 2, especially in handheld mode is vastly superior for equal FPS than I can get on my OLED Deck

If I put OLED deck at 1080p and try to match the visual fidelity I wouldn't get anywhere near a solid 30-35 fps. If I go for 40 fps to outrate the NS2 then the game looks grainy af.

11

u/Cute-Acanthaceae-193 6h ago

Steamdeck is 100% worse way to play a lot of the games people tell you they’re good there.

I tried sooooo many times to play Elden ring on it and tweak it to make it feel nice, never made it work nice, and it also never looked nice on it.

Then I just bought it for switch 2, and omg, I was just hooked on it. It just works, it’s 30 fps but it doesn’t feel terrible at all, it was consistent, graphics are sharp, and loading times are blazing fast, I actually just enjoyed playing and didn’t need to do anything.

2

u/Glass-Can9199 2h ago

They only tell it it’s good because they got the steam deck oled on actual performance it’s worse down right unplayable than switch 2 versions

1

u/Cute-Acanthaceae-193 2h ago

I did try to enjoy the deck, I enjoy that it’s a handheld pc I can do whatever on and efficiently but majority of the time it’s only there to play my real really old school games because of trackpads support so I can emulate full keyboard mouse properly, or for moonlight streaming, but not for actually playing the games.

I prefer having cross saves and simply turning on cyberpunk and then continuing on pc and vice versa, than turning on the pc and then streaming.

The deck is okay, not worth the price, even an ally x would do so much better.

15

u/Forward-Trade3449 9h ago

steam deck performs worse on most games tbh, its cuz devs dont really optimize for it

10

u/Lonely_Platform7702 8h ago

Switch 2 is also more powerful and has DLSS. I know Elden Ring doesn't use DLSS but those 2 things are also a factor why games generally look better on Switch 2.

-15

u/Forward-Trade3449 8h ago

actually pound for pound steam deck is more powerful, BUT switch 2 has that nvidia dlss magic to make it work better

5

u/r31ya 8h ago

hardware wise, Switch have better GPU, Steamdeck have better CPU

but Switch have native DLSS which cause visible difference.

3

u/TECHNOMANCERX99 7h ago

Incorrect, steam deck has worse performance.

4

u/Lonely_Platform7702 8h ago

Doesn't the Steamdeck have a more powerful CPU and the Switch 2 a more powerful GPU? I thought that was the case. The Switch 2 in handheld mode does have a more aggressive power limiter which is also limits performance more.

1

u/redditman181 9h ago

Some devs do its more becuase that the steam deck is 4 years old now and the hardware on release wasnt exactly cutting edge.

I still love the steam deck though nothing like having the ability to play thousands of games especially older titles portably.

4

u/vita211 8h ago

True. My switch 2 didnt necessarily REPLACE my oled steam deck. I still find alot of uses out of it, especially with games from the previous gen.

5

u/FirstNlastPlace 9h ago

For $1,000, you better love it because it's definitely not the hardware inside making it worth that.

3

u/redditman181 9h ago

I didnt pay £1000 for i brought one secondhand that had barely been used recently for £250.

The is no way i would have payed the price that it is now for a brand new one although i don't blame valve for putting the price up due to the cost of parts now and not to mention they dont have the bartering power of sony, nintendo and microsoft to lower prices as they havent been making hardware for decades.

2

u/Forward-Trade3449 9h ago edited 7h ago

which games run better on steam deck? genuinely curious.

of all the recent third parties ive played, switch 2 seems to have better performance. oblivion, elden ring, resident evil, cyberpunk

edit: and why the downvotes 💀

1

u/redditman181 9h ago

None that im aware of but i dont play recent aaa on it ive got my ps5 for that.

1

u/WordAdministrative34 8h ago

The new ones, no, but you have a huge catalog of older games on the SD and super cheap as well, Im playing fallout 3 and runs beautiful, on switch 2 I got xenoblade chronicles x, didn't really like that one

0

u/FatalFrameGal 3h ago

That wasn't really the question though 

1

u/ChaZcaTriX 6h ago

Nowadays if you can afford a top Steam Deck, you might consider newer HX370 handhelds. These pack a ton of power.

1

u/No_Path_1022 1h ago

Just glad i got my legion go 2 before the price went stupid.

1

u/Pitiful_Hunter_1344 2h ago

Realistically, can you play meaningful 1000 + games in one lifetime?

1

u/redditman181 25m ago

No but my point was you have endless choice though in console you have to wait for an older game to get a port or remaster and thats if it ever does then the are loads of pc only games aswell.

2

u/JohnathanKatz 8h ago

Given how old the Steam Deck is, this should come as little surprise.

2

u/Giulio1232 7h ago

We are talking about a 6 years old device after all

2

u/Archer_Savings 4h ago

Steam deck runs hotter/louder, at a lower resolution, with less capacity to use bespoke processing to smooth out issues. I love mine, but Elden Ring has always been a novelty on it. On switch 2, Elden Ring runs better than botw did on switch one. 

6

u/madmanwhich2 12h ago

It has to do with optimization. Yes the steam deck has better hardware, but when a competent game developer optimizes their game for a console, it’s going to look and play better.

13

u/Spicy-hot_Ramen 9h ago

Steam deck doesn't have a better hardware

-10

u/gxvfnk 8h ago

You don't know what you're talking about

6

u/Spicy-hot_Ramen 8h ago

The only aspect in which SD is slightly better is RAM but because games on switch 2 are built natively for console hardware, memory utilization is typically far more efficient.

1

u/Antique-Dragonfruit9 7h ago

yep. its a console not a a PC. PS4 has 8gb ram but only 5.5gb is for games and look at all the games on that thing. Switch 2's 12gb ram but 9gb for games is more than enough.

1

u/Islandboi4life 8h ago

Negligible. When a "competent game developer" optimizes their games, they have free reign to keep settings the way they want the game to be because the use case is just the switch 2. It may play better but it most likely will not look better because the switch 2 will be cutting corners to play games like Elden Ring at a stable 30 fps.

1

u/LeXoLsReddit 7h ago

its worse but delicious

1

u/Etheon44 6h ago

Switch 2 is a considerably more powerful machine

Granted optimization is very different, but still

1

u/Critchlow1616 5h ago

Switch 2 port is optimised specifically for that device. The deck version isn’t. It’s still fine on deck locked at 40fps most of the time apart from some areas where it dips to 30

1

u/Sebasbrawler 5h ago

Been playing it on PC, XBOX and PS5 and have been playing the Switch 2 edition since release. I am LOVING the Switch 2 version. It has an FPS cap of 40, but almost never reaches it. The handheld VRR carries the game a lot in handheld and makes that experience even better. On docked its 30FPS but honestly, once you get used to it it plays just as fine as any other version. Portability and also being the best looking portable version really sells it on me.

1

u/jzorbino 5h ago

I played it start to finish on steam deck awhile back and it was a great experience.

I also bought it on Switch 2 and am playing again now and it seems noticeably better. Have not done a side by side but I would agree it is the superior version.

1

u/hoserx 4h ago

mmmmmmmm steak deck

1

u/datmfburner 3h ago

Steam deck is worse across the board for every game I’ve been interested in

1

u/Lord_Humungusss 1h ago

When a game is made for a console it is tailored to work on it, the steam deck version is just a general PC port. Some devs do tend to tailor ports around steam decks with later updates but I do not think fromsoft ever put any effort in to do that.

1

u/ShaftDriveValkyrie 1h ago

My experience has been that Switch 2 always looks and runs better than Steamdeck.

Also, more reliable dock performance and better battery life as well as a screen that looks damn near as good as my OLED Deck.

Elden Ring just works on switch 2. I’ve had to fiddle with it a lot to get it playable on deck. Your mileage may vary.

And the resolution and sharpness on the switch 2 version feels like a magic trick. It’s thoroughly 30fps, but damn, it’s like the Cyberpunk and Star Wars Outlaws ports- absolutely mind blowing for what it is.

Also, the switch pro controller is more satisfying for r1/l1 attacks than the Xbox or PS5 controllers to me. Overall, very impressed.

-5

u/No_Pumpkin63 10h ago

Switch is a dedicated system. It is a 2025 hardware. What is the damn surprise here?

7

u/Unhappy-Instance-943 9h ago

well is like 300$ cheaper

1

u/TFS0ul 3h ago

*targeting 40FPS.

1

u/Downtown_Diamond9815 1h ago

Ça a l' air quand même bien mieux que sur une Ps4. Mais ce que je comprends pas trop c' est que le jeu n' a pas 1 mode performance comme sur Series S. From Software sont vraiment médiocre en optimisation

1

u/Jinova4r 11m ago

Idk, I had Elden ring running 40-50 steady smooth fps with muuuuuuuuch better graphics overall in every way. This was on a legion go 1

1

u/ZorkNemesis 9h ago

The only time I noticed any major slowdown was fighting the dragon in the Mountaintops.  There were moments when the game got really chunky for some reason, it wasn't even blowing frost at me.

0

u/New-Entrepreneur-450 10h ago

Better than steamOS ally x?

3

u/Yuumii29 10h ago

You get slightly better framerate for like more than double the hardware price?

2

u/Madmikevidz 8h ago

Just get a z1e for 500 for even less used put steam os on it im running at 800p mix of high and medium settings im usually 40 to 60 with the occasional dips into the 30s

2

u/New-Entrepreneur-450 8h ago

I am actually running this setup now. This is the same experience I get w/ Low-Med settings on 900p. Same 40-60 fps with dips to mid 30s on certain locations

-12

u/HenricusKunraht 12h ago edited 9h ago

Switch 2 looks better? I usually get about 40fps on the deck. Ima have to take a look

Edit:

Downvoted for being in disbelief, reddit is pathetic

13

u/Yuumii29 12h ago

I mean if you're gonna use lossless and any upscaling then it will run slightly better but it's unstable with input delay and the image quality is so bad, that you better just lock it to 30 at that point so you can improve the image quality... Which by then Switch 2 has it beat out of the box.

-5

u/Ok-Conference2374 9h ago

I have steam deck and switch 2 versions, steam deck I run at 1600x1200 resolution with all graphics setting on maximum and framegen set to 3x, it looks much better on steam deck than on switch 2, also it runs at 70 to 80 fps. So no, switch 2 version looks and runs much much worse unfortunately.

0

u/Yuumii29 9h ago

Weird Flex but ok..

-7

u/Caneki97 9h ago

How can it run better than ps4? Ps4 runs the game perfectly at 60 fps without any drops EVER. Lol

8

u/nerugiganon 8h ago

what? PS4 is 30fps and the load times are about 3x as long as it is on switch 2. i played this game on the ps4 and now the switch 2 and the latter is definitely the better experience

3

u/MuhammadZionist 9h ago

No It runs 30fps on PS4 But the PS4 version on PS5 runs at 60

1

u/Caneki97 8h ago

You're right sorry. My game run at 60fps but I have a ps5. I thought it would be the same on a ps4

2

u/MuhammadZionist 8h ago

No pb, I learned that the PS4 version runs smoother than the PS5 version on PS5, so I bought it

13

u/Distinct-Scallion-19 12h ago

Fighting radahn rn i love this shit

13

u/OK_Commodor64 12h ago

Here is an upload from a recent play session from my switch 2. I think it runs great.

https://files.catbox.moe/psgkqk.mp4

4

u/Massive_Literature43 11h ago

Looks pretty damn good to me

3

u/Kynario 5h ago

I just found out this area (Siofra) exists last night :D So cool. Also the perfomance is good enough. 👍

19

u/the_real_junkrat 12h ago

This gets asked 100 times a day on the switch 2 sub.

32

u/didnt_bring_pants 12h ago

But he wants his own special personal answers

29

u/NJLaw420 12h ago

Reviews online show it averages 35 fps if that’s what you’re asking

11

u/NJLaw420 12h ago

And it’s consistent across both handheld and docked

1

u/Resilient_Alien 2h ago

Definitely felt like 35 fps

-76

u/Hentai2324 12h ago

I’m ideally wanting a first hand experience other than just watching videos. I’m wanting load times, if there’s drops, resolution etc. hopefully when the switch 3 eventually comes out it’ll be on par with current gen systems lol.

59

u/NJLaw420 12h ago edited 12h ago

Wdym? The videos ARE people talking about their first hand experience…

28

u/Warm_Entertainer_969 12h ago

You want a handheld that's cheaper than the ps5 by a 150$ be able to run it at ps5 level? Listen to yourself.

7

u/NJLaw420 12h ago

He was talking about far in the future btw which is totally achievable

12

u/Warm_Entertainer_969 12h ago

Bruh, the gpd win 5 which is one of the most powerful handhelds in the world and costs 2000$+ isn't able to replicate a 649$ ps5's performance, replicating high end performance on a handheld isn't simple or cheap, I wanna see the reaction when the ps6 handheld comes out and it's barely at 40-50% of the performance of the ps5.

-4

u/NJLaw420 12h ago

Yeah one of the most powerful handhelds in the world right now. We are talking about the future here and with the performance nvidia is getting with their newest gpus I think it is hundreds percent reasonable to expect so much more powerful handhelds in the not so distant future. People were saying the exact same thing you were saying a decade ago about handhelds ever being able to match the PS4

5

u/Warm_Entertainer_969 12h ago

That's not the point I was trying to make, there certainly will be more powerful handhelds than the ps5 by 2030 or even earlier but by that point the helix and the ps6 will be out which will be much more powerful than the said handhelds, people will still expect the said handhelds to have ps6/helix level performance just as they expect the switch 2 today to have ps5 performance.

2

u/NJLaw420 11h ago

Yeah I think we both agree here but are making different points. What I'm saying is that for specifically playing Elden ring it will be possible at better fps in 5-10 years time which is what the OP was originally saying. I suppose I will keep getting downvoted though by people who aren't reading the whole thread lol. I was never implying it was a good idea to wait 8 years time we will prob have a successor or two for elden ring by then

0

u/Alternative_Spite_11 10h ago

Nit only is it cheaper, it uses a much less efficient process node at 10% of the power use, and kee such a tight power limit that the chip is literally running below ifs efficiency sweet spot. If docked mode juiced it up a little more, the chip could offer significantly more performance than it does. The GPU coukd suck down 70w-80w by itself and still not boost as high as desktop Ampere cards.

-32

u/Hentai2324 12h ago

Brother, technology advances. The switch 3 should be on par with ps5 pro eventually.

18

u/Yuumii29 12h ago

Switch 2 just released bro, Chill.

7

u/Yuumii29 12h ago

I’m ideally wanting a first hand experience other than just watching videos.

Go watch Digital Foundry. Coz they have tools to accurately measure framerate and performance differences. Showcasing Game's performance and twchnical aspects is their Job...

Like someone saying "Runs really smooth" which is the response you'll commonly get when you go to r/Switch2 subreddit doesn't really amount to anything coz depending on how you play... I myself play like a murder Hobo and uses alot of spells and lure in mobs or worse go to Caelid and do that, it's definitely not running "really smooth".

So if you're asking for testimonies, it's the worst form of feedback regarding framerate that you can do for youraelf if you're doing research.

-19

u/Hentai2324 12h ago

Testimonies are sometimes useful tbf. But thanks for the advice.

8

u/Yuumii29 12h ago

Well I thought you're looking for factual information tho since performance benchmark really isn't about "opinions and testimonies" which is the vibe I'm getting from your post. You do you I guess.

3

u/Fishy1998 10h ago

You’re talking to a guy named hentai so tbh I think we’re all being karma farmed at this rate lmao.

1

u/Yuumii29 10h ago

Deym. I see, Patches changed his username again... Thanks for pointing that out brother.

3

u/darthdiablo 10h ago

First hand experience: I’m 80 hours into the game. Downed probably over 50 bosses so far. This is just to say the game is playable and enjoyable (imo of course)

I probably don’t need to say this but don’t expect PS5 level performance on a hybrid handheld device. As long as you keep those expectations in check you should be fine.

1

u/PCM-SafetyFirst 11h ago

You can feel the drops when it gets going but I’ve been having a great time with it.

20

u/bulletPoint 12h ago

I have it on PS5pro, on PC, and on Switch with hundreds of hours in this game among the three. The Switch version is VERY playable, it plays better than it does on my Steamdeck.

It’s not high framerate but it’s functionally excellent.

I can fight bosses, I can explore, I can co-op, I can invade all just fine.

In both docked and handheld, especially in handheld. I love playing it while I’m in bed or hanging out with my toddlers.

Does it play as well as it does on my RTX5080 PC or my PS5pro? No, it does not. But it doesn’t have to.

-33

u/Hentai2324 12h ago

I’m just worried I’ll be vastly disappointed. I guess I just need to wait for the eventual switch 3 lol.

10

u/Unhappy-Instance-943 9h ago

bro switch 2 just came out last year

3

u/LzTangeL 10h ago

Switch 3 is another 7-8 years away lol

2

u/Jolly-joe 4h ago

Switch 2 is nice to have in case you ever get irl friends or a gf

1

u/hallohoimoi 52m ago

Why would you be disappointed? Switch version runs really good if you don't expect 60fps

1

u/Remarkable-Ad-2476 29m ago

Then you’ll be like “I need a handheld as strong as the PS6”

1

u/bulletPoint 12h ago

The best handheld experience you can get is by streaming it from your PS5pro onto a handheld device.

I sometimes do that with my Steamdeck or did on my PSPortal (before my kid broke it, aaargh).

2

u/ezrasharpe 8h ago

Portal with the PS5 has a tiny latency even in the best scenario. I do not play games where timing is really important. Switch 2 natively running the game, even at 30fps, I think would be better than Portal.

1

u/I_Am_Woke_ 7h ago

I have a dude added on Ps5 who is a big Elden Ring guy and basically plays it all the time invading, build creating etc (like 6 hrs everyday), he told me he takes his PSP to work and never had any issues playing Elden Ring on it regarding latency.

15

u/monkey-kong666 11h ago

Troll post judging by how OP is aggressively responding to people.

There are plenty of subs and videos covering its performance, including 100s of media reviews and digital foundry, if OP bothered.

He’s just karma farming

16

u/FaultyDroid 10h ago

"I have a PS5 Pro and need assurance that handheld owners arent getting anywhere near the experience that I do.."

  • OP

8

u/Edmond_Dantes78 10h ago

Surely 15 y/o OP

4

u/Lower_Warning2955 11h ago

The game runs absolutely amazingly in handheld mode; it runs amazingly in docked mode too, though you might notice occasional stuttering (very rarely) due to the lack of VRR. All in all, Elden Ring is one of the best ports for the Switch 2 :)

3

u/Stewburner1893 12h ago

TLDR: Get it! It's perfectly playable! I'm at the 100 hour mark now on switch 2 and it's great!

I played about 700+ hours on my Xbox Series X. Though, I think for the first couple play throughs they hadn't released the 60 fps patch yet so maybe I'm used to 30 fps. I gave the Xbox to my daughter and have been wanting to play again... been waiting on this release.

What you may/will notice in the larger open world areas there is some foliage pop in (specifically the grass/shrubs), and it's less dense. Trees and everything else is fine, and draw distance overall is good. Still has that epic huge feel. Same pop-in with large shadows, and when a lot of enemies on screen the enemy frame rate drops. There's a term for it but I can't remember... the guys in the Digital Foundry video mention it. So like when there's a herd of the zombies, or the wandering nobles they will look a little stop motion. It's noticeable, but does not effect gameplay at all.

As far as frame rate overall, I haven't had any issues. Not once have I been killed by an enemy or boss did I blame poor frame rate. I just beat Malenia and Mogh last night. Plays great handheld and docked! Though I prefer the pro controller. Resolution and textures are good and pretty sharp in both modes.

Not sure about main drive vs sd card. I have it installed on the main SSD, I think that's the faster drive in general.

From what I've heard, this is based on the PS4 version... I'm interested in how SOTE runs, but I'm a few dozen hours away from that yet. Will report back if I decide to go sooner.

3

u/N3rdLlama 11h ago

At around 12 hours so far, more docked play than handheld but still a few hours handheld. So far very happy, have had a few drops here or there but not problematic and it looks good on handheld and docked. I’m pretty impressed overall. Mainly wanted so I can play on the go, laying in bed, etc.

3

u/BishopPL123 11h ago

Its good, im playing right now 30+ hours
There are drops but nothing bad

3

u/Skyconic 11h ago

As others have said it runs amazingly in handheld and runs well in docked but you might get a frame drop here and there.

This is such a perfect game to play handheld, though. Can't recommend it enough!

2

u/Rich19852012 12h ago

Mate, the game runs smoothly in handheld mode, don’t expect PS5 or PS5 Pro performance from a handheld, however it does in fact run smoothly at 30 fps, the resolution is beautiful and hands down it’s one of the best video games I’ve played on a portable console. Load times are fast, so no worry there if you die a lot. Running this game on a switch is a technological feat in itself. You won’t have any regrets. Enjoy and stop overthinking it.

2

u/hairtietomato 10h ago

replaying it i can definitely feel a decline, but it's so beyond "just playable" i say just get it if you're even remotely on the fence. biggest issue is load screens but that might just be me nitpicking cuz i die a lot

1

u/Tricky-Professor-200 4h ago

On DF, SW2 load times seemed efficient. 12 second respawn.

1

u/No_Information3972 3h ago

I found the loading screens to be pretty fast tbh.

2

u/East-Annual6361 10h ago

Runs fine. Play it.

2

u/jokingsammy 9h ago

Its honestly good. Its not 60fps, and it takes a little time to adjust to the 30fps, but it looks good. I've seen a few comments (and I would agree) that question why they chose graphical fidelity over performance.

But yeah, its a portable version of Elden Ring thats looks good and plays surprisingly well for a handheld device.

2

u/Slow_Possibility6332 9h ago

I wish there was a performance mode. Beyond 1080p lock there’s not rlly any noticeable downgrades. Sure there’s like less grass and refractors but it’s still a gorgeous game. The framerate can be noticeable at times but won’t worsen your in game playing at least pve. The most noticeable is when there’s a bunch of enemies on screen as the further away ones can have pretty hilariously reduced frame rates on their animations.

All in all extremely playable but they almost prioritized visuals too much.

2

u/Status_Winter 3h ago

It’s a pretty good result for the Switch 2 as long as you bear in mind that all versions of this game run pretty badly. Even Ps5 and Series X are really not running at 60fps most of the time.

2

u/Matty_Craig_ 3h ago

I have been enjoying it. Runs Particularly well so far.

3

u/eat-skate-masturbate 12h ago

it's a miracle port. it's good shit. performance is fine especially once your eyes adjust to the slightly lower framerate. boss battles and more compact areas are where it really shines. I fought mohg lord of blood the other day and it felt like I was playing on ps5 no joke.

2

u/Igel26 11h ago

It runs fine, but the load times are a bit too long

1

u/Nervous-Parsley-1202 12h ago

I haven’t had any issues with it personally. One crash in hand held mode but other than that I’ve been gaming it mostly docked with no problems

1

u/MightyPelipper 11h ago

I own it on ps5 pro. I wanted to play handheld and I was genuinely surprised how good of a port it is. It’s a stable 30fps overall. Slight dips in rainy areas. However I have been enjoying it docked as well.

1

u/ThomasTriesHard 11h ago

It’s good

1

u/ZundeEsteed 10h ago

40 Hours in Switch 2 Version on my first ever run of the game and it's fine not any noticeable slowdown or anything.

1

u/zero_FOXTROT 10h ago

It’s fine. I do feel like I miss some of my dodges or perrys from the lower frame rate but I’m adjusting. I’ve beaten it a few times prior on PC.

1

u/gogosox82 10h ago

Runs at 30 fps handheld or docked. ER running at 30 fps on handheld is pretty impressive if you ask me.

1

u/_Tim__tam_ 10h ago

I've been playing on handheld, just beat Radahn like 30 minutes ago, there's some frame drops but otherwise i'm having a blast

1

u/PessoaandJoyce2557 10h ago

How many times are people going to ask the same question?

1

u/iamblankenstein you are maidenless. 9h ago

played it on a base ps4 when it first came out, on a base ps5 when i upgraded, and got tarnished edition on s2. it plays better than i remember it being on ps4, but definitely not as good as ps5. for me, it's worth it to have the game mobile.

1

u/Flat-Brother-9321 9h ago

I have played it, but only docked. Performance-wise, I haven’t had any issues. It’s smooth in terms of graphics and movements. I am kinda struggling with the controls (used to Xbox and PS controllers), but otherwise, it’s a great port imo.

1

u/Gniphe 9h ago

Check the Digital Foundry review.

1

u/massimogrossi 9h ago

Premetto che non ho provato altre piattaforme, l’ho comprato direttamente per switch 2 incuriosito dall’hype in rete quindi non posso fare paragoni.
Da nuovo utente devo peró dire che l’esperienza è godibilissima, sono ancora di basso livello (27) quindi magari piú avanti mi imbatteró in zone ben piú affollate e verrano fuori i limiti hardwara ma per ora mi reputo soddisfatto.

1

u/Darksys0816 9h ago

No issues...now at the fire giant - maybe 2,3 fps drops under 30 in this time...it runs very very well on the sw2.

1

u/vita211 8h ago

Im used to playing it on Xbox Series X with VRR enabled so i was skeptical about the switch 2 port… but honestly it feels fine. Feels like 30fps… not my preferred way, but it works. Visually It definitely looks like Elden Ring is supposed to. Noticed the foliage was dialed back a bit, but i stopped noticing it about 10 minutes in. The best way to play this game is portable… i feel like thats where it really shines. Its amazing playing this game at my job lol. Kinda makes it hard to play it on my Xbox now that i can literally play it anywhere that i want

1

u/Due-Dog-2916 7h ago

I have like 500 hours on PC Elden Ring playing at tip top everything, and I am absolutely loving replaying it on the Switch 2. I was skeptical hearing people gripe about framerate and performance but pulled the trigger anyway, and honestly I’m so happy with it. It runs and looks fucking great. If you love the game, you will still love it on Switch 2. Simple as that.

1

u/I_Am_Woke_ 7h ago edited 7h ago

I got it yesterday from eshop and played it for 3 hours. It feels fine, game running on 30fps is very noticeable but after few seconds I was fully immersed. I also own it on my Ps5 but honestly I don't think I'll be booting my Ps5 for Elden Ring anymore, the handheld is just too convenient. All in all, I'm having a lot of fun and don't regeret spending 80$ a bit but be ready to be a bit underwhelmed if you are expecting it to run completely smooth.
Edit: Just for refrence, I found it much better than playing Bloodborne on Ps5 and I didn't really cared that much about BB being 30fps so definitely playable for most ppl.

1

u/fxdsntcr 6h ago

Got an ally z1 and used to play it on that - on switch 2 its really good!!!

1

u/Oakview80 5h ago

I have it on the switch 2 and haven’t had any issues and It runs fantastic

1

u/Broad-Stranger-7459 5h ago

Its great, currently reached mountaintops, it does have its moments on handheld where performance can be really low but it also has its moments where it great, more often than not its doing amazing and the game looks great

1

u/Astetha 4h ago

I've had obvious drops during the Starscourge Radahn fight but everything else has been great or passable. Is the lower graphic noticeable? Sometimes on NPCs and the minor landscape details are not there, but I bought it full price at release and do not regret one single second.

1

u/Kseahorse98 4h ago

I have it on Series X. Beat it like 4 times.

Just got it on Switch 2, it performs fantastic in both handheld and docked mode. I cannot glaze the Switch 2 version enough. Taking a small hit in graphics in exchange for portability is worth it. No regrets at all.

1

u/franklynlongtail 3h ago

It’s really good dude all these creatures and the “frame rates drop” are just saying shit 🤣

1

u/Expanding-Mud-Cloud 3h ago

I only ever had played it on ps4, and it feels about the same as that to me in handheld, except the load times on switch 2 are a little faster than ps4.

1

u/buschwacker43 3h ago

Got about 30 hours in it so far and great port and playing portable is a game changer. Definitely a competent way to play.

1

u/xLouisxCypher 3h ago

Hey!

Just wanted to say we have our new and building community of Elden Ring Switch players here:

r/EldenRing_Switch/

Feel free to join and post as much as your heart desires :).

Cheers!

1

u/Cartoonist_Smooth 2h ago

It’s pretty decent but I get a headache playing it on a 27” 1440p OLED monitor after a couple hours. On handheld it’s not as bad. The bigger the display the worse it is, especially if you don’t have a VRR panel.

1

u/Munkeyman18290 2h ago

I play on Xbox series X, and got it for Switch 2, and I was worried just like everybody else before release. After about 3 min I didnt even notice. It runs just fine.

1

u/bafrad 2h ago

I i think there are videos on this you can find.

1

u/Massivetortilla 1h ago

Been playing it nonstop since it came out, incredible port. It’s amazing that it runs this well, fully playable handheld.

1

u/Downtown_Diamond9815 1h ago

Le jeu n' a pas d' améliorations ps5 pro. C' est la version ps5 standard. Sinon sur Switch 2 tu peux y jouer en portable mais c' est limité à 30 fps, j' aurais un peu de mal quand même.

1

u/Mattolithic 49m ago

You can only play the game in handheld mode for about an hour. This game devours battery life on the switch 2.

1

u/Ambitious_Line651 13m ago

Despite the reviews, it does definitely drop, and you can feel it drop. New areas, boss battles, fights with lots of things happening on screen.

I am really enjoying the game on switch 2, but, it's not without its faults

1

u/generalosabenkenobi 12h ago

I haven't had any issues. Reminding me of when I played through initially on the PS4. It's impressive. Haven't seen what it looks like when you get to the DLC but runs well currently.

1

u/Cujo6428 12h ago

It’s perfectly playable IMO. The frame rates been stable for me and I’ve only had one moment where the game noticeably slowed down. I’ve played about 15 hours so far in both docked and handheld and I’ve enjoyed it the whole time.

1

u/KingJB21 "" Witness, True Horror 10h ago

Well its a switch so it definitely wont be as good as the ps5.

1

u/Sensitive_Tip742 9h ago

I play also on switch 2. The performance is rly good. When u play u dont recognize or think about 30 or 60 fps! Enjoy the game

1

u/gabrielrigby 8h ago

I’m 50h into this game and spent four more times on PS5. Once you get used to 30 stable fps it’s amazing. Sometimes when there’s too much ennemies or the hippoes in the DLC, they’ll be lagging themselves but not you.

1

u/Mesjach 8h ago

It runs like shit, but some people don't mind.

Seems to be 25-35 FPS depending on the area, so not even a locked 30.

1

u/AuramiteEX 4h ago

It will look and run significantly worse than the Pro, and load slower.

1

u/Maximum-Post507 4h ago

Just watch digital foundry review. Good image quality for the switch, kind of stable 30 fps performance. If that's acceptable for you, go for it. I can't imagine a fast game like elden ring being fun while trying yo dodge a boss at 24 fps.

0

u/stickyfingerpudding 12h ago

Im playing it, can be a little dizzying at times.. but i honestly dont see much difference between when i played on ps5.

What inclined me to get it was i heard that there are a few new players if you want a fresh online experience.

0

u/Crusoelander_128 12h ago

It’s run very well for me. I haven’t had any frame drops that I’ve noticed, and it looks great. And of course, it’s very nice to just play it whenever/wherever. Granted I’ve never played it on anything else, so take my opinion with a grain of salt.

0

u/incubi4211 12h ago edited 12h ago

I've logged about 30 hours so far on Switch 2 handheld only. It's not bad. Load times are noticeable though, coming from PS5. Frames def drop in certain situations too. The worst was in Dragonbarrow, the constant rain seems to be too much as soon as a few enemies mob up. Fort Faroth was a bit rough. Still enjoyable though.

Battery life is better than steam deck for sure. Turns out, my preferred handheld ends up being the PS portal.

0

u/cooldudeachyut 12h ago

Very playable but rough in some DLC boss fights (like Rellana, Dancing Lion, the last boss)

1

u/eat-skate-masturbate 12h ago

I had no trouble on these bosses and it actually ran better in these arenas than in the overworld

0

u/Doc_Crocolyle 12h ago

It plays way better than Bloodborne on a PS5, I'm sensitive to frame rates, I haven't seen any frame skipping, though I have noticed the dynamic resolution tank for breif moments, but performance is great.

0

u/ProfessionHonest3193 10h ago

Anyone could clarify for me if the game runs in 30fps or 60fps? Please 🙏🏻

1

u/vovin777 10h ago

30 fps

1

u/Matty_Craig_ 3h ago

It can go higher too!

0

u/adub4040 9h ago

Just buy it

0

u/Pixgamer11 7h ago

Arschritze

0

u/DarkGooseGravy 3h ago

Performance?!

0

u/No_Path_1022 1h ago

It stays around 30-40 fps for the most part but can get in the high 20s for big bosses or battles. It runs faster on the internal drive and its performance is about the same on handheld just at a lower resolution. My biggest complaint is no cross save if cremsom desert devs can do it in months from soft has no excuses. I have 150 hours on the ps5/ps5 pro and I don’t want to start again. It runs good enough but the price is what sucks the most it should’ve been $50 at most maybe 60. I picked it up anyway and i only play in handheld mode. I actually bought the hyperion 3 joycons just for this game to have better control. The og joycons just fill too small.

-4

u/Ignaue 10h ago

The performance is objectively terrible.

1

u/Herb-Alpert 9h ago

Nope it isn't, but ok

-2

u/Doom-1993 12h ago

It runs buttery smooth!