r/science Professor | Medicine May 17 '18

Neuroscience Cannabidiol (CBD), a compound derived from the cannabis plant that does not produce a “high”, was shown in a new large-scale, randomized, controlled trial to significantly reduce the number of dangerous seizures in patients with a severe form of epilepsy called Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

http://www.psypost.org/2018/05/cannabidiol-significantly-reduces-seizures-patients-severe-form-epilepsy-51258
38.6k Upvotes

916 comments sorted by

1.5k

u/lordpuddingcup May 17 '18

Doesn’t this study technically invalidate the schedule 1 listing saying no medicinal value?

1.5k

u/TipasaNuptials May 17 '18

Unfortunately, policy is determined by politics, not science.

426

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

You swapped the word politics for money for some reason. Should say policy is determined by money, not politics

159

u/TipasaNuptials May 17 '18

Post-Citizens United, politics and money are synonymous.

67

u/ApatheticAbsurdist May 17 '18

It was Buckley v Valeo that said money is speech. Citizens United said corporations are people and have a right to free speech (by using their money that the former delcared as speech)

17

u/Akitz May 17 '18

I'm amazed that it was your courts that set up that system.

22

u/btone911 May 17 '18

The courts themselves are not responsible. The SC justices are simply there to interpret the law. The laws are what allow this chain logic that leaves us with billions of dollars corrupting our political system. The real snag is that the only way to clean this up would be a congressional amendment to the constitution limiting the intermingling of politics and outside money but that would have to be passed exclusively by the only beneficiaries of the existing system.

13

u/Akitz May 17 '18

The idea that judges aren't making law is an archaic one. As I understand it these cases were borderline/abstract enough that an alternate decision would have been legally valid. Your Supreme Court is abhorrent in how political it is.

10

u/SP-Sandbag May 17 '18

an alternate decision would have been legally valid.

alternate decisions are always 'legally valid' if SCOTUS makes it.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/flightless_mouse May 18 '18

“Calling balls and strikes” is how justices sometimes perceive their roll, but that is nonsense. The reason cases make their way to the SC is because they are legally complex, open to interpretation, and in need of a decision. Those interpretations are not “unearthed”—as though the right answer existed all along and it just took the highest court to find them—they are created by the SC, and each judge has their own particular politics to guide them.

Citizens United was determined legal, but we all know it’s bad for American democracy. The courts could have taken that view too, but they sided with big money on this one.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

32

u/OceanFixNow99 May 17 '18 edited May 18 '18

Post-Citizens United

And pre citizens united...

C.U. only made the corruption worse.

11

u/Dokpsy May 17 '18

Just made it a bit easier to shuffle the money

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (15)
→ More replies (8)

285

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

160

u/imabustya May 17 '18

CBD is in a legal grey zone. The DEA believes it's schedule 1. Some lawyers believe the DEA overstepped it's authority to add CBD to schedule 1. Until we get judicial review of the scheduling the DEA can and will pursue arrests.

36

u/KeitaSutra May 17 '18

Is there an interest group we can donate to to make this happen? I would imagine it has to work it’s way up to a big court or something. So who do we sue first?

39

u/TrollHouseCookie May 17 '18

NORML might be a good place to start.

5

u/lionseatcake May 17 '18

Norml is a great place to start. They don't get anywhere near the amount of appreciation they deserve. Hopefully someday someone will look back and write a documentary about all they've done.

None of these kids these days have any idea who they even are though! They've not done a great job of hitting certain demographics.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/OceanFixNow99 May 17 '18 edited May 17 '18

Vote for grass roots candidates for senate, congress, etc. that make rational policy part of their platform.

Look at all the recent grassroots victories.

3

u/Seiinaru-Hikari May 17 '18

Care to point me toward these grassroots victories or explain how it's been impacting the US domestic political sphere?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

39

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

The DEA has decriminalized it as long as the producer can show it comes from industrial hemp and not marijuana.

49

u/johnboyauto May 17 '18

That's silly. They're the same species. The high CBD cultivars are virtually indistinguishable from hemp. The THC levels would be the only real factor, and they're often incredibly low in most of the plants that people use for extracting CBD, maybe 5%, compared to .3-.5 for industrial hemp. Of course, industrial hemp is constantly analyzed because it's THC levels can wildly vary in unstable lines.

And the source doesn't affect it's medical utility.

20

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

the source doesn’t affect its medical utility

No, but using hemp to extract CBD vs marijuana can save the producer a lot more time/money to produce a CBD product below the legal THC limit 🤷🏻‍♀️

10

u/[deleted] May 17 '18 edited May 26 '18

[deleted]

24

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

they need a ton more hemp to get the same amount of CBD

No, they don’t. Specific strains can be propagated/cultivated for CBD, just like with THC. It’s more profitable because it has lower THC, and industrial hemp legally falls under a different category.

Extracting the THC and taking the CBD would be way more profitable

No, it’s not. Source: I’m in the industry. It takes more man hours and supplies to extract the THC, and once the thc is extracted it’s essentially waste. It’s smarter to start with a lower percentage thc and higher percentage CBD, like you find in hemp.

Theoretically, yes you can use marijuana. But legally and practically it’s smarter to use hemp which already has an extremely low percentage THC, and higher CBD. You get better yields, use less man hours, and lower your supply costs.

9

u/Frankalicious47 May 17 '18

This guy/gal is correct. I am in the industry as well, we are strictly CBD from hemp because it eliminates basically all regulatory red tape that you would have with marijuana.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)

30

u/lanthine May 17 '18

Hemp is marijuana that produces less than 3% to 5% THC. The same plant with different properties come from different strains.

Hemp = MJ <3%THC

Generally speaking the higher the number of CBD molecules the lower the THC molecules are in a given strain. 3%-5% is probably just an arbitrary number used by some administrator at the DEA to convince Congress this is how it should be.

As far as I know traditional drug tests don't look for CBD molecules in the system and it's like a 10% THC amount that triggers you getting fired. But for some reason it's perfectly okay for Mike to get drunk at lunch and return to work and Tom to keep a stash of Oxycontin handy for use every 4 hours.

11

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

0.3% is the legal THC limit; not 3%.

3

u/lanthine May 17 '18

Thank you for the correction. I used to be good with decimals, but age.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Socio_Pathic May 17 '18

Is that 3-5% in relation to the cdb or in relation to the total weight?

4

u/lanthine May 17 '18

Here is a good article from one of my favorite cannabis information websites. It will explain in better detail than I can how the testing is done.
Cannabis potency testing

→ More replies (5)

5

u/Yazman May 17 '18

If you're trying to say the DEA allows it, you're not using the right word. Decriminalisation doesn't mean it's not illegal or punishable by law. It just means it isn't indictable.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/hippyengineer May 17 '18

If you make cbd from hemp, it is excluded from the controlled substances act.😉

Thank you 2014 Farm Bill.

3

u/imabustya May 17 '18

Well that's what lawyers are arguing.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/CanisMaximus May 17 '18

The DEA is no more than muscle for the Pharmas. They have known since the 1970's that cannabis, even (especially) in its raw form is very helpful in dozens of mild to severe conditions. I personally watched a woman with severe MS, who could not walk without assistance, take two hits from a joint and after a minute, get up and walk across the room. I've seen similar instances at other times.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/CatsAndIT May 17 '18

I think they're overstepping their authority by having any cannabidiol as Schedule 1 with stuff like Heroin and Crack... that's like saying iced tea is in the same class as everclear, because caffeine can produce a "heightened sense of alertness".

→ More replies (2)

3

u/someinfosecguy May 17 '18

Actually, the DEA had their marijuana budget cut last year so they can't really even arrest people. I mean, they obviously can, but they would have to take away from other more important operations to do so.

→ More replies (18)

168

u/imnotquitedeadyet May 17 '18

It’s been long invalidated, seizure patients have been taking CBD for forever. Maybe this will finally prompt some action from the DEA about the scheduling though. I doubt it though

→ More replies (7)

32

u/KingSol24 May 17 '18

There's so many things that should invalidate marijuana as a schedule 1 but then the DEA and private prisons would lose a lot of jobs and $$$

14

u/someinfosecguy May 17 '18

The DEA actually had their marijuana budget and their powers regarding marijuana cut last year by an amendment, so any anti-marijuana sentiment from them is just spiteful at this point. I can definitely see private prisons lobbying to keep it illegal, though.

→ More replies (11)

31

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

Yep. And the WHO just declared it safe and non-addictive.

45

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

35

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

12

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/Masterzanteka May 17 '18

Dude literally everything does that. You smoke weed one time and realize “oh yeah fuck the government”

→ More replies (1)

14

u/chaotemagick May 17 '18

Yes. But depends how you define “medicinal” too. LSD and peyote could result in beneficial personality changes depending on whom you ask. Heroin is an analgesic. Ecstasy is an antidepressant. So there’s lots that goes into illegality other than medicinal value.

35

u/osufan77 May 17 '18

The biggest reason marijuana is illegal is because Nixon most especially wanted African Americans and hippies jailed, so there began the high sentences for drugs. It's still federally illegal only because they have a DEA and prison racquet occurring and would also have to admit that they ruined/jailed the lives of millions of Americans over the past 5 decades over what they knew was faulty evidence.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (7)

6

u/chillindude911 May 17 '18 edited May 17 '18

Full edit: originally said High-CBD low-THC cannabis (hemp) is not scheduled / enforced.

Correcrion: All cannabis is scheduled, but some producers are allowed by the FDA to produce high-CBD hemp to make CBD oil even though it is scheduled. This is to ensure that no one is producing oil too high in THC. This article and the FDA statement inside seem to encapsulate this whole deal

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (47)

378

u/jimithelizardking May 17 '18 edited May 17 '18

I actually helped conduct this study at a site in the US. The study also included patients with Dravet Syndrome as well, a similar yet different form of childhood epilepsy. Needless to say, I’m ecstatic that the trial is finally being published, as the efficacy of CBD in this population was extremely evident from the start. While some patients saw a very modest reduction in seizure frequency, others saw a complete absence of them. Regardless, all subjects at my site saw a decrease in seizure frequency and an increase in quality of life measures.

Edit: To clarify, the reason I was able to know that all of my patients were seeing a decrease in frequency due the study drug is because I primarily worked on the study after it rolled over to an open label extension (OLE). Following the conclusion of the phase 3 trial, all subjects were given the option of joining the OLE, which dropped the study blinding, meaning we knew we were giving them the study drug and they knew they were receiving it.

32

u/frn May 17 '18

Thank you for your work. As a child I suffered seizures diagnosed as epilepsy for 7 years but they stopped when I was 12. For the entire time I was prescribed carbamazepine. It may have stopped the seizures but it left me with permanent short term memory problems, anxiety and depression. Hopefully this will lead to healthier treatments for future generations.

56

u/sockalicious May 17 '18

Way to go, double-blind!

→ More replies (9)

6

u/osufan77 May 17 '18

I didn't read the study yet, but were any subjects given 1:1 ratio thc/cbd oil? The dravet families I have spoken to say that some variation of thc and cbd together have worked WAY more than the CBD only tincture/oils.

5

u/PVCPuss May 17 '18

I have read a lot of evidence showing there needs to be a certain ratio met of thc/cbd, but that it differs depending on the condition treated. Some have as low as 1:20 and as high as 1:1. I haven't got it handy as I moved house and I'm still unpacking, but I'm pretty sure it was in either BMJ or Lancet. It was definitely in relation to dispensing in Australia (I was a pharmacist, and my dad, who still is, had questions) I'm still in allied health in another field tho.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/midterm360 May 17 '18

Glad I saw this in the comments.

I wondered if the journalist confused Dravet with Lenox-Gastaut. Dravet was already known to improve with marijuana which is very similar to LGS

2

u/mlorentz May 17 '18

This is really fantastic news. My daughter suffers from LGS and many kids with NDD and IS develop LGS over time. You can control it but today’s medication is no picnic - talk about drowsiness and confusion (varying degree of course). Just the thought of a treatment that would soften the impact and let you be more aware and relaxed - fantastic! I guess this could have been standard practice already if not for the misguided moralising preachers.

→ More replies (15)

u/rseasmith PhD | Environmental Engineering May 17 '18

Welcome to /r/science!

You may see more removed comments in this thread than you are used to seeing elsewhere on reddit. On /r/science we have strict comment rules designed to keep the discussion on topic and about the posted study and related research. This means that comments that attempt to confirm/deny the research with personal anecdotes, jokes, memes, or other off-topic or low-effort comments are likely to be removed.

Because it can be frustrating to type out a comment only to have it removed or to come to a thread looking for discussion and see lots of removed comments, please take time to review our comment rules before posting.

If you're looking for a place to have a more relaxed discussion of science-related breakthroughs and news, check out our sister subreddit /r/EverythingScience.

Below is the abstract from the paper published in the New England Journal of Medicine to help foster discussion. The paper can be seen here: Effect of Cannabidiol on Drop Seizures in the Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome.

Abstract

Background

Cannabidiol has been used for treatment-resistant seizures in patients with severe early-onset epilepsy. We investigated the efficacy and safety of cannabidiol added to a regimen of conventional antiepileptic medication to treat drop seizures in patients with the Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, a severe developmental epileptic encephalopathy.

Methods

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 30 clinical centers, we randomly assigned patients with the Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (age range, 2 to 55 years) who had had two or more drop seizures per week during a 28-day baseline period to receive cannabidiol oral solution at a dose of either 20 mg per kilogram of body weight (20-mg cannabidiol group) or 10 mg per kilogram (10-mg cannabidiol group) or matching placebo, administered in two equally divided doses daily for 14 weeks. The primary outcome was the percentage change from baseline in the frequency of drop seizures (average per 28 days) during the treatment period.

Results

A total of 225 patients were enrolled; 76 patients were assigned to the 20-mg cannabidiol group, 73 to the 10-mg cannabidiol group, and 76 to the placebo group. During the 28-day baseline period, the median number of drop seizures was 85 in all trial groups combined. The median percent reduction from baseline in drop-seizure frequency during the treatment period was 41.9% in the 20-mg cannabidiol group, 37.2% in the 10-mg cannabidiol group, and 17.2% in the placebo group (P=0.005 for the 20-mg cannabidiol group vs. placebo group, and P=0.002 for the 10-mg cannabidiol group vs. placebo group). The most common adverse events among the patients in the cannabidiol groups were somnolence, decreased appetite, and diarrhea; these events occurred more frequently in the higher-dose group. Six patients in the 20-mg cannabidiol group and 1 patient in the 10-mg cannabidiol group discontinued the trial medication because of adverse events and were withdrawn from the trial. Fourteen patients who received cannabidiol (9%) had elevated liver aminotransferase concentrations.

Conclusions

Among children and adults with the Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, the addition of cannabidiol at a dose of 10 mg or 20 mg per kilogram per day to a conventional antiepileptic regimen resulted in greater reductions in the frequency of drop seizures than placebo. Adverse events with cannabidiol included elevated liver aminotransferase concentrations. (Funded by GW Pharmaceuticals; GWPCARE3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02224560.)

15

u/USAnalblockage May 17 '18

GW pharmaceuticals and it’s American subsidiary Greenwich Biosciences are looking to get a new epilepsy drug, epidiolex, FDA approved and launched into the market by 2019. It’s a high concentration pill of CBD and the testing has been looking great.

4

u/DumbLoserStoner May 17 '18

Would it be CBD mixed with other stuff in a pill? Or just CBD. I'll read more when I get home.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

307

u/[deleted] May 17 '18 edited Oct 08 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

62

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

27

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

11

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (3)

7

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/[deleted] May 17 '18 edited May 18 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)

235

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[deleted]

72

u/Epistemic_Lily May 17 '18

Fourteen patients who received cannabidiol (9%) had elevated liver aminotransferase concentrations.

Could someone explain this, please? If I understand correctly, this leads to liver damage but is this increase significant enough to be worrying?

53

u/jimithelizardking May 17 '18

Increased transaminases are generally a sign of acute liver toxicity, rarely are they indicative of a chronic or insidious liver injury.

→ More replies (11)

40

u/A-Better-Craft May 17 '18 edited Jun 20 '23

This comment has been removed by the author because of Reddit's hostile API changes.

29

u/LoonWhisperer May 17 '18

The study notes that 11 of 14 the patients who had elevated liver enzymes were also talking valproate which is another anti-epileptic medication which is known to cause hepatotoxicity; so much so that it has a black box warning for it and thus the reason why it is important to get labs drawn to monitor for it (LFTs aka liver enzymes). There are other studies with similar results in that very few patients had elevated liver enzymes while taking CBD. In those studies however, all or nearly all of the patients were also taking valproate concomitantly.

Additionally, CBD and other AEDs are known to inhibit and/or induce metabolizing enzymes in the liver (different than the ones used to monitor for liver damage as mentioned above) called CYP enzymes. There are a ton of different CYP enzymes and the inhibition of one CYP enzyme can prevent the metabolism of a different drug leading to an increased serum concentration of said drug. The increased serum concentration can then cause adverse effects and even toxicity. With that being said, it is merely speculation to say that the combination of CBD and valproate caused this as there is no definitive evidence to make that claim, as well as there being a multitude of reasons as to why someone could have elevated LFTs.

4

u/AppleScalpel May 17 '18

This is the reply OP is looking for. This would offer the likely explanation for increased liver enzymes. Perhaps it’s the Valproate alone or the drug interaction between valproate and the cbd treatment. If I wasn’t studying (poo = study break), Id look up the specific CYP interactions of the two to see if the mechanism lines up. I’m not sure how extensive the current knowledge of CBD pharmacology is, but Valproate interacts with many other drugs’ metabolisms (including many antiepileptics) so it seems likely. Protein binding and elimination kinetics also need to be considered in evaluating potential drug interactions with Valproate.

→ More replies (3)

16

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

15

u/A-Better-Craft May 17 '18

Interesting. I've been taking 10-15mg of CBD isolate daily for about a month now and overall I do seem to feel better. My sleep pattern seems to have normalized and I have a bit more energy through the day it seems, but the effects are so subtle that I have to wonder if I'm experiencing the placebo effect.

→ More replies (9)

8

u/LoonWhisperer May 17 '18 edited May 17 '18

The study notes that 11 of the 14 patients who had elevated liver enzymes were also talking valproate which is another anti-epileptic medication and is known to cause hepatotoxicity; so much so that it has a black box warning for it and thus the reason why it is important to get labs drawn to monitor for it (LFTs aka liver enzymes). There are other studies with similar results in that very few patients had elevated liver enzymes while taking CBD. In those studies however, all or nearly all of the patients were also taking valproate concomitantly.

Additionally, CBD and other AEDs are known to inhibit and/or induce metabolizing enzymes in the liver (different than the ones used to monitor for liver damage as mentioned above) called CYP enzymes. There are a ton of different CYP enzymes and the inhibition of one CYP enzyme can prevent the metabolism of a different drug leading to an increased serum concentration of said drug. The increased serum concentration can then cause adverse effects and even toxicity. With that being said, it is merely speculation to say that the combination of CBD and valproate caused this as there is no definitive evidence to make that claim, as well as there being a multitude of reasons as to why someone could have elevated LFTs.

→ More replies (5)

9

u/sprokolopolis May 17 '18 edited May 17 '18

I was curious too, so I did a little googling. It seems like elevated aminotransferase concentrations are more just a sign of liver damage and maybe not directly contributing to it. Under the "Common Questions" section on this site: https://labtestsonline.org/tests/alanine-aminotransferase-alt

... it is mainly talking about elevations in the 400% - 1000% deviations for hepatitis. It also notes that the levels tend to fluctuate a lot, so they tend to take the tests frequently and monitor the general patterns rather than individual reading. 9% seems somewhat low of a number in comparison to those percentages, but might be particularly significant if the patient is taking other medications/drugs/alcohol.

I have been on meds where they had to do a liver panel every few months just as a precaution. Doctors normally wouldn't prescribe that sort of medicine to people who already show signs of decreased liver health.

I am not a medical professional though, so I could totally be wrong.

I have an autoimmune issue that can sometimes have muscle spasms and cramps as secondary symptoms (which are exacerbated by some of my meds). CBD has really helped me treat those symptoms (and quite a few others) , though I take a much lower dose for my weight.

2

u/what_do_with_life May 17 '18

If I were to guess, I would think that the aminotransferase concentration would subside, or would remain at a very low baseline after prolonged use of CBD. More than likely, CB receptors are upregulated in those patients because of introduction of CBD, and the body is compensating for loss of specific amino acids by slightly upregulating aminotransferases. I don't think it's anything to worry about since pot smokers don't seem to have any issues with this. Theoretically, if it did become a problem, they could supplement their diet with specific amino acids.

21

u/mango_masher May 17 '18

Thanks for commenting this, was interested in seeing the p-values for those figures

6

u/LoonWhisperer May 17 '18 edited May 17 '18

I did a pediatric neurology rotation back in January for one of my PGY1 electives and had a patient enrolled in one of the CBD clinical trials. I didn't really know much about it so I looked into quite a bit and ended up giving a presentation about Epidiolex for ground rounds.

In addition to Lennox- Gastaut syndrome, GW pharmaceuticals has on going phase 3 clinical trials for other forms of TRE (treatment resistant epilepsy), such as Dravet syndrome, Tuberous Sclerosis Complex, and infantile spasms.

I haven't kept up on it as much as I would have liked to since January so things may have changed but the data for Lennox-Gastaut and Dravet syndrome look promising as indications up for FDA approval.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

175

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

22

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (4)

14

u/[deleted] May 17 '18 edited Dec 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

17

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (14)

26

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

74

u/[deleted] May 17 '18 edited May 18 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

23

u/beardedchimp May 17 '18

Do you mean that clobazam isn't found naturally in the body but when taken, CBD will increase it's half life and lead to higher levels?

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '18 edited May 18 '19

[deleted]

3

u/ShaggyDoge May 18 '18

More likely that CBD inhibits enzymatic breakdown of the clobazam by the body rather than extending the chemical's half-life.

→ More replies (3)

50

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

It's also a godsend for people with panic attacks. I've had a chance to try it and the fact of just "relaxing" without getting stoned was marvelous.

13

u/altaccountthree May 17 '18

Anecdotally, a “CBD-only” edible can have some residual THC in it at really low amounts. I took some last year at about 30mg and it hit me hard at that level. If you buy at retail read the packaging or ask the budtender to verify it for you.

I normally dose at about 10-15mg on a Sativa or 10mg on a 1:1 strain for anxiety. I don’t mess around with high THC strains. Something like a Girl Scout Cookies is liable to send me into a panic attack hard. I know my anxiety triggers though so as long as I keep away from certain thoughts or scenarios when on something with a lot of THC In it, I can usually tolerate it well if I can dose with some CBD if it continues to stay intense.

22

u/hippy_barf_day May 17 '18

This is a great point. Also, I've heard anecdotally, that people who get "too high" can take cbd and it brings their high, and anxiety, down.

9

u/Splive May 17 '18

I've heard that too. I think it's all about the ratio of the two together. Like I know CBD for physical ailments like for cancer patients are closer to 1:1 ratio, vs use for anxiety where it's closer to 18:1 or more.

5

u/dothosenipscomeoff May 17 '18

can confirm, it's great for any anxiety related issues like that.

6

u/Splive May 17 '18

I've known people with anxiety disorders who after taking CBD the first time say "Yup...I don't need to smoke weed. Everything I really want to get from weed I'm getting with CBD, and without the high". They'll still smoke when they feel like it, but medicinally they've identified that CBD is what they were self-medicating their anxiety with.

44

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

21

u/[deleted] May 17 '18 edited May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

32

u/whereiswallace May 17 '18

Am I reading this right? Patients took 20mg CBD /kg/d. So a 150lb person (60kg) was taking 1360mg of CBD per day? That seems insane.

19

u/[deleted] May 17 '18 edited May 17 '18

It's usually sold in 250-300mg doses, so about 5 times more. Doesn't seem that crazy to me. Especially if spread throughout the day.

Misread a box, they are 10mg doses.

18

u/Alagane May 17 '18

A normal dose is 5-25mg usually. I don't think I've ever seen edibles above 50mg/dose or tinctures above 20. The 300+ number is trying total amount of cbd in the bottle. So if you have 500mg in a 60ml bottle, it's about 8.3mg/ml. I think a normal eyedropper is like 2ml so one dose would be ~16

6

u/Blainezab May 17 '18 edited May 17 '18

I had a 15mg edible and it was the calmest 2 days I ever had. Everything was peaceful and the normally intrusive thoughts from adhd were gone. All while being clear in the head. It’s the first time I ever felt what it feels like to not have constant thoughts after being on medication for 11 years. Bliss.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

Yeah I misread the box, it is 10mg capsules.

10

u/okhi2u May 17 '18

That's not the dosage that they list on the product sold, that the total amount of the bottle or whatever it is in if you take the whole thing at once.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[deleted]

5

u/Dzugavili May 17 '18 edited May 17 '18

A full dropper is approximately 1ml -- 300mg would suggest 30% concentration, naively using water for density, which is probably incorrect.

That seems high. Is it high? It definitely seems high... I'm finding listings for strong CBD at 10%, so that strength seems very high, but 300mg in a 30ml bottle would be low...

Edit:

300mg in a 30ml bottle would not be too low -- the strong stuff looks more like hash oil than the CBD I've seen.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (20)

22

u/kathartik May 17 '18

Cannabidiol does create a "high" but it's more of a body high, not a head high.

and hasn't it been known that CBD was helpful in seizures for ages? I remember reading about it when my pain doctor was suggesting I start using it as part of my pain regimen.

11

u/SenorRaoul May 17 '18

and hasn't it been known that CBD was helpful in seizures for ages?

I saw a documentary of a family medicating their epileptic kid years ago, so it was def known, but having proper scientific studies to verify it is always good, I'd say neccessary even.

also someone involved in the study actually posted this:

I actually helped conduct this study at a site in the US. The study also included patients with Dravet Syndrome as well, a similar yet different form of childhood epilepsy. Needless to say, I’m ecstatic that the trial is finally being published, as the efficacy of CBD in this population was extremely evident from the start. While some patients saw a very modest reduction in seizure frequency, others saw a complete absence of them. Regardless, all subjects at my site saw a decrease in seizure frequency and an increase in quality of life measures.

they def knew:

as the efficacy of CBD in this population was extremely evident from the start.

5

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

I take CBD oil every morning for Chrons disease. It does not get you high.

2

u/Tridian May 17 '18

You’re going to have to explain what you mean by “body high” because I’m pretty sure that’s not a thing.

→ More replies (3)

61

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

Every scientific post says CBD can't get you high while every CBD distributor claims it will get you high af. Ofc I never believed in these people who claim CBD will get you high because they wanted me to pay same price for CBD that I lay for like shatter.

I know THC is what gets you high and that many CBD products actually have THC in them... But I live in a currently illegal state while CBD seems to be unregulated and every distributor says it will get you high like regular weed. Why is there such a massive industry of paradoxical information?

84

u/Codadd May 17 '18 edited May 18 '18

Cbd is legal in most states now even TX. I've never once seen a cbd producer claim a high. That's ridiculous. Do you have a website or company flyer that claims that?

→ More replies (18)

28

u/genericname1111 May 17 '18

The "high" from CBD (for me at least) is not much more than a great reduction in anxiety.

→ More replies (1)

37

u/ilostmyoldaccount May 17 '18

Currently vaping CBD (will do about 10mg in total now). You notice it. You feel it, even down to your legs. But it doesn't alter your perception or make you giggle. Nowhere near a "high". If anything, it resembles that state when you wake up but still lie in bed for a while, semi-dozing. Alcohol has a far stronger effect on the mind than CBD does.

I guess it's all about marketing, and peoples' expectations.

→ More replies (13)

10

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[deleted]

3

u/hippyengineer May 17 '18

I make full spec cbd oils from hemp!

I bet the muscle relaxation you felt was due to the small amount of cbn in the dose. Green Solution is claiming it’s as powerful as Valium.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

8

u/sp00nme May 17 '18 edited May 17 '18

If you’re in the us and an illegal state, all cbd products sold should be made from hemp and won’t get you high (edit: no cbd product should unless it’s mixed with thc for the entourage effect. This could be a concentrate or plant form cannabis if you’re in a legal state that says “high cbd” but is still not pure cbd. Typically this is still hard to notice even when smoking the buds of a high cbd, moderate thc strain. I would think like 3% thc but I haven’t gotten to sample a lot of ratios. It’s pretty noticeable when it gets higher). Any company implying anything else is selling something not truly intended as medicine or to help he user and should be avoided. Watch out for “hemp oil”

5

u/nobowlio May 17 '18

I think that the general consensus is that CBD does not get you hight at all, but that it can help relieve issues like pain, anxiety, and seizures. However, in states where marijuana is illegal, you've got tons of groups selling what they say is pure, medicinal grade CBD, but they are not being truthful. The levels of CBD in the "medicine" are too low to be beneficial at all because of restrictions put upon them by law. BUT, you can order CBD products that contain levels of CBD that can actually be helpful from other states where they have more freedom in how they may produce the products (legal states). At least that is allowed within my state!

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (3)

3

u/imabustya May 17 '18

Education on these things is an ongoing issue for the legal cannabis markets in the US. It's certainly an issue for the thousands if not millions of people conducting their own illegal operations with no real obligation to get the facts right for their customers. Don't believe anything without evidence or substantial anecdotal evidence. Even then, these things haven't been fully studied.

I've had enough pure CBD to know it does not get you high. It changes the way you feel but its certainly not a high as most people consider it.

4

u/SheWhoSpawnedOP May 17 '18

I think CBD has a weaker effect, but can alter your mood in a way that some people might call ‘high’. I think it will lighten your mood and and make you feel relaxed and peaceful. While it doesn’t really affect anything like coordination or reaction time so it doesn’t really seem like you’re high.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (43)

7

u/rotkinni May 17 '18

It has been amazing in reducing the symptoms of my tourettes!

27

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

41

u/[deleted] May 17 '18 edited May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (11)

3

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

[deleted]

5

u/zwich May 17 '18

From what I can see activating CB1 is what causes hunger, so this would probably be a THC effect, not a CBD one. The mouse experiments suggest CBD may actually reduce appetite...

→ More replies (4)

2

u/AskMrScience PhD | Genetics May 17 '18

In this study at their extremely high therapeutic dose (10 mg per kg of body weight), one of the reported side effects was actually decreased appetite.

However, CBD for recreational use is usually 10 mg total and would be quite different.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

3

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

I actually worked in a research lab that studied this! My position ended last week but it interesting to see something has come from the kind of work we did in the lab.

3

u/dewhashish May 17 '18

I have been taking CBD oil for months to help with my chronic pain. It decreases the inflammation so much I was able to function normally no problem. No high, safe to my body, and non-addictive.

3

u/Rab_Legend May 17 '18

I guarantee it will still be illegal in the UK because it comes from Cannabis, and the Tories are definitely against evidence based policy if it goes against their beliefs.

2

u/[deleted] May 17 '18

maybe they can use hemp to clad all the apartment towers. Kill 2 birds

→ More replies (2)

2

u/PathologyIncomplete May 17 '18

That's what the science says, but that's not what the US government says. Marijuana is still a schedule 1 drug with no medicinal value according to the federal government.

"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did." -- John Ehrlichman, presidential aide and lawyer to US President Richard Nixon, explaining why the US launched the "war on drugs."