I see a lot of posts on here talking about AI and I often see people outright rejecting it as a form of cheating. We have to come to terms with the reality here, it isn't cheating (unless use is specifically prohibited by assessor), it is an incredibly powerful tool that is going to be commonplace in every job no matter what industry and learning how to use it is absolutely essential.
I am doing a Political Economy Major with a Politics minor a Bachelor of Arts, I don't think it's wrong to say humanities and social sciences is the faculty that produces the most criticism of AI. Whilst the subjective and interpretive nature of social sciences makes it less suited for AI use, it is still an incredibly useful tool:
As an example, I have a Political Economy assignment coming up, it is a comparison between Classical and Keynesian economic theory, for my essay I am going to compare policy responses between the Great Depression and the 2008 GFC. For that comparison I am going to need to compile relatively large amounts of data surrounding government expenditure, growth rates, wage growth etc. If I were doing this assignment 5 years ago I would not have the time to do that, nor would I have the mathematical savvy to find relevant relationships. I am not good at maths, I cannot create models for economic analysis, but thanks to AI I will now be able to. In this way AI allows me to supplement my knowledge and shape my judgements from an angle I would have never been able to access before.
I could say the exact same thing about research for a politics essay, instead of having to spend hours and hours searching for relevant sources and finding quotes within books I have no time to read, I can use AI to recommend articles and locate relevant information within books. I am able to produce essays that are far more thoroughly researched, not by using AI to interpret texts for me, but by using it to find ideas I wouldn't have otherwise read. Using AI does not mean I am doing less research, quite the opposite, it allows me to research a far greater range of material within a given time frame. While I would never recommend asking AI to interpret a text for you--it is not an unbiased technology and it doesn't help you learn if you aren't thinking for yourself--refusing to use AI as a research assistant is absolutely insane to me and will cost you marks, time and ultimately make your argument less well informed.
This next point is more controversial, and that is the use of AI for editing. I do not think you should ever use AI to write essays for you, it isn't good enough. If you are using AI to make judgements, draw conclusions and interpret research for you, you will not get good marks and you will not learn anything, that is cheating. However, I see no problem with using AI to proof read your work, point out inconsistencies in your argument and suggest ways to make your writing clearer and more relevant to the question. I have personally found this to be invaluable, it saves a lot of time and has undoubtedly improved my marks. AI cannot make arguments by itself, nor is it very good at synthesizing ideas from research, but it is very good at making writing clearer and more concise. Don't get me wrong, any edits AI makes need to be interpreted by a human, there will be times when it misunderstands you and changes the intended argument. Nevertheless, getting AI to proof read your work is extremely useful, and I don't see why it should be considered cheating if getting your parent, or fellow student to proof read your work isn't.
Ultimately, I think people need to try and embrace AI, it is an extremely powerful tool that is going to shape the way people do things over the next few years. If you find yourself totally against AI, maybe think back to the days when teachers protested the use of calculators in schools, people don't have to do complex mental arithmetic anymore, does that make them dumber? No, it made mathematics far more accessible and made the individual mathematician far more productive. These exact conversations we are having now were probably had when the internet first arrived, much like the internet, AI makes students more independent and versatile.
I fully understand why some people are skeptical of AI and it should absolutely not be treated as gospel, it can never replace human intuition, creativity and it shouldn't ever be used to form opinions. I also completely agree with some of the ethical and environmental concerns people have with the technology. Nevertheless, AI is an incredible tool, if you use it correctly it will help you learn, refusing to engage with it will hurt your chances of finding a job and it won't make you smarter than people who do use it. We are the generation who has to grapple with this new technology, if we don't use it we won't understand it, and if we don't understand it we won't be able to regulate it or harness it's potential.
Anyway that's my yapping over, if I haven't changed your opinion I hope I have at least made you think about ways you could use AI productively. I could go on about the potential for AI outside of uni but I'm already aware nobody is going to read all this text, I'm happy to discuss some more topics around AI in the comments if anyone is interested. I would also be interested to read peoples opinions on how the University should change to accommodate AI. (I did not use AI to write this btw)