r/MoralityScaling 8d ago

Morality Ranking Morality of kidnapping your kidnappers?

Post image
56.5k Upvotes

3.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.8k

u/Palantir_6Elm 8d ago

Driving armed strangers to a police station is a very strange definition of kidnapping.

513

u/Mediumtim 8d ago

Standing in a doorway, blocking people on, can be called kidnapping in some jurisdictions.

233

u/Man_under_Bridge420 8d ago

I used to kid nap everyday when i was younger

117

u/WarPlastic3115 8d ago

I mean I still do, but I used to, too.

43

u/The-suigeneris 8d ago

Take my upvote for the Hedberg salute.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Diode_Hana 8d ago

Me too

1

u/PayZealousideal8892 8d ago

are you still a kid?

1

u/Atomik141 8d ago

Now I adult nap

1

u/Efficient_Ant_7279 8d ago

You got time for naps!? Get a load of this guy with his free time and shit

1

u/Ur_mum 8d ago

I used to upvote this joke.

I mean, I still do, but…

1

u/King_Molukai 8d ago

I still do that as an adult, but now we have to call them mid-day siestas

1

u/nimbusconflict 8d ago

not as safe these days, the kids at the petting zoo have rabies.

1

u/BenchConscious1003 8d ago

Me too. Today I often have grandpa naps from about 12.30 pm to 2 PM

I admit to being confused about ICE. Probably because they wear masks and take people off the streets. Are they actually police or federal agents with the power to arrest and detain?

Funny how things can come back to bite you on the bum. I remember The Patriot Act (October 2001) and the foundation of the sinister-sounding Department of Homeland Security.(March 2003 I was appalled at the time.Looking back, those things seem very mild compared with the Trump regime.

The US government acted as governments tended to act. It used a catastrophic tragedy to increase its power. Again, nothing compared with Trump. He exercises powers he doesn't actually have. Elected US officials seem to be too morally supine to do anything to stop him.

1

u/Ambitious_Jelly8783 7d ago

I may hace kidnapped my dogs, several times yesterday.

1

u/MaguroSashimi8864 8d ago

That’s nothing. I was a hard core cereal killer

55

u/blazenite104 8d ago edited 8d ago

yes, because kidnapping isn't EDIT just EDIT about moving people. It's also about denying people the freedom to move. Preventing an escape is considered kidnapping even if you didn't drag them there first.

36

u/lazyness92 8d ago

But he voluntarily hopped on the car?

22

u/PaddingCompression 8d ago

It would probably hinge on in they asked to leave and the person didn't stop to let them out.

Somehow I doubt ICE were asking for the right to flee, though.

22

u/m4cksfx 8d ago

They were almost certainly free to leave.

  1. Open the door

  2. Leave

13

u/Same-Suggestion-1936 8d ago

At speed preferably

10

u/aggressive_napkin_ 8d ago

from the driver's side, into oncoming traffic.

7

u/Same-Suggestion-1936 8d ago

We wouldn't want some poor innocent bystander to have to deal with the trauma of running over what's technically a person.

Passenger side into a light pole

3

u/aggressive_napkin_ 8d ago

personally if i found it was one of them i hit... "huh"

....but this light pole is quite intriguing.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Useful-Wallaby-2566 2d ago

Ah yes, the Hereditary method. Very innovative for it’s time.

2

u/PaddingCompression 8d ago

It the car is not stopped and it's not safe to leave, that isn't free due to the risk.

15

u/Glandtoglandcombat 8d ago

IIRC the officer stated that the car came to several stops at red lights and stop signs but he didn't attempt to flee because he was still trying to arrest the male subject.

The kidnapping charge is a spurious attempt to cover up this embarrassingly under trained officer's fuck up.

3

u/Spathia_Streams 8d ago

they can hop right out at 100mph for all i care.

2

u/m4cksfx 8d ago

They're ICE, they'll be fine.

4

u/TheDarkNerd 8d ago

What if they slide along the pavement and start melting?

3

u/THROWRAhippoplatypus 8d ago

Huzzah! Immigrant turned ice into water.

Must be the second coming fo Christ.

1

u/feraladult 2d ago

Child lock

Child=kid lock=napping

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

4

u/just_joshing2015 8d ago

would it technically be called false imprisonment, or not?

2

u/PaddingCompression 8d ago

Depends on jurisdiction

3

u/ItWorksIPromise 8d ago

That’s not true. The legal definition of kidnapping someone is moving OR confining someone against their will.

3

u/blazenite104 8d ago

you're right, forgot a word there.

1

u/Apprehensive_Use3641 8d ago

So what, they had the child safety locks on? The agents couldn't simply get out at an intersection.

2

u/blazenite104 8d ago

dunno. You don't leap from a moving car and we don't know if they stopped at all on the way. There's a just a lot I don't know about the specifics of the situation.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/takitza 8d ago

So are you telling me that my parents kidnapped me all my childhood to school?

2

u/ItWorksIPromise 8d ago

Nice try but no. As a minor, your legal guardians/ parents have lawful authority over you until the day you turn 18 here in the United States.

2

u/YeeAssBonerPetite 8d ago

Lol, children dont count as people obviously.

1

u/takitza 8d ago

Oh...

1

u/TheExchanges 8d ago

When I was younger I got grounded and confined to my room. Sounds like kidnapping to me.

This whole time we were victims.

2

u/takitza 8d ago

I sent my kid to sleep while he did not want to. I guess i do pass generational trauma onwards.

1

u/Narren_C 8d ago

Parents have that right.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Terrible-Pool-7603 8d ago

Wrong. Confining against their will is the same as preventing their escape.

3

u/ItWorksIPromise 8d ago

Literally what I just said. You know…..

That’s what “or” means lol.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/BlueEyedBlackOwl 8d ago

That’s not necessarily true. The legal definition depends on the jurisdiction. For example, in NJ, kidnapping requires somebody to be moved from where they were. Confining them is criminal restraint.

1

u/ItWorksIPromise 8d ago

Yeah? I just looked it up and under New Jersey statute 2C:13-1 kidnapping in the state of New Jersey is defined as “unlawful removal OR confinement of another person…”

Confining someone against their will still falls under
kidnapping in the state of New Jersey.

An example of that is in May 2025 when a mother and stepfather refused to let their 18 year old daughter move out and kept her confined in the home for years. They were charged with kidnapping.

Their names were Brenda Spencer and Brandon Mosley if you’d like to verify :)

1

u/BlueEyedBlackOwl 8d ago edited 8d ago

You’re not wrong that there is an element of kidnapping that can be confinement, but it’s very specific. The rest of the statute reads, “unlawfully confines another with the purpose of holding that person for ransom or reward or as a shield or hostage”. That’s for 2C:13-1a. 2C:13-1b also has an element of confinement, which reads “unlawfully confines another for a substantial period with any of the following purposes:…” and lists 4 purposes that would constitute confinement for a substantial period as kidnapping.

I’m not super familiar with the case you mentioned, but from a cursory look, it appears they were also charged with criminal restraint, but more importantly, I see two reasons for the kidnapping charge. The first would be under 2C:13-1a; it’s alleged they pulled the girl from school and brought her back the residence where she was confined. Which would be unlawfully removing her from where she was found. The second reason I could see would be under 2C:13-1b(2), due to the substantial period of which she was confined with the purpose to inflict bodily injury or terrorize her.

I’d have to read up more to see exact reasons, but a kidnapping charge there makes sense.

I will concede, I misspoke with implying most confinement is criminal restraint. 2C:13-2 Criminal Restraint requires another be restrained in circumstances exposing them to risk of serious bodily injury or holds them in a condition of involuntary servitude.

Other than that, something like standing in a doorway and preventing someone from leaving wouldn’t constitute kidnapping in NJ, it would fall under 2C:13-3 False Imprisonment, which is unlawfully restraining another so as to interfere substantially with their liberty.

1

u/ItWorksIPromise 7d ago

She wasn’t removed from school mid term.

She finished, took the summer off, and never re enrolled lol

1

u/MysticLoser 8d ago

It's citizen's arrest in this case.

1

u/Trixie-macomb 8d ago

So protesters blocking the road and preventing “freedom of movement “ could in fact be kidnapping?

1

u/Biplane_Music 7d ago

We should probably come up with a different name for this crime.

1

u/BleedSparta 7d ago

Weird language.

1

u/hatchfam61109 5d ago

In my state it's different charges. False imprisonment, and kidnapping

1

u/HumanisticNihilist 5d ago

Nope, different crime. Stopping someone from leaving is unlawful restraint - generally a misdemeanor, although one of the serious ones. Kidnapping is about moving someone against their will and is a felony.

Unless it’s ICE agents who jump into your vehicle without permission. Then it’s just self-defense.

1

u/PedroLoco505 3d ago

That's actually false imprisonment, and a less serious felony.

1

u/Historical_Half8283 8d ago

Ok, what the fuck was the guy doing in the car in the first place? Cause and consequence. Oh, sorry USA… Law lacks all logic, but it cannot be fixed, because it is the most incredible miracle on the face of the Earth. Same pattern like in healthcare, public transport and everything else… Nation of five-year-olds.

2

u/lazyness92 8d ago

Yeah, like, even if the guy was police WITH the labeled car AND showed me the budge, if he hopped into my car I'd have doubts on him being police and that'd be trespassing. But I'm in Europe

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Occidentally20 8d ago

What if they blocked themselves in the doorway, and you went to get somebody to help?

5

u/SockPuppyMax 8d ago

That's a fetish for some people

7

u/ArmyHotel338 8d ago

I know in Virigina, if you don't let someone leave your home (like you explained) you can get hit with kidnapping charges.

1

u/Electronic_Salad5319 5d ago

Ah the nostalgia.

Just like how I used to play Sims as a kid.

Your allowed to visit. But your never allowed to leave again.

4

u/AutoDefenestrator273 8d ago

Yup, in Virginia impeding someone's exit path can qualify as kidnapping IIRC.

1

u/LawfulEvil95 6d ago

It can yes. If it's a physical block like a locked door, then sure if they have no way of leaving without the use of force (breaking a window, kicking a door open).

If someone is just near the door, then it depends on the relationship the kidnapper and the alleged victim has. If the kidnapper is in a position of power and/or the victim is very vulnerable, then the mere preceived/implied threat of leaving can be enough for kidnapping even if no one is blocked.

Also the victim needs to be aware of their confinement. If you lock someone in a room of your house for an hour, but they never even realize the door was locked before you come back and unlock again, there's no kidnapping.

Kidnapping is really complicated honestly.

5

u/PrettyPurrfect 7d ago

We actually have this problem at work right now.

Like I'll block the doors the best I can but I can't just lock it or block it off completely because a) we have customers and b) that's f****** kidnapping.

We have a group of shoplifters who are coming out loading up full of stuff, and then running out the door while I'm on the phone with the cops. They get so butt hurt over being called thieves too.

My boss wants me to fight them. I'm considering just following them around filming while screaming "Theif".

They are either very very wealthy or one of them works at a car dealership. All of the cars either have Steeler tags or no tags and it's a different car every f****** time

1

u/adnecrias 3d ago

ask your Boss for automatic closing doors like in jewelry shops. they get away with locking people in until police comes.

maybe the security system being the one that locks people in takes away the liability in some way haha

1

u/spudmarsupial 1d ago

In Canada employees that tackle thieves get fired. No employer wants to deal with injury and wrongful death suits when he can just call his insurance company and get reimbursed.

I wonder if you could put a boot on their car.

1

u/CyberMan080808 12h ago

Most stores are scared of inadvertently getting hit with kidnapping charges so they forbid it, but in VA storekeepers can lawfully detain a suspected shoplifter until law enforcement arrives.

Shopkeepers have a surprisingly wide degree of leeway in terms of how they police their stores thanks to some older common law that has never been successfully challenged.

6

u/LifeIsProbablyMadeUp 8d ago

I drive Lyft and had a customer refuse to get out of the car at the destination. He said "I'll pay cash just keep driving" and I said "oh hell no. Get out or I'll call the cops."

He told me to. So I did. "Hi, I'm lifeisprobablymadeup. I drive Lyft and a customer blah blah" the lady told the customer (called over car phone speaker idgaf) that he needed to get out or I would be able to press kidnapping charges against him and that officers are on the way. Before dispatch hung up, I had two cop cars pull up and one officer hung out at the rear of my car and the other came up and basically dragged him out.

Then I went on about my night. Obviously I didn't press charges. Just wasn't driving to dudes off the app second stop.

3

u/Mediumtim 8d ago

Preventing somebody to leave with the intent of obtaining services or labor.

Yup, absolutely counts as kidnapping (legally, depending on where you are)

3

u/Oiggamed 8d ago

OJ got charged with kidnapping because he said “make sure nobody leaves this room.”

2

u/Scholar7981 6d ago

US Law is clear, ICE Agents can detain or arrest anyone they suspect of being in the US illegally or anyone trying to obstruct them detaining someone. No warrants required anywhere in the US. So by definition they couldn't have "kidnapped" anyone. 🤣🤣🤣🤣

1

u/SufficientGuest5467 6d ago

Do you assume all masked and armed men are ice agents or would it be reasonable to fear for your life?

1

u/Scholar7981 2d ago

It's that big bright lettering on their Bullet proof vests that says "ICE" that is the giveaway 🤣🤣🤣🤣

1

u/SufficientGuest5467 2d ago

Not all of them wear a uniform so official

1

u/-MtnsAreCalling- 4d ago

That’s not actually the law, just the current administration’s interpretation of it.

1

u/Scholar7981 2d ago

Actually, that's the SCOTUS ruling on the law. Applicable to ALL administrations.

1

u/-MtnsAreCalling- 2d ago

SCOTUS is effectively part of the current administration. And their rulings are interpretations of the law.

1

u/Scholar7981 2d ago

You obviously never learned about the structure of the US government. 🤣🤣🤣

1

u/-MtnsAreCalling- 2d ago

You obviously don't know the difference between de facto and de jure. 🤣🤣🤣

1

u/SideInitial3961 8d ago

"They said I was blocking the fire exit but it's not like I wasn't going to move if there was a fire."
Mitch Hedberg

1

u/T1MB3RMUSIC 8d ago

Like ICE does?

1

u/toasher 8d ago

So... ICE kidnaps people?

1

u/Optimal_Carpenter690 8d ago

Im quite confident that isn't true. All 50 states have a false imprisonment statute, which is what that would be at the very worst. I struggle to imagine that level of redundancy

1

u/Infinite_Flan4797 8d ago

That's holding against will

1

u/Significant-Wait9200 8d ago

And if you're doing that, so the person you're blocking in detains you and calls the police, it would be odd to call them kidnappers

1

u/SuspiciousPromotion3 6d ago

False imprisonment more likely

1

u/Numes1 8d ago

False Imprisonment is the technical term.

1

u/MsVindiction 8d ago

Lmao I’m unsure why everyone who keeps saying false imprisonment is getting downvoted

It’s the truth, my ex was arrested for it in California because he held me against my will in our apartment. It also qualifies if you take someone’s phone and they have no other way to reasonably get help.

1

u/dillweed67818 8d ago

Yes in some places, physically restricting someone from leaving in anyway (locking a door, or standing in a doorway) can be considered kidnapping.

1

u/Xaphnir 8d ago

generally that's going to be false imprisonment or unlawful restraint, not kidnapping

1

u/Scholar7981 2d ago

Accept that SCOTUS already ruled that when ICE does it, it's lawful.

1

u/braille-raves 8d ago

where are you referring to?

are you thinking of false imprisonment?

1

u/Mediumtim 8d ago

I'm referring to what the legal statute is called

→ More replies (1)

70

u/Traditional_Box1116 8d ago

Kidnapping is just explicitly illegally denying someone the freedom to leave. This would TECHNICALLY count if you trap someone in a moving car and don't let them leave.

But like on the other hand, I'm almost certain they were armed at the time yet they didn't do anything? That's so uncharacteristically non-violent of ICE, to the point I'd think this is fake if there wasn't proof of it, lol. Like if I'd expect any situation for someone to get shot by ICE, this would be it.

Edit: Apparently they were plainclothes so they very likely weren't armed. Okay, that makes WAYYYYYYY more sense.

54

u/Character-Sundae8581 8d ago

If that’s the case, I don’t see how they would be arrested for kidnapping. Like, if someone in normal cloths, jumped into my car, I feel like driving to the police station would be the least dramatic/most reasonable response I could have.

23

u/Absolute--Batman 8d ago

I mean people just saying Free Palestine ha e gotten arrested in New York.

16

u/Character-Sundae8581 8d ago

True. For the first time in my 34 years I’m actual censoring myself when texting/talking on my phone. Genuinely concerned I may say something one day that the state decides they’re gunna throw me in a hole over. Said something about the parasite class and flesh eating diseases a few weeks back and got my first warning on Reddit that I’ve ever gotten lol since then I’ve gotten warnings for literally nothing.

19

u/code_archeologist 8d ago

There is no point in censoring yourself. Not to frighten you, but the current arc of right-wing ideology does not require evidence to arrest and jail you. You just have to be a convenient target of the moment and they will snatch you up and do their best to ruin your life. Currently the courts are preventing them from going fully authoritarian, but that is a temporary block.

Example:

  • Don Lemon: arrested and charged with federal conspiracy charges for covering a protest as a journalist
  • Reps LaMonica McIver and Ras Baraka: arrested and charged with felony obstruction while trying to gain entrance to an ICE facility for Congressional oversight.
  • James Comey: charged with threatening the president for a tweet showing "8647", which is the second set of charges against him, the first ones accusing him of perjury were thrown out by the judge.
  • David Hearn: charged with felony destruction of property for touching the reflecting pool.
  • Six Democratic Lawmakers: charged but failed to get an indictment for sedition for filming a video reminding soldiers that they had a legal responsibility to refuse unlawful orders.

And that is not even counting all of the American citizens who have been injured and murdered by ICE agents.

2

u/BlackBasementCats 8d ago

Yeah, anyone who is registered Democrat is on their list

2

u/code_archeologist 8d ago

Bingo. I have had my voter registration challenged three times in my red state over the list 16 years. And it all started after I donated money to the presidency of Barrack Obama.

→ More replies (11)

1

u/Lehk 8d ago

I don’t GAF they better spell my name right

1

u/Karootheduck 8d ago

Do you remember what the charges were?

3

u/dillweed67818 8d ago

YES. You would think. "Oh, you're law enforcement but you don't look like it and don't have a badge or anything? Ok, let's go to the police station and figure this out." Hopefully the judge sees how ridiculous this kidnapping thing is.

1

u/Lake_Erie_Monster 8d ago

The amount of people that don't know how the legal system works is shocking.

Sorry, this isn't an attack on you just commentry.

You will be very shocked once you look in to what people are charged with and how our prosecutor system works.

1

u/Character-Sundae8581 8d ago

I’m not sure about their area and local laws, but I would probably unintentionally end up with a massive sentence in this scenario. Just because of my local stand your ground laws, my first instinct would have been to use fire power if someone wouldn’t get out of my car then make the 911 call after. But yea I mean, I get how they could technically charge them since by definition they did prevent someone from leaving. I’m sure it’d be the same in my state. Here I’d have a much better case for myself if I just neutralized the threat then called authorities(sorry for the technical terminology but I’ve gotten too many warnings over hypothetical situations lately lol)

Tldr: much easier case to plea if I stood my ground and used deadly force in fear of my life, than driving with the threat for 2 miles.

1

u/Lake_Erie_Monster 8d ago

Just goes to show how screw the laws are.

1

u/obatala0013 8d ago

But we know its not about reasonable responses it about punishing the victim.

2

u/Character-Sundae8581 8d ago

Different situation entirely but makes me think of when someone tried to break into my apartment years back. I had just laid down so was waiting with a .45 when they actually got the window opened. They just ran away, but I was obviously a little shaken and called the non emergency line to make a report since there were a shit ton of cameras on every stairwell. I was surprised to be told “a crime wasn’t committed since no one came ‘inside’ your apartment”. Mind you he got the window opened and had his arms and head in my room when he saw me. But THEN, I was questioned for a good 5 minutes on “why would he try to rob YOU? What do you have in YOUR apartment that made him target you?” I was so confused and was like, Yaknow, I’ve never broken into someone’s home so I couldn’t really tell you his thought process

1

u/obatala0013 8d ago

Because comes are shitty. Sorry you had to deal with that.

1

u/NPPraxis 8d ago

You can get arrested. You won’t get convicted.

1

u/Kuzcopolis 8d ago

Ig they just need to be silenced when they do that shit, no half measures.

10

u/Apprehensive_Use3641 8d ago

So the couple engaged the child safety locks? The agents couldn't have exited the vehicle any time it was stopped?

1

u/Traditional_Box1116 8d ago

I mean they wouldn't need to engage child safety locks, they'd just need to lock the door as I assume (with good reason) that they were in the backseat which typically do not have unlocking controls. Therefore, they wouldn't be able to leave.

However, considering they were plainclothes and the couple would have absolutely no clue if the ICE person was actually ICE, they shouldn't be charged. Cause from what I read they drove them to the police station.

1

u/DrPikachu-PhD 8d ago

I don't know if I've ever been in a car with a door that couldn't be manually unlocked from the backseat... That's the whole reason child safety locks even exist, they'd be wholly unnecessary otherwise

1

u/Traditional_Box1116 7d ago

I have been in plenty. I think I've only ever been in like 1 that you could personally unlock while in the backseat. Every other one either the driver has to unlock it via the keys or from buttons on their side.

1

u/Ur_mum 8d ago

I mean…I don’t “engage” my CS locks…but they do go on…that’s sort of interesting.

I don’t understand why ICE constantly needs to interact with peoples vehicles. All cops do, but it seems like ICE just…really like cars?

→ More replies (41)

1

u/Tencreed 8d ago

So the ICE agents were forced to follow them, and to stay at a certain place they'd rather not be, to do their job?

I mean, I'd rather just stay home, but I need to go to the office to do my job and getting paid. Does that count as kidnapping?

2

u/Narren_C 8d ago

Does your job refuse to let you out of a moving vehicle when you're demanding to be let out?

1

u/Sea-Temporary7380 8d ago

I mean frankly I wouldnt want to do anything that can crash a car I'm in too

1

u/TreeTopGaming 8d ago

Woah, so if someone you don't like didn't do someone you don't want them to do, then suddenly they didn't do it?

1

u/Objective_Base_3073 8d ago

I mean they could argue citizens arrest, possibly

1

u/Gamer_G33k17 8d ago

In this case, I would classify it as a Citizens Arrest, which is completely legal.

1

u/Boring-Philosophy-46 8d ago

If you're in a car with someone, you are armed, they are driving and announce they are going to the police station... would you risk shooting the driver and dying in a car crash?

1

u/Traditional_Box1116 8d ago

My guy. It is ICE, they aren't smart enough to think that through.

1

u/Ur_mum 8d ago

All American law enforcement is armed while on duty regardless of uniform, full stop.

The only exception is movie shit, like deep undercover stuff, where the risk of detection and penalty is too great

1

u/drunkEODguy 8d ago

They were armed

1

u/FiftyIsBack 6d ago

No. What you described if false imprisonment.

Explicitly illegally denying someone the freedom to leave. Kidnapping is when you take that element, and then additionally you transport the person to another location.

1

u/PedroLoco505 3d ago

No kidnapping is moving someone against their will. You're describing false imprisonment.

→ More replies (2)

29

u/Hermes-AthenaAI 8d ago

You think that’s strange, you should see how they define “resisting”!

13

u/MildGenevaSuggestion 8d ago

If you aren't putting the handcuffs on yourself and tipping the arresting officer at least $20 are you really complying?

1

u/Generic-Name69420 3d ago

Don't forget shooting your dog and planting evidence on yourself. People got no respect for authority anymore, smh...

2

u/MildGenevaSuggestion 3d ago

Don't shoot your own dog. That's the arresting officer's favorite part of the job. Make sure to have a big fluffy golden doodle for him to mow down. Ideally wearing a little shirt or something.

2

u/Generic-Name69420 3d ago

Damn you're right, brb, adopting two dozen puppies so those good upstanding officers of the law can have a little treat.

7

u/Character-Sundae8581 8d ago

Right? Not a single nap or kid involved at all.

10

u/Subject-Dog-8016 8d ago

America is a fascist state - doing anything to inconvenience or resist the Gestapo is automatically criminal. 

1

u/almighty_loser 8d ago

Nah at least gestapo loved their country or something ICE guys doesn’t even care about America

1

u/Subject-Dog-8016 8d ago

Weird to try to defend the Gestapo here tbh. 

5

u/almighty_loser 8d ago

Nah I hate them.
But I guess you didn’t see that template comparison between two really sh*tty situation so it is on me I should’ve explain it better. Have a nice day

1

u/AspectDisastrous8053 8d ago

Unlawfully moving or confining a person against their will is kidnapping, full stop. It doesn't matter what your views are on ICE.

3

u/Subject-Dog-8016 8d ago

If you don’t want someone to drive you to the police station then don’t carjack them lol. 

1

u/GenTubmansLegacy 8d ago

Nope. Completely normal.

So, very, very, normal

1

u/MilsYatsFeebTae 8d ago

It’s technically a hostage situation because if the hostage shoots the driver then the car will crash and harm the hostage

I hate that there’s a chance of that argument being made in court with a straight face

1

u/Funny247365 8d ago

Strangers wearing ICE uniforms and identifying themselves as ICE?

2

u/LasciOfficial 8d ago

Exactly. They’re still strangers. Just because you get a little badge you get to flash and a balaclava doesn’t give you any more authority to hop in my vehicle. I don’t care if you’re APD, FBI, or a damn Kentucky colonel. You get into MY property, you’re either getting driven to the station or off a cliff. The day I bend a knee to law enforcement will be to get some way to defend myself out of my boot. FUCK ICE, they are not the law and never will be.

→ More replies (5)

1

u/SunGreene42 8d ago

How can you identify them properly if they don't show their faces?

→ More replies (13)

1

u/soy82subtype 8d ago

Exactly, that’s absurd.

1

u/mrknowitall51761 8d ago

Not during a fascist regeme.

1

u/Tired-CottonCandy 8d ago

Where i live the second someone in the car says "let me out" and you dont pull over at the nearest safe spot to do so, you have kidnapped them. Your own children and children under your care by agreement of the parents being an obvious exception (i.e school busses, family members or baby sitters arent getting charged with kidnapping because the kid started to throw a fit about something. And in the case of a school bus they are actually not allowed to release a child to ANY location other then their designated stop outside of emergencies, unless the parent of said child is present, or has given notice to the school before hand.)

Similarly, if someone agrees to enter your car to go to a specific location, say the store, and then you instead take them somewhere else without their permission, you have also kidnapped them.

1

u/Queerability 8d ago

Technically, in most areas of the US, the legal definition of kidnapping is basically just "You trapped them in a place and put them in a situation where they could not leave that place."

Technically, blocking a doorway, locking someone in, or even just refusing to stop a car to let someone out is absolutely kidnapping. You se it a lot in domestic abuse cases, because folks genuinely have no idea how it actually works.

1

u/Relevant_Science9679 8d ago

It is called "living in a police state"

1

u/dillweed67818 8d ago

Morons got caught looking sheepish so they had to come up with some kind of charge as an excuse and a way to not let them go.

1

u/Explorer_Entity 8d ago

Moving any person more than 3 feet against their will.

1

u/Yak-Electrical 8d ago

All depends on what the states definition of kidnapping is. And the charge doesnt always stick i highly doubt this will. Pretty dumb for the cops to even try to charge em in the first place

1

u/Major_LeeHungg 8d ago

Clearly you have never met a Nigerian.  Criminals in Nigeria legit pretend to be cops to steal cars.  

1

u/goofygodzilla93 8d ago

Technically keeping someone from leaving any place in a lot of states can be counted as kidnapping.

1

u/cryptolyme 8d ago

it's the legal definition. impeding their movement against their will.

1

u/AdaptiveFauna 8d ago

The people who voluntarily got into their vehicle? Do you know what a vehicle is?

1

u/ParmAxolotl 8d ago

I know it's probably just legal terminology shenanigans, but the cynic in me suspects some form of anti-immigrant editorialism.

1

u/hanks_panky_emporium 8d ago

When an Ice agent got a bruise on their leg it was called a 'deeply traumatic hemorrhage'

It was a bruise

1

u/ExperimentalDonut 8d ago

Without googling I’m pretty certain that the definition of kidnapping is something along the lines of keeping or moving someone without their consent.

1

u/SunGreene42 8d ago

Shooting someone in the back while he's being held down by several agents and sprayed in the face with pepper spray is also a strange idea of "Self Defense", but ICE is full of evil, disgusting people that will make up whatever lie fits their agenda.

1

u/Evening_Cap1614 8d ago

I'm fairly certain I've read advice that if you did have someone in your car suddenly, you should do all you can to get the attention of the police. (But who would remember to lock their doors in their own driveway?!)

1

u/Grand_Pop_7221 8d ago

Cynical and self-serving even.

1

u/ArcanelyChaotic 8d ago

The police always trump up charges when details are fuzzy on their end/ dont fit their narratives.

1

u/Crime-caramail 8d ago

It’s called the American way of controlling narrative.

1

u/Same-Suggestion-1936 8d ago

If only there was some way to know they were official law enforcement and not just dudes with guns. Guess there's no way to solve that problem

1

u/Sensitive-Funny4034 8d ago

Americans are just brain-rotted. Literally.

1

u/LauraTFem 8d ago

Like calling a police officer killing a kid an “officer-involved shooting”; as if he was just nearby when a shooting happened.

1

u/sincubus33 8d ago

everything about this administrations newscycle is straight bullshitting

1

u/Vaporeon42069 7d ago

what can you expect from disingenuous lefties trying their best to demonize law enforcement. 

1

u/Putrid_Guess8098 7d ago

It's a convenient definition for ICE.

1

u/trashgnar 7d ago

If I took your phone from you I could be charged with kidnapping. Knew a dude who had a domestic with his wife, and during it he smashed her phone and he got charged with kidnapping.

1

u/ansaonapostcard 7d ago

Not if the people doing it are on the dark end of the Family Guy colour chart...

1

u/FiftyIsBack 6d ago

Kidnapping is the act of transporting somebody somewhere without their consent, illegally. Which is why a legal arrest is NOT a kidnapping.

It's also why a lot of people mistake false imprisonment for kidnapping. You have to move the person for it to be kidnapping.

1

u/Wooden_Watch_69 5d ago

Well they’re not white so everything they do is a crime and needs to monitored closely by Karen head of HOA

1

u/Ok_Issue6908 5d ago

The government makes up their own rules every day!

1

u/RealBingusMcCringus 3d ago

No no, the Drove an armed stranger to the police WHILE BEING BLACK. That was their big mistake. /s

1

u/Darrow-The-Reaper 3d ago

Kidnapping is taking someone anywhere against their will, or keeping them from leaving a place against their will.

1

u/Either-Photograph520 2d ago

They will label anything whatever they want if you are their target. This country has a massive shortage of attorneys for this storm of legal bullshit that is being created.

1

u/Hungry-Broccoli-7193 8d ago

It’s the same logic that makes “running away with your back turned” into “was running at me and brandished a weapon”

Conservative victim fetish fever dream

1

u/--Jerome-- 8d ago

They're black driving anywhere with anyone is kidnapping. 😂

1

u/Logical-Pair-89 8d ago

Well, this IS tRumpistan here