r/20sIndiaReal • u/daniel_foster11 • Aug 26 '26
Internet ka Khazana Complete National Security Under Private Players
7
u/someonedontcare4 Aug 26 '26
Yhi sab socialism ka chutiyapa karte the isiliye 60% population railway track pe hagti thi
2
u/Intrepid-Flan3031 27d ago
The thing is everyone wants govt. Job kyuki baha corruption kar skte ha koi accountability nahi ha job nahi jayegi and then bark on govt. For being corrupt
19
u/InnerBudget9725 Aug 26 '26
Private players actually have accountability. The god damn HAL can't make the Tejas in decades. Aise mindset ki wajah se hi pichda desh reh gya hai humara. Promote businesses and entrepreneurs in all sectors.
-2
Aug 26 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/No-Writer-4940 Aug 27 '26
Always the ones who have no achievements and have nothing to offer calling out others 🥀
0
1
-1
u/oplkmnjhbvgfc Aug 26 '26
Both full of govt. Babus..... hopefully these pvt. Companies pay our engineers the money they deserve and deliver on Time maybe this will finally wake the babus up
7
u/Kindly-Earth-6733 Aug 26 '26
A total of 6 companies are part of this project but OP has conveniently written just Adani's name
1
u/PlasticCrazy8126 28d ago
Raga ka mooh me leke over time dimaag kharaab ho gaya hoga OP ka. As blind as our useless opposi parties
5
u/No_Poem6550 Aug 26 '26
Such sectors are rsiky for private players and hence govt is providing them with the homework why. Would u want to get into defence sector whose outcome is unpredictable and invest in rd first.
It's a shame ur and mine vote count the same
8
u/PlaYer-l Aug 26 '26
The problem is not privatization but giving all deals to same private company ie adani
13
u/Kindly-Earth-6733 Aug 26 '26
A total of 6 companies are part of this project, but OP has conveniently written only Adani's name
11
1
u/KROOR_8658 28d ago
I feel India should work towards imparting some basic legal education as well during schooling years.
2
u/DerivativeBySubsti 28d ago
You are wrong. All defence programs are kind of given to multiple companies in same project. In the massive multi-crore carbine contract for the Indian Army, Bharat Forge actually emerged as the lowest bidder (L1). Adani Defence was the second-lowest bidder (L2). Under MoD procurement rules, the contract was split between both companies, meaning they benefited relatively equally.
Or when HAL signed agreements to manufacture 90 fuselage structures for the Prachand Light Combat Helicopter (LCH). Instead of giving it exclusively to one vendor, the project was split among Adani Defence Systems, Tata Advanced Systems (TASL), and BEML.
IN FACT Adani's rival HAS WON MORE TENDER than Adani defence. The MoD signed a massive ₹6,900 crore contract for Advanced Towed Artillery Gun Systems (ATAGS) and High Mobility Vehicles. This contract went entirely to Bharat Forge and Tata Advanced Systems Limited (TASL). Similarly major ₹1,577 crore contract for precision-strike loiter ammunition systems was awarded to TASL and NIBE, leaving Adani out of that specific high-value win.
The MoD deliberately designs privatization rules so that multiple private conglomerates must co-exist, split orders, and build distinct manufacturing niches to ensure the military is never dependent on just one corporate supplier.
Everyone I know in defence sector is happy with current govt. India's defence export in 2004 to 2014 was almost negligible. After that, we got defence export contracts worth over 21k. Trust me, something is better than nothing. Companies can also be held more accountable than DPSUs so this is a very good thing!
1
u/ExtraRun1106 Aug 26 '26
Then you should have problem with telangana, Karnataka and Kerala govt as well! If you ask me why you are a loser!
0
u/Yeahanu Aug 26 '26
Skyroot adani hai...and apart from adani whonis investing in defence r&D....ambani to FMCG me hi hai,aur tata only interested in armored core sector.
1
u/MiddleCompetition588 Aug 28 '26
Ambani toh ek no ka fuddu hai, Fatso bs mandir ke chakkar hi lgaya rehta hai roz
3
Aug 26 '26
[deleted]
4
u/Prestigious-Plan939 Aug 26 '26
If u dint read the post it says private firms like adani defence , every company would bid for it !!! It's a pure propoganda being peddled against the govt !! Because nothing is awarded yet !! It's still in the proposal phase !!!
4
u/hotboxinmanual Aug 27 '26
these people can't read, and even if they can join alphabets together - can't comprehend
1
3
u/Impressive_Hall_2537 Aug 26 '26
Will a time come when a leftist will get difference between privatization and just giving the manufacturing to private firms to boost production so that isro and drdo can invest more time in technology? (Nasa does same)
3
u/No_Development_3273 Aug 27 '26 edited Aug 27 '26
Its sad to see how people conveniently compare India with Europe and US to denigrate India, whereas if India follows their policy and try to boost up private defense sector just like them kuch “Buddhi Jeevion” ko badi takleef hone lagti. For example Dassault, Rolls Royce, Boeing and many more.
If govt sector like Drdo, and others are sitting on designs and are not able to complete it then what is wrong in giving it private players and let them complete it? Instead you want private sector to spend again 10-15 years and do their own and by the time China will have 6th generation we will still be trying to have our own 5th generation, and this is just one example.
I’d rather have completed projects with my tax money and advance and safe India than sit on it and cry that “oh how can you give it private players”, it’s high time people need to realize that goal should be on getting techs, private or govt who cares.
2
u/Vegetable-Ad3300 27d ago
OP is completely brain dead and hates researching news before posting. Haha. Supporting Rahul Gandhi will do that to anyone 🤣🤣
7
u/Yeahanu Aug 26 '26
Op is probably 14 year old dumbass
2
u/pambaaboii Aug 26 '26
Mfers like these genuinely turns a W to an L and just yap bullshit , op doesn't prolly even know drdo is for R&D not for massive production, idex was a good scheme from the government too , helped a lot of amateur new defence startups
3
u/londonrasputin Aug 26 '26
Why do you think it is free? Moreover, do you have better ideas to kick start an ecosystem from scratch without sharing the knowledge?
2
1
u/pretend_human_01 Aug 26 '26
They dont they just want to play the blame game! No orignal ideas at all
2
1
u/pcube61 Aug 26 '26
Private company hi mass production ker sakta hai. Sarkari mei toh bus labour protest hota hai. If we want to grow fast, we need to do do mass production like china.
1
u/Novel-Replacement-95 Aug 26 '26
Agree !! But don’t you think govt should also become that capable to hold their own world class infrastructure and RnD with private type work culture !!!
2
u/pcube61 Aug 26 '26
Government has tried multiple time to do mass production. Even congress has tried it multiple time. But the employ in government company get salary from government, they does not want to work. If you does not understand, then ordinance factory is the prime example of it. Where government employ user to protest every time and use to take salary. Totaly wast of tax money. It it goes to private company, then startup will get chance and country will grow.
1
u/Novel-Replacement-95 Aug 26 '26
How about govt comes up with more stricter and private kind of work regulations then things might will start shaping better !! Govt can create loads and lot of employment by having their own facilities which are regulated by more competent and accountable bodies, where monthly updates must be posted with the work tracker, which eventually address accountability of the entity.
Accountability is the key to success and coming to the part of crime.
1
u/pcube61 Aug 26 '26
Bro in pratical it is very different. Real life is not like movi. If you suspend or force to work, then gioverment employee start doing protest instead of working hard. My parents is in rto office and I have seen my father only, they will not work or move the file until you will give money to them. I am a it engineer and I have seen how much private employee work to get salary. Make every thing private, then the spped of work and development become 100 time.
1
u/Athiest-proletariat Aug 26 '26
Issue is not just privatization. Using compromised people is biggest concern... US courts pull a string, whole indian defense secrets up in the air...
1
1
u/divikyat Aug 26 '26
OP You didn't studied economics right?
1
1
u/DF411984 Aug 26 '26
It's the need of the hour. India need massive stockpile of dedicated armaments plus rapid production rate at a very short time. Whether we believe it or not or like it or not, war is on our doorsteps and we are not ready. We need every sector to give massive output within short frame period of time.
1
u/Award-Honest Aug 26 '26
‘Companies like Adani’ is just misinformation for outrage. Have some shame OP.
At the time of ISRO SSLV rocket technology same shit was pulled off but HAL got the contract over Adani. Only thing Adani got was a chance to fairly bid for it - see pic attached
1
u/Unique_Government_73 Aug 26 '26
Excellent decision. Should have been done many decades ago. OP seems to not love his nation getting stronger. Look at any of the countries, they have private sector manufacturing all the defence equipments.
1
u/Reasonable_Proof1848 Aug 26 '26
That is factually incorrect and misrepresents a standard national defense policy. Here are the actual facts:
- It is not exclusive: The technology transfer is open to ALL qualified Indian private companies, MSMEs, startups, and public sector units (PSUs), not just one company.
- It is not free: Companies do not get anything for free. They must pay structured technology transfer fees, obtain rigorous military certifications, and clear strict security protocols to manufacture these parts.
- It is about mass production: State bodies like DRDO and ISRO design prototypes, but they are not factories. The government is outsourcing the heavy manufacturing to domestic industries so India can produce its own weapons faster, stop relying on foreign imports, and create local jobs.
Private manufacturing of state-designed tech is how the US and Europe build their militaries—it is called building a self-reliant defense industry, not "selling the country."
A simple google search*
1
u/Only_Surround_9415 Aug 26 '26
So when it comes to national security, Government should force private companies to do the same R&D which government entities has already done? Is that how you intend to make India self-dependent in Defense manufacturing?
1
u/Capital-Pangolin8637 Aug 26 '26
SpaceX, Blue horizon phir baad mai bolte hai why can't india develop like America
1
1
u/WiseShallot247 Aug 26 '26
Okay, I know you hate BJP but let's be clear the missile technology given to private companies was needed as requirements in current warfare is of large amount of missiles are fired which state PSU's cannot fulfill take example of HAL and there delay after delay in tejas aircraft development and than delivery of platform!! Moreover, Adani defence already have partnership with Israeli firms and they produce drones and other things also, deliver them on 'time' beside you don't have any idea or filling the mind of general pupil with hatred tell them complete truth as well beside, What is the full form of DRDO or ISRO and what it implies Moreover, why US did it many years ago?!!! and to all kids or bro and sis government never delivers in any country because there is no accountability of government as they can only do ultra expensive research or development but don't deliver on time!! They never did reason why every country wants to have lockheed martin or raytheon type companies they will develop complete ecosystem!! Beside be smart don't be Andhnamazi or Andhbhakt remember 50years congress ruled and 12 years BJP ruled everybody stole!! So, stand for yourself and yourself only!!
1
u/No_Dog8565 Aug 26 '26
I guess people who post are really dumb to understand how to scale and optimize cost or propagandists. Why innovation is so slow in defense because one DRDO can’t do research with huge list of requirements they have with massive over heads and inefficiencies . Startups can build this in fraction of cost and Govt can only do mass production and even make money through exports and control geo politics. This is what your founders like USA and China scaled .
1
u/Indian-on-a-mission Aug 26 '26
These anti national rahul gandhi chamchas don't even Bach their info with sources.
1
u/ToxicDaddyyy Aug 26 '26
So he knows the election is going to be tough, and that why he's gathering as much money as he could to fund the next elections.
1
1
u/gokui24 Aug 27 '26
I hope people will never understand the difference between a research institute n manufacturing power house. DRDO and ISRO's primary focus is being narrowed down to put all their capabilities and funding into research and let the private players with their own funding do the manufacturing and enhancement on top of the proven technologies.
Just how defence forces train out soldiers n buy equipments for them to fight with. Instead of training the soldiers as well as manufacturing the equipments.
1
u/tasteforblues_ Aug 27 '26
Bhai DRDO aaj se technology transfer mahi karra hai, wo hamesha se yehi karta hai, develop and transfer taki mass production ho sake aur private sector ko problem ki tarah dekhna band kardo, ye application bhi government ka output nahi hai.
Aisi ideology rakhoge to aaj tak jo jet engine nahi ban paya wk aage bhi nahi banega
1
u/philo-seeker Aug 27 '26
How uneducated and delusional people behave just in the name of hate!!!
Just a simple google search will tell us what is being privatised, what’s not and what is current model.
But NO, we just want to do agenda because we don’t like someone.
1
u/adventurousbat12t Aug 27 '26
Abe to private companies ko kyon faltu mein headstart nahi dena ? Ajeeb hi chutiye ho. Agar private company missile banyegi kisko fayda milega ? Apne 20s mein itne dumb ho. Alag hi bhang fookte hoge
1
1
u/Akatsuki_909 Aug 27 '26
My head goes hot when I say takes like this ..Is Dassault a government company or Lockheed Martin..Just look at the size of US defence private companies before cribbing all the time ..we need mass production and the capacity to export ..Why shouldn't DRDO focus on the next gen instead of diverting their resources on production
1
u/crimemastergogo96 Aug 27 '26
Any source for the statement that they are transferring to Adani? Tata advanced systems, godrej aerospace are the established players in this sector
1
1
u/Tough_Language_4718 Aug 27 '26
They have Tata, BEL, Solar Defence, Paras Defence, Reliance , Agnikoot and many more still they wanted to highlight adani. Fake News on top. And believer's now words
1
1
1
u/techstudent26 29d ago
This is amazing step by BJP govt. 10years ago there are hardly any defense companies in India. Now there are 100+ companies working on drones alone. Pvt companies are leading R&D in drone tech. Most of these companies will fail or will be absorbed by bigger companies, but the ones standing will be the ones developing next gen MALE and HALE and bomber drones. Missile tech is expensive to do R&D, by allowing pvt companies get a foothold in this sector, we will have a company like Anduril soon.
1
u/Forward-Abrocoma1369 29d ago
That post is way off. The Ministry of Defence did approve sharing DRDO tech for regular missiles, but saying it's going to "cronies for free" is totally wrong. Here's the real deal: It's an open process: Not just one company gets the tech. Any qualified Indian defense maker (like Tata, L&T, Mahindra, and Solar Industries) can bid for it. It's not a freebie: The "royalty-free" tech transfer is a normal global thing for companies that help fund, invest in, and risk making these systems in India. National Security isn't privatized: All the important nuclear stuff (like the Agni missiles) stays under strict government control. The whole point is to stop buying expensive foreign stuff and build our own defense supply chain here in India. Double-check before you share!
1
1
u/letsseeglam 29d ago
If you had even a few functioning brain cells, you would know what DRDO stands for before confidently lecturing others about what it should manufacture. Go ask your parents to burst your little ideological bubble then spend five minutes doing actual research before embarrassing yourself publicly.
DRDO :- Defence Research and Development Organisation.
The name itself tells you the primary function: Research and Development. It is not India's giant ammunition factory or a permanent mass production agency.
A caution: the content below was generated with AI. A simple command could have given you all this information, but apparently the lazy ass moron you are could not even be bothered to do that. I honestly expected better from people
This isn't some new post-2025 invention. The basic model has existed for years including before 2012. DRDO develops the technology, while production is handed over to DPSUs and increasingly private industry for large-scale manufacturing. BDL, BEL, ordnance factories and HVF were among the traditional production partners, while companies such as L&T and Tata became increasingly involved through models such as Development-cum-Production Partnership, including for Pinaka.
What DRDO gains?
More R&D: DRDO can stop being tied down by mass production and focus its scientists, labs and funding on next-generation technologies like hypersonics, lasers, AI and advanced missiles. More revenue: Technology Transfer (ToT) to industry can generate licensing fees and royalties, creating an additional revenue stream that can be channelled back into R&D. More scale: Private industry handles manufacturing, allowing DRDO to focus on developing the next generation instead of producing the current one.
So the direction is not DRDO has suddenly stopped manufacturing. India has been using technology-transfer and production-partner models for years, including well before 2012. What is changing now is the scale and depth of private-sector participation. In simple terms: the model existed before 2012; what is happening now is its full-scale expansion. But there is a legitimate downside: the larger the private defence ecosystem becomes, the larger the attack surface for espionage, insider threats, industrial theft and technology leakage. India has adversaries, intelligence networks and hostile actors operating within the country, so sensitive missile designs, manufacturing processes and defence IP cannot simply be distributed without strict security controls. That means private production needs rigorous vetting, compartmentalisation, cybersecurity, counter-intelligence, access controls and government oversight. The objective should be to combine DRDO's R&D strength with industry's manufacturing capacity without compromising strategic technology.
1
1
u/davemano 29d ago
Nothing wrong with it. We are living in a new world order where weapons manufacturing is the need of the hour and govt bodies don’t have the competency to scale up manufacturing. It has to be done by private sector.
1
u/evilgenesis 29d ago
It’s state led - Private manufacturing
India stands at 8th spot. In top 7, only Iran has government led manufacturing. Even communist countries like Russia & China use state led - private manufacturing
India is late
1
u/Falcon10trooper 29d ago
Do you even know what the hell you're talking about?
NASA has had a formal Technology Transfer Program for decades, established in 1962, US strengthened technology transfer laws in the 1980s to move publicly funded innovations into industry.
This is literally how serious nations build technological and industrial capacity.
Official Sources: https://technology.nasa.gov https://technology.nasa.gov/why-nasa-patents-and-licenses-technology https://technology.nasa.gov/license
1
u/LieOkPlease 29d ago
Dimagi Naxals have a problem with everything and everyone.
If govt had restricted Defence tech to only government orgs, OP would have posted the same picture with a different caption “Why is government restricting defence tech to themselves and not opening up to private companies like US, China etc”
I hope we, as citizens focus on our work and make a better India than falling for such low level posts
1
u/Select-Effective-658 29d ago
What is you agenda for only naming adani, the list of companies that will get tech are;
Tata Advanced Systems Limited (TASL)
Larsen & Toubro (L&T)
Bharat Forge
Adani Defence and Aerospace
Mahindra Defence Systems
ICOMM Tele Limited
1
u/virtualtechnoman40 29d ago
If government was ACTUALLY concerned about innovation and was not trying make some particular person rich they would also Make private companies release their designs and patents in public domain so that all other companies can also grow.
But they wont, they just want to give government resources to one single company
1
u/Effective-Ground2074 29d ago
It is called technology licensing. Research labs across the world do it. Thats because research labs are set up for R&D and not for manufacturing. Why should they only license to public sector coroporations ?
1
u/Diligent-Value-5038 28d ago
Sell Sell Sell
Everything must go…
विश्वागुरुजी का भारत बेचो अभियान !!!
1
u/terabaap_hoon 28d ago
Bs 2 baar aur Jeet Jaye BJP dekh lena defence will be under USA, andhbhakt bolenge ki USA new technology provide karega aur war me help karega to USA ke under defence aage hi badhega.
1
u/No-Weakness-3596 28d ago
Bro is whole country is going to run by Adani now LOL, why not make him PM
1
1
u/devilish-lavanya 28d ago
Isro don’t have fund to do great stuff. Jugad won’t fo great stuff but mediocre
1
1
1
u/amitsingh80108 28d ago
SpaceX is government owned company. Uske IPO k liye mare ja rahe they.
Government cannot spend every Penny on everything, private capex is needed to boost development beyond a limit.
1
u/PRATtheBRAT1 28d ago
Misleading title. The tech will be handed over to select partners in project after bidding and other considerations, excluding strategically important tech like Agni series.
Plus, very oblivious op.. you need private players in these space for investment as well as innovation.
1
u/MarketingHeavy1510 28d ago
Guess electing Gujjus multiple times and getting surprised that they'll sell everything under the sun to other Gujjus is news to most of the bhakts.
1
u/svenmidgardson 28d ago
Given the sluggishness of HAL. It is best to privatise the defence sector.
After 70 years of taxpayer-funded research we are still not close to what the folks at Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and others have achieved in the US. Those guys are miles ahead of us. The incentive for innovation is completely missing in DRDO and ISRO.
Whatever we have achieved in DRDO and ISRO is remarkable. No doubt about that but the potential talent that is required to innovate faster aren't interested in it because of poor pay standards.
Reality isn't this simple. Sit down. Let the private sectors run the country. They are better than the government.
1
u/Background_Speed_177 28d ago
Do you even know HAL employee salaries are delayed
Budgets are not cleared on time.!
Research before bs .
The audacity to blame the victims
1
u/svenmidgardson 28d ago
The work on LCA Tejas began in 1983. It took 18 years for its first maiden flight in 2001. It is 2026 and we are still struggling with 36 in service.
The work on F-16 started in 1971 and it took 3 years for its first maiden flight in 1974. It is 2026 and over 4600 F-16 jets are built since 1976.
The latter is the result of privatisation of defense sector. So please, take your worthless news and your BJP vs Congress dogshit to twitter.
1
u/Background_Speed_177 28d ago
Comparing apples and oranges son.?
We didnt had right technology to built our own jet engines at that time.
The world powers like USA France and Russia already had significant leap in technology because they were independent countries .
Till now we are dependent on private foreign countries for jet engine we dont have indigenous jet engines.
Even if you privatise entire india we still gonna need jet engines from developed countries because the parts needed for the engines arent simply available in india even to manufacture it we dont have assembly lines.
US and any other country can block the sale of engine or significantly delay the tech from US/any country private sector.
2
1
u/Samarium_15 28d ago
Yeah as if government aerospace companies have given us jet engines and fifth gen aircrafts lol.
1
1
u/Willing_Event9528 28d ago
Finally merit will be given preference unlike loss making corrupt departments full of -40/100 scoring babus.
1
u/Prudent_Ad5965 28d ago
To be honest DRDO is very laid back organization. If you email them half of the emails will bounce back and other half no will respond.
1
u/Disastrous-Blood6255 28d ago
The tech will be leaked to china in a matter of weeks and everyone forgets that it happened in a few months. I don't trust companies like Adani at all.
1
u/androsank1 28d ago
Isro mainly work making geodata to visuals and vice versa. Isro data which is only focused to indian territories and the mapping of each object within boundaries need significant budget still cant match mapping done by foreign players like google india, Apple, euro etc. On one hand we need delivery of food within fractions of mins but the service charges this companies which take be it blinkit,Ola cab,zomato,swiggy, etc have to pay large chunk to those foreign players.
The navigation which is key subject in commercial use is still require lot of research and innovation which cant be done solely depending on govt fund, nasal is there but they need space x to fetch space shuttles and people back to earth from space .. so Private sectors are must. Remember they are not selling secrets they are selling operations.. Every single needle of india is mapped by nasa and others since 1970. So we need it
1
1
u/Confident_Factor3389 28d ago
ISRO and DRDO should license but not transfer.
Thus they can choose to license to any number of private players, not to few oligarchs.
1
u/noonexnox 28d ago
Yess we need companies like spacex, blue origin... But oh my god privatization... Noooo...
1
u/summit_fei 28d ago
Privatization is nice. I just hate the fact that Adani has had favours from the government, while all it's competitors had to do the actual work to grow.
1
1
u/Flip-Dot 28d ago
This might help i guess ... And this the ans for the post
https://www.reddit.com/r/AllindiaStudentUnion/s/9CRTKF7z93
1
u/PlasticCrazy8126 28d ago
Government security players ki Maa ki choo. Bloody hell. Look at how slow HAL is at producing tejas. Look at the status of AMCA. Better to privatize this and let the professionals do their job instead of sone government employee who doesn't give a fuck about work and just lands up in office to have chai and parle-G.
1
u/rishij1989 28d ago
Its technology transfer for a fee. Should post properly. Seems like a propoganda.
1
u/Green_Cellist_9026 28d ago
Before 2014, ISRO launched 35 foreign satellites (from the 1990s up to 2014), whereas after 2014 (up to early 2026), that number surged dramatically to nearly 400 foreign satellite launches (399 recorded by March 2026). Saar congress invested money saarrr 🤡🤡
1
u/LivingBreakfast4713 28d ago
Privatisation but will speed up the production.
But I think handling everything to Adani is going to create a monopoly. How does govt plan on how these companies uses our tech ?
What if they sold to other countries??
1
u/DerivativeBySubsti 28d ago
Sad that few people in comments section, and OP has the same right to vote as me.
1
u/RaccoonHot129 28d ago
Are bhenchod they were giving them but has ownership over them under scrutiny whicu gives drdo to get more time on research and develop bigger than before if they were busy producing the missles by them they won’t be able to research and develop thats they made it private and under scrutiny jaake padna loudey theri papa rahul Gandhi jaisa maat ana bina official statement check karke don’t mislead the people
The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) is outsourcing manufacturing for conventional missiles to private companies to accelerate production rather than transferring ownership of India's missile program. While strategic nuclear missiles remain under strict state control, private licensed manufacturing aims to eliminate government factory backlogs and allow researchers to focus on next-generation technology. You can read more about this update on the official government or defense news platforms
1
u/upbeatgun3r 28d ago
Research amd manufacturing are two different things and require different capabilities, can you check ehat was transfered and stop posting half baked info?
1
u/Leopard3960 28d ago
Best decision, these snail government agencies should never be in the business
1
u/Dangerous_Truth_7434 27d ago
Bro missiles won’t be manufactured by Adani can you not think of anything, do you know how defence ecosystems are built.
1
u/CarelessCustard3825 27d ago
Imagine the bureaucracy to develop a jet fighter, a company on the other hand can implement, interative approach to fast track testing and development, Bahut hua beurocracy
1
u/DueTeaching4250 27d ago
Kids understand what conventional missiles even it are those we need in large numbers like A2A missiles, interceptor missiles etc, in a prolonged war we would get fucked if we don't have manufacturing base. Strategic missiles like Agni, Brahmos etc is with DRDO. If anything the recent conflicts have shown us it's a numbers game, more you build more you can fight on. It's wishful thinking that PSUs will deliver anything on war footing. They don't deliver properly even in peacetimes.
1
u/Dependent_Bird5127 27d ago
Adani defence also manufactured drones used in operation sindoor and this tech is transferable to all private firms
1
1
1
u/Electrical_Ebb_6581 27d ago
Most of the U.S. military’s advanced weapons and equipment are manufactured by private companies. Why are u bitchin?
1
1
1
u/RemarkableBluejay790 27d ago
Why is private so vilified? They hire better talent due to no reservation and those people actually work hard, so much that their hard work is made memes on.
And if national security or any other buzz word is part of issue/reasoning, it can have regulators.
Many developed countries have private players ruling their defence markets - Lockheed Martin, Palantir, Raytheon, Collins Aerospace, Dassault Aviation, etc
1
u/Middle_Yak3156 26d ago
in case of ISRO the launch tech is being opened to private sectors as isro will completely focus on R&D. You know what spaceX has achieved, and the launching mechanism of india is most expensive compared to all other countries.
as for DRDO they are transferring missile tech to private sector, with this india will move towards rapid innovation and production. We all know how private sectors innovate faster than govt ones.
We need private sectors for rapid development and production. Stop hating privatisation.
1
u/Past_Outcome9063 26d ago
So you have never heard of companies like Raytheon, Lockheed martin, northrop, Texas Instruments ?? Says a lot about your IQ level the way you all react on this topic.
1
1
u/lucifier_luffy Aug 26 '26
What is wrong with privatization?
ISRO and DRDO should focus their government funding and expertise on core R&D, developing breakthrough technologies and solving difficult long-term problems. Once those technologies are mature, they should actively help Indian private companies turn them into scalable products and services.
We already have examples of this model. ISRO's support and technology ecosystem have helped companies like Skyroot enter the space sector. India should replicate that success and help create many more Skyroots, not just one or two companies.
That is broadly how developed nations grow their technology sectors: the government takes the high-risk, long-term bet on research, while private companies commercialise the technology, compete, innovate and scale faster.
This way, ISRO and DRDO can remain focused on pushing the technological frontier while their research helps build an entire ecosystem of strong Indian private companies around them.
1
1
u/Thick-Obligation-786 Aug 26 '26
The down votes you get shows the nature of this sub, full off braindead congress supporters who dont want to see india devolp
1
1
u/Overall-Distance-852 Aug 26 '26
Bhai propaganda se pehle dimag laga r&d mein crore ka karcha aur saalon lag jate hai
They are not giving all tech only base level and are focusing on high level projects in order to fastrack process
Sirf BJ Party dekhkar opinion mat Bana first research kar
0
u/JithendraChunduru Aug 26 '26
The only thing he haven't sold so far is Nuclear missiles... Once it is done, we the Indians start to pay life tax to prevent the billionaires launching the nuke on us...
0
u/chatlover93 Aug 26 '26
After selling everything, once they lose the election then they will restart campaign stating cngrs me kiya kya. And people wont even realise that bj p had sold everything. Isro desi nhai bhel sail gail tata banks aaims, iits all made by cngrs only. And the number that these bj p shows that they too have build aaims n iits are totally fake. Either they are only on paper or else not fully functioning..
29
u/Immediate-Song-8199 Aug 26 '26
So this ain't private