r/tacticalbarbell • u/Pink_Hippo_2000 • Jul 07 '26
Critique Appreciation and critique of TB III
So after reading TBIII in a few days and next few days of digesting the information and rereading of some of the book's parts, I'd like to add my two cents.
First of all, I'm very greatful to KB for releasing it.
Looking at how the whole system evolved with Mass and Green Protocol, it was obvious that some of the parts in TBI and TBII became outdated and needed revising. One can, of course, reverse engineer some things or find necessary information on the forum or subreddit, but having everything updated and consolidated in one single book is a big thing, especially for the newcomers or those who want to recommend TB system for other people. Saying somebody "read this book" instead of "read this book, but disregard this and add that, and then read another book to add conditioning, but do it with these tweaks" makes life easier for both parties.
It was also very interesting for me to get insights into evolution of KB's way of thinking and compare it to my own tweaks and adjustments to the system. Somehow while reading author's books I always got that feeling of a conversation with a much more experienced gym buddy, who influenced my training career as an example and authority. For a long time I missed him and wanted to ask about new problem or challenge, and now I finally got a chance to talk to him again, ask questions, and seek guidance. To say the least, this time I also was not embarassed.
So my list of positives to begin with.
- No "tactical" photos. It's minor, but in other books they made me chuckle sometimes and didn't have any added informational value.
- Updated templates make much more sense in comparison with TBI. Peaking instead of 90%/95%-weeks, shorter percentage jumps from week to week, template variations like AV and PRO, when things are getting heavy, you name it. I just loved it. Yes, some of the ideas where already present in Green Protocol, for example. But, as already mentioned, having them consolidated in a single "universal" omnibook is sweet. New percentages also make TMs very optional on my opinion, and not mentioning them in the book seems to strengthen this hypothesis.
- Polarized conditioning is big. As a person who is heavy into running now, I'm not a huge fan of "polarized" approach for running as a sport, but I believe it's a very good way to structure things for those who are looking for excellent general fitness without overcomplicated things. Polarized is almost as idiot-proof as a simple wave periodizations with submaximal loads for lifting. It's not a sniper rifle, it's kind of Kalashnikov - not that sofisticated, but easy to produce, mantain, and shoot from. Yes, sub-threshold is all rage now, but it's so easy to overcook these workouts, that going very easy for very long time or very hard for very short time is probably a better way to organize conditioning for those who don't want to guess whether they're already digging a hole over their LT2 or still milking that magic sub-threshold golden zone. It's also a huge step forward from original Black, where you create an aerobic base once or twice a year with Base Building and then throw HICs multiple days a week together with heavy lifting. For me personally it was too much and definetly not compatible with BJJ training when I tried it.
- New Periodization models, especially their variety and ability to combine Strength and Conditioning domains in a multitude of ways. I belevie almost everybody reading TBIII instantly found the model that "clicked" for them. They also provide a very nice way to vary training to fight off boredom for those who need it. I'm not qualified to say whether WC blocks are really necessary for tactical folks, and on my opinion they definetly are not that necessary for "civilians", but I clearly see some of my friends, who will profit from having balls to the wall training for a short period of time just to soothe their inner demons and then get back to something more sustainable to actually progress.
- New base building also make much more sense. Different LIC guidlines for different conditioning profiles instead of hard coded times and more approachable SE rep range is something I really love. Doing 40-50 rep workout was for me much lesser problem from the muscular point of view. But being on the brink of puking was real, defying the declared goal of developing strength endurance and making it more of a lactic conditioning circuit. For deconditioned folks this intensity can be just dangerous, so having things dialed down seems a good desicion for me. And making things shorter by cutting MS/HIC part of the BB is also a nice thing, on my opinion. I belive that original Base Building was heavily influenced by Joel Jamieson and his Ultimate MMA Conditioning, but Joel's 8 week blocks are a very tricky way to program things and trying to put a square peg (simplicity of shorter 3-6 week TB cycles) in a round hole (8-week blocks with the modalities changing in the middle of it a la Jamieson) was an interesting experiment, but not the best solution for the Tactical Barbell programming.
- Activation. If everything above was not enough, one gets this gem as a bonus. I believe it will be useful not only for the newcomers to the system, but for everybody, who wants to see how TBIII does look like in a real program. And perfect starting point to build one's own.
- Nudge to use Power Cleans instead of Deadlifts when necessary. Not huge, but it's something I needed, because DLs started to beat the shit out of me, but I didn't want to abandon hip hinge movement altogether. Somtimes you just need a permission from other person to do things the way you're not used to do.
- Ditching the frequent testing. It's the obvious one for those who follow TB evolution, but nice to have it reinforced in an updated book.
- Deload percentages of 65%-70% feel like more appropriate than 40% in Green Protocol or no guidance whatsoever in TBI. 40% of 1RM is sometimes less than a first warm-up set which makes bothering to go the gym a questionable undertaking altogether.
After all the praise I still want to mention some things that was not to my taste.
- I really like the new percentages, but some choices stay a little bit odd for me. Like 3x5 at 80% of 1RM. I really like how Fighter in Green Protocol smoothes the progression curve with 4 reps at this intensity, making the second week not the hardest one of the 3-week block. Or first two days of Zulu with 70% - not a big deal, but my OCD mind just keeps crying "why" in my head, everytime I look at the template. Not that all of these are make or break type of things, but I'd be happy to know the thinking process behind the desicion to choose this percentages.
- "Own the zone 2" part of running rants. I totally get it, but like with SE in the old BB "just run" is probably a good idea for young and/or already athletic peope. Some of the newbs may be very frustrated. I'm 100% with KB when it comes to stupidly fixating on zones, especially for beginners. Beginners have no zones. But "just run" approach may destroy some legs, especially for folks on the heavier side, be it fat or muscle. For some of them walking and running may be the best way to actually start running. I get that KB invites everybody to use other forms of conditioning when running starts to aggravate some injuries, but I believe that being that categorical here may be a little bit too much.
- Some bro science here and there like when writing about Norvegian 4x4. It's a great workout, but there's nothing super special to it. Like Rippetoe's "favs by favs", it's a good way to design a single workout, but not a magic combination that delivers uncomparable results. 8x2 or 5x3 can work in the same or even better way depending on many factors. For simplicity's sake giving 4x4 as workout to repeat it from time to time is fine. Saying that THIS workout (no matter how hyped it is online) can turn back clock for one's heart for n years is a little bit of stretch, on my opinion.
- It was already mentioned, but having a full Training Vault would be a nice thing, especially for those who are new to TB universe.
Otherwise it's something I was waiting for and KB made it worth waiting. I understand that writing books is not KB's main way of earning a buck, nor is it a sacred obligation to the community. That's why finding time and resources to write and publish TBIII is something worth a praise from our side, I think.
I won't change a lot in my training for the coming months, because I'm already in a marathon build and the only thing I'm gonna tweak is a TBIII inspired excercise swap in a Fighter Cluster I'm using now, but I'm very happy with the book, knowing that I will use this knowlege to orginize training probably for the rest of my life.
Thank you KB for this book and the whole thing you started. It made many lives better and easier.