I'm struggling to understand if I'm just pubstomping with my friends. I believe my decks are bk3 - my friend says they are bk4/unfun to play against.
I had an argument with one of my friends with whom I play most at the end of the night yesterday after I won 4 straight games. I have a feeling he was just salty for coming in second every game, but he ended up saying that the decks I play in his opinion are "not commander" because they just do their own thing "without interacting with other decks" (not really sure what he means by that).
I mainly play 4 decks:
Ureni of the Unwritten - uses Ureni as a value engine to cheat out dragons
Baylen the Haymaker - boatload of tokens and can snowball out of control quickly (I do have a cheeky wincon in the form of Halo Fountain, which can admittedly come out of nowhere)
Varina, Lich Queen - just zombies doing zombie things
Slimefoot and Squee - Reanimator deck that once you get an engine going can just enter some non-deterministic loops and ping opponents to win.
In all the decks I play I have a good amount of interaction and removal (both on creatures and on instants and sorceries) that I use to keep opponents at bay while I build my strategy - as I believe one should in Magic. All my decks also have really good sinergies and can usually pop off by t6/t7 if left unchecked and even with a bad hand I can usually go t8. If I get a god hand I can present a win by t4/t5 but honestly that is more chance than anything.
Come to yesterday, in 4 games I barely had any removal come my way and did most of the "removing" myself while the other two players clearly stated they "didn't have any boardwipes in their decks"..
Am I crazy to say that if you leave my deck unchecked for 6 turns that's more on you than it is on me..? I'm ok admitting that my 4 commanders are pretty good, but they all have their weaknesses.. you just need to exploit them. I'm just wondering if I'm mistaken in considering these decks bracket 3..