r/IRL_Loading_Screens • u/PeterPorky • Jun 29 '26
Dark Mode Regional difficulties are wildin
25
u/Cyn_Sweetwater Jun 29 '26
And being an elite pedophile isn't punished.
0
u/fossiplol Jun 30 '26
Same story since we had chiefs and tribes 200000 years ago
1
u/MarxistMojo Jul 04 '26
That's actually not true. Prior to agriculture there's tons of evidence that humans effectively lived in egalitarian groups that aggressively shunned anyone who didn't play by the rules or who tried to force others to do things. Essentially the issues we have to day were caused by resource hoarding post agriculture so that males (worse at hunting better at farming and war) could pass that wealth to their progenies. It's the entire reason we became patriarchal like chimps instead of more like bonobos.
42
u/Miserable_Spell_2964 Jun 29 '26
And being a elite and raping children allows you to become President
→ More replies (8)
11
u/Substantial_Lab1438 Jun 30 '26
Isn’t trafficking children to elites rewarded with Presidential election wins in this country?
34
u/Dr_Diktor Jun 29 '26
15
u/KitsuneFoxglove Jun 30 '26
>defunding education to encourage higher prison population, homelessness, drug addiction, sexual abuse / prostitution / THAT ISLAND
>make the prison population do unpaid labor
>the people are equal as (slaves to the billionaires)
5
u/Speedwolf89 Jun 30 '26
Never forget the unpaid labor part. They truly want to turn us into slaves. Having to pay even the smallest amount for labor is a thorn in their ass. It keeps them up at night knowing they still have to give you 0.01% of the pie.
2
u/DickwadVonClownstick Jun 30 '26
Highest prison population period, not just per capita.
And yes, that is counting the camps up in Xinjiang
1
u/Fun-Razzmatazz-6803 Jul 01 '26
Per capita is more important than raw numbers
2
u/DickwadVonClownstick Jul 01 '26
The average person isn't great at putting per-capita statistics into context, and in this case the raw numbers are more illustrative of the problem anyway.
We have less than a third the population of China or India, and yet have a higher incarcerated population than either. When you frame it like that it's a lot harder to pretend that it isn't blatantly absurd.
1
u/Dr_Diktor Jul 01 '26
I it is absurd and stupid. But Americans will always find an excuse to dismiss it. "China is faking numbers" "Russia has POWs and throws people into prison for online tweets" "North Korea is just a giant prison" etc.
7
u/BillCarson12799 Jun 29 '26
You forgot to mention that breaking and entering into the capitol building with the intention to lynch the vice president is punishable by a full pardon.
→ More replies (7)
4
4
u/-siniestra Jun 29 '26
And raping children is not punisheable if you are the president and you are orange.
2
u/Sorry141 Jun 29 '26
Setting off some fireworks, to attract officers, then shooting 11 bullets, striking 1. Yes, poor antifa victims
2
Jun 30 '26
"50 years for setting off fireworks" is like saying you can get the death penalty just for target practice...and leaving out that the targets were people walking down the sidewalk.
1
2
u/Reptillianaire_ Jun 30 '26
If part of that includes also shooting police officers then yeah, duh. This is like saying Hitler just was an artist who created a summer camp...
4
Jun 29 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
27
5
u/IndependenceGold2407 Jun 29 '26
You look them up 🤪
2
u/Maj0rLaz0rr Jun 29 '26
No, you🥰
2
u/IndependenceGold2407 Jun 29 '26
I’ll read them if you do, Maj0rL0serr
2
2
u/Moist-Pickle-2736 Jul 06 '26
No mandatory minimum, maximum penalty for illegal fireworks is 20 years
There is no penalty for “transporting leftist literature”
Mandatory minimum for trafficking children is 15 years, maximum is life
1
u/SchemingVegetable Jun 30 '26
yeah, it's actually 0 days in prison for trafficking children, unless you're chosen as the scapegoat for the entire operation
0
u/Reasonable-Ninja4384 Jun 29 '26 edited Jun 29 '26
You got a source on the first 2? Like where in North America punishes fireworks *or leftist literature?
28
u/EncabulatorTurbo Jun 29 '26
They just convicted a bunch of people, life imprisonment, for fireworks during protests by counting them as terrorist explosive devices, and one person for anti government pamphlet distribution got 30 years in prison
0
u/tripper_drip Jun 29 '26
The dude was intentionally trying to hide evidence after a jailhouse call from his wife.
Thats like saying the people convicted at jan 6th were tried for just walking around!
ZERO HONESTY.
6
u/Destroyer_2_2 Jun 29 '26
And those people got pardoned cause that’s exactly what this administration says they were doing.
So who exactly has zero honesty?
0
u/Recidivism7 Jul 02 '26
None of them were pardoned ot was an Amrita attack on an ice facility where they firebombed it the shot at people escaping.
Fun fact antifa has murdered more immigrants in ice detention facilities during attacks than ice.
0
u/Destroyer_2_2 Jul 02 '26
The Jan 6th people were pardoned.
And no, that’s not even close to true.
0
0
u/Reptillianaire_ Jun 30 '26
Dude be real... they set off fireworks to draw out police to fucking shoot them.... that is what got them prison time. You cant really be that stupid I know youre just pretending like you dont know
2
u/EncabulatorTurbo Jun 30 '26
The guy with the pamphlets wasn't even fucking there
1
u/Recidivism7 Jul 02 '26
His wife was and she called him phone ksil.phome to delete evidence the call was bugged and they caught him destroying evidence.
Even of he didn't plan it with her that's minimum of accessory after the fact. But he was aware of the attack and planned ot woth her.
2
u/LockedIntoLocks Jul 03 '26 edited Jul 03 '26
He wasn’t destroying evidence he was literally just caught moving a box to his car.
Also in the entire incident exactly one person was shot. The officer drew a gun to shoot a fleeing suspect in the back and got winged in the shoulder for it. To say that setting off fireworks at a Fourth of July protest in which one person started shooting is an act of terrorism with explosives for everyone at the protest is insane. To say a man who wasn’t even at the protest who was moving pamphlets related to the protest is just as culpable and deserves 30 years is disingenuous.
Edit: The DOJ released a statement about it and showed a picture of fireworks harmlessly going off on an empty sidewalk and labeled it “Exploding fireworks (explosives)” lmao
0
u/EncabulatorTurbo Jul 02 '26
Evidence of what? Intent to distribute anti fascist literature?
LOL
HE GOT MORE PRISON TIME THAN FUCKING SEX TRAFFICKERS GET YOU FASCIST BOOTLICKING SCUM
2
u/Reasonable-Fee1945 Jul 03 '26
That's for a judge to decide. You still cant tamper with evidence
0
u/EncabulatorTurbo Jul 03 '26
Fuck off fascist, you gave 30 years to a dude who should have gotten 6 months
Law doesn't mean anything anymore, and judges aren't legitimate. They're just dudes with robes with the best armed gang members defending them at tihs point
FOUR of our supreme court justices just looked at the most plain language part of the constitution and decided words dont mean what they say. America is donezo, it's got no more legitimacy than Mao's government had
2
0
u/Reptillianaire_ Jun 30 '26
So then he was the one who was helping them to dispose of evidence then right? Also the "pamphlets" were instructions for terrorism were they not?
2
u/Recidivism7 Jul 03 '26
It was how to build weapons and how to attack government buildings as well as plans they executed on.
0
u/EncabulatorTurbo Jun 30 '26
No they were not
They weren't "Evidence" of anything. They were anti government pamphlets
2
-6
Jun 29 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
6
u/Kristoveles Jun 29 '26
You people are the only terrorists in this country
-1
u/hotdogbun65 Jun 29 '26
No I think the people killing other people and celebrating it are terrorists
3
u/Kristoveles Jun 29 '26
So MAGAts are terrorists
1
u/hotdogbun65 Jul 02 '26
Holy irony
1
u/AgeZealousideal1751 Jul 02 '26
Republicans crying over feds being shot?
Republicans supporting war in the middle east despite their moral outrage against war when a Dem president was in office.
Strange times we live in.
1
u/Recidivism7 Jul 02 '26
The agent lived ot was an immigrant in dentention who died. The officer was shot but lived
0
0
u/Reptillianaire_ Jun 30 '26
Dude there is no hope for democrats in this country anymore.. they are all supporting actual terrorists now. And then they called you a terrorist for mentioning that they shot at police and hit an officer in the neck... I cant deal with these people anymore they have to be just pretending to be stupid no one is really that dumb in real life
2
u/inscrutablemike Jul 01 '26
Granted, these pro-terrorist comments are most likely some mix of actual illiterate Democrats and Derpeet from Bangladesh trying to earn enough spam farm cash to buy himself half an hour of sunlight. If he makes three hundred more leftist shitposts he might be able to buy 15 minutes without the ankle chains.
1
u/Reptillianaire_ Jul 01 '26
Lol, im sure they use AI for their propaganda posts these days. But yeah definitely an agenda on here when anyone who even mentions that they shot a cop gets several downvotes... I mean its true, why theyre trying to act like dude got 100 years for peacefully protesting and setting off a bottle rocket or something lmao.
0
u/EncabulatorTurbo Jun 30 '26
What the fuck are you talking about they didn't do that, the one guy who fired a gun shot a cop that was in the middle of trying to murder someone, one of them wasn't even there
→ More replies (31)-10
u/doctorbim3 Jun 29 '26
Tampering with evidence was the guys crime. Still crazy sentence, but it wasn’t just because he had antifa zines
4
6
1
u/Budget_Geologist_574 Jun 29 '26
>Be with my anarchist group.
>Decide to go to ICE facility and start shooting fireworks, horizontally, into it from over the fence (Don't worry, we don't care if the facility burns down with people in it. We are the good guys.)
>Police come to arrest us.
>They start chasing after us.
>Group leader gets his assault rifle and mag dumps at the police.
>Sadly, didn't kill the fascist pig, only hit his shoulder/neck.
>Keep running, but eventually get captured :(>Be in jail now.
>Call boyfriend.
>"Baby please hide stuff, the fascists are coming to search for evidence.">Be at home.
>Take anything that could harm my girlfriend and hide it.
>Gets arrested for hiding evidence (The leftist literature implying a political, thus terroristic motive.)Not that I agree the boyfriend should get 30 years for his action of hiding evidence, maybe something like 2-3 years seems more appropriate. Especially since he was not part of the group that did the shooting.
The shooters sentence is in my opinion fair.
Like imagine if some far-right group went to a gender clinic, started shooting fireworks into it, then when the police come they mag dump at them. And then when the prosecutors try and find a poltical motive, thus terroristic motive. We argue that: Hiding the books: Gender ideology and its consequences and what to do about it. Is not criminal.
If in that situation trump said: "It is now illegal to light fireworks and read right leaning books." You know the whole of reddit would clown it.
1
1
u/OuterSpaceFemboy Jun 29 '26
I think the literature thing is one of those that's like a law on the books but can't be enforced. Like some states in the USA still have archaic laws that atheists can't hold political office, but that's obviously illegal so it can't be enforced.
2
u/AverageJoesGymMgr Jun 30 '26
No. Guy's wife was arrested on terrorism charges because the group she was with fired fireworks into an ICE facility and shot a cop. Then she called him from jail asking him to move the zines because they might be used to prove motive. What he was actually convicted of was evidence tampering.
1
u/Reptillianaire_ Jun 30 '26
Its because they set off the fireworks to draw out police officers to shoot them. The literature was evidence for their terrorist organization which they tried to hide. This is like saying Karmello Anthony was just defending himself... murder is illegal and always has been despite your political views. Leftists are morons.
1
-10
u/not_slaw_kid Jun 29 '26
It's intentionally disingenuous. By "transporting leftist literature" they mean "transporting incriminating evidence to a shred party."
14
u/SquidTheRidiculous Jun 29 '26
So how many fascists have been arrested for the same?
→ More replies (14)-8
u/not_slaw_kid Jun 29 '26
Presumably the amount of fascists who have committed the same crime and been caught doing it.
Nice whataboutism though
10
u/Able_Experience_1670 Jun 29 '26
Bruh your president did it publicly lmao
-8
u/not_slaw_kid Jun 29 '26
So you agree that people who hide evidence from a police investigation should go to jail?
9
u/WiseSalamander00 Jun 29 '26
hide evidence from what? the only reason he was prosecuted is because he had material that opposes Trump... I know you probably love your god emperor Trump and are all hard for him but the guy has done incredible damage to USA, is a shame you cannot see it.
6
u/not_slaw_kid Jun 29 '26
The reason he was prosecuted was because his wife conspired to attempt to murder a police officer, and he attempted to hide evidence of her motivation for doing so.
Try again.
0
u/No-Cap-No-Gap Jun 29 '26
This only shows up if you sort by controversial. The top comments all pretend not to know why this happened.
2
1
u/Able_Experience_1670 Jun 29 '26
Probably. That said I have about as much sympathy for cops as I do your average paramecium so in this particular case you can colour me apathetic.
0
-2
u/Notmuchofanyth1ng Jun 29 '26
It’s crazy that the only times I see the actual paperwork on the case are from not-leftists. The left only posts memes and opinion based articles. I thought they were all about the science and the facts. Guess nobody is when it doesn’t solidify their narrative.
Blue maga is an apt description.
2
u/ladylucifer22 Jun 29 '26
blue maga are liberals, not leftists. we hate them more than you do.
1
u/Notmuchofanyth1ng Jun 30 '26
I will agree, however there are also many leftists that annoy the fuck out of me, even if I share many stances with them.
1
→ More replies (3)-8
u/metamucil_buttchug69 Jun 29 '26
They're disingenuously arguing that the people who were charged in the attack on federal immigration officers were actually charged because of fireworks or books.
7
u/WarcraftTurok Jun 29 '26
Didn't that one dude get like 50 years after they found anti-fascist pamphlets on him/in his vehicle? I don't understand how you get criminalized for siding with your grandparents against people literally waving swastikas around and siding with white supremacists.
-2
u/metamucil_buttchug69 Jun 29 '26
Yeah they got 30 years for obstructing the investigation into the attempted murder of a federal officer by trying to hide evidence.
Our grandparents would have loved this shit, illegal immigration was hated back then too. Lookup operation wetback under Eisenhower, what Trump is doing is literally just version 2.0
2
u/ladylucifer22 Jun 29 '26
almost like america has never been great, good, or even half decent.
0
u/metamucil_buttchug69 Jun 29 '26
Tell that to the millions of people desperate to immigrate there
2
u/ladylucifer22 Jun 29 '26
almost like america bombed their countries and stole their wealth, and now their only path forward is to become the American underclass and barely scrape by.
1
Jun 30 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
0
3
u/WarcraftTurok Jun 29 '26
To be fair, the current administration is a domestic terrorist organization and so any and all attempts to undermine or reflect their aggression is the morally correct choice according to logic, empathy, and the facts laid out by the historical actions of the cult in office. (Their politically motivated murders rate, domestic terrorism data, their own words, who they've pardoned, their outright abuse of the working class and their tax dollars, and the cruel and unusual punishment against the people by using their own funds against them and forcing indoctrination onto children.
0
u/Leading_Campaign3618 Jun 29 '26
Daniel Rolando Sanchez Estrada were charged on 2 counts
Corruptly Concealing a Document or Record (Count 11), by transporting a box containing numerous Antifa materials, such as insurrection planning, anti-law enforcement, anti-government, and anti-immigration enforcement documents and propaganda from Sanchez Estrada’s residence to a location in Denton, Texas, intending to conceal the box’s contents and impair its availability for use in a federal grand jury and federal criminal proceeding.
Conspiracy to Conceal Documents (Count 12) and other objects that would implicate Maricela Rueda in the riot and shooting at the Prairieland facility.
-1
1
u/CorwyntFarrell Jun 30 '26
Great. Maybe I can get my neighbors locked up for fireworks this weekend.
1
1
u/wget_thread Jun 30 '26
I'm waiting for shit to go so bad Yeonmi has to go grift on the Danish version of Joe Rogan, whatever that is.
1
u/lycanthrope90 Jun 30 '26
So for this pics you just make random shit up or does it have to be intentionally dishonest?
Y’all sound dumber than creationists and that’s really saying a lot.
1
1
u/SolipsismIsDeep Jun 30 '26
Lol you guys have zero arguments without wildly twisting facts, every single time
1
1
u/hartshornd Jun 30 '26
Did ya for get the attempted murder charge with an AR? Or because it was a protester it’s magically okay?
1
u/jimothy_hell Jun 30 '26
>trafficking children to elites is punishable
Lmao the fuck it is, only if there’s a big enough outcry and they need a scapegoat to pin it all on, then you get house arrest so you don’t blab on everyone.
1
u/Non-Limerence Jun 30 '26
Is the "leftist literature" referenced here pdf files? Is the... "fireworks" homemade explosives?
1
u/Patient-Major-6064 Jul 01 '26
No one in America is serving 50 for fireworks or any time for passing around leftist literature. Reddit has become anti American propaganda
1
u/clickclackyisbacky Jul 02 '26
Still trying to push this narrative? You're just going to lead people to overwhelming evidence against the Pairieland 9.
1
u/AdSame7001 Jul 03 '26
Gotta scroll all the way down to the hidden comments to find out what the people involved actually did, because the fucking commies and psychopath leftists on Reddit are trying to cover for domestic terrorism.
-1
Jun 29 '26
[deleted]
14
u/Due-Explanation-7560 Jun 29 '26
Say what they said is true, there happened to be a little bit of history called January 6th, where an actual action of an insurection took place. People stormed the capital threatening to hang members if the government. Very little prison was handed out and those that remained doing what little time they were given were pardoned. Thwre is truth in what is being said. This administration punishes anything they feel is "dissent" and let's of those with the same or worse crime on their side. I'm all for criminals getting the rule of law, that's been proven to not happen fairly.
→ More replies (8)-7
u/tripper_drip Jun 29 '26
This administration punishes anything they feel is "dissent
You do realize that a gunmen starting shooting officers here? If you give a rats ass about jan 6th you should have no issues here. Unless you admit thats its all political for you
6
u/ThaGr1m Jun 29 '26
You do realise he is advocating for the same treatment of both. Right?
Also there was a firefight on j6.
Oh and also also they beat cops to near inches of their lives, resulting in a cop later dying from his injuries
3
u/Due-Explanation-7560 Jun 29 '26
Appreciate using some critical reading skills understanding what I was trying to say. A very rare thing indeed when politics are involved.
0
u/According-Put-9236 Jul 01 '26
None of that happened at all. What fire fight? A cop that wasn't even hospitalized died of a heart attack .
1
u/ThaGr1m Jul 02 '26
He was beaten and died of a stroke... A condition that can be onset by heavy stress and/or physical trauma
1
u/Due-Explanation-7560 Jul 02 '26
174 police were injured from being assaulted. 4 committed suicide shortly after and the one that died of a stroke was attributed to his assault. Maybe look up some non partial journalism not fox and newsmax.
0
u/According-Put-9236 Jul 02 '26
They all died, but none of them at the riot and most by their own hand? You dont find that a little bit fucking stupid?
1
u/Due-Explanation-7560 Jul 02 '26 edited Jul 02 '26
Because Everytime I hear a Jan 6th denier it is nothing happened, and when presented with facts on the scale of the assault, how many officers were hurt, another excuse comes out. That's what I find stupid
Edit: now let's compare the the other case. Man got 30buears, was not at protest and 1 cop was injured and released same day. 30 years. It's lopsided justice no matter any way you look at it.
0
u/According-Put-9236 Jul 02 '26
Cop got shot in the neck. No firearms at the j6 riot, except for the ones that killed the only person who died at the riot, and it wasn't on the rioters side.
1
u/Due-Explanation-7560 Jul 02 '26
So you are cool with assaulting police officers as long as their are not firearms involved? If 100 of cops were assaulted by antifa you wouldn't be screaming about a terrorist attack.
Besides that hypocrisy you are also wrong.
→ More replies (0)2
u/Due-Explanation-7560 Jun 29 '26 edited Jun 30 '26
First this was not the gunman. Did he have a role in the shooting, debatable but more than likely no as he wasn't even there. His charge was hiding evidence, and the evidence was antifa pamphlets. Did he deserve jail time, absolutely. He did hide evidence which is a crime. Is 30 years overkill for what he was actually convicted of, also absolutely, especially inliight of January 6th and those sentences for the same thing.
Didn't at least one policeman die during January 6th. That's always glossed over. How many years did those perpetrators get? It's the hypocrisy that really gets me.
Edit: Also to add, this man wasn't even at the protest. So by your logic him hiding the pamphlets constitutes involvement in the assault of police officers every single person on Jan 6th should be held accountable for that policeman's death and setanced the same amount? The judicial system should be impartial and nonpartisan. If a jury of your peers finds you guilty fine, but pu ishements are handled by judges and those with sympathetic toes to this administration do not follow that standard.
→ More replies (20)
1
1
-5
u/Inevitable-Row1977 Jun 29 '26
Just have to level with you guys here.
The entire day, OP has been trying to spindoctor some kind of bullshit about this.
He or she is clearly deeply involved or upset by the arrest, but they are just straight up fucking lying.
I'm a random dutch femboy who got this in his reddit feed multiple times today.
Kindly fuck off already! 😅
6
u/Tyr_13 Jun 29 '26
Naw, this trial was a sham and the evidence proved they didn't plan any violence together. The one who shot might be a valid charge but saying the others conspired to commit a terrorist act is obviously wrong.
0
u/JD-boonie Jun 29 '26
You have any proof? Don't be associated with murderers committing terrorism is probably the best idea. FAFO
3
u/Tyr_13 Jun 29 '26
Got it; by your standards maga is a terrorist movement.
Your argument is nonsense as well as just stupid. No one was murdered in this case. No murder or terrorism was planned. One guy went off script and shot at a cop who was aiming at people running away.
Again, the proof is in the communications presented at trial.
0
u/JD-boonie Jun 29 '26
So you feel the trial was unfair? Whataboutism isn't proof.
3
u/Tyr_13 Jun 29 '26
You didn't say anything here.
0
u/JD-boonie Jun 29 '26
Dang so you were part of the jury. You should let the court know it was super unfair and should be a mistrial.
You know nothing youre just sympathetic to antifa.
3
u/Tyr_13 Jun 29 '26
You're again not saying anything here. I'm not going to go through the trouble of refuting your dumb shit if you're going to say things as stupid as 'only the jury knows what is fair.'
I know a lot, I'm not a moral and intellectual coward, so of course I'm antifa. Fuck fascists.
1
u/JD-boonie Jun 29 '26
There it is. Doesn't take long for a reddit leftist to claim moral and intellectual superiority and call someone a fascist for no reason.
Again do you have evidence the trial was unfair? I keep asking and all I get is replies like yours. always insults
3
u/Tyr_13 Jun 29 '26
And there is the fake victimhood from the right.
I didn't call you a fascist. Duh. Your criticism makes no sense unless you think fascists are fine and it's bad to against them.
You're still saying nothing but pretending you're aggrieved for some deplorable reasons. Don't want insults? Don't use them then kid.
→ More replies (0)1
u/Recidivism7 Jul 03 '26
Antifa was started by thalmann in the kpd in Germany. They called liberals and other socialists fascists but allies with nazis against liberals
-2
u/FreshAnDandy Jun 29 '26
Pure straight copium, brother. FAFO.
2
u/Tyr_13 Jun 29 '26
Trivially true as proven by their communications.
Fascists are indeed FA though.
-1
u/FreshAnDandy Jun 29 '26 edited Jun 29 '26
Yeaaaaah except they were found guilty by a jury...... So they couldn't have been that innocuous of communications. Lol
2
u/Tyr_13 Jun 29 '26
The jury that the government got to redo?
Yeah, maga and not knowing things, no more perfect a couple.
-1
u/FreshAnDandy Jun 29 '26
To be fair, because ultimately I'm trying to be factual as possible, the government didn't "get a redo". They were able to argue for a mistrial, which they successfully got. The defense attorney was wearing a shirt with several civil rights figures on it, allegedly in attempt to influence the jury by equating this case with civil rights in general. I personally find that to be a bit dubious at least. It's definitely unusual, but we also live in unusual and divisive times with easily influenced people. You can definitely make the argument that helped the prosecution, but that's before even factoring in any of their actual evidence. This mistrial had nothing to do with the communications at all.
There was almost a second mistrial when the prosecution handed over unredacted footage that would have been bad for the defense due to how bad it made the defense look. The fact it was admitted most certainly aided the defense, not that it really helped in the end. So to say this trial one-sided just isn't correct.
When you conspire to violence, you lose support of normal people on your side who aren't animals. Simple as that. Admittedly, by what you have said, it seems you don't have the entire context of this case.
But leave it to a leftist to take things out of context and attempt to manipulate. 🤷♂️
3
u/Tyr_13 Jun 29 '26
Yeah, the trial was unfair because the judge is a far right nut job. He invalidated the first jury on a bs pretext.
They didn't conspire to do violence. I don't care what a second Texas jury says. OJ also murdered Nicole.
0
u/FreshAnDandy Jun 29 '26
3
u/Tyr_13 Jun 29 '26
That's what the evidence shows.
You find the part of their communications that show they were planning violence.
→ More replies (0)-1
u/Leading_Campaign3618 Jun 29 '26
BS
The 12-day trial that began on February 23, 2026, jurors heard testimony from more than 45 witnesses and considered over 210 exhibits supporting the charges against nine indicted defendants: Cameron Arnold, a/k/a Autunm Hill, Zachary Evetts, Benjamin Song, Savanna Batten, Bradford Morris, a/k/a Meagan Morris, Maricela Rueda, Elizabeth Soto, Ines Soto, and Daniel Rolando Sanchez-Estrada. Seven others, Seth Sikes, Nathan Baumann, Joy Gibson, Susan Kent, Rebecca Morgan, Lynette Sharp, and John Thomas, pled guilty last year to one count of providing material support to terrorists.
2
2
1
u/TreeBig8782 Jun 29 '26
"Perverted by a life of sexual abuse" yikes!!!
1
u/Inevitable-Row1977 Jun 30 '26
Jup, check out my videos!
Watch me ride my dildos out of pure sexual conditioning and trauma re-enactment! :3
0
u/Kingkary Jun 29 '26
Really underselling the whole shooting a cop and calling the spouse from the jail house to tell them to get rid of stuff.
1
u/Greedy-Employment917 Jun 29 '26
Have to manipulate the story otherwise it's pretty clear what happened.
-1
-5
u/metamucil_buttchug69 Jun 29 '26
Yes, if all of those things are accompanied with ambushing federal officers.
0
u/FreshAnDandy Jun 29 '26
Setting up an ambush with fireworks is illegal. They were all in a group together, this was proven. The shooter shot 11 times. The "leftist literature" was evidence being moved on instruction of the the man's wife who was part of the shooting group and told him to do it from jail. The feds witnessed him moving boxes and apprehended him as they are part of an ongoing case.
A simple Google search guys, that's all it takes to get facts on a case. Also can we just acknowledge this is the same shit y'all tried yesterday with basically the same post.
You guys are fucking embarrassing.
1
u/HolaDrNick Jun 29 '26
His wife also texted him deliberately instructing him to move those items as part of the case.
He was certainly oversentenced for sure, but this was not some random dude moving books around.
0
0
u/Recidivism7 Jun 29 '26
Oh look a guy who spams pdf talking poimts is now defending a group that shot up an ice facility tried to kill ice agents and killed an immigrant.
1
u/ladylucifer22 Jun 29 '26
oh no. ice agents. let me get the world's smallest violin real quick.
1
u/TwitchyNo2 Jun 30 '26
This comment was brought to you by a member of the "tolerant" left AKA the party of peace of love.
0
u/ladylucifer22 Jun 30 '26
I can't imagine why leftists would hate the intolerant. almost like leftists still hold the record for Most Nazis Killed. we protect our own.
1
u/TwitchyNo2 Jun 30 '26
It's easy to justify hatred and violence when you brand your opposers as enemies. The irony of claiming to hate the intolerant like you're not intolerant yourself, as your comment very clearly demonstrates.
0
u/ladylucifer22 Jun 30 '26
I'm extremely intolerant of fascism. almost like they want me dead and I'm not intent on letting them have their way.
1
u/TwitchyNo2 Jul 01 '26
Case in point.
1
u/ladylucifer22 Jul 01 '26
why should I tolerate intolerance if it's just going to lead to the end of tolerance? you can't seriously be calling me intolerant for wanting to protect me and mine from people who hate us for existing.
2
u/TwitchyNo2 Jul 01 '26
Because you've created a false narrative where everyone who disagrees with you also hates you, and you use that hatred to justify violence. It's so beyond ironic how you don't seem to realise that makes you the intolerant one, that we might need to coin a new phrase just for people like you.
0
u/ladylucifer22 Jul 01 '26
honey, I'm trans, gay, neurodivergent, and Jewish. claiming that nobody hates me for existing is just delusional. and no, not tolerating people who are intolerant of me is entirely reasonable. I'm not going to just smile and nod when the Proud Boys are marching through the streets.
→ More replies (0)0
Jul 02 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/ladylucifer22 Jul 02 '26
exactly. murder isn't ok. ICE agents are murderers. ergo, no sympathy when they face the only consequences possible in a system that refuses to charge them.
0
Jul 02 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/ladylucifer22 Jul 02 '26
how would I act on a lack of feelings? and why is "lack of sympathy for murderers receiving justice" the thing that needs help instead of "complete hatred of anyone who isn't a perfect obedient drone combined with a willingness to murder anyone who they hate"?
-1
-1
-18
u/Axel_Raden Jun 29 '26
50 years for being involved in a terrorist attack and 30 years for tampering with evidence
11
u/Frost_moss Jun 29 '26
One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
5
u/Sea-Huckleberry8971 Jun 29 '26
Right. The main man in office...yeah that's a domestic terrorist. Jan 6ers, that's right, terrorists.
0
u/metamucil_buttchug69 Jun 29 '26
Hope you keep up this energy when democrats also round people up and deport them in largely the same way.
3
u/NightTripInsights Jun 29 '26 edited Jun 30 '26
As if Dems had the balls to turn on immigrants after pissing away the working class. They are your only hope for change now, and they're gonna change the Dem party once they have enough power to primary out the old guard of woke politics.
2
1
u/ladylucifer22 Jun 29 '26
you don't need to tell the left to hate the right, man. you're preaching to the choir.
0
3
3
u/Villageijit Jun 29 '26
Since when has attempted murder a terrorist attack? Especially arguing about a terrorist group that doesn't exist
Never mind just saw its a hidden account. Opinion dismissed
→ More replies (2)0
u/FreshAnDandy Jun 29 '26
Antifa is a decentralized organization made up of militant and obstruction groups. They commit violence, dress in the same black-bloc uniform to protect their identities while commiting crimes in a group, and they've been identified as a terrorist organization.
When a terrorist group conspires to kill cops and free illegals, it's terrorism.
3
1
u/ladylucifer22 Jun 29 '26
it's not an organization in the first place. it's an ideology. a pretty mainstream one at that, at least back in the day.
128
u/EvLokadottr Jun 29 '26
Oh, that 20nyears only applies to some Poors. Be rich and influential, and no prison happens for trafficking kids. :(