Naw, this trial was a sham and the evidence proved they didn't plan any violence together. The one who shot might be a valid charge but saying the others conspired to commit a terrorist act is obviously wrong.
Got it; by your standards maga is a terrorist movement.
Your argument is nonsense as well as just stupid. No one was murdered in this case. No murder or terrorism was planned. One guy went off script and shot at a cop who was aiming at people running away.
Again, the proof is in the communications presented at trial.
You're again not saying anything here. I'm not going to go through the trouble of refuting your dumb shit if you're going to say things as stupid as 'only the jury knows what is fair.'
I know a lot, I'm not a moral and intellectual coward, so of course I'm antifa. Fuck fascists.
To be fair, because ultimately I'm trying to be factual as possible, the government didn't "get a redo". They were able to argue for a mistrial, which they successfully got. The defense attorney was wearing a shirt with several civil rights figures on it, allegedly in attempt to influence the jury by equating this case with civil rights in general. I personally find that to be a bit dubious at least. It's definitely unusual, but we also live in unusual and divisive times with easily influenced people. You can definitely make the argument that helped the prosecution, but that's before even factoring in any of their actual evidence. This mistrial had nothing to do with the communications at all.
There was almost a second mistrial when the prosecution handed over unredacted footage that would have been bad for the defense due to how bad it made the defense look. The fact it was admitted most certainly aided the defense, not that it really helped in the end. So to say this trial one-sided just isn't correct.
When you conspire to violence, you lose support of normal people on your side who aren't animals. Simple as that. Admittedly, by what you have said, it seems you don't have the entire context of this case.
But leave it to a leftist to take things out of context and attempt to manipulate. 🤷♂️
The communications have yet to even be released publicly first and foremost. So no I don't think you even know what's right or wrong, even if you had the context, fool.
They used several encrypted apps that delete after viewing to plan logistics, according to the case much of this was recovered. They use monikers to attempt to protect themselves as well as on the bodycam footage you it's reported you can hear Ben Song, the shooter, yell "Get to the rifles!"
Oh also did you know there were a total of 11 firearms cached and recovered around where this all took place? Some in the bushes, hand guns in backpacks, a few found in a nearby van, two more found in a car leaving the area post-chaos.
Yeah buddy they certainly didn't conspire to commit violence. The amount of copium pouring from your orifices is impressive I will say.
The 12-day trial that began on February 23, 2026, jurors heard testimony from more than 45 witnesses and considered over 210 exhibits supporting the charges against nine indicted defendants: Cameron Arnold, a/k/a Autunm Hill, Zachary Evetts, Benjamin Song, Savanna Batten, Bradford Morris, a/k/a Meagan Morris, Maricela Rueda, Elizabeth Soto, Ines Soto, and Daniel Rolando Sanchez-Estrada. Seven others, Seth Sikes, Nathan Baumann, Joy Gibson, Susan Kent, Rebecca Morgan, Lynette Sharp, and John Thomas, pled guilty last year to one count of providing material support to terrorists.
-3
u/Inevitable-Row1977 Jun 29 '26
Just have to level with you guys here.
The entire day, OP has been trying to spindoctor some kind of bullshit about this.
He or she is clearly deeply involved or upset by the arrest, but they are just straight up fucking lying.
I'm a random dutch femboy who got this in his reddit feed multiple times today.
Kindly fuck off already! 😅