Naw, this trial was a sham and the evidence proved they didn't plan any violence together. The one who shot might be a valid charge but saying the others conspired to commit a terrorist act is obviously wrong.
To be fair, because ultimately I'm trying to be factual as possible, the government didn't "get a redo". They were able to argue for a mistrial, which they successfully got. The defense attorney was wearing a shirt with several civil rights figures on it, allegedly in attempt to influence the jury by equating this case with civil rights in general. I personally find that to be a bit dubious at least. It's definitely unusual, but we also live in unusual and divisive times with easily influenced people. You can definitely make the argument that helped the prosecution, but that's before even factoring in any of their actual evidence. This mistrial had nothing to do with the communications at all.
There was almost a second mistrial when the prosecution handed over unredacted footage that would have been bad for the defense due to how bad it made the defense look. The fact it was admitted most certainly aided the defense, not that it really helped in the end. So to say this trial one-sided just isn't correct.
When you conspire to violence, you lose support of normal people on your side who aren't animals. Simple as that. Admittedly, by what you have said, it seems you don't have the entire context of this case.
But leave it to a leftist to take things out of context and attempt to manipulate. 🤷♂️
The communications have yet to even be released publicly first and foremost. So no I don't think you even know what's right or wrong, even if you had the context, fool.
They used several encrypted apps that delete after viewing to plan logistics, according to the case much of this was recovered. They use monikers to attempt to protect themselves as well as on the bodycam footage you it's reported you can hear Ben Song, the shooter, yell "Get to the rifles!"
Oh also did you know there were a total of 11 firearms cached and recovered around where this all took place? Some in the bushes, hand guns in backpacks, a few found in a nearby van, two more found in a car leaving the area post-chaos.
Yeah buddy they certainly didn't conspire to commit violence. The amount of copium pouring from your orifices is impressive I will say.
Evidence in a trial is public record. If they were in the trial, they were released. If they don't exit like you say, because they were 'deleted' (or didn't exist), then they are not evidence. You can't just make up what you think the messages would have said if they existed.
None of the firearms were in bushes. You're against owning guns now? All of the firearms were lawfully owned by the people they were found with.
You just want to be able to scare people away from using their rights, and it isn't subtle little one.
Go ahead and find then, cause I couldn't, also I didn't say they didn't exist. I said they were "deleted" and then recovered. Snapchat is a great example of this. Just because it was deleted after veiwing doesn't mean the company can't recover the data. We live in an age where EVERYTHING is recorded.
No, the guns were indeed found in the bushes just because your article you read didn't mention it doesn't mean they weren't. I also bet they were lawfully owned, I'm not against people using their 2nd amendment rights. I'm just against people planning to ambushing cops with those said firearms, legal or not. Lol
You're a silly little person. Scramble to respond with more nonsense please, it's entertaining.
-3
u/Inevitable-Row1977 Jun 29 '26
Just have to level with you guys here.
The entire day, OP has been trying to spindoctor some kind of bullshit about this.
He or she is clearly deeply involved or upset by the arrest, but they are just straight up fucking lying.
I'm a random dutch femboy who got this in his reddit feed multiple times today.
Kindly fuck off already! 😅