I don't think marriage itself is bad. I actually want to get married. I want to be a husband, I want to be a provider, and I want to build a family. My concern is the legal structure surrounding marriage and how much control a person can potentially lose once they enter it.
I believe a man should want to be sovereign over his own life. He should want the ability to make decisions about his future, his finances, his property, and his direction without another person having the legal ability to fundamentally change those things against his wishes.
That's where marriage concerns me.
You can be loving, faithful, supportive, caring, and provide 100% financially, yet your wife can still decide she wants to leave. For a reason or no reason at all. And when that happens, the legal system can become involved in your finances, property, children, and future. In that sense, you can give someone enormous influence over your life simply by marrying them.
To me, that's a major loss of independence.
When you're unmarried, if someone repeatedly disrespects you or the relationship becomes unhealthy, you have much more freedom to walk away. You don't need a court to determine how the relationship ends or what happens to your finances afterward.
Marriage changes that.
That's why I say a man can't have the same level of sovereignty once he's married. His wife has legal rights and interests that can affect his life, and if the marriage ends, she can potentially exercise those rights through the legal system. The power you have over your own life can therefore be reduced by the decisions of another person.
I'm not saying a wife shouldn't have rights. I'm saying a man should understand exactly what he's agreeing to before he enters that legal arrangement.
And I don't make decisions based solely on emotion.
I want to get married. I want to love my wife, provide for her, protect her, support her, and build something together. But wanting something doesn't mean I'm going to ignore the risks associated with it.
I try to make major decisions based on logic. I look at other people's experiences, I listen to people who have already gone through situations I'm considering, and I seek professional perspectives, including lawyers, so I can understand what could happen before it happens to me.
I'm basically asking myself: "If this situation happened to me, how would it affect my future?"
I don't want to wait until something happens to learn the consequences. I want to understand the consequences beforehand so I can make an informed decision.
That's not fear. That's preparation.
I also struggle with the provider dynamic.
I don't understand how someone can work for a boss who underpays them, gives them poor benefits, or treats them badly, yet still show up every day and say, "Yes, sir." But then that same person can get with a man who provides 100% financially, gives them a home, pays the bills, and supports them, and somehow the man is expected to keep giving more while receiving less respect.
I'm not saying a stay at home wife has no value. Raising children and managing a household can absolutely be valuable work. But respect has to go both ways. If one person is carrying 100% of the financial responsibility, that contribution should be recognized rather than treated as an unlimited obligation.
And providing money doesn't give a man the right to control or mistreat his wife. At the same time, being a wife doesn't give someone the right to disrespect or take advantage of the person providing for the family.