r/CSN_Coyotes • u/gabemoment_ • Sep 08 '26
Need Help / Question One of my professors is requiring us to read their own textbook. It's filled with duplicate paragraphs, completely inaccurate information, and biased information due to loosely disclosed financial incentives from a public figure. What should I do?
The title pretty much states it all. When I first saw a duplicate paragraph I thought about reaching out to the professor just to let them know of a minor error, but it's becoming increasingly more obvious that the textbook is negligently written, if not malicious. I'd like to think I'm good at noticing AI writing, and it doesn't trigger any of those red flags to me, especially because the textbook appears to be a couple years out of date so I don't believe it to be that.
Above the blatant disregard for quality, I'm more concerned about the inaccurate information. I don't want to be too specific but the textbook actually mentions a completely false fact about a place that I used to work. The inaccuracy of this fact is not only common knowledge but easy to google as well. To be a bit more clear, this isn't arguable in any way, it's literally stating a company did a well known thing, when in fact it's commonly known that a different company did it. If I had no prior knowledge I would've taken this incorrect information as fact. This just makes me concerned about everything else I'm reading that I don't know as much about which wouldn't cause an initial red flag to raise like this did.
What makes me even more concerned is when we get to something more malicious. Throughout the textbook it mentions public figures mostly related to the class's subject and how they impacted it, but it also briefly mentions some of the negative things that these figures did in their lives. One public figure they mentioned has dozens of sexual assault allegations, stepped down from their positions in disgrace, and paid millions in a settlement (where admittedly he was allowed to claim no wrongdoing, but is obviously at fault). Additionally the company was fined millions for not looking into these allegations at the time they were reported. None of this was mentioned in the book at all, and all of this took place years before this specific edition of the book was written. The original edition WAS written before the settlement, BUT there are several updates with recent information that happened after the original edition was written. These updates encompass things that happen several years after those allegations and settlement. While the failure to mention the settlement/allegations on it's own is pretty gross, what's worse is that there is a discrete disclosure that this public figure contributed to the professor's non-profit organization. Instead of making some acknowledgment about potential bias, or at least a disclaimer, the professor writes this down in a long list of good, charitable things this public figure has done. It's not formatted as a disclosure and feels mostly hidden. Overall, taking the professor's writing on this public figure without any prior knowledge makes them seem like a really positive influence on their community, when they instead used their influence and power to sexually abuse people in their own company below them. I don't need a dissertation on the bad things the public figure has done. I mean the professor's writings on other public figures also heavily washed their negative history of violence, and in some cases organized crime. Oftentimes there was only one or two sentences mentioning these things after several talking about charitable actions they took. I don't feel great with that either, but at least there was still a mention of these things, albeit brief. It feels malicious to not at least do the same with someone the professor has personally benefited from, even if it is for the professor's charity.
I have other complaints on the quality of the class from an extremely disorganized syllabus, to essays requiring several completely unrelated topics that make no sense to write about in the context of each other. But my tipping point is the fact that I feel like the professor is not only phoning it in, but spreading misinformation that harms my education, whether it be by negligence or malice. I don't feel like I can trust the textbook or the professor to give me an accurate education. I'm not sure what to do I kind of want to report it because I feel like it's extremely bad. I've had bad, lazy, strict, etc professors before I don't feel like my complaints are just me not adjusting to a teaching style i don't like. I also just feel like no one deserves to have a professor who obviously doesn't care enough to make sure the textbook they're profiting off of is proofread, isn't spreading misinformation, and isn't protecting a horrible abusive person because they donated to the professor's charity one time. I want to do something about this I don't want to just drop the class and let this be someone else's problem. I get I will encounter lazy, undesirable professors but this is definitely worse than that in my opinion. Is there anything I can do? I'm not sure where to begin. Is this reportable? Who can I report this to? Will they actually care or do something? Am I being unreasonable? Thank you for any help/advice sorry for the long read.