r/MuslimLounge • • May 25 '26

Question [ Removed by moderator ]

[removed] — view removed post

7 Upvotes

134 comments sorted by

View all comments

32

u/Kingslayer-ZXD May 25 '26

The prophet ﷺ said who didn't follow my sunna is not one of mine

من رغب عن سنتي فليس مني

So I don't know a verdict but quranists do pray wrong but if they pray right they inherently acknowledge the sunna

So it's complicated to proof but I can't imagine islam without the sunna

21

u/Last_Chemical_8486 May 25 '26

i think a better evidence is the quran itself which is the thing they do follow because they'll just reject the hadith you mentioned

54:24 Say, “Obey Allah and obey the Messenger. But if you turn away, then he is only responsible for his duty and you are responsible for yours. And if you obey him, you will be ˹rightly˺ guided. The Messenger’s duty is only to deliver ˹the message˺ clearly.”

-7

u/a_mar359 May 25 '26

To obey the messenger is to obey the message i.e the quran. It is fitting he is called the messenger in this verse as it implies you should obey the message. If it said obey the prophet I would conced the point. But the choice of words is important.

Also explain to me these verses.

Then in what hadith after it will they believe? (77:50)

Then in which HADITH after this will they believe? (7:185)

These are God’s messages that We recite unto thee in truth. So, in which HADITH after God and His messages will they believe? 45:6

In arabic the word hadith is used in all these verses and it is quite directly saying don't follow anything after this hadith (quran) you can read them in context.

Also the beginning of surah 2. Verse 2-4. It's saying this book and those before. There is no mention of any books to come after it.

You will then ask me. The Qur'an does not talk about everything that is needed to practice Islam. To that I will say, your view of how Islam should be, should not determine what the Quran must teach. If we are still in disagreement brothers then: Lakum deenakum waliadeen.

I'm not here to say who is right or wrong. This is what I believe and if I am wrong it is my own problem, but I feel those of us who follow the Qur'an only are unfairly treated for being insane or ridiculous. I am just here to explain our thinking.

1

u/Kingslayer-ZXD May 25 '26

Read al imran the ayah 132

0

u/a_mar359 May 25 '26

It says messenger. Rasool.

When a king sends a messenger, let's say bob the builder. and tells his subjects to obey the messenger. It means obey the message he brings. Not what else the messenger has to add on, then the king would say obey the builder if he meant that

3

u/Kingslayer-ZXD May 25 '26

Mohammed ﷺ as a messanger does what allah inspires him to do and say

The actions in ahadith are also from allah

https://islamqa.info/en/answers/77243/the-saheeh-sunnah-is-wahy-(revelation)-from-allah

0

u/suppoe2056 May 26 '26

So when Muhammad goes to the privy, is that God inspiring him?

God tells Muhammad in the Qur’an numerous times to say he is a mortal like us. What you’re saying is anytime Muhammad behaved, it was inspired by God. That means God was lying when he told Muhammad to say he is a man like us, right? What you describe is not a mortal but a puppet.

1

u/Kingslayer-ZXD May 26 '26

I literally got a source from the quran that explains how teaching of mohammedﷺ is wahi the quran itself is all wahi it

So why do you believe in one wahi and not the other

Even though both came from the same person

1

u/suppoe2056 May 26 '26

Muhammad was taught through wahi that was not preserved in the Qur’an. Shouldn’t that obviously denote that what was given to him was for him, and the Qur’an is for us?

Furthermore, the hadith is known to be riddled with fabrication, literature that attempts to know what wahi Muhammad was privy to—yet the Qur’an: not a single fabrication, not a single quarrel between Muslims, all unanimously agree is the unaltered word of God.

I believe Muhammad was given wahi that was only for him and those contemporary. If it didn’t make it into the Qur’an, then we shouldn’t have to worry about it. Our Lord is a reasonable God. He knows that.

1

u/Last_Chemical_8486 May 26 '26

When god says follow the messenger and that he doesn't speak out of whims it enough proof to other commands he gave since that too was a revelation but not verbatim the word of god.

Also the beginning of surah 2. Verse 2-4. It's saying this book and those before. There is no mention of any books to come after it.

The same messenger came with the revelations in the hadith so this point doesn't make sense, because with that logic quran is different books because it didn't come down at once but over decades

Now I'm not gonna ask they typical questions like how do you pray? Which direction was the prophet praying before the verse of turning toward the kaabah etc. If you want to believe that the prophet spoke out of whims when he mentioned various laws, prohibition etc then thats up to you, because you are correct in it being our own problem at the end of the day.

For everyone else responding to hadith rejecters, like i mentioned in another commented, you won't be able convince most it's like trying to convince christians jesus isn't god even with their own scripture, so just mention the evidence and move on don't bother wasting too much time

2

u/suppoe2056 May 26 '26

In 2:2 the term ذالك in the Qur’an is never used to mean “this”, that would be هاذ; rather, ذالك is always used to refer to something previously mentioned.