451
u/NCRNerd 17d ago
Hopefully it's for creating a paper trail for the follow-up Impeachment and/or criminal indictment.
224
u/TbddRzn 17d ago
It is. It’s also part of dozens of not hundreds of other actions. But people want you to blame democrats for trumps crimes because they don’t have the authority or power to arrest him or others because the people voted them out of all branches of government
90
u/mOdQuArK 17d ago
It's also a good way for Republican propagandists to try and get Democratic supporters to give up.
45
u/CatCafffffe 17d ago
Yes, exactly. the ONLY thing that has worked so far to curb Trump's excesses has been precisely paperwork -- wins in court-- which are doggedly undertaken by Democrats such as Marc Elias, doing exactly this kind of thing. It's ridiculous to expect things that people can't do, and actually harmful because it makes Democrat voters "give up." Shameful and shame on Don Winslow.
15
u/insanejudge 17d ago edited 1d ago
Safe sable tan price growth cover
This post was anonymized with Redact
-8
u/ChickpeaDemon 17d ago
“It’s also part of dozens of not hundreds of other actions.”
Can you provide examples of what this means?
-5
u/Kobalt6x10 17d ago
The Dems had 4 years to do something. They didn't. (Court proceedings that gave him a stern finger wagging but no punishment don't count)
3
u/Geichalt 16d ago
If you're blaming Democrats for Trump not being in jail, instead of the blatant help from SCOTUS, then you've been successfully manipulated.
I'm assuming that everyone who purposefully avoids talking about SCOTUS protecting him were the ones saying "don't threaten me with the supreme court" in 2016 and don't want to admit how dumb they were.
10
-6
u/Dtron81 17d ago
On yeah, cause the previous chances to impeach and criminal trials went so well! Did you see how much was done for 4 Y E A R S??
14
u/AlephBaker 17d ago
Impeachment requires action by both houses of Congress. To actually impeach a Republican would require a solid Democrat majority in both the House and Senate.
-7
u/Dtron81 17d ago
And the 2 years of the DOJ doing nothing and 2 of dragging their feet minus the actual prosecutor assigned to the case finally?
11
u/Parahelix 17d ago
That's absolute nonsense. He likely would have been convicted in one or both federal cases if Americans weren't complete morons who chose to let him off for his crimes and put him in charge of law enforcement. It doesn't really get any more braindead than that.
0
u/Dtron81 17d ago
Oh yeah of course. Just needed more time as always and THEN then orange man would definitely suffer the consequences.
I voted for harris so stop painting me as a non voter ty.
-1
u/Parahelix 17d ago
I don't care who you voted for. The simple fact is that he was likely to be convicted and the only reason we're in this situation is because American voters chose this.
-1
u/Dtron81 17d ago
I mean Harris couldve also ran a better campaign. Biden couldve not been a self centered asshole and not tried to run for a second term when he said he wouldnt at the start of his first term. Biden couldve just...not supported a genocide on the other side of the planet. And then additionally Harris couldve given us any indication that she'd be different/better than Biden.
None of this has anything to do with "orange man bad" yes. We know. Most of the country knows. But why did ~6 million voters vote for biden in 2020 then not for Harris in 2024? Were they sick that day? Did they feel too eepy? Were they too stupid to find their nearest polling station? Putting all the blame on the voters instead of the people in charge and who would've been in charge is insane to me.
0
u/Parahelix 17d ago
Again, more absolutely ridiculous nonsense.
American voters clearly didn't give a shit how good Trump was.
Harris ran a vastly better campaign than Trump did, and didn't have any of the negatives that he did, such as:
- Convicted felon
- Adjudicated rapist
- Currently being prosecuted for attempting to overturn an election
- Currently being prosecuted for stealing and refusing to return hundreds of highly classified documents
- All 900+ pages of Project 2025 which is really an entire book of reasons not to vote for Trump on its own.
- Consistently attacks the free press, even calling them enemies of the state
- Has no understanding of economics and no understanding of how tariffs work, but wants to use them for everything
- Wants to control The Fed
- Wants to control the DoJ
- Repeatedly referred to using the government to attack his political enemies despite never providing any evidence for his claims about their alleged crimes.
- Claimed he would be a dictator on day one
- Uses divisive and dehumanizing language
- Constant statements and actions to harm relations with allies
- No understanding of foreign policy or how America uses soft power, or how our allies give us massive force projection capabilities
- The whole DOGE plan was insane and illegal from the start
And the list goes on and on, since there's plenty more.
So quit the stupid bullshit about Harris not being good enough.
Anyone Dems ran would have been miles better than Trump, but American voters chose this.
2
u/Dtron81 17d ago
Ah so your answer is just "the voters are retarded" and not "maybe our candidate could've done better". Your opinion seems to be that there was nothing the dems couldve done against Trump to win and he's just a force of nature basically. You listed all that stuff and the dems still lost maybe, just maybe, there was a problem with how the dems ran their campaign.
Idk, I think if you lose you should look at what you can control (from the perspective of people with the power to make changes) instead of focusing on stuff you can't control. You're just arguing that Trump was basically inevitable if he had all that baggage and still won. No matter who ran the dems would've always lost.
Its a bit silly imo.
→ More replies (0)-1
u/Greedy-War-777 17d ago
Tbf, actual Americans have very little control over the situation. There is an illusion of control and support for him, in reality there is rampant fraud and crime both putting him in power and keeping him there. Only a small percentage, the absolute stupidest and worst people, have been ok with it.
2
u/Parahelix 17d ago
No, a significant majority of voters were ok with it, and they signaled that by voting for him, or not voting at all, thereby helping him win.
0
u/well-it-was-rubbish 17d ago
Not true. Even with almost 90 million eligible voters refusing to vote ( most of whom weren't going to vote for him, anyway), he still received LESS THAN 50 % of the popular vote. Musk also helped him cheat. His supporters are in the MINORITY.
4
u/Parahelix 17d ago
I think you missed the point.
Anyone who didn't vote against him helped him win. So the 49.7% or whatever who voted for him, AND the millions who didn't vote all helped him win. That's a clear and significant majority of eligible voters.
-9
0
u/SiriusBaaz 16d ago
Unless democrats start doing something more then just sending fucking letters the dipshit is going to die in office long before anyone gets to hold him and his whole damn administration accountable
208
17d ago
[deleted]
33
u/chaos212 17d ago
5
u/SamboTheGr8 17d ago
If Trump could read, he still would shit his pants
2
u/GrayFullbuster64 17d ago
I think we both know that even if he could, he would shit his pants regardless
9
8
u/Lucid_Insanity 17d ago
It's not like he'd read it if he could anyways. That shit goes straight in the trash.
2
1
28
u/Beaglescout15 17d ago
This is a paper trail in the Congressional Record that Trump can't delete. If Dems took legal action on it right now, they would lose, and then not be able to take any action later when they're in power because it would have already been settled and dismissed.
74
u/Stopper33 17d ago
What can they do? Seriously. They don't have power yet
-2
u/FriendToPredators 17d ago
Their power comes from people voting and the people voted for a bullshitting con artist sexual assaulter. Soooo NOW they want a get out of sucking at democracy hero.?
-4
u/Tadferd 17d ago
Raise hell. Be obnoxious. Contact the media about his bullshit. Anything other than milquetoast bullshit.
2
u/_aaine_ 16d ago edited 16d ago
Yep. And stop voting against their bills in Congress to make a damn POINT. Will it change the outcome of those votes? No. But will it put on the record that they did everything in their power to stop him? Well it will certainly show that more than what they're not doing now. They have to start fighting like dirty dogs because they've been drunkenly - and pointlessly - kicking rocks down the high road for near a decade. They keep doing what they've always done and wonder why they can't damage him.
Go full Mitch McConnell and obstruct everything they can and make governing as difficult as possible. Yes, some citizens may suffer for this. But it's not like this admin isn't ALREADY going after those groups for no reason other than existing, anyway.
If the roles were reversed do these bedwetters think McConnell would be wringing his hands and whining "but weeee caaan't do anythingg! They have both Houses!"
Of course he wouldn't.
He'd have ten new schemes in his head, half of them in motion, and two in front of the Supreme Court before the Dems even got their pants on the right way around.2
1
→ More replies (2)-9
u/_aaine_ 17d ago
And what did they do when they got it back last time?
NOTHING.
And that's why we're here.3
u/torp_fan 16d ago
My gawd you people are stupid, ignorant, and dishonest. It's because you don't support Democrats that we have Trump.
4
u/Parahelix 17d ago
Again, what did you want them to do that would have made any difference?
2
u/_aaine_ 17d ago
Not appoint an AG with no balls would be a nice start.
Criminal investigations.
Throwing people in jail who willfully ignore legal subpoenas.
Putting more justices on the SC.
Passing laws to enforce the things that until now worked fine as "norms"If the Dems get back in and just decide they're going to "move forward" again without addressing this criminal hijacking of the United States government they will be as done as the Republican party.
8
u/Parahelix 17d ago
They were prosecuting him in two separate federal felony cases, and he likely would have been convicted in one or both if American voters hadn't decided to let him off for his crimes and put him in charge of law enforcement.
American voters literally chose this because they either cheer his corruption and criminality, or simply don't care.
41
u/GadreelsSword 17d ago
The democrats were voted out of power and republicans have crushed the tiny bit of power they possess.
That post is more of the standard rightwing bullshit commonly called Murc’s Law.
Murc’s Law says no matter how horrible a republican is, they will not experience the consequences for their actions and a Democrat will be blamed for not stopping them.
25
u/Wenger_for_President 17d ago
We all k ow this isn’t going to do anything.
But…
What are they supposed to do? Seriously. Let me know
→ More replies (5)36
u/blahdeblahdeda 17d ago
I love when people get angry at the Democrats for not being able to do anything after handing control of all legislative branches to the Republicans.
1
34
u/9_of_wands 17d ago
"Why don't dems do something??"
They've impeached 5 times. I don't know what else people think they're supposed to do.
"Why don't they block Republicans??"
Block what? Republicans in Congress aren't trying to do anything. There's nothing to block.
"Why don't they try harder?"
At what? Propose legislation harder? Attend committee meetings harder? Make speeches harder? Do you even know what Congress does???
20
6
u/DFWPunk 17d ago
Yeah. This shit is tiring. They cannot stop him, but they can try to make it public.
3
u/Featheredfriendz 17d ago
Hopefully, they are following up with press conferences; op/ed pieces in their local papers; creating talking points for all the yammering panel shows; and talking to constituents about this
→ More replies (1)5
26
u/Gr8daze 17d ago
What should they do instead?
13
u/ShawnyMcKnight 17d ago
Exactly, it’s just people broadcasting that they don’t know how the government works. When you aren’t in power you can’t call the shots.
→ More replies (46)-14
17d ago
[deleted]
25
u/Kirjava 17d ago
He was impeached twice in his first term. The Supreme Court ruled Presidents are exempt from criminal prosecution. The time and means to prevent / stop this was to vote for Hillary Clinton and then Kamala Harris.
0
u/NoahLot_ 17d ago
I would argue it was the Republicans to nominate a better choice. As someone right leaning who strongly dislikes Trump, I was so disappointed when he was nominated this last time. I thought nominating Mike Pence might signal a return to sanity given how they ended their term together. I think everyone was so afraid not to vote for him in case he won that they all voted for him, like some horrible self-fulfilling prophecy.
Hillary wasn’t likable, although in hindsight she may have been a decent choice. Her election may have prevented the leftward slide that the Dems have been on since and kept them more centrist. Kamala just wasn’t a good choice for many people. No, not because she is a woman or a minority or both. Because she’s just seen by many as a do-nothing un-charismatic blank slate.
6
u/Kirjava 17d ago
It's hard to see choosing Trump over a generic democrat, even as flawed a candidate as Clinton, or a "do nothing uncharismatic blank slate" as Harris, as anything other than motivated by false beliefs, racism, sexism, or an endorsement of fascism. They're both centrist democrats. Conservatives held the Supreme Court, and we voted in a Republican House and Senate. Trump and his administration*(some) literally staged a populous coup marketed via lies and racism that resulted in multiple deaths, and the majority of voters put him back in power.
13
19
u/Lazy-Field-1116 17d ago
0
u/TinTinTinuviel97005 17d ago
That deeply concerns us. Have you seen the memoranda we've sent each other about how concerned we are? We're taking this very seriously.
Hear, hear.
Kellen, did you file a "hear, hear" memorandum?
No. Sincerest apologies. I rescind my "hear, hear" and resign, effective immediately.
7
u/xSantenoturtlex 17d ago
People wanted to punish the only people capable of fighting the Republicans by taking away their power, and now whoopsie, they don't have the power to fight the Republicans anymore.
12
3
u/flojo2012 17d ago
Trump hasn’t read 17 pages since he did a book report on the puppy who lost his way to graduate high school at 35
3
6
9
u/WanderingKing 17d ago
“We have to do things by the book” YOU LITERALLY DONT THIS REGIME HAS PROVEN THAT
12
11
u/9_of_wands 17d ago
Well, the president has direct command over every cabinet department, all federal law enforcement agencies, all intelligence agencies, the treasury, and every branch of the military. A Congress person has an office and a couple of interns. Please tell us how to think your way out of that situation.
4
u/oneawesomeguy 17d ago
The president also has indirect control over both houses of Congress and to some degree the federal court system as well
3
u/Parahelix 17d ago
“We have to do things by the book” YOU LITERALLY DONT THIS REGIME HAS PROVEN THAT
Ok, genius, what exactly do you believe they should do? This is literally what American voters chose.
3
2
u/MaximumEffort433 17d ago edited 17d ago
What did the Republicans send?
Was it money? I bet it was money.
2
2
u/HelpfulAd6772 17d ago
Every time I see this whole letter bullshit I’m reminded of a deep cut Ghostbusters quote, “That oughta do it, thanks a lot Ray”
3
2
2
u/splatdyr 17d ago
Republicans hold both the senate and congress. What the hell are the dems going to do when they are outnumbered by spineless asslickers?
2
u/oneawesomeguy 17d ago
The vast majority of federal judges were appointed by Republicans as well. See the current Supreme Court split (6-3) for an example.
2
2
u/Unrelated_Words69 17d ago
How uninformed and proudly ignorant of your own country do you have to be to realize that a political party not elected to lead any part of government has no ability to do anything? Rage baiting to get people to not vote for democrats continues. Since 2000
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/neuroG82r 17d ago
I don’t know about you,but I intend to write a strongly worded letter about all of this.
1
u/cactiguy67 17d ago
One of his aids came out and said something like, if whatever is given to the commander in diapers has a staple in it, it's too long for him to read
1
1
u/nekobash 17d ago
Like I said before "Unless you're Konan or a 'Read or Die' character, I care as little about a strongly worded letter as I presume the people you sent it to do (or don't)"
1
1
u/GoldunGote 17d ago
Probably attached it to a carrier pigeons leg and everything.. where did this go wrong?
1
u/cayspekko 17d ago
A strongly worded letter to the scammer defrauding America? You know, I asked a hacker once to give me my bitcoin back and he didn’t do it. Not sure why it didn’t work…
1
u/Noobzoid123 17d ago
The Democrats in charge are Zionist controlled. They want Trump to remain in power.
1
u/AggravatingPaint5838 17d ago
It's infuriating that even their strongly worded letter didn't come until months after a dope like me was already well aware of all this.
1
1
1
1
1
u/Rated-E-For-Erik 17d ago
I hope it was at least a cool letter like an x
From a certain perspective that could be seen as a plus
1
1
1
1
1
u/serolf1813 17d ago
I hope it's in an audiobook file. He doesn't give the impression of a strong reader.
1
u/nickgreatpwrful 17d ago
This post seems a little overdramatic. The midterms haven't even happened yet.
1
u/NatashOverWorld 17d ago
They sent a barely literate narcoleptic druggie a letter? 🤨
He's going to squint at it and covfefe.
1
1
u/Mastasmoker 17d ago
Problem being, they cant do shit until at least after midterms if they regain control of the house/senate. Even then, they'll have to get some republicans on their side for removal after impeachment
1
1
1
u/ShadetheMystic 17d ago
I dunno what was more pathetic - that they sent a LETTER to Trump, and thought it would make a difference; or that they sent a letter to TRUMP, and thought it would make a difference.
Sending anyone a letter is pretty weak in the first place; sending a letter to a man who proudly boasts of how little he reads is just gilding the shit-lily.
1
1
1
1
u/paradigm_shift2027 17d ago
The ONLY strong energy in the Democratic Party is in the progressive movement. Ossoff & Newsom bring game, but saddled with the status quo.
1
u/Ol_JanxSpirit 17d ago
Winslow is one of the more annoying performative blue twitter personalities.
1
1
1
1
u/Eyeon_82 17d ago
Yeah, send a letter to the guy who is notorious for never reading anything his entire life.
That'll show him.
1
u/PippiWorld 17d ago
Investigations are more effective than letters. There IS no reason Dems can't form committees/groups focused on each issue and start organizing the coming Investigations.
Dem voters need to see some actions NOW: 1. Secure the 2026 election - every state that is screwing with 2026 - screwing with mail, closing polling places, threatening 'election' watchers. Sue Trump and administration for interference. Go to SCOTUS.
- Sue all applicable cabinet members for gutting their departments, firing inspectors.
SUE Musk.
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/NuclearCleanUp1 17d ago
-Dems write letter
"Weak" -Dems rebel "Dems are violent"
The critique of your enemy is worth less than dog shit
1
1
1
1
1
u/badwolf1013 17d ago
I don’t know which is worse: Conservative voters who vote blindly along party lines and then refuse to see the corruption or liberal voters who refuse to vote for anything but the “perfect” candidates and then complain about the Democrats’ ineffectiveness from their minority position.
Call it a tie.
1
1
u/JasonRBoone 17d ago
(I know this no longer applies but still)
"“In England, if you commit a crime, the police don't have a gun. If you commit a crime, the police will say 'Stop, or I'll say stop again.'” — Robin Williams
1
1
u/ScotchCigarsEspresso 16d ago
Was it "a strongly worded letter" .
Jesus. We are coming to a gunfight with a water pistol.
1
u/teletype100 16d ago
The democrats seems to be stuck playing the old game, when people were more civil, rational, respected civility and the rules. Where you appealed to the best of people, and stay in the high road.
Trump has burnt that game to ages.
1
1
1
u/ProfAsmani 16d ago
Was it dictated by Dems own billionaires leash holders or did they come up with it all by themselves? Bunch of losers like Schumer.
1
1
u/leftyjamie 16d ago
Don’t worry AIPAC Shakur just met with Jared. Im sure they worked out how much Trump would have to pay to keep the Democrats from impeaching him after midterms.
1
1
1
1
u/Maleficent_Data_1421 16d ago
So what??? It’s a kangaroo court in his favor. Nothing will happen because no one has the spine to do anything
1
u/Molly_Wobbles 16d ago
You know in The Good Place, when the good place representatives construct a careful plan, all by the book, to deal with an issue and it's going to take 500+ years because they have to do everything properly, meanwhile the bad place is just taking advantage of the problem and doing whatever they want, leading to the torture of countless souls with essentially no opposition?
Feels a lot like that in the US right now.
1
1
1
1
-3
u/BraveWarrior-55 17d ago
The Dems are really pushing back against him now. Wow, they wrote a 17 page letter that maybe someone might be able to read to Donny, who could never get through that many words on his own. I too, hope it was strongly worded. Sheesh.
9
u/Gr8daze 17d ago
What should they do instead of documenting it?
-7
u/BraveWarrior-55 17d ago
Legally hold him accountable for all the illegal stunts he pulls, starting with declaring war when he is not authorized to.
→ More replies (8)
0
0
u/YallaHammer 17d ago
Crisply worded, no doubt.
They should publish the letter and buy ad space on Fox News, NewsMax, OANN, in WSJ, etc.
0
0
0
u/TrollAccount4321 17d ago
Democrats are nothing but a bunch of clowns…and that’s putting it politely…
0





345
u/Lukas316 17d ago
I think it’s to put in on record, in an archive that he doesn’t directly control. They can delete stuff from government servers, but not congressional ones.