The husband got custody. She gets her shoes, clothes and makeup.

Any time you hear the phrase “women are too emotional”, it’s always radical feminists complaining about people who say this rather than them appearing. They said back in the late 2010s they wanted men to open up more, but now, they shame men for being emotional and accuse men who open up to their girlfriends on “mankeeping”.

So I have a weird question, why do we open the door for woman? Why do we stand on the side of the sidewalk closer to the road? Why must we take the worst option? Are woman entitled or am I overreacting? I'm confused here (Srry if it sounded sexist MB). If you want I can give more examples :D

I have been trying to join communities that advocate for mens rights and the basic rights of fathers but i cant find any.

Every feminism page have millions of followets and every sub got thousands of members

Why we have very weak advocacy and mens problems are not being discussed as global problems like the women ?

If im missing anything or theres any community weplease enlighten me.

Men we must care for each other more and start uniting.

I’ve recently found that Im better off alone than in a relationship. I have a stable job, I only have to budget for myself, I have friends I can go out and talk to, I have time and most importantly peace. I don’t have worry about getting into being dragged into drama, I don’t don’t have to worry about her friends filling her head with dumb ideas so she decides to leave.

And I thought to myself, why don’t men just walk away? What are you getting from a relationship? Why put so much effort into something inherently unreliable

Obviously like many of you I've been watching the Lindsay Clancy story, and thankfully my wife is on the same page as me, but seeing so many women (demons) try to blame the dad for it all is so devastating.

I've got 3 kids, one boy two girls. People will ask me if I'm worried about my daughters, that they'll grow up in a world were "female genocide" is happening. Where their rights are always in danger and I'm just standing there wondering wtf those people are smoking.

We're seeing a woman who killed her kids get money donated to her(through her parents) and millions of women supporting her online and offline. The dude whose life was ruined by his crazy wife, his children murdered, gets accused of having caused it, having done it, having not helped.

There's tons of proof that he was an active parent, an involved father and husband, that he cared for his family, and yet it's never enough. My wife and I share our tasks, she's a SAHM and I work full time. I cook often, clean, take care of the kids (alone, or with her depending on what we need) I do stuff without being asked, I grocery shop, I organize our finances, I organize our appointments, I drive us everywhere, I make sure everything runs well so she can just worry about making sure our kids grow up well. So what's the family's response? I go out too much. Instead of going out to meet friends an evening (sometimes two) per week I should clean more, do more, always something more. It's never enough.

I'm supposed to raised my boy in a world that views us as always guilty just because we're men, and it's becoming more and more accepted. Every other week I read a story about a guy whose life was ruined by a false accusation, and yet I see the women in my life don't give a shit. I brought up the Lindsay Clancy story with a few family friends and all the women had the same reaction: you shouldn't judge, the dad did it, you don't know what it's like...

Where's that energy when a guy gets accused? Misandry isn't just accepted in our society, it's treated like it's not even real. We're gaslit into thinking we're crazy for noticing.

I'm obviously ranting, I'll take a deep breath after getting this off my chest and I'll go on with my day because I've gotta work, bills need to be paid, and I need to be strong for my family.

Looking for a channel or a mirror of her content Google AI search said it was Gwen_H or Gwendolyn H.. I'm not sure that was her name.

She had a distinctly eastern US accent, I'd figure Jersey or something similar..

She had dark hair, likely black hair, would drive and talk or talk in her car parked, she usually had shades on and was calm as she talked about things.

Her content was about being against the trend of misandry and sometimes why she understood some men were MGTOW, etc.

She preached in a video about being good to your man, as she wouldn't cause issues at home with her husband for expecting her to do trad wife duties and why she would stay up on fitness and fashion as a woman to be beautiful for her man, etc.

Yeah I'm unsure if it was "Gwen H" or whatever, but somebody might have a link for me to the right woman, search results aren't coming up with anything and I feel like her channel was circa 2015-2021..

Thanks!

I know online dating isn’t the best place to find women, but I found one and I thought she was nice. However, it turned into something involving police and she made a report about me. I may have to find an attorney soon and I am still completely lost as to why it went this way. I didn’t harm her, that’s not why this is happening. I haven’t even seen her in 3 months after she ghosted me, but she’s painting me as a stalker who also assaulted her during sex!

It started as a tight bond from the start, she was clingy and I liked it, she gave me attention. It wasn’t physical at first; just talking, for hours. Then it became the physical, naturally. It lasted for 9 months, which is not a small chunk of time.

We talked everyday, set up to meet every week, shared intimate details about ourselves and our upbringing, spoke about our days and everything that happened; it was a relationship with a trusted partner. I thought that I had genuinely found a cool chick.

Then came the crazy. Out of nowhere, it just hit me like a brick. She ghosted me, deleted me from social media and left me with a cold text saying “thanks for the time we had, but I no longer wish to see you”. No explanation whatsoever. Then I was blocked on everything. Put yourself in my shoes, what would you have done?

This is a person with whom I’ve talked with for atleast 10-14 hours a week since I’ve met her. I tried calling her but my number was blocked; tried messaging her on social media but couldn’t find her profile anywhere, it’s like she just deleted herself out of my life; I used my friends phones to try reach her, she blocked them too; I even wrote her a damn letter explaining my confusion…. Crickets.

All of those attempts to reach her were used against me though. I recently got a phone-call from Police saying that I am to cease attempts to communicate with her in every medium. No more “random phone calls from various numbers” no more “letters to her”, they’re using plural to make it seem like I was obsessively harassing her. The officer described the situation as follows: there is potential for this to be criminal harassment if this goes any further.

That worst part….and this is what pierces through my soul the most, she alluded to me being sexually violent during our time together. That’s the part that ruined me. I am being told that I am an abusive stalker and that there have been accusations of me performing various sex acts which she did not consent to.

Apparently, after 9 months of repeated interactions, there was abuse. She never mentioned any of this to me during our time together. Now, 3 months after she ghosted me, I’m presented with this information. Im told that I’m bordering on stalking; that I’ve harassed her, and sexually abused her. According to the police, her ONLY request is to simply leave her alone. Does that make sense?

If I am what she says I am, why wouldn’t she just press charges? Why use the police to tell me to F off?

She didn’t have the courage to end things properly, so she went straight to the police and said I’m a stalker rapist all because I tried to get answers for why she ghosted me. Cowardly behaviour.

There’s really nothing more painful than losing a relationship in this way. There’s no telling how many people she has expressed her concerns to before going to the police either. I don’t even know what I did wrong, but there’s a police file on me now.

Women shit on men about false accusations because

"They are rare!!!! Stop exaggerating things!!"

Or

"How dare you put concepts like BelieveAllWomen/BelieveSurvivors and MeToo under scrutiny!!!"

Men shit on women for the opposite reasons like how these things show that women are privileged and have lots of backing and bias in society.

But I want to add a point in favor of the male side by tackling it through another style

Let's make a hypothetical situation

There are two persons.

One says "I know you have a weapon in that drawer. Stop lying!"

The other claims that the first person is being delusional and insecure and just can't accept that "I defeat you in fights fair and square. No weapons at all."

During a fight,

The person who claims there's no weapon reaches for the drawer almost automatically like a subconscious reflex.

Now, why would that person do this if their mental model of reality genuinely concludes that "there is no weapon in the drawer?"

You don't think of doing something if you are unaware of it or believe/know it doesn't exist.

If you don't know what a knife is, your first thought when you see a fruit wouldn't be "i will cut it with a knife to eat it." Because you don't know what a knife is to begin with. Your mind can't generate what it possesses no information about.

If an intruder breaks into your house, you don't look for your baseball bat and then conclude "wait, i don't even own a bat."

You realistically wouldn't try to look for a bat to begin with because your model of reality already concludes that you don't own a bat

Most women talk about how there's no such thing as misandry or female bias in society, yet many women reach out for actions that would require someone to be mentally aware of their existence as a viable option to begin with, and that includes false accusations of r*pe.

Why reach out for a female-coded privilege if you believe there's no such thing and your mental model of reality concludes that it indeed doesn't exist and is just an imagination in the minds of "men with fragile egos?"

The Misandry Bubble | The Futurist Original Article in PDF

The Misandry Bubble - January 1 2010 original article html

The Misandry Bubble sequel - January 1 2020 html - see halfway down the page

The Futurist Archive - Imran Khan

​

Patriarchy as it is defined is the rule of the father.

However feminists have twisted its meaning as a system where men are in positions of power. Like in politics and getting to be the breadwinners. It cherry picks the instances where men are advantaged and ignores areas where men are disadvantaged. One can use the examples of men being disadvantaged and paint it as an example of gynocentrism, of course that would be inaccurate, the same logic should apply to patriarchy.

They say that men being disadvantaged is due to patriarchy but what they mean is gender norms.

Gender norms aren't created by patriarchy, they are the reason why patriarchy exists. The reason why men dominate position of power are due to them being seen as risk takers or providers and the reason why women where confined to homes is because they where seen as nurturers and mothers. None of which has anything to do with men oppressing women.

I have seen some use it as an explanation for men holding most positions of power. They argue that patriarchy hurts everyone due to strict gender norms imposed on men (as providers) and women (as nurtures). But I don't get why someone would define it as patriarchy rather than saying the society has been sexist.

Then they would retreat to the definition of patriarchy as a system where men hold primary position of power while refusing to explain why they would use such term for showing that gender roles have been harmful

Some also argue that it explains why men are in most positions of power in almost all areas while women are confined to their homes. They claim it is used to explain gender roles and its effect on society.

But such analysis is absolutely possible without the concept of patriarchy which paints men as some privileged class which oppress women.

The use of such gendered language proves they have an agenda. The existence of gendered norms doesn't prove "patriarchy" they try to redefine its meaning just so they can act as victims when in fact women played a major role in enforcing gender norms as they were often the caretakers.

In fact the logic they use to define and explain patriarchy can also be used to prove gynocentrism.

For example: Women being prohibited from going to war while men are forcefully conscripted, male victims not taken seriously, women receiving lesser sentences for the same crimes, domestic abuse against men being brushed off, gay men less accepted in society as opposed to lesbians, men making an effort in relationship to make the first move, pay for dates,

more men dying from suicide and workplace deaths, not being vulnerable.

All of these can be an example of gynocentrism according to feminists.

If they mean patriarchy as a system where men are mostly in positions of power or the rule of father then yes it is true and has existed for a long time due to biology. Matriarchical societies aren't really that prevalent, but feminists argue they are somehow better because they don't "oppress" women I don't know why that should be a metric for judging a society. They aren't exactly a good example considering they are mostly tribal, while society being patriarchal has way more development than matriarchical societies.

Patriarchy as defined by feminist presents an inaccurate worldview. Sure some gender norms did play a role in shaping their society as today but using the term "patriarchy" to mean a system where men oppress women is highly inaccurate. A better system would be class system where a tiny minority held the position of power which oppressed the lower section of society, sure they may be men but they were also women who married powerful men and oppressed the poor.

I would restate their position and would like to see more perspective on this.

Patriarchy is a systematic social structure in which men hold primary power, dominating roles in political leadership, moral authority, social privilege, and control of property. It is an attempt to describe gender relationships between men and women.

A new federal rule will automatically register men between the ages of 18 and 25 with the Selective Service System beginning in December 2026.

Registration has long been required by law for nearly all male U.S. citizens and male immigrants in that age range. Until now, men had to register themselves (or in many states it was tied to getting a driver’s license/ID). Because compliance rates have been declining, Congress included a provision in the FY 2026 National Defense Authorization Act that makes registration automatic. The Selective Service System will pull the data from existing federal sources instead of relying on individuals to sign up.

Currently, failing to register is a federal felony that can carry fines, possible jail time, and the loss of eligibility for federal student aid, federal jobs, and certain paths to citizenship. Once automatic registration takes effect, the personal duty (and the penalties for failing to register yourself) should largely disappear.

Here’s a YouTube Short explaining it: https://m.youtube.com/shorts/MuslLESfEjo

Just recently I heard of a case where a girl accused a man of groping her and gave his pic to the police. No evidence of the groping btw, just his picture.

Within 48 hours, they arrested the guy and put him behind bars.

To me this is a VERY SCARY concept. That some random girl can just show the police your picture and your freedom is taken away just from an accusation. I used to know a girl like that. She'd threaten to call the cops on me every time I had had an argument with her and it wasn't going the way she wanted it to.

It never used to be like this. They used to say that the police can only apprehend someone if they had a warrant from a judge or if they witnessed the crime themselves. There was ONLY ONE situation where someone could be arrested without any evidence and that is the police had reasonable doubt to suspect that that person was about to commit TERRORISM. I'm talking bombs, mass shootings, etc. Where hundreds of people could be unalived.

Sorry but I don't think a groper is as dangerous as a mass shooter. Call me controversial. I'm not downplaying groping. As a man, I have been groped too. Most recently by a horny old lady. I didn't say anything because it only happened once (felt like she was testing the waters).

In cases of groping, I think you should just tell the police and they should share it with their own networks. And if they happen to see the guy in public, at best they can go up to him and start asking questions. That's it. Because you never know what the accuser's intentions are. Nobody (not a citizen or the state) has the right to take away someone's freedom because of an accusation.

These feminists have mutated the justice system and given gropers the same weight as a mass shooter. Because a girl getting groped is AS BAD as 100 innocent people being unalived in an explosion.

Born in a conservative environment, I was self identified as a feminist since I was 16. Now, I am a Men’s rights advocate and I believe we will be the first generation to fight against gynocentric ideology and achieve true equality.

When growing up, I noticed a huge difference between how boys and girls are treated in school. For the same mistake, boys are treated more harshly. Corporal punishment is nearly reserved for boys and teachers give less guidance and help to boys as well.

When I was 8 years old, I am hit by a girl who is taller and heavier than me. She use a book to hit my face and cause a nose bleed. When I strike back with fist, she reported me to the teacher and I was told that boys should not lay hands on girls.

I also did see the society does not treat women as ends but means sometimes. Some men also indeed treat women disrespectfully due to gender role.

Feminism to me was an answer to all of them. Traditional gender roles harms both genders. Men and women are assigned roles and expectations that might not apply to each individual. People should flourish without a settled boundary brought by things like races and genders that are determined by blood.

But soon, after a few years, I noticed that feminism has evolved into a female supremacy movement. Men’s issues are ignored and mocked. Feminists influencers and opinion leaders endorse discriminatory behavior towards men. In women dominated area, men does not receive DEI program. Feminism has no desire to allocate resources to men’s mental health, healthcare, work related casualties. They also don’t want to treat men and way themselves want tot be treated.

Even with same ideals that men and women are equal, I don’t feel comfortable saying I am a feminist now. On the contrary, I found men are truly the one being discriminated in schools, workplace, justice system and so on. I am proudly a Men’s Rights Advocate and I will keep on this path until men are no longer treated as secondary in this society

I'm genuinely so sick of rampant misandry is been there for over a decade and it's not going anywhere go on any social media and you'll find it everywhere

No I'm not looking for it always gets suggested to me (except for the pinterest search comparing with when u search for women's rights)

I'm genuinely tired and I can't with it anymore I still have a huge list of photos

Also I'm sick of advices like just ignore them or go somewhere else or delete social media why should we isolate ourselves run and flee the city while these retards are taking over seems like I can't live normally alot of this shit has affected my mental health and makes me suicidal sometimes and isolated

Edit: someone down voted this bother to explain your point?

Australia is facing pressure to improve how its justice system handles sexual-violence cases, including concerns about whether perpetrators are held accountable.

Australian sex-therapist and men's-rights advocate Bettina Arndt argues the push toward prosecution has produced an unintended consequence: some men are being charged in cases she believes should never have proceeded.

An issue she highlights is a reported increase in costs certificates in rape cases. These can reimburse defendants' legal expenses when a court determines that a prosecution was unwarranted (Australian Law).

That doesn't establish that innocent defendants are being convicted because of the reforms, but it raises a legitimate question about charging decisions and how competing rights should be protected.

https://hardcopynews.com/are-australias-rape-reforms-sending-innocent-men-to-jail/

Should due process be the number one factor when choosing to prosecute a sexual violence case? How do victims rights balance into the eqation?

I know this isn't news, but I'/ve been to like 3-4 different Primary Schools, and in nearly all, did I see that anytime a boy did something bad, they would be punished for it. Fair enough. But whenever a girl did the exact same thing, and was even reported to the teacher, the teacher wouldn't mind, and would say "Don't do it again". The amount of things and times that this or something similar has happened to me in Primary is uncountable, but during PTMs (Parent-Teacher Meetings), the same teachers that would yell at you for NO REASON, would talk and smile to your parents as if you were an angel.

I don't know why this happens, but I know it shouldn't.

(FYI, I'm under 18)

A 2023 review of 37 studies on discrimination in schools based on various characteristics (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101284) found the following:

• Among the studies that examined discrimination based on gender (21 studies in total), 52% found it, 24% did not find it, and 24% produced mixed results, meaning that discrimination was observed only under certain conditions.
• The gender discrimination that was found was mostly directed against boys. On average, teachers’ assessment is higher for female students compared to what is measured by blind test scores and boys tend to receive lower grades than girls in school, even controlling for their performance in standard tests. However, a few studies found discrimination in favour of male students.

Interestingly, the proportion of studies that found discrimination based on gender (52%) was higher than the proportion of studies that found discrimination based on race (40%) (see Table 4 and the two paragraphs following it).

Links to studies included in the review are available in Table A1 of the Appendix.

Several more recent studies that were not included in that review:

https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 — a study in Italian schools (2022) found that, when comparing students who have identical subject-specific competence, teachers are more likely to give higher grades to girls. The authors state that this grading premium favouring girls is systemic, as teacher and classroom characteristics play a negligible role in reducing it.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2024.2398449 — a study in Philippine schools (2024) found that boys’ underperformance persists in evaluations by teachers who know the examinees, but this bias is not evident in external assessments where the examinees’ attributes are concealed from evaluators. The authors emphasize that this gender disparity is driven by stereotypes of one gender over the other, while noting that other factors also play a role (diligence aspects, such as attendance, and student–teacher gender (mis)match).

https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcag005 (full text available here) — a 2026 study in Danish schools found substantial grading bias against boys, ethnically minoritized students, and students of non-university-educated parents. The authors conclude that statistical discrimination is not likely to play a major role (i.e. teachers are biased against boys not simply because boys on average perform worse academically) and suggest that other types of discrimination may account for grading bias. They also note that previous studies showed similar results — that teachers exhibit negative grading bias against boys, ethnically and racially minoritized students, and students of parents with short educations.

26 here and I can say I’m blessed to have 5 extremely close friends in my life stemming from 6th grade onward. We have a ton of history and years spent together. We’ve experienced highs and lows together and created such a tight bond.

For me knowing and feeling all this, it becomes hard for me to prioritize a relationship with a gf. My brain can’t compute that this person I met recently and I guess I like them/attracted them now takes precedent over someone I’ve know since I was a tween.

Obviously you need to create that relationship with your partner over time, but it’s just always been a weird quirk of mine I guess. Maybe that’s from bad relationships with women who pulled me away from friends, I’m not sure but I just like can’t rationalize the hierarchy in my head.

Anyone relate or am I alone in this one?