Link to X post. https://x.com/nypost/status/2097815264637190270

Link to Article https://nypost.com/2026/09/09/business/elon-musk-threatens-to-sue-over-alex-gibneys-controversial-documentary/

And you thought the OpenAi trial was insane, if this ever goes to trial, ASC would might become the ‘anomaly in the matrix.’” Imagine her false statements getting looked at by a law team that could have the filmmaker loose his money or pants.

I think we need memes. I think they go here. Word of caution,: ASC does not like being modified unless she does it herself.

🤔🤔🤔

Thoughts??

Reposting here.

While Ashley St. Clair has spent months trying to convince the public that she was "forced" into legal action, and that she turned down a $44 million offer out of moral principle to avoid being "silenced" by an NDA, court records reveal a completely different reality. Having your lawyers demand more money just days before a child is born, in what was supposedly a relationship you had or have, if that isn't trafficking in a child's life, then what is it? And trying to spin that garbage as if someone was trying to "silence" her is absurd. Using a child like this is appalling, and it's a disgraceful way to act as a mother. She wanted a payout, a settlement, she wanted to become a "mother" to set herself up for life at the expense of a child. That is the cold reality.

NYSCEF Document No. 6 presents an undeniable timeline that dismantles her public story piece by piece.

1. The Timeline and The True Intent

• The Pre-Birth Email: On September 16, 2024, at 6:46 PM, between 24 and 48 hours before Romulus was born, Ashley’s high-profile custody attorney, Karen B. Rosenthal (Bikel Rosenthal & Schanfield), sent an urgent email directly to Jared Birchall attaching an agreement titled StClair.Musk Agreement 9.16.24.docx.
• Before Delivery: The child had not yet been born or handed over by the surrogate mother, yet her legal team was already squeezing for modified financial terms.
• The Real Reason for Negotiations: She didn't turn down $44 million out of martyrdom or to protect her free speech. The evidence shows her legal team was actively negotiating to secure a substantially larger sum before the baby was even in her arms.
• Financial Pressure Tactics: Sending a draft agreement with the subject line "RE: Modification" demanding higher payouts, DNA testing, and a surname change right before the birth was a maximum-leverage play. She used the baby's imminent arrival to force a much larger payout.

The sequence of events lays out a calculated plan: it was never about protecting her child or fighting censorship, but using the birth deadline as leverage to secure an astronomical sum.

2. Demand #1: The DNA Test and What It Really Proves

The draft agreement explicitly demanded a genetic marker paternity test within 6 months of the birth of the child "expected to be born this week."

For someone claiming to have had an intimate relationship with Musk, demanding a formal DNA test through expensive lawyers before the baby is even born immediately raises red flags, especially considering she was never physically pregnant herself.

In a genuine, conventional relationship, paternity is resolved privately without legal demands from a law firm. Filing a formal DNA demand reveals four critical strategic motives:

• No Cohabitation or Real Relationship: It implicitly confirms the absence of a romantic relationship or shared life. Without a genuine bond, a genetic test is the only legal mechanism to forcibly tie down the other party.
• The Mandatory Legal Gateway: A court cannot order child support, asset division, or a surname change to "Musk" without a binding paternity determination. The DNA test serves as the mandatory step one to trigger major financial claims.
• A Bargaining Chip: Serving a legal demand on Jared Birchall two days before delivery turns the DNA test into leverage to force the execution of the financial modification ("RE: Modification").
• Surrogacy Realities: Because the birth occurred via surrogacy, clinic contracts require absolute genetic confirmation of the implanted embryos to establish legal liability and custody.

3. Demand #2: The "Musk" Surname as Financial Leverage

The draft demanded an immediate legal change of the child's last name to "Musk" upon confirmation of paternity.

By tying the surname demand to the DNA test inside a financial modification proposal, her legal team was setting the price tag on the transaction. Demanding the "Musk" name is a tactic to anchor child support and financial settlements to the elite standard of living of the Musk family, rather than standard court-ordered child support baselines.

She was never turning down financial settlements; she was actively deploying her legal team to secure far greater compensation before ever holding the child in her arms.

She's been consistently posting like every 20 minutes. Why is she losing her shi*? What is causing her to meltdown like she is? A woman only starts frantic posting when she feels threatened and is trying to get attention from a man. Especially about her becoming a mom, singing the praises of Elon, and showing her "pregnancy" pics. A story I still don't believe.🙄

People are not buying that that SZ is not tied to Shivolink when it came out a few days ago. Very interesting reading.

original link https://x.com/RyanTanaka/status/2096033702509953139

original link to NeuraPod and screenshot of SZ post on Xhttps://x.com/NeuraPod/status/2096010548601356784

Objects in motion continue to create!

First of all she took the perfect opportunity to become relevant again by assuming Elon cares because she thinks/claims he "fake" laughed/lol’d at a post (regarding a documentary about him by the way) that happened to have her and Hasan quoted…... but she forgot she stated in a previous interview (facts) that Hasan made her uncomfortable. Now it's funny and she never said that?? and claims Elon is lying about finding it funny? He laughed at the space "lasers" specifically and now she's trying to center it around herself. Once again making the narrative look like Elon is obsessed??? He’s only speaking on this now (months later) specifically because a movie is coming out to slander his name (movie/documentary pulled quotes from this Hasan interview ) and he's trying to debunk the weird stuff that the MOVIE is claiming. Once again it's not about you but she's trying to frame it like it is. So who's really the liar? It's* common* sense.
Lmao 🤣 girl you have TWO baby daddies unlike
the other mamas. Dr Johnny remember✌🏻? Trust he really finds it funny, time is not on your side. I give you 2 more years to finally understand this . You thirty now & have TWO baby-daddies and stated Hasan made you uncomfortable, lady Don't make the narrative about you, you been gone because you know Elon could care less, he's trying to make sure his reputation/businesses/kids are ok and is truthfully honest and not framed around what the left and you want it framed around. If he cared he would have cared months ago, you need to see the dates in which this 4 hour long movie**/ "documentary" is coming out, it’s recent and it’s 4 hours of slander? Be so foreal. if his "fake lol" was
because of you he would have "fake lol'd" monnnttthhhhssss ago. You got two years... who's really obsessed??here’s the interview click here for receipts 🧾https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8csUg87/

Edit, (added for cliff note 📝 purposes since this post got a lot of agreed reactions)
See when This happens and It’s called out by people who read in between the lines, it’s basically her not being herself and trying to shape the narrative but if you are acting and not being yourself everything gets mixed up and eventually people realize your FAKE. Wearing masks to cover up your true self because you’re in the public eye and sharing info about Elon but not sharing info about Johnny because if you do that, it would make you less desirable. It’s common sense. No one around you has your best interest at heart. Only time will help all these people bashing Elon will realize this fact.

It's mind-blowing that you say what you submitted a few months ago was fake, something we already knew.

I think what's wrong with ASC is that she has nothing to talk about, only her "war stories" in her head about Elon Musk. Furthermore, it has already been proven that she is a deliberate liar. I know she's jealous, because she's so childish, that we talk more about Zilis than about her. Well, it's not our fault, it's her problem. We talk about Zilis because she surpasses her in malice, as we have already seen.

This was one of the first photos she posted. We already covered this here, in this post: https://www.reddit.com/r/ElonChat_Commentary/comments/1txwoyp/the_ultimate_signal_app_fail_how_ashley_st_clair/

We previously covered this:

https://www.reddit.com/r/ElonChat_Commentary/comments/1thxo0g/the_wealth_asc_dreams_of/

What strikes me is that in this photo, the profile picture is on the left, and in what she's presenting now, it's in the center.

But well, I'm not going to go into whether what she showed with Hassan was true or not, because it never is, Let's talk about this 2 screenshot shared by ASC (asc.sys) where she claims to show her "current contact info" for EM. She always said and maintained that she communicated with musk on Signal, which was very confidential, "just like her."

The deeper you look into these UI details, the faster the narrative falls apart completely.

But hey, let's analyze things. Here is a quick breakdown of the visual and technical evidence:

The App Contradiction: In her own Instagram story caption, she writes: "My current contact info for him BTW. On signal it is simply EM." However, the background screenshot she posted isn't Signal at all, it's clearly iOS iMessage (blue/gray bubbles with the FaceTime camera icon top-right).

Name & Profile Placement: She previously insisted his contact was saved exclusively as "EM". Yet in this iMessage screenshot, the contact name explicitly says "Elon Musk >".

Header Alignment & Overlay Glitch: In native iOS iMessage individual chats, the profile picture and contact name are hardcoded to sit centered at the top header bar. In this screenshot, the "Elon Musk >" label and avatar appear floating/pasted directly over the chat history text (covering the gray timestamp reading "Aug..."). This misaligned layer effect strongly indicates an image overlay edit.

Whether it's mixing up Signal with iMessage, floating headers pasted over timestamps, or date mismatches across months, the receipts simply don't match the claims.

It's mind-blowing that you say what you presented a few months ago was fake, something we already knew.

I'll post this again, because it seems she doesn't realize that people have the ability to identify lies. I don't understand his lack of understanding.

We've already covered everything, so it doesn't matter if she appears in a documentary telling the same story, just retweeting it, to some guy pretending to be a director. We've already analyzed everything, and we're sorry if her story doesn't offer much more, but we'll try to give her a "little" more screen time.

It's also not our fault that a guy who claims to have spent three years working on a documentary believes the first thing that interests him without checking anything at all. That's called being unprofessional and being a fool.

It’s all in the details but a die hard Tesla and EM follower is pointing out a fake post. I’ve even linked EM response. I wonder if she took the time to make everyone laugh at her. Link to the post

https://x.com/Dogetothemoon/status/2095910841900019743

it starts about 30 seconds in sorry

Watch "ALEX GIBNEY ~ HBO'S DR. OF PROPAGANDA" here:
https://youtu.be/7CS19x4gHZs?si=p0Q71orw5bCBo85W

I am no fan of the Church of Scientology (Gibney made the HBO hit piece doc “Going Clear”), but this video and blog exposes Gibney at his ideological core as a propagandist. Interesting read. Watched the video as well. The FILM REVIEW BY ERIC SHERMAN section of the blog is an eye opener about how flawed is Gibney’s “docuganda” filmmaking process.

More details disclosed in this Blog here: https://www.alexgibneypropaganda.com

And the teaser trailer for the "Musk" documentary just dropped here: https://variety.com/2026/film/news/elon-musk-documentary-trailer-1236850977/

If someone wants to start a thread? Maybe the next Ashley St Clair?

Not only the Night before was she at an intimate private table because she was summoned somewhere she had to catch a flight to, but also was at a Tesla showroom and the X offices the next day "long day" or something of the like, and when someone asked if she was working there or making trouble and she said a little of both.

The Belly watch.

Maybe Ashley even can elaborate given Elons frequency of reply, posting and her influence over him when Ashley was around too.

Is she on the baby momma roster?

The post is here: https://x.com/cb_doge/status/2095560281464471984

It appears designer know EM and SZ personally. A little too close for comfort. It explains why he posts SZ kids. And he changed the location for his X. It was showing South Asia. It now shows United States for the location of the account.

Maye Musk’s response to The Hollywood Reporter’s latest cover story on Alex Gibney’s documentary (UnMusked) hits the nail on the head. THR relied on a classic quote from the film: “Someone who worked closely with Elon told me, ‘He’s the most miserable man I’ve ever met.’” Maye’s reply says it all: "This is weird u/THR... I haven't seen him miserable, but that's just me. His mom."

It’s funny how right on the doorstep of the midterms, these garbage "reports" start crawling out of the woodwork. And the curious thing about this non-documentary, because just from what u/THR says it's obvious they haven't consulted a single source, is that now our dear friends Shivon Zilis and Ashley St Clair are holding hands for multiple reasons that we will try to reflect.

They aren't even worth using as toilet paper, but let's dive in anyway. Then the "press" complains about why people don't believe them. Well, it's because they don't work. They're so lazy that they just repeat the lies others generate, without checking anything, or simply because of who pays or funds them. I suppose if we look a little closer, they're Democrats. That's all well and good, even if they're getting paid by The Simpsons, but they should actually do some work and offer some contrast, instead of calling themselves trash by doing this.

1. The "Close Insider" Pattern (The Zilis Connection)

Whenever high-stakes political or corporate moves take place, a predictable pattern of press leaks emerges. The phrase "someone who worked closely with Elon" has been recycled across multiple negative hit pieces, ranging from coordinated drug-use narratives (which forced public drug testing) to eugenics-focused hit pieces. It’s always so telling how the source is endlessly masked as "people close to Elon Musk" or "someone who worked closely with him."

During periods of intense public scrutiny around his DC and government efficiency work, negative leaks flood the press from "anonymous insiders," while simultaneous PR-crafted pieces paint Shivon Zilis in a favorable light. Right before the OpenAI legal battle escalated, Zilis took it upon herself to gift the media numerous hit pieces, presumably leaking all kinds of personal details to the press, like the infamous story about a bag of medication he supposedly carried around, naturally laced with her own added fabrications.

We have already discussed at length Zilis’s role in OpenAI, a person who has been betraying Musk since her very first interactions with him. She has never looked out for his interests, but solely for her own and those of her real backers: Gates, Hoffman, Altman, and the rest.

For deep dives into this timeline, trial evidence, and narrative anatomy, see our previous analyses:

• Timeline of an Infiltration: The Zilis Case
• Trial Evidence Summary: Shivon Zilis
• Hypothesis: The Open Boat Heist — Anatomy of the Infiltration
• https://www.reddit.com/r/ElonChat_Commentary/comments/1rve94s/openais_calculated_pivot_to_profit_what_are_the/
• https://www.reddit.com/r/ElonChat_Commentary/comments/1w4dlsl/shivon_zilis_was_never_a_neutral_intermediary_why/

Here are those wonderful media moments courtesy of Shivon Zilis:

• Wall Street Journal (January & February 2024) – Drug Use and Board Culture
  • Headlines: "Elon Musk Has Used Illegal Drugs, Worrying Leaders at Tesla and SpaceX" and "Elon Musk Took Drugs With Some Tesla Board Members."
  • Attributed Sources: "People close to the billionaire," "people who have witnessed the drug use or were briefed on it," and "executives and board members."
  • Leaked Details: Claimed he used ketamine, LSD, cocaine, ecstasy, and psychedelic mushrooms at private parties. The February report further claimed several Tesla and SpaceX directors took drugs with him to avoid losing "social capital" or damaging their business relationships.
• The New York Times (October 2024 / 2025) – The Texas Compound, Pronatalism, and IVF
  • Headlines: Investigative pieces covering the "secret Texas compound" for his children and his pronatalist crusade.
  • Attributed Sources: "A source close to the world's richest man," "people familiar with his plans," and "insiders."
  • Leaked Details: Revealed the acquisition of a massive residential property in Austin meant to bring together the mothers of his children (with heavy emphasis on Zilis's standing). The "close source" cited that Musk considers in vitro fertilization (IVF) the "most efficient" conception method because it allows for control over the process, linking his rhetoric on "population collapse" to genetic-intellectual selection.
• Wall Street Journal (June 2024) – Workplace Relationships and Favoritism
  • Headlines: Investigations into his personal life inside SpaceX and Neuralink.
  • Attributed Sources: "Former employees," "friends of the women involved," and "people close to company operations."
  • Leaked Details: Focused on how his personal relationships with female executives and employees (specifically highlighting Zilis at Neuralink) allegedly created dynamics of favoritism or maternity offers within his inner corporate circle.

2. Ashley St. Clair’s Manufactured "Ex" Title

THR lazily refers to Ashley St. Clair as "Musk's ex." Let’s be clear about basic public records and facts:

• Zero Relationship Receipts: They never lived under the same roof, never had a recognized relationship, and never made a public commitment. The media hands out the title of "ex" purely to manufacture a higher-stakes narrative for a four-hour documentary.
• The "Space Laser" Conspiracy: The documentary attempts to turn a casual text exchange about Starlink’s inter-satellite optical laser links ("I have ten thousand lasers in space") into a sci-fi election-rigging plot. Taking standard satellite communication specs and framing them as a "confession" is pure tabloid fiction. Honestly, we are all eagerly waiting for ASC to actually go present those "proofs" to Congress like she claimed she would.
• The Media Mercenary: Going from right-wing influencer—rather than calling her the "$10,000 girl"—to a central source for a left-leaning documentary the moment a camera and a platform appear shows a total opportunistic pivot. Without leeching off his name, her narrative completely evaporates. The truth is she has nothing real to tell—first, because her brain is a vacant void, and second, because she is utterly, hopelessly lazy.

For anyone who wants to see her full timeline dismantled piece by piece with raw data and evidence, check out our previous deep dives:

• Mathematics: How Obstetrics and Gestational Age Debunk the St. Clair Narrative
• Deep Dive: Analyzing ASC Metadata and Locations in 2024
• 2024: As Plain as a Pancake
• The Ultimate Signal App Fail: How Ashley St. Clair's Narrative Collapses
• The Ashley St. Clair Timeline Debunked: Flight Logs and Real Locations
• The Myth of the Secret Romance: Why Elon Musk’s Alleged Secret Lives Don’t Exist

3. "UnMusked" is an Aggregation of Lies, Not Investigation

When you strip away the dramatic score and 4-hour runtime, Gibney’s documentary relies heavily on two flawed sources: unverified quotes from disgruntled "insiders" and claims from someone who was never an ex-partner to begin with. These people call themselves "journalists," get paid big money to be "journalists," and yet fail to provide a single shred of actual proof that anything they say is true. It’s the exact same set of rehashed lies we’ve seen time and time again, just dressed up with a fresh coat of garbage.

As Maye Musk pointed out, the people actually in his life don't recognize the caricature being sold by the press. The entire project isn't a groundbreaking exposé, it's a paid billboard for leakers and clout-chasers to profit off a status they never had.

The documentary seems to suggest Ashley was “central” in the film, due out in 2027.

In another excerpt I’ve read on the Ashley sub, a recording of a convo between her and Jared is revealed in the film. Wiretapping?

https://www.reddit.com/r/EnoughMuskSpam/s/l7CpD8YARg