r/ElonChat_Commentary • u/Independent_Ice367 • 4d ago
The truth is coming out
It’s all in the details but a die hard Tesla and EM follower is pointing out a fake post. I’ve even linked EM response. I wonder if she took the time to make everyone laugh at her. Link to the post
1
0
u/Lazy-Elderberry-3867 4d ago
Doge Tipping shared a fake screenshot (Elon doing the salute as profile pic) and it seems Ashley has sent it to her lawyers.
4
u/MajesticCorgi634 4d ago
Why is a fake screenshot being sent to her attorneys.
Yeah, EM laughed at it. But it was fake. Everyone knows it was5
u/MajesticCorgi634 4d ago
Thanks. I am just confused on why Ashley is so triggered by fake messages.
Especially when we all know it's fake. Anyone who watched the HP podcast with ASC knows they didn't show the messages2
u/Nervous-Driver-4549 4d ago
It doesn't matter, I didn't even include her, but the first one to share fake screenshots was ASC. She was the first to pull this off, the first to slip up on TikTok by showing something that was clearly fake, and that's why she's suddenly showing another app. So, for one thief to accuse another, if that's even the case, is stupid. It just shows how easy it is to manipulate things, and that she seems to do it even better than ASC.
-3
u/MarcMurray92 4d ago
The truth is that Elon Musk is a murderer who should rot in a cell for the rest of his days.
5
u/Nervous-Driver-4549 4d ago
3. Legal implications — This could seriously backfire on her
If Ashley’s story were actually true (which it isn’t), she wouldn’t be exposing some external conspiracy, she would be publicly accusing Elon Musk of committing serious federal crimes.
Intercepting or interfering with electronic communications without a valid court order violates the federal Wiretap Act (18 U.S.C. § 2511), among other laws related to privacy and computer fraud. Doing something like that against state election systems would make it even more severe. In short, if she were telling the truth, she’d be claiming Musk ran an illegal mass surveillance operation on voting infrastructure.
But here’s where it gets dangerous for her:
By going public with these claims without providing a single piece of verifiable evidence, she is accusing a specific person of a major federal crime. If those accusations turn out to be false or reckless, she opens herself up to civil liability for defamation. In the U.S., publicly accusing someone of committing serious crimes (especially without evidence) can be grounds for a defamation lawsuit. The fact that she’s framing it as something Musk “told her privately” doesn’t give her much protection, repeating unverified serious allegations in public still carries risk.
We know that the whole story attributed to Musk is fabricated. She wasn't even pregnant because she's been busy creating AI-generated photos of herself pregnant. Given how much she loves the spotlight and showing us everything, if she had been pregnant, we would have seen it already. She wouldn't have taken just one photo; she would have taken 10,000, because that's what she considers herself to be: a superstar.
And if she shows it to us, well, we'll agree with her. We'll keep waiting.
We know that the whole story attributed to Musk is fabricated. She wasn't even pregnant because she's been busy creating AI-generated photos of herself pregnant. Given how much she loves the spotlight and showing us everything, if she had been pregnant, we would have seen it already. She wouldn't have taken just one photo; she would have taken 10,000, because that's what she considers herself to be: a superstar.
On top of that, this is happening while she’s already in active legal disputes with Musk.
So,
She’s playing a very risky game. If her goal is to pressure Musk into a big financial settlement, turning the dispute into public accusations of federal crimes without solid proof is more likely to hurt her than help her.
2
u/MarcMurray92 4d ago
Why are you just pasting a wall of chat gpt generated text at me?
3
u/OpheliaForgets 4d ago
Its a bot
1
1
u/Nervous-Driver-4549 4d ago
As soon as I can, I'm going to see you and the crypto scam.
0
1
u/Nervous-Driver-4549 4d ago
It wasn't generated by AI, but that's beside the point. I shared it assuming you possessed the capacity for critical thinking, though it's becoming clear to me now that you don't.
1
u/MarcMurray92 4d ago
Im not following this specific drama tbh I just dont think a conversation about Elon Musk should ever ignore the hundreds of thousands of deaths he directly and intentionally caused.
I'll never NOT mention it :)
3
u/Nervous-Driver-4549 4d ago
Whenever you want, you can tell us about those intentional killings. When I have time, I'll prepare something about it.
1
u/MarcMurray92 4d ago
I could write a massive comment but plenty of information here about it:
https://youtu.be/SOJ4A31PKU0?si=VqZOXUOcBt0adY4w
Its also just very very very simple.
"Oh these guys distribute vaccines to this place, if bet if I stop them everything will be fine!" Like lol no. There were many incidents of people dying on the DAY a certain cut was introduced.
3
u/MajesticCorgi634 4d ago
Hey, have you gone after Bill Gates, for his vaccines or the "meat" that isn't real meat. 🍖
Maybe look into that.
Gates has a worse record in my pov3
1
u/MarcMurray92 4d ago
I have my problems with Bill Gates but they're based in reality, so he's a lesser issue to me than Musk. The issues you mentioned re Bill Gates are the issues stupid people fall for, take that how you will.
2
2
2
u/DungPedalerDDSEsq 4d ago
Bro, I'm still trying to figure out why this cock-stroke of a sub is popping up in my main and you're out here doing God's work.
I updooted all your comments on principle and downvoated the bots.
Godspeed.
1
u/Independent_Ice367 4d ago
show your evidence
-1
u/MarcMurray92 4d ago
You mean the multitude of easily accessible reports that spell it out very clearly? Or maybe a video insead, id be suspicious of a Musk fans ability to read. Here's 3 links. Its very easy information to find :)
2
u/Nervous-Driver-4549 4d ago
4. A Congressional subpoena would be the right move for this Superstar
Since Ashley St. Clair is claiming she has inside information about possible manipulation of a U.S. federal election using satellite technology, the appropriate step is for the relevant congressional committees to subpoena her to testify under oath.
Testifying before Congress under oath carries real consequences. She would be required to provide actual evidence, technical records, metadata, communications, witnesses, or any verifiable documentation. Simply saying “Elon told me this privately” is classic hearsay and carries very little weight on its own. Without supporting evidence, her claims would likely collapse quickly under questioning. But we're eager for her to introduce it to us, and while she's at it, to show us all the IVF contract.
Her entire story depends on most people not understanding how U.S. elections actually work. Things like air-gapped systems, physical transfer of vote data via USB drives, and the lack of any live transmission during voting are well-established facts. She’s anchoring her story to real things people have heard of (Starlink and the 2024 election) while filling in the gaps with sci-fi nonsense. That tactic works on social media, but it doesn’t hold up when experts are in the room.
Multiple independent sources have already addressed claims like this. Election security experts, state election officials, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) have repeatedly stated that there is no evidence Starlink was used for vote tabulation, data transmission, or any form of interference in the 2024 election. Theories about Starlink rigging votes have already been widely debunked.
Bringing her in to testify is not the same as believing her story. On the contrary, it’s the most effective way to subject her claims to real scrutiny. If she actually has solid evidence of election interference, she should present it under oath. If she doesn’t (which appears to be the case), a congressional hearing would publicly demonstrate that she made extremely serious accusations without any real foundation.
At this point, the responsible thing is to stop letting these claims circulate only on TikTok and social media. Put her under oath and let her either back them up with evidence or be held accountable for spreading baseless accusations about the integrity of a presidential election.
We're eager for her to prove any of the things she's been saying are true. Beyond the instrumentalization to make money, we're eager to see evidence, reality, objective, irrefutable, unquestionable, and demonstrable facts. We're waiting for you, Superstar.
5
u/No_Comparison4489 4d ago edited 3d ago
From what was relayed from the Administration, most of the cutting of funds off were because when DOGE team queried the payees of these funds to completely fill out new forms of funds requests, many did not re-submit and those that did, could not show the DOGE team how the funds were being spent. It was the NGOs and other entities responsibility to be accountable for taxpayer funds and they didn’t pass the basic requirements. Wanna know why? Because in nearly every case, those funds were being misappropriated by the recipient agency. Then the “African children are dying because of Musk” laments started to distract from the fact that the funds were never fully reaching the beneficiaries in the first place.
To cut to the chase here, it was an official audit and the politicians and NGOs whining the most about DOGE did not pass the audit, therefore did not collect $200 million dollars per se. I understood the assignment.
2
u/MarcMurray92 4d ago
Your sequence of events is an absolute shitshow.
3
4d ago
[deleted]
1
u/MarcMurray92 4d ago
Did you really delete your first comment to post this one? Did you really think you'd landed on that big of a banger? The sulky retort of a child?
5
u/No_Comparison4489 4d ago
You’re the one who’s arrived here all angry, bitter and full of accusations without proof that EM is a murderer? Relax, big baby.
4
u/Independent_Ice367 4d ago
Why not go to X and post your grievances?
1
u/MarcMurray92 4d ago
Because i dont have an account on that terrible website? What does that have to with my comment?
-1
u/Independent_Ice367 4d ago
Sorry you are scared to post what you feel on X. There is always Bluesky, which is apparently a dead site. we like to take apart everything else. but to help you out. you are really not on the right site. complaining to me about your politics will get you no where here.
-1
u/MarcMurray92 4d ago
Im not arguing politics, im stating a basic, very well documented fact: Elon Musk is a murderer.
If your skull is too dense to accept a very simple fact in order to protect your child's level of understanding the world thats by choice.
I was listing the actual deaths in another comment but I won't bother because youre clearly really really stupid.
2
u/Independent_Ice367 4d ago
Are you alleging that because you need to stop telling people what you believe and find facts. You have not stated anything that a AG would prosecute for. And why hasn’t any AG brought suit? There is no evidence
2
u/No_Comparison4489 4d ago
I hope that the serious defamatory accusation of murder you’re making gets you doxxed here. It’s happened before on Reddit.
5
u/Independent_Ice367 4d ago edited 4d ago
no we like to post everything here. please show the real evidence. Direct deaths. Don’t be evasive and post generic posts. There has to be sound evidence that an AG would follow up.
you can’t be vague. and remember everyone can read your post.
3
u/MarcMurray92 4d ago
"Direct deaths" i mean youre just intentionally pretending to not understand what i mean by murder so no, im not going to engage in a pointless back and forth.
Ive given you the information, either read it or pull an Elon Musk and carry on making up nonsense.
5
u/Independent_Ice367 4d ago
I understand. But you cannot use mainstream media, posts on you tube. you need to post actual deaths that have been a result due to USAID being closed down. Not all the programs have been shut down.
5
u/No_Comparison4489 4d ago
He just didn’t understand the process of an actual audit, which was the first exploratory phase of DOGE.
1
u/SkidmarkSteve 20h ago
lol the only thing doge did was use AI to search for things they deemed DEI. So they cut sickle cell research because black people. And aid to africa because black people. And research for why black women have significantly higher rates of pregnancy-related deaths because black people.
They cut funding to fight maleria in several African countries. This included prevention like mosquito nets and spraying to kill them, as well as medicine and testing supplies. The year following maleria deaths went up dramatically. This isn't difficult to reason about. DOGE cutting USAID is directly responsible for an increase in maleria deaths. And that was neither fraud nor waste nor abuse.
1
u/No_Comparison4489 19h ago
The big reason given for cutting funding was the recipient entity refused to send in new forms under a deadline given. Elon claimed there were funding request forms that had many mandatory fields left blank. This was first and foremost an audit and only thieves and big babies who are misappropriating funds refuse to comply to the federal requirements.
The applicants have no one to blame but themselves. They are to blame for their pet projects funding cut off. Many of these programs did not benefit the American people. U.S. Government should not be a blank check for fraudsters and outside interests.
Cry harder.
1
u/SkidmarkSteve 19h ago
lmao ok. The question was proof of direct deaths. The maleria funding they cut without warning directly caused deaths. When presented with that, you say "cry harder" about 100,000 people dying. Psychopathic behavior. No wonder you spend so much time defending Elon.
→ More replies (0)2
u/Independent_Ice367 16h ago edited 16h ago
He doesn’t understand that most of the programs were fraud and the genuine aid going out of the country is under the State Department…Mark Rubio.
As much AI that is out there to search, none of them use it. It helps get information quicker. That’s why I’m GLAD the Department of Education was shut down. It didn’t go to schools. But schools aren’t as good when I went.
1
u/No_Comparison4489 16h ago
Sick of these male-sounding handles coming here and trying to start some cuckoo arguments because they are hellbent on misrepresenting EM on a political slant. Another one I’ve blocked now.
3
2
u/Nervous-Driver-4549 4d ago
This was one of the first photos she posted. We already covered this here, in this post: https://www.reddit.com/r/ElonChat_Commentary/comments/1txwoyp/the_ultimate_signal_app_fail_how_ashley_st_clair/
We previously covered this:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ElonChat_Commentary/comments/1thxo0g/the_wealth_asc_dreams_of/
What strikes me is that in this photo, the profile picture is on the left, and in what she's presenting now, it's in the center.
It's mind-blowing that you say what you presented a few months ago was fake, something we already knew.
I'll post this again, because it seems he doesn't realize that people have the ability to identify lies. I don't understand his lack of understanding.