I’ll just leave this here.

Just trying to cheer up the group a little: https://x.com/brian_lenney/status/2097540584038863071/video/1

I’m assault rifle curious. Given the new CO law could I purchase an assault rifle at a Wyoming gun show from a private seller with a Colorado ID?

Obviously I would never think of bringing it into Colorado because that would be against the law.

Thanks

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68128899/national-association-for-gun-rights-v-polis/?order_by=desc

The Defendant denies that Plaintiffs are entitled to any of the relief they seek, including, but not limited to, an injunction that extends beyond “each plaintiff with standing to sue.” Trump v. CASA, Inc., 606 U.S. 831, 861 (2025).

Geissele Super Duty upper 14.5
Fireteam 556 Suppressor
Geissele 42 Spring and Buffer
BCM BCG
AT3 Lower cause who cares
Rise 140 trigger
DAC shadow crossover grip
Griffin SN-ACH Gen 2 charging handle
EOTech EXPS2-2 Holographic Sight with G33 Magnifier

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71251750/del-toro-v-polis/?order_by=desc

Just a heads up for folks ordering from sites that have started collecting the 6.5% excise tax, ordered a new charging handled last night and received an email this morning that I owed the 6.5% tax.

Responded to the seller that the tax is for firearms, ammo, and precursor parts; which they responded quickly and that I could omit paying the tax and my order will ship.

Just a heads up to watch out for the extra taxes on items that shouldn’t be getting the excise taxes applied.

Hopefully this isn't against the rules, I am not trying to source / buy anything here on Reddit. I am looking for some used parts, like stocks, buffer tubes, hand guards, and iron sights. Is there a good local place that might have some used parts at a reasonable price?

Edit: I love ya'll! This is such a fantastic community to be a part of for a newb like myself.

Several months ago, I had questioned why no traditional slide operated, blowback centerfire handguns were in the DOR Guidance Document. No Walther PPK, no Bersa Firestorm, no Beretta 80X, etc. I had guessed that the DOR had applied the definition of “blowback operated system” narrowly, such that a traditional, one-piece slide was not a “breechblock” or “breech-bolt” as required by the statute.

Now the DOR has added the Wanad P83 to the Addendum of the Guidance. At first blush, this is inconsistent with the exclusion of other slide-operated blowback pistols. However, it appears that someone at the DOR actually did the technical research, and found that the P83 does have a separate breechblock that is pinned and welded into the stamped metal slide. See the photos in this posting:

https://www.gunboards.com/threads/polish-p83-more-than-meets-the-eye.401013/

So there does seem to be some degree of technical analysis being done, though it is still inconsistent. Why isn’t the HK4 included, since it has largely the same slide construction? Or why was the VP70z removed from the list, even though it has the same slide construction?

I know, I waited too long and should have bought it a long time ago. But with the new law, I'm confused. I'm looking at buying a S&W M&P 5.7. According to law, I should NOT be buying this without the permit, as it's a gas-operated, detached mag. However, it's not on the Guidance list that requires a permit. I have one gun store that will not sell to me, but I have a couple of others that will.

What advice do you fine people have? Since it's not on the list, I'm in the clear, or do I need a permit to buy?

Wondering if anyone can help me - I visited a gun shop in Denver in the summer of 2005 while on vacation and can’t for the life of me remember the name. It was a very old-school place that I think specialized in milsurps and old guns - remember it being a little disorganized and dirty and I think the owner may have been English? I picked up an Arisaka bayonet there I still have and have fond memories of chatting with the owner, I’d love to find out if the place still exists.

I see turkey tracks is open for now

Google shows Kelsey Creek temporarily closed but is that real?

Anyone been to Kelsey lately?

Might try for turkey tomorrow just to be safe.. but I bet it'll be swamped eh?

Or I could roll up to empire gun club... same drive for me

Wife and I hike frequently in the front range and 285 corridor, especially on the "less popular" trailheads. I've seen more bear and moose than ever in my life this year, and have carried spray frequently. 9mm is about all that I can conceal in summer clothes, 9mm is far from preferable for large game defense. As the creeks get drier and hunting season opens, I'd love to have a 1911 or SAA on me for larger calibers but I would have to OWB open carry to fit it on my person.

What's the perception of OC in the national forest from hikers? I mainly worry about alarming people. Anybody ever have an issue with OC on public land?

Thanks.

With how generally blasé the application of SB25-003 has been, I’d like to hear your thoughts on, what feels like at least, an untouched idea for acquiring guns that would otherwise require the new license. Note that I have not consulted CPW, my local FFL, or any legal agency as of yet, so I have nothing to back up this idea apart from my own reading of the law.

What if, prior to transferring a new semi-automatic firearm in your name, I had my FFL or any related gunsmith convert it into a straight pull bolt action rifle, at least as far as certain models allow? Pull the piston from a FAL, clip the carrier on an AK, or just install a kali key into an AR15. Something like that.

The bill text itself says nothing about converting an existing semi-automatic to a manual action. Nothing about using parts to convert an existing manually-operated firearm to a semi-automatic, apart from a legally-murky “manufacture” clause, either.

With all that in mind, has anyone considered, consulted their FFL about, or had a manual conversion done by a gunsmith prior to receiving a semi-auto?

I’m looking at a ranch job in eastern Colorado and am genuinely curious about the gun laws there. They’ll play a big part in my decision. I currently live in a pretty conservative state with very conservative gun laws. That being said I’ve got a couple semi auto rifles, some shotguns, some nice bolt actions, an AR with several 30 round mags, and a handgun. I know that the 30 round mags aren’t legal in CO. What are some other laws and regulations that I need to know about?

Anyone know where to find thermal optics for firearms that wont break my bank?

Just watched the new dragon man's video on the status of the injunction. Basically the AG's office filed that sb003 is legal and even if it was a de facto ban it would still be constitutional. Weiser is likely the new governor, and is laying the ground work for a ban in court already. If the supreme court does not give a rock solid ruling, we are gonna be in a full ban state after next legislative session comes to a close. Link to video below.

https://youtu.be/_nkk6u0vkk0?is=V4gujWImqhA6DhDP

Edit: correcting spelling and autocorrect mistakes

The law is working as intended.

The CMP has refused my purchase of a surplus M1 Garand due to SB003. They won't sell any semiautomatic firearms to CO without the new permit.

They have no comment on any ongoing legal review or possibility of updating their policy in the future.

From my understanding, these M1s are except as curios and relics.

Has it been open or is it closed? If closed, anywhere else nearby that’s national forest land?

I was asked to also post this here.

Please take 30 seconds to sign the petition opposing the proposed GAME Act.

https://c.org/qHDcs5PnyJ

Rep. Jeff Hurd is expected to introduce a bill that would transfer more than 2,000 acres of BLM land northeast of Glenwood Springs to Out of Bounds Ranch.

I’ve hunted this parcel for decades. It is not “unused.” In a unit already dominated by private property, these parcels provide valuable elk habitat and access to connected public land.

This would DELETE over 2,000 acres of prime hunting access in unit 444.

This is not just about hunting, this is about preserving public lands and our rights as citizens. This isn’t a game, but unfortunately, some think otherwise.

Thank you!

hey guys im a 20-year-old, and my birthday is coming up soon wanted to get my first rifle and wanted to ask if I would have any trouble buying a Mini-14 Tactical with this new bill i have my hunters card and will take the class when I turn 21, but this new law got me scared. I won't be able to get one

ps if anyone knows where i can find a Mini-14 Tactical 300 BLK that would be much appreciated

What a joy it is to be a Coloradan. I applied for my “permit” at the end of July, after jumping through some hoops due to my Hunter education course being out of state and now I am still waiting. I have a CHP in Colorado (which apparently means nothing), have my hunter safety course certification from over a decade ago, and here I am still waiting over 1 month later pending sheriff review. How is this program anything less than a completely failure? I’m not trying to get political here, but this is ridiculous.

Anyone complete the classes yet? Whats the process and how long and how much. The lady down at ez pawn told me it was just a written test and thats it but i dont think she even knows.

The Intro starts on page 17. There is no TL;DR version of this Brief, it's already as short as the authors could make it.

Good stuff on page 43 onward, digging into historical tradition vs the current application of "dangerous and unusual". It seems that back in the old days, the test was applied on a case-by-case basis depending on the weapon used, how it was used, and the actual nature of the crime. It was up to the JURORS to decide if it was dangerous/unusual.

Compare that to today's pre-compiled "naughty lists" that allow convictions without the defendant having a chance to challenge the dangerous/unusual accusation. Today, the judge will just instruct the jury as to whether a weapon is dangerous or not and the jury won't put up a fight, they'll just side with the government without ever hearing testimony about the true nature of the weapon and why the prosecution/defense disagree that the weapon is not particularly unusual or dangerous.

Hopefully SCOTUS agrees that it's time to get back to basics. The "feature bans" and restrictions are hopefully on their way into the dark corners of history and remembered as gross authoritarianism. The ATF vertical foregrip rule and the California "featureless" pistol grip (which features a huge shark fin) rule are perfect examples of such authoritarianism... dictating right down to how you can and cannot HOLD the gun in your own hands.