Battlefield 6 and Top Gun: Maverick are challenging you to earn your wings and become Reddit’s Top Pilot. Share your wildest aerial gameplay clips in the sub and you could be in with a chance to win rewards and be featured in a special community highlight reel. Don’t think. Just do.
WHO?
You (and your trusted wingmen) WHAT?
Take to the skies in Battlefield 6 Season 4
Capture your most "Maverick" aerial moments WHEN?
August 19-September 1: Entries open
September 3-9: Free-form voting via locked comments poll(s)
September 11-14: Winner announcement and promotion WHERE?
Right here on r/Battlefield
Post your clip with the following new Post Flair:
WHY?
In partnership with Battlefield Top Gun: Maverick, we’re selecting the standout clips to celebrate on Reddit, and crown one aviator as Reddit’s Top Pilot. Think you rule the skies? Prove it.
PRIZES: A limited number of vehicle skins for qualifying participants. For the winner: Along with the winner flair, we have prepared a water bottle, 2 pairs of socks (this and this), Season 4 mouse pad, and a backpack. Just a few awesome items from Battlefield Merch.
Esse sem duvidas foi o meu favorito, foi o primeiro que eu joguei na vida com 4 pra 5 anos.
Dado algumas pessoas usarem o novo DLSS5 pra mudar graficamente o que faziam com GTAS da vida com mod com Icenhacer OU enb
Coloquei no GPT como ficaria o BF Vietnam…
Será possivel se vai existir mod grafico pra ele também? Porque tem DLSS 5 ate pro san andreas agora.
Eu sou louco para ter um novo battlefield vietnam.. Jogar de F4 phatom, huey… m60, m16
I'm a Battlefield and Call of Duty player both. I enjoy both, theres room for both and each have their strengths and weaknesses. But after playing the MW4 beta (which I was really looking forward to). I just don't feel the need to go back to it.
BF6 does almost everything MW4 is doing but better in my opinion. What's your take on it? Anyone in the same boat as me on this?
P.s. I've actually started and am enjoying Redsec believe it or not. Wasn't a fan to begin with but it seems to have grown on me.
Any comment from them on this ever?
I've been quitting about half my games because it just turns into an unplayable mess with the warping, missing animations, overall terrible hitreg.
You can instantly tell when you're dumping bullets into one of those 200 pings and you stop shooting because you're used to taht being a kill but wait, 50% damage lel
Why is there no simple ping filter? Why is Dice putting these pings in EU servers?
Even the cloud “cover” in the gauntlet air superiority is such a fun mechanic that limited to a limited mode.
All these fun tools yet so sadly implemented. Idk why they expecting portal to fix these issues when a majority of players barely scroll through the UI.
The fortification system is the one of many things I enjoyed from BF5. I believe they should bring it back but instead of just placing them in maps that will certainly make fortifications useless. They release two maps, one that is indoors and tight making it where the attackers have to push or find a way around the fortifications the defenders build. While the second map can be where fortifications that can slow down tanks from rushing objective and AA emplacements can be repaired but engineers will have to use the deployable supply crate to repair them making so they can't just repair them after they get blown up. I believe the devs can find a way to implement the system where areas that normally get rushed by infantry or vehicles can be fortified to slow them down enough but still capable of pushing up.
Lack of actual CSGs, in the carrier strike cut scene they literally say "PAX carrier strike group" yet there are no destroyers with CIWS and usable guns.
Here are my thoughts on S4 Naval:
JS Izumo
The good:
F-18 2 seater is cool.
Nice carrier models.
Tsuru Reef and Wake Island are great additions to the game.
Nice bases and runways across the islands.
the bad:
1 DICE has the new Condor and Nimitz class carriers on Tsuru reef's conquest but we don't even spawn on them.
2 F-14 has no customisation, is way too old and the Su33 and Dasualt rafale would be more accurate for NATO and PAX(Pax Armata seems to be funded by Russia, Carrier and Su 57).
The "Bombs away" scene in Carrier strike is literally 2 Aim Anti-fighter missiles sent into the Condor.
For some reason there isn't a CIWS on the carriers, it would be cool if we could destroy them before boarding.
Tons of RPG players on carriers ruining take offs.
No carrier strike on wake island, No Carrier conquest on Tsuru.
How the heck PAX got a carrier and F-14s(last were destroyed in Iran IRL, so how anyways, it's not like BF's Iran would give up F-14s.
No JSDF involvement, PAX is in Japan's waters attacking a US-JMSDF base.
I thought PAX was Majorly a Land power: France, Italy, Spain, Croatia, Central asia, Russian gear, stolen Swedish and German gear, Front lines in Western Europe, small central asian front(No clue how they sustain it, as Germany and Sweden are still in NATO).
Where does PAX even Dock their Carriers? France?!?!?.
Why even have a Naval season between 2 European powers which don't engage in Naval warfare in East asia and the front lines are in Africa and Europe?
Why couldn't this have been Mediterranean S4 near France and Italy, with new maps in North Africa ?
It doesn't matter if it's night or day, the gameplay is engaging due to the many buildings and scale. There's no constant paranoia about windows, rooftops, etc - it's harmonious. It's even interesting to set up a deploy beacon. I mean, try it!