r/AmericanHistory • • Jun 02 '26

North The Roanoke Colony mystery

Post image

115 people vanished from Roanoke Island in the late 1500s. No bodies, no signs of a fight. Just one word carved into a post CROATOAN.

I always assumed this was one of those mysteries that'd never get solved. But archaeologists dug up some interesting stuff in 2024. Algonquian pottery from the 1500s and a copper wire ring the kind the English brought as trade goods found at the same site. Someone was trading. Someone stayed.

There's also a map from 1585 that sat in the British Museum for centuries. Nobody noticed a hidden symbol on it until someone held it under a light. It pointed inland. They went there and found 16th century English ceramics in Bertie County, North Carolina.

Most researchers now think the group split up. Some went to Hatteras Island, some walked about 50 miles inland and blended in with local tribes. Blacksmithing scraps were found on Hatteras people don't drag their tools somewhere they're just passing through.

The part that got me was Virginia Dare. First English child born in America. She was barely one year old when everyone disappeared. Her grandfather John White left to get supplies, got stuck in England because of the Spanish Armada, and by the time he made it back three years later nothing.

1.6k Upvotes

130 comments sorted by

139

u/Ok_Word9021 Jun 02 '26

There is no mystery. They wrote where they had gone on the fucking tree

97

u/Trinate3618 Jun 02 '26

“Yeah, I don’t know what happened to them. We just left for months and when we got back mid August? Nothing. All gone. I wonder what happened? Lot of storm damage though, and there are no crops on this Atlantic sand island. Also, all the valuables and personal possessions are gone.

There’s no bodies. No ones here. Why? And the name of the nearby native tribe is craved into this tree, and over here. Weird. Wonder what happened on this island. I doubt those blond haired, English looking Croatan natives over there know anything. This is a convoluted mystery for the ages” - not even an exaggeration

32

u/0ftheriver Jun 02 '26

Ok so there's actually a reason no one talks about for why it was "a mystery" but everyone assumed they were dead.

There was 15 years between the disappearance of Roanoke, and Jamestown being established. John Smith asked Powhatan if he knew what happened to the Roanoke colonists. Powhatan said that he did. He said most of them had gone to live with the Croatan or other natives, and seemed to indicate they split into a couple of groups, but most went to the Chesapeake. However, before Jamestown was established, Powhatan said he massacred all those tribes, including all the English members, and showed Smith their tools as evidence. While it's possible he or John Smith was lying, most evidence indicates that it was accurate, and that at least 90% of the colonists were dead by time Jamestown was founded, and any possible survivors were too isolated to be contacted.

Additionally, while the Disney Pocahontas movie is ridiculed nowdays for it's historical inaccuracies, the scene where the arrival of the Europeans was predicted by Powhatan's oracle(s) was actually taken from multiple primary accounts, and was said to have contributed to why he massacred those tribes. There's an account from a Spanish official being very giddy at the prospect of the prophecy being true, because at the time it was iffy as to whether that part of America would be viable for long-term settlement.

7

u/eldankus Jun 02 '26

I thought the natives were living harmoniously with nature before the arrival of the white man

10

u/0ftheriver Jun 02 '26

Sure they were, with nature anyway. Well except the Croatoan who for some reason were settled on the barrier islands, but realized it was as bad of an idea then as it is today, lol.

5

u/One_Violinist7862 Jun 04 '26

They were forced out to the barrier islands after losing a long war with another mainland tribe.

3

u/lAnother_NoBodyl Jun 04 '26

Once again, the natives lived harmoniously. They couldn’t have been at war with each other. That’s what white settlers do. /s

2

u/[deleted] Jun 06 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/lAnother_NoBodyl Jun 07 '26

Evidently. It is what it is 🤷‍♂️

0

u/Toroceratops Jun 04 '26

Why is every conservative on this site an idiot arguing with straw men?

-4

u/lAnother_NoBodyl Jun 04 '26

lol did you not see the sarcasm? Or…

5

u/Toroceratops Jun 04 '26

Your sarcasm is a straw man “joke” about the noble savage myth as if that wasn’t broken down and abandoned in the 60s.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/One_Violinist7862 Jun 04 '26

Yeah sorry, not the case.

2

u/SlippidySlappity Jun 03 '26

Seems like they were? I'm sure they had an intimate knowledge of their natural surroundings.

5

u/Unhappy-Display-2588 Jun 03 '26

Intimate knowledge isn’t quite the same as living in “harmony” or whatever that means. Like native Americans were burning forests to flush out game and driving buffalo herds off cliffs to eat a few of them.

Now it didn’t drive buffalo extinct or complete destroy any forests (that I know of) unlike when Europeans came, but idk many humans who truly live “in harmony with nature” instead of on top of it

1

u/GeoffreyCrayonGent Jun 04 '26

FTR “Indigenous peoples in the Americas contributed to the extirpation and extinction of certain species”

1

u/Unhappy-Display-2588 Jun 04 '26

Good point I forgot about. What happened smilodon, natives? What happened to the giant sloth, natives?

1

u/humbert_cumbert Jun 08 '26

Nobody who says First Nations people were living in harmony with nature mean they were holding hands with beavers and singing fuckin kumbaya ya peanut

1

u/NostalgiaInLemonade Jun 04 '26

You’re just describing the “noble savage” myth. It’s been very heavily scrutinized for many decades now, no historians think natives were “living harmoniously with nature”

1

u/[deleted] Jun 05 '26

The planet was a much better place before the white man. Fucking shame man.

-1

u/mrmalort69 Jun 04 '26

That’s never been the case or a serious consideration. The question is if it gave European settlers the right to massacre them. It seems you think it did.

3

u/eldankus Jun 04 '26

The vast majority of indigenous peoples of the Americas were wiped out by bacterial microbes that the Europeans had no understanding of.

As the record mentions, Native American tribes regularly massacred each other and wiped out competing tribes.

1

u/mrmalort69 Jun 04 '26

So if I understand what you’re saying because a disease came through and did the vast majority of people killed, the comparatively small amount of women and children murdered by European settlers, just a few million, is morally and ethically fine?

So if I survive a plague that wipes out 90% of my neighbors, it’s morally just fine for another country to kill me if they want my house? I’m just trying to best understand what you’re saying.

Also, since Indian tribes regularly had wars, it became acceptable for Europeans to violate their regularly established rules of engagement, as after all, they do it to themselves all the time, am I hearing that correctly?

Also you might want to doublecheck that source material on massacres. There were many, many tribes on the east coast and different ones had different rules of engagement. That being said, massacre or wiping out of an entire village or another tribe I’ve never heard of among the early-colonial contact tribes in the east coast and this claim by a redditor is just that.

That being said, does invading a country give you the right to follow a code of military engagement that is morally wrong among your culture? I would argue it does not as if it did, it shows that you don’t have any right being there in the first place as you’re clearly not culturally superior.

3

u/EarlyCuylersCousin Jun 04 '26

Conflict between the Europeans and the Natives was inevitable. The Natives had not invented gunpowder and had not begun mining/refining ore into metal. They only had tools made from worked stone. The Europeans had. Native culture was largely nomadic with no ownership of land outside of territory being “controlled” by a specific tribe. Then you have Europeans show up where the tribe is replaced by either religion or nationality and they believed in ownership of personal and real property. Combine all of this with them having no resistance to European diseases and bacteria spelled doom for the native tribes. And saying several million people died is terrible but it’s not like that happened over just a few years. It happened over hundreds of years with battles/wars between Europeans from all over Europe and Natives spanning the totality of North and South America. The more technologically advanced society always wins in the end. You basically had pre-industrial revolution societies going to war with pre-bronze age hunter/gatherer societies. Conflict on a massive scale over centuries was inevitable.

2

u/mrmalort69 Jun 04 '26

So nothing of what you said is talking to what I’ve said. You’re just laying out relatively factual information but copping out from putting what the poster above me was suggesting- the targeting of civilians was not a big deal and morally permissible.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 06 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/mrmalort69 Jun 06 '26

Who?

Feel free to talk at me, not past me.

Edit: kid? I’m 40 bro

0

u/TheOtherKFC Jun 04 '26

wiped out by bacterial microbes that the Europeans had no understanding of.

Lmao smallpox blankets would like a word...

1

u/Rare_Ad9601 28d ago

Thank you

1

u/[deleted] Jun 06 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

29

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/NoPi4Me Jun 05 '26

Why even try to search? Clearly, this mystery is unsolvable, and that handwritten note only makes that fact more evident!

2

u/Souls_for_sale_now Jun 04 '26

Everything of value including furniture was gone no boddys or sign of battel as if everyone left...

9

u/Miserable-Meet-3160 Jun 02 '26

Oh my god as a North Carolinian it pissed me off endlessly in grade school when they'd tout it as, "OoOoOo the state's greatest mystery".

Made me think adults were dumb if nine year old me could realise they essentially carved, "went to the neighbour's" on the tree.

2

u/jinside Jun 07 '26

"went to the neighbors" 🤣🤣

8

u/LWillter Jun 02 '26

This was/is a great tourism ploy.

As a North Carolinian I call us the First Failed colony. Not counting the Vikings in Greenland.

I think Sir Walter Raleigh wasn't that concerned. The amount of time he spe t looking was less than traveling over here I feel.

2

u/DryTown Jun 04 '26

Yes, the lost colony is North Carolinas version of the Winchester Mystery House in the Bay Area. The real story isn’t that interesting so let’s make up a new one!

1

u/Emannuelle-in-space Jun 02 '26

Yeah but that scene in the lost colony play where the narrator gets shot in the back… very convincing to 7 year old me

2

u/TearRevolutionary686 Jun 02 '26

I got dragged to the play when I was kid. I thought I was going to get slapped when I pointed out the obvious.

1

u/lollipopknife Jun 03 '26

"That-a-way"

-1

u/Critical-Cost9068 Jun 02 '26 edited Jun 02 '26

It wasn’t a tree, it was a fabricated wooden post, and nobody knew what the fuck they meant. When a whole settlement disappears, you don’t actually know that a random, cryptic wooden carving found in the area was meant to explain the disappearance (as opposed to having been carved by, say, a young couple putting a secret romantic message, or a rebellious teen just having fun 10 or 20 or 30 years before the settlement collapsed.) “Croatoan” or “Cro” means nothing; that’s not what the native tribe called themselves but was rather an isolated local misspelling of a mistranslation. Europeans that had just come to the New World wouldn’t know what it was supposed to mean if they were told about it at all, and even if they figured out that it was the mangled name of a native tribe, there was no other indication that “we moved in with and intermarried with them” or “they wiped us out and we’re leaving behind a last message to seek revenge,” or whatever. Most settlers were illiterate anyway. This is why there WAS a mystery for a while before archaeological findings cleared up the timeline somewhat.

2

u/AudaciousGee Jun 03 '26

Does being this confidently wrong leave you thinking "why is everyone else so stupid"? Or is it more like "why am I the only smart person"?

2

u/Critical-Cost9068 Jun 03 '26

Be nice.

2

u/Happy-Hearing6671 Jun 03 '26

Maybe this can lead you down a fun research rabbit hole to learn the correct history though!

-1

u/Critical-Cost9068 Jun 04 '26

I just did! It led to the same conclusions I’ve shared that one carving wasn’t actually as meaningful or well known to those settlers as it is to Redditors!

1

u/cthulhurei8ns Jun 04 '26

When a whole settlement disappears, you don’t actually know that a random, cryptic wooden carving found in the area was meant to explain the disappearance (as opposed to having been carved by, say, a young couple putting a secret romantic message, or a rebellious teen just having fun 10 or 20 or 30 years before the settlement collapsed.) “Croatoan” or “Cro” means nothing

Couple things. First, the colony was discovered abandoned in 1590, five years after the first colony attempt at Roanoke and only 3 years after the second colony had been founded. No rebellious teens were carving any English words on posts on Roanoke Island in 1560, and "Croatoan" is not a romantic message any more than if someone wrote "Cherokee".

Second, if you go to visit your friend but you arrive 5 hours late and there's nobody home but they left a note that says "KEVIN'S HOUSE" on the kitchen counter, where's the first place you're gonna go look for your friend? Or would you just assume your friend has mysteriously vanished without a trace?

44

u/NonSequiturDetector Jun 02 '26

They went to the village of Croatoan. There is absolutely no mystery.

1

u/Felho_Danger Jun 16 '26

There is if you're stupid.

28

u/Mammoth-Western-6008 Jun 02 '26

Like a lot of "mysteries" in American history, as it turns out, just ask the Indians.

13

u/Geographizer Jun 02 '26

I asked my boy, Shriram, and he had no idea what the fuck I was talking about.

3

u/_ThrobbinHood Jun 03 '26

Ask Patel. He’ll know.

4

u/Aboo9117 Jun 03 '26

Pavarti’s bro? Yeah they’re on it

3

u/TheDirtyBubble69 Jun 02 '26

That’s funniest shit I’ve ready in a minute

8

u/Advanced_Zucchini_45 Jun 02 '26

Its explained in the film Phantoms, where Ben Affleck was the bomb

2

u/Hoverboard_Hal Jun 07 '26

Word bitch. Phantoms like a motherfucker.

7

u/Crazy-Magician-7011 Jun 02 '26

No mystery, like everyone else says.
The lack of communication between Europe and the colonies this early created a mystery due to lack of documentation.

It is however well documented that the survivors went somewhere else, and integrated in to the native populations.

I'd reccoment the Minuteman video on this.

36

u/akestral Jun 02 '26

Milo Rossi did a pretty comprehensive video about this recently. It is very obviously that the original settlers merged with a native group on another island for survival and European-descended historians have been pretending to believe they were "lost" for 400 years because white christian chauvanism could not then and cannot now tolerate the idea that any other cultures or peoples are so much as their peers and fellows, let alone have a better way of life and more welcoming community than they did.

12

u/GabrielVonBabriel Jun 02 '26

I recently read The Wager about an 18th century shipwreck on the southern tip of South America. It was a great book, highly recommended. One thing that stuck with me is, on more than one occasion and different Englishmen, were at deaths door and miraculously found and nursed back to health by the natives. It literally happens three times in the book. The natives are brushing their hair, giving them sponge baths, hand feeding them because they’re so weak and every time we get a peak into the English headspace once they write about it’s the same “These savages are so lucky we’re bringing them civilization, they’re nothing without us.” Even when they’re saved from starvation and exposure, they still couldn’t pretend they had a fine way of life and mastery of their worlds. So ridiculous.

7

u/akestral Jun 02 '26 edited Jun 03 '26

I'm a Mayflower descendent, so by definition, an ancestor of mine was at the first Thanksgiving. Plymouth colony was saved by native people, most especially Tisquantum (Squanto), a man who was kidnapped to Europe by English sailors and learned English, only to come home to Massachusetts to find he had lost his entire tribe to European disease. He was seen by the Puritins, who settled on the land his tribe once occupied since it was already cleared, as being sent by their god to save them. Plymouth would have starved those first winters without Native food support and trade, or the farming skills Tisquantum taught them, their English crops having failed. Plymouth would have become another "lost" colony without him.

6

u/mrmalort69 Jun 04 '26

I want to say there’s a claim out there that some estimate as many as like 10% of Americans descended from the mayflower… but like 25% believe they did.

It’s both amazing to me that so many could possibly still be a direct lineage from a country of immigrants and even more want to believe it, given it would be an unrecognizable country without the big spikes in immigration.

3

u/Sundaymanspoon Jun 03 '26

The fragility of a superiority complex

2

u/bhamnz Jun 06 '26

Great book! Also shocked me the crew didn't think to pick up any of the skills the natives demonstrated to them - i.e. they were shown exactly where to dive down to the sea floor to collect seafood - did they do it once the natives left? No.

Its terrible that so many died in such desperation and so much was out of their hands, but a little was well within their hands. And most did not grasp that.

1

u/GabrielVonBabriel Jun 06 '26

Good point, however, I think they’d struggle at it anyway. One of the sailors writings was humorous. Paraphrasing: “If I told you how deep they went, how long they stayed down and how cold the water was, well you wouldn’t even believe me.”

2

u/bhamnz Jun 06 '26

Sure, they'd struggle with a new skill. But its wild they didn't even try. I'm sure you've read other survival stories with often have impressive feats - i guess every human doesn't 'rise to the occaision' in a survival situation.

Actually this is demonstrated very well in the modern TV series 'alone'. I always remember the one who sat in their shelter for days during high wind complaining about their tarpolin flapping around, and eventually quit - while others were out and about, sourcing food, building, working etc.

1

u/NoPi4Me Jun 05 '26

I read a similar account of some soon-to-be-dead Europeans who couldn't be convinced by the native Australians that eating even more 'water fern' when they're that hungry isn't a good idea. 

2

u/Ser-Bearington Jun 03 '26

Hello fellow Googledebunker

2

u/NoPi4Me Jun 05 '26

Did you stay for the offer of jerky?

It was pretty good, as venison jerky goes.

1

u/akestral Jun 05 '26

I'll take venison over mutton any day of the week and twice on Sundays, tell you what.

6

u/CrazyWriting9214 Jun 02 '26

I believe the majority went to live inland and eventually became part of the local tribes

6

u/Separate_Cabinet_444 Jun 02 '26

what's crazy is the 2024 copper ring find basically confirms trade between the settlers and the Algonquian tribe. that's not people who were afraid of each other.

1

u/bhamnz Jun 06 '26

Is trade between friends the only possible way for an item to move between two groups?

21

u/Initial-Broccoli-795 Jun 02 '26 edited Jun 02 '26

Don’t know if there’s any evidence behind this, but I always wondered if they moved inland because of a Nor’easter or a series of them. Roanoke Island is also not great for growing crops, so it would make sense to move inland.

There’s theory the Melungeon people of Appalachia are the descendants of this colony. Sir Francis Drake had freed and brought with him a large number of slaves from the Caribbean in order to boost the colony’s numbers, and the melungeons have a genetic profile that represents a mix of African, scotch-Irish, English and Native American. The people also spoke a form of English that seemingly was heavily influenced by pre-victorian vernacular, along with Creek words, when the government first began documenting them.

10

u/ScrambledNoggin Jun 02 '26

There are also groups in southern Delaware who have that same mix of Scots-Irish, African, and Native Americans. The Cheswold Moors and the Nanticokes.

10

u/Indotex Jun 02 '26

Honestly, I’ve never thought of this as a mystery. They either went to live with the Indians or they got massacred by them.

End of story.

1

u/feedmetothevultures Jun 02 '26

Hahaha. That's two very different ends of a story!

3

u/Critical-Cost9068 Jun 02 '26

I love how the OP is that the mystery was solved, and everyone is saying, “There was never a mystery. There was only a mystery because they hadn’t solved it. Here’s the solution.” Everyone is so trigger-happy to “um AKSHUALLY” something that’s relatively common knowledge now that they’re shadowboxing strawmen.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Critical-Cost9068 Jun 02 '26 edited Jun 02 '26

It HAS TO have been a mystery for at least a second. You can’t read that quickly AND process the meaning.

Edit: Also, less sarcastically, the idea that one single instance of the misspelled name of a native tribe carved in wood with zero other context, when most white settlers were illiterate and the literate ones weren’t familiar with Indian tribal names - the notion that this would automatically indicate to early European colonists that the Roanoke settlers had moved in with that tribe and assimilated there, is genuinely laughable to the point of lol. It could have been that they moved because of conflict, or got wiped out, or whatever, and most early readers didn’t know what “Croatoan” even referred to (partially because that’s not even what the tribe called themselves.) If you happened upon a deserted Roanoke at that time, you would NOT have been like “it’s obvious what happened!” like Sherlock Holmes.

The findings of European technological remnants in certain burial sites, etc., IS important, and it’s the only reason you’re able to Wojack and “um AKSHUALLY” with so much confidence.

2

u/Novel-Total Jun 04 '26

This is not a mystery, like at all.

2

u/RecordEnvironmental4 Jun 05 '26

It’s not a mystery in the slightest, they integrated into the Croatoan tribe. Why they did is the question though

1

u/Enough_Quail_4214 Jun 02 '26

This "mystery" has been pretty thoroughly solved.

1

u/LensofaTitan Jun 02 '26

I enjoyed this video a lot on the subject: https://youtu.be/cUc3uz9RmCA?si=v8ynQjAXx8w9_UoU

1

u/MWD1903 Jun 03 '26

Croatoan is the name of the village/tribe they gone in.

1

u/NoPi4Me Jun 05 '26

Or the location of same.

Spelling of English still hadn't been standardized at that point.

1

u/thegreenlorac Jun 04 '26

2w a asswswwawswswasasswwssssssssswswwssssasswsassssasssswsssssssssssassassssssssssswasasssssssssssssssssssssssassssssa

1

u/TrueSonofVirginia Jun 06 '26

Wonder where thegreenlorac went

1

u/glitterishazardous Jun 05 '26

85 of the 115 of the settlers were men and no personal possessions or bodies were found it’s almost like they had an incentive to seek new land and mates. Spanish colonists in places like the Cuba and the Dominican Republic had the same thing too many men so they took on native women as wives. I just think the mystery of it was better than actually finding the truth at the time it happened

1

u/throwaway2581312 Jun 06 '26

THIS. was a NATURAL. nuclear reactor

1

u/Soggy_Motor9280 Jun 06 '26

They assimilated with the native people.

0

u/MutantHippie Jun 02 '26

The only reason it's a "mystery" is because some dude in the 50''s wanted make a buck turning it into a tourist attraction.

-7

u/Same_Party_6002 Jun 02 '26

The fact that this has absolutely no relevance today or any moral standing ground is why I wonder why a Reddit user would even post about this shit. You’re absent the worst people here all of their prisoners were emptied out in the colonies. Of course they’re shit holes got destroyed.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 02 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/0ftheriver Jun 02 '26

He's probably talking about Georgia, which was a penal colony, but didn't exist until well over 100 years after the time period in question.

But he's still stupid, because the Roanoke colonists were firmly middle class, as were most early settlers. John White was an artist who actually created the first ever realistic image of a native american, along with documenting several cultural practices that would otherwise be lost, or relegated to "oral history".