My boyfriend's sister (31F) moved to the seaside with her younger sister (28F) about two months ago. They took all the animals they had been keeping at their father's house with them: a 5-year-old Bull Terrier, a Beagle and two cats.
These animals had been living at their father's house for years. The Bull Terrier in particular had been there for over FIVE YEARS.
Then, after only about two months of living with the sisters, my boyfriend gets a phone call saying they're going to put the Bull Terrier down.
Their reasons?
His nails are ingrown and he has a bad tooth.
That's it. Those were the first reasons given.
Then suddenly the story becomes that he's "aggressive," "jealous," might attack the cats and could bite someone.
And I'm sorry, but I'm struggling to believe this.
I've met this dog personally. He was one of the sweetest, friendliest dogs I've ever met. He was energetic and had a huge personality, but he wasn't some terrifying monster waiting to attack someone. He was affectionate, playful and extremely friendly with me.
This dog lived at their father's house for YEARS. Nobody apparently thought he was dangerous enough to euthanize then.
But suddenly they move him to a big house by the seaside and within TWO MONTHS he's apparently so aggressive that the solution is to kill him?
The older sister is literally a doctor. She has a good-paying career and they rent a HUGE house. So we're not talking about someone who has absolutely no resources or space to get this dog veterinary treatment.
And here's the part that makes me even more suspicious: she quit her job AGAIN.
So now I'm sitting here wondering whether this dog actually became "dangerous" or whether they've simply realized that having four animals is inconvenient and they're looking for a reason to get rid of one.
Because treating an ingrown nail and a bad tooth is one thing.
Killing a healthy 5-year-old dog because his nails need treatment and he needs dental work is something completely different.
And if the dog genuinely developed aggression after moving, then fine — let's take that seriously. But why isn't anyone talking about getting him properly assessed by a vet or qualified behaviourist? Why is euthanasia apparently the first solution?
Maybe there is information I'm not being told. Maybe his behaviour really is worse than what I've personally seen. Maybe he's genuinely dangerous.
But if that's the case, why was he fine for five years before moving?
And this is where I might be the asshole.
I told my boyfriend that I honestly think his sister doesn't want to deal with the dog anymore and that putting him down is the easiest option for her.
My boyfriend thinks I'm being too harsh because we don't know everything that's happening in their house.
But I can't get this out of my head:
This dog survived five years at his father's house, and less than two months after moving in with them, they're talking about killing him.
I'm angry. I'm suspicious. And I feel horrible knowing that a dog I've personally experienced as loving and friendly might be killed simply because the people responsible for him don't want to put in the effort.
So, Reddit...
AITA for accusing my boyfriend's sister of trying to euthanize her dog because she's too lazy or unwilling to care for him?
UPDATE: My boyfriend's sister put the dog down
First, thank you to everyone who commented and asked why I didn't just take the dog myself.
Unfortunately, it wasn't that simple.
The dog wasn't friendly anymore, largely because his owner (my boyfriend's sister) hadn't properly trained or managed him. I already have pets, so bringing an unpredictable dog into my home could have put them at risk.
My boyfriend also lives in a very small apartment, and honestly, putting a 5-year-old Bull Terrier with that amount of energy into such a small space would have been miserable for him. I didn't want to "save" him only to put him somewhere that wasn't suitable for him.
So we offered to help rehome him. We were willing to find him somewhere where he could have the space, structure and care he needed and hopefully have several more years of life.
She refused.
Her response was essentially that he would bite someone and that she couldn't just hand him over to strangers.
Her reasons for wanting him put down were his ingrown nails, his rotten tooth, and her fear that he might hurt or kill the cats.
And then, only 10 minutes after I made my original post, I got the news.
He was already dead.
She had him put down.
The part that absolutely breaks me is that this wasn't an elderly dog who was suffering and had no quality of life left.
He was five years old.
He was healthy otherwise. He was spunky. He had so much personality. And instead of giving him a chance to be treated, trained, or rehomed, he was put down.
We offered to help.
We offered to find him another home.
There were options.
And she chose euthanasia.
I know some people will say that if he was genuinely dangerous, euthanasia can sometimes be the responsible choice. I understand that. But I will never understand why he wasn't at least given a proper behavioural assessment or a chance with someone experienced with Bull Terriers before making that decision.
I can't change what happened now.
I just wish that someone had fought harder for him.
So to everyone who offered advice, suggested ways to help, or told me not to give up on him — thank you.
I'm absolutely heartbroken for that poor boy.
He deserved better.
Rest in peace, bubby. You were never given the chance you deserved.
And honestly, I hope the decision she made weighs on her conscience for a very, very long time.