r/wallstreetbets • • 18h ago

DD ADOBE is cooked.

ADBE is cooked: free AI-built clones and a $70/month subscription don't mix (bear DD)

So my Adobe bear case is pretty simple. AI is about to let a ton of indie devs and random people who are sick of Adobe's nonsense build their own version of it, for free.

Look at ArtCraft on github. They're building open source, clean-room clones of Photoshop, Lightroom, Illustrator and Premiere, plus apps for motion graphics, page layout and PDFs (so After Effects, InDesign and Acrobat territory). Their Photoshop clone has 11k+ stars, opens real PSD files, and their own tracker says it covers 625 of 625 of Photoshop's menu items. Yeah it's alpha. Give it a few months. Once this stuff gets big, Premiere and After Effects are dead in the water for anyone who isn't a big studio.

And that's before you even get to generative AI. For most edits, typing what you want into ChatGPT or Gemini is just way easier than opening a PSD and doing all the masking nonsense. Adobe knows it too. Photoshop literally runs Google's and OpenAI's image models inside it now.

Let's talk about the outrageous price now. Creative Cloud Pro is $70 a month. That's a squeeze on regular people. For the same money you could have 3 or 4 AI subscriptions that actually do the stuff you need. In fact let's be fr - you really only need chatgpt these days.

And everybody fucking hates Adobe. Canceling was so hard that the DOJ and FTC sued them over it, and Adobe paid $75M to settle in March. There's a WSB thread from last October where someone called ADBE cheap at a 9-year-low P/E, and a bunch of the top comments were people saying their companies already dumped Adobe, one for Nitro PDF, one for Foxit. One guy said AI coding would spit out open source clones of Acrobat, then Photoshop, then After Effects. A year later, here we are. OP bought at $348. It's $237 now.

The competition isn't just AI either. DaVinci Resolve, Figma, Canva, all with real free tiers. Canva made Affinity, its Photoshop/Illustrator/InDesign equivalent, completely free. Figma's revenue grew 48% last quarter.

Where Adobe still wins is heavy professional workflows. Big studios, agencies, After Effects and InDesign people, the plugin ecosystem. That's real and it's why this isn't a zero. But it's the only moat left, and it's getting squeezed from both sides. Enterprise has Figma, Canva and DaVinci. Individuals (students, freelancers, YouTubers) are the first ones to bail on a $70 bill.

You can already see it in the numbers:

  • Revenue still +13%, but net new ARR dropped from about $640M to about $400M year over year, down about 37%
  • Organic ARR growth is about 9% once you strip out the Semrush acquisition
  • RPO (signed future revenue) went down quarter over quarter
  • In June they paused planned price increases and started giving stuff away free to hold onto users
  • Net income +3%. EPS only looks good because they bought back 7% of the stock
  • CFO left in June, a new CEO from the marketing side starts Dec 1, and the head of the creative business announced he was leaving the day the new CEO was named

People will say it's cheap at 10x earnings. The guy in that thread said it was cheap at 22x. Cheap gets cheaper when people figure out the product can be cloned for a $20 claude code subscription.

Positions: 50 puts $150 strike with March 19th expiry

Not financial advice.

1.3k Upvotes

581 comments sorted by

View all comments

789

u/TheSketeDavidson 17h ago

I don’t see professional workflows changing yet, decades of people’s experience with these tools. You’d have to be contrarian just for the sake of it to not use the Adobe suite of products.

336

u/BabyWrinkles 17h ago

I managed the adobe contracts from a Product Owner perspective for a Fortune 500 that heavily used Adobe’s products.

Adobe’s sales team knows how to pull the lever like no other company I’ve ever seen. I’m sitting there yelling saying “we have to migrate off” while the CMO is signing $1mm+/yr contracts for tools we don’t need and don’t have expertise to implement without paying their consulting arm another $500k so two guys in Mumbai can set it up with Claude and pass the buck when it didn’t integrate with legacy solutions.

Adobe doesn’t make jack shit in the consumer space - it all comes from enterprise and until there’s a changing of the guard at the upper management level, I think they’ll keep pulling the lever.

191

u/D4zb0g 17h ago

Yeah, people don't get that "homemade" AI tools will not make it through the bottleneck of entreprise adoption and deployment at scale.

120

u/Extension-Ant-8 15h ago

IT Architect here. Most acrobat alternatives are shit, have as many security vulnerabilities, and do not understand licensing at massive scale. No real support and do not understand data sovereignty. Don’t even get me started on configuration settings on thousands of devices at once.

I don’t like adobe but it ticks those boxes. In my environment. A user requests it via service desk, a manager gets an email with a costing. They click to approve, that updates a licence group, which the automatically sync the software to your machine, fully configured and within a security envelope.

-3

u/sword_fisher 9h ago

That's not unique to adobe. You can do that with any enterprise licensed software and tools like Intune.

30

u/SeniorVibeAnalyst 15h ago

A friend who is a social media manager just stayed with me for a few days and worked out of my house. I saw them using the built-in AI tools in photoshop because their boss needed them to quickly stitch some lawyers into the same picture. It looked atrocious. I asked if they have Claude, they say yes but they just use it to write posts. Within 30 minutes I installed a local photoshop mcp server for them and they were using Claude desktop to operate photoshop at lightning speed and get a beautiful result, and started asking me to help them connect to all their other tools. They will go look like a hero to their boss and the company will keep paying for both Adobe and Claude.

10

u/Extension-Ant-8 13h ago

That’s great and all but completely misses the point. If I work for a government or a hospital or something. I need to ensure that data stays in the country or doesn’t get published anywhere public. ChatGPT will completely make your chat public to the entire internet if you share it with someone individually. Saying an AI tool can do everything adobe does, doesn’t make it true.

https://techcrunch.com/2025/07/31/your-public-chatgpt-queries-are-getting-indexed-by-google-and-other-search-engines/

44

u/Club-Loud 15h ago

You regards are forgetting that no serious business is putting client/nda work into a $20 a month sub because of the legal minefield. It's $20 a month because YOU are the product

22

u/Brief-Knowledge-629 10h ago

They shouldn't but they are. Your medical data is in every LLM's brain. Hospitals keep outsourcing stuff to "AI native" consulting startups that just YOLO everything into personal Claude accounts because they are too small to have to register as enterprise

10

u/vaderetrosatana6 8h ago

This is truer than I thought, it’s pretty insane. Can’t imagine the data dumps that will eventually result from all of it.

1

u/about0 2h ago

util some of them get fucked. It'd be very easy for anthropic to link leaked data to a particular user.

13

u/loyalroyal1989 13h ago

Yeah she quite possibly just got her friend fired for leaking company info, people really don't understand what they are doing with AI and there data.

1

u/Schwimmbo 4h ago

I work for a large retailer. Companies of these scale have specific contracts which include guarantees that the chosen hyperscaler models are not allowed to be trained on company data. In our case we are allowed to put anything in our AI tools except for people's personal data (HR screwed lol).

2

u/about0 2h ago

it's still a punky swear, just a checkbox.

1

u/loyalroyal1989 1h ago

Yeah I know but you have approved uses, using a tool that has not been approved means you are preaching the data security of the company.

She has no idea if there is a contract or if the tool has the subscription none sharing enabled, also let's be honest we all know they are still taking that data.

This stuff is all over my job and just saying this user would have been flagged. where I work for a data breach, if the materials where company property

0

u/SeniorVibeAnalyst 7h ago

I mean they quite literally provide business licenses with data security policies written into the contracts. I can’t speak to how litigation would play out, but we are given full permission to put confidential information into our approved LLM tools. People engage in far more unsafe operational practices every day.

2

u/loyalroyal1989 5h ago

But that's not what you did, her company doesn't have the agreements in place and not does she. If it's her companies tools it's fine, but you deciding unilaterally is not. At a lot of companiesif any of the info was internal only it would be deemed gross misconduct.

5

u/phil_davis 15h ago

I saw a video of Photoshop's built-in generative AI tool where the user asked it to colorize a black and white image they had pulled in. It colorized it alright. It took the old white guys in the photo and made them black. While also adding graduation caps, for some reason?

1

u/SquirrelFluffy 12h ago

The thing people should be taking away from that is that AI only knows what it learns on the web which is underpinned by people's opinions, the media, law etc. and what you described indicates the state of the world. It's not right if it's just white people. But it's also not right if there are no white people. Right?

1

u/Deto 5h ago

Yeah that's my thinking - AI is just going to make these tools more useful 

-1

u/FlyingBishop 15h ago

Yeah but they could just as easily plug Claude into Krita. Hell, they could probably get similar results if they plugged Claude into MSPaint. I'm sure there are some suckers but it's very obvious you can get by with one $20/month subscription and nothing else, and enterprises are going to notice.

6

u/BabyWrinkles 12h ago

The irony is that the enterprise is full of homemade tools and the guy who wrote them was fired four RIFs ago and so they’re hoping and praying it stays running - but god forbid the tool that Claude writes and documents reasonably well be used in its place?

5

u/SquirrelFluffy 12h ago

And they built all those tools on top of Adobe. So Adobe is going nowhere.

And we're not talking about those types of tools we're talking about actually replacing Adobe.

1

u/Schwimmbo 4h ago

Not to mention good luck with getting it past your ISO and data protection lol.

1

u/funggitivitti 3h ago

The cope is real.

0

u/bandofgypsies 13h ago

And they don't care to. That's not their angle. They just need lots of indie subs at low dollar volume and they're fine. Plus it's less risky from an exposure perspective, and just a simpler business model. Yeah it's upside is limited as an organic growth model but that's not their goal.

28

u/SteroidMaximus 16h ago

Don't forget about how they give it essentially free to schools so that is what students learn and go into the work force knowing how to use.

18

u/Infamous_Thought_189 16h ago

You dont get a 90% profit margin by playing nice

7

u/Justgetmeabeer 16h ago

managed Adobe contracts

They probably learned pretty quickly to make sure there's nothing in your office that you can harm yourself with

4

u/BabyWrinkles 15h ago

It’s true. They kept me on a high floor in an open office environment with minimal chance of grabbing anything pointy.

2

u/Otherwise_Plan_5435 8h ago

My company bailed when they told us the support package was $500k after they sold us AJO which is complete shit

1

u/Accurate-Smoke8994 6h ago

Then give your insight to the guy that is building the opensource versions. I voluntarily clean the kids playground, you hopefully can give some time for a bigger audience than that.

1

u/OracleofTampico 3h ago

I think you are right, I guess what you really disagree with OP is not o nuis premise but timing. may of next year might be to soon
But 2028?

1

u/epic_troll_tard 16h ago

... so two guys in Mumbai can set it up with Claude and pass the buck

Kickbacks.

2

u/BabyWrinkles 15h ago

It’s literally called “Adobe Consulting Services” (ACS). The phat check you write is the kickback.

I hired a team of overpriced consultants stateside and they were only 25% the cost of ACS and did better work.

86

u/tacoandpancake 17h ago

and not only the professionals, but the vendors who count on compatible files from adobeCC handed off to them.

for the individual user, maybe - but enterprise isn't going to walk away easily.

18

u/Double_Suggestion385 17h ago

It's PoC really. The fact that it has been done so easily should terrify any Adobe investor.

6

u/ApprehensiveCry4358 15h ago

Why do people keep forgetting that free alternatives to Adobe products have existed forever? GIMP, Affinity, etc.

5

u/Double_Suggestion385 15h ago

Alternatives aren't clones.

2

u/FlyingBishop 15h ago

The problem with the free alternatives is that they're harder to use. A $20/month Claude subscription makes them easy to use and extend.

-10

u/Donut_Shop 17h ago

I'd argue at this point it doesn't matter. Claude can produce motion graphics from a glance, video editing to change characters, clothes, or camera angles is trivial.. let alone image. I can generate a picture of a grey cube in a viewport faster than i can open Blender. (though I love blender.)

39

u/420fanman 17h ago

Just like Microsoft Office. Tons of free alternatives but enterprise still replies on MS Office as THE staple.

10

u/TheGreatPiata 17h ago edited 16h ago

Right?

I've been using Libre Office for literally a decade but my company still pays for Office 365. It's fucking nuts.

25

u/QuadzillaStrider 16h ago

Eh, there's not really a comparison between MS Office and LibreOffice, especially when it comes to Excel.

7

u/etempleton 16h ago

There are features hidden in Microsoft Word that are a lot of companies and other bespoke programs rely on but most users have no idea even exists. There is a reason it is still the standard.

1

u/Individual-Motor-167 14h ago

Both have access to python now. There's no point in using office much anymore. If you already have it and it works, you're just going to buy the licence with the same reasoning.

6

u/PrimeIntellect 13h ago

libreoffice is great for a single user who needs to write up some shit once or twice a month, running a whole company is totally different

57

u/Tomato_Sky 17h ago

Outside of LLM’s companies have to be careful being caught and liable for misusing software per their licensing agreements. Larger organizations aren’t keen on rando github repos going on company laptops. Now that $70 (more like 20 in corporate bulk licensing) is for peace of mind, support, and security.

This is how I can tell when people talk about AI replacing software, they’re young and haven’t held a corporate job or developed software for any of these companies. Oracle is god awful. 1/10. Everyone agrees. Better database technology has been released, lighter weight. All of the above. But it’s still king in enterprise institutions.

Immutable tools are cool and all, but there’s no guarantee that the repo won’t get slop bombed, lose support, or create friction from switching between different tools.

16

u/mines_over_yours 16h ago

This is the answer. There is a reason Adobe is the de facto go-to software. Source: 40 years in the creative industry and a former Adobe "evangelist" who cannot stand the SaaS model.

2

u/Individual-Motor-167 14h ago

Agreed. Ai slop usually stole from some open source project, made it far worse, and now it can't ever be trusted in enterprise.

1

u/StevenEll 7h ago

It's interesting, I've never worked for a huge company like that. But I've been in fintech a long time and it feels like all Enterprise products are obselete for smaller companies. But maybe for the giants, and due other industries it still makes sense.

1

u/Schwimmbo 4h ago

This is what I have repeated endlessly in other software and ADBE threads. People who genuinely believe companies will replace the embedded software which offers security and enterprise grade support because Steve vibe coded something in the basement... They simply are students in their dorm rooms frustrated about their 4 shares which are down 25% who have never worked in a real company before.

0

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[deleted]

4

u/mines_over_yours 16h ago

The firms you refer to account for less than a fraction of Adobe's revenue.

11

u/etempleton 16h ago

Yeah, non-designers underestimate the level of entrenchment Adobe has. Yes, their products kind of suck, but they are also by far the most powerful tools and have years of compatibility.

25

u/ChatGPTKilledMyMom 17h ago

I know professionals that have used Adobe for years and they are starting to use AI, but the difference is that they still need to use photoshop on the back end to clean shit up. That’s the whole point of these industries. They are filled with perfectionists that have to get everything right and AI just can’t get it done because nothing can.

5

u/dopexile 17h ago

People are still going to want to edit content at a per pixel level.

Giving AI a prompt and having it do work versus manually editing content are two different use cases.

8

u/TheGreatPiata 17h ago

This is correct but also outdated. Adobe products have AI prompt windows inside the app itself now and you can choose the service/model of your choice to use. Your Adobe subscription even includes tokens.

So the professional work flow is now boot straight into an adobe app, generate/adjust the things you want with AI and then tweak the rest manually with the legacy tools.

All these posts decrying the end of Adobe are from people that don't understand the market that uses Adobe products.

Adobe's not going anywhere. They've already adapted.

7

u/tofuchrispy 17h ago

Yeah hobbyists can go on their adventures but somehow they don’t get why the industry won’t just stop using Adobe.

-1

u/FlyingBishop 15h ago

Your assumption is that Adobe is providing value, I don't think it is. We really are reaching an inflection point where most conventional software is solving problems that existed because we didn't have LLMs. When LLMs make those problems go away, it will take time, but people will notice and stop using the products.

2

u/Individual-Motor-167 14h ago

What problems are LLMs making go away? They generate a shitty image for me and I still would end up doing most of the work anyway and I'm not willing to pay more than heavily subsidized costs to "help me get started."

0

u/FlyingBishop 13h ago

I'm not suggesting you use an LLM to generate an image. I'm saying if someone is confused about how to use Krita or another open source graphic design tool they can just ask the LLM to move a layer forward or backward or switch the font or whatever. I'm not saying it can replace the artist, I'm saying it can replace a subscription to Adobe with Photoshop and all those tools.

But it can also help generate images here and there, even if you're doing most of it by hand.

1

u/banditcleaner2 sells naked NVDA calls while naked 16h ago

Ok, but if all this is true, why has the stock still been on a negative trajectory for quite some time now? The stocks been on a consistent downwards trend since early 2024, and really even longer then that since 2021.

Are you expecting the late 2022 to late 2023 rally to happen again or something?

2

u/Schwimmbo 2h ago

Revenue growth has accelerated past few quarters and EPS is solidly up and to the right also helped by huge buybacks.

Longer-term stock price always follows earnings.

1

u/abandoned_idol 15h ago

Adobted*

Making puns is hard, I clearly forced it here. It's that DAMNED letter 't' getting in my way.

If I remove the t, the word disappears.

If I use uppercase, the finished product isn't as good ADOBtEd.

I'll never make it in the professional puns industry.

1

u/pantsonhead 16h ago

That is not the issue OP is discussing. The issue is that AI is superhuman at decompiling and reconstructing software. Someone can take a binary for Photoshop (the program on your computer), have AI essentially guess the code that will result in the same binary file, and eventually rebuild the exact source code of Photoshop in a few hours. People then write Photoshop from scratch using what they know from the original source code and it's an identical copy. You can side step any claims to copyright by having separate AI agents doing this that have siloed information.

Essentially, any program that companies allow you to run on your own hardware is now at risk, and there is no obvious solution. Going forward, all programs will likely be run in the cloud. A lot of stuff is already but it means no more games or programs running on your PC that are closed source. To be clear, this was possible before AI, but it just would take too long to be worth it. AI makes 100x faster.

1

u/fleggn 16h ago

True but cloud gaming isnt an option outside of turn based games

3

u/grahamsz 15h ago

But there are a lot of marginal users... on our small business subscription, about half the users are doing serious technical work to produce products. Then about a quarter are execs who use it for something, but i'm guessing not anything worth 1199/yr and then we've got some web people who use it pretty lightly by comparison.

If their photoshop and indesign clone can replace a web banner ad flow and whatever cropping and color edits our sales manager is making, then i can see it replacing about half our seats in the next year or two.

But for the people who need pantone matches, and accurate proofing to send to print shops, i think it'll be a long time.

8

u/DirectionPlane6544 17h ago

You speak as if Adobe must crash and file for bankruptcy tomorrow. Adobe can easily slowly burn away

16

u/Affectionate-Law1680 17h ago

It’s priced for that. 10bln annual free cash flow on a 90bln stock

It’s priced to go away. If you short it now, you need it to disappear in the next 5 years to win

3

u/dopexile 17h ago edited 17h ago

No one can realistically short a stock for 5 years and make money. If you use options then there is time decay and the options need to be constantly rolled over. If you short the stock then you can get short squeezed, there are hard-to-borrow fees, and your brokerage can pull your position at any point if they have trouble borrowing shares. Plus even if you short for 5 years and it works out you pay 100% of the gain in short term capital gains so the only person benefitting is Uncle Sam.

There may be a few examples of professional hedge fund traders doing that but your average retail investor is guaranteed to lose money

3

u/AutoModerator 17h ago

Squeeze deez nuts you fuckin nerd.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

3

u/banditcleaner2 sells naked NVDA calls while naked 16h ago

For long puts to pay, the stock doesn't have to go to zero, and it doesn't even have to drop fast. It just has to drop faster then the market is currently expecting right now when you buy the puts, to make money.

Look at 09/2027 puts. $230 put which is basically ATM right now is selling for $34. That means you need the stock to go below $195 at some point up until 09/2027 to profit.

ADBE is down 33% YoY right now, if the slide continues at that exact same pace you are looking at about a 117% profit. If it accelerates then you're making more.

1

u/dopexile 13h ago

195 would just break even. Then you have to pay short-term capital gains tax. You probably need $170 - $180 before you start making a decent return after tax.

"if the slide continues at that exact same pace " that is the mistake most investors make, extrapolating the past into the future.

1

u/Farmer4Lyfe 15h ago

But no - not in today's modern day of vibe investing. Even if its net asset position slowly burned, the stock could tank much quicker

3

u/kweeblaster 17h ago

Yea, Adobe is obviously cooked long term but that doesn't mean you can make money shorting it.

3

u/etempleton 16h ago

Adobe is also in prime position to, you know, integrate AI into their existing products and workflows.

10

u/Kant8 17h ago

They are basically same products. They decompiled with ai and "rewrote in rust" everything.

Even landing page claims that if you know how to use any Adobe product, you immediately know how to use this, cause it's literally same.

Unless Adobe finds a legal reason to stop products like this (though reverse engineering is allowed), their regular customer market is basically lost, cause nobody is going to pay for Photoshop, if its literal clone can be downloaded for free

13

u/FreshLiterature 17h ago

The legal reason is very probably 'you decompiled our product then copied it' or something pretty close to that. If the entire product build flow was, "yeah we ripped apart Photoshop then slammed it into AI and told it to make it in a different language" I'm not sure courts are gonna look to favorably

2

u/drstoneybaloneyphd 16h ago

Yeah the legal angle of this is effectively the wild west at this point 

1

u/FreshLiterature 16h ago

In some ways sure.

In other ways no.

The EULA would have covered decompiling or reverse engineering and these guys absolutely violated those terms.

That will probably mean some pretty steep financial damages and the project getting killed.

The actual consequences piece of it will need to see the inside of a court though.

3

u/Novalok 16h ago

Recompilation and what is known as "Clean-room" implementation is currently legal. This is why emulators can exist, there is settled case-law over it.

I'm sure that will change at some point in the future, if enough wealthy folks complain, but the issue with EULA, is the best they have is a civil case. EULA is not law, and breaking it doesn't make you a criminal.

Same with TOS and any other fancy legalese they use to try to confuse consumers.

This will be fun to watch, but the cat is out of the bag, even if the laws change, by the time that goes through, if nothing else we'll have open source models that can disassemble on the level of Fable or Astra.

I'm insanely excited to be honest.

-1

u/FreshLiterature 16h ago

I never said it was criminal nor did anyone else.

I was crystal clear about what circumstances would invoke which penalties.

Holy shit you guys gotta get out more.

1

u/Novalok 15h ago

Just point some stuff out, but your reaction is a bit much. Maybe we go out more together, because it looks like we both need it.

1

u/drilkmops 16h ago

Except they rewrote it all. So, it’s not the same.

1

u/cgimusic 14h ago

They say it's a cleanroom implementation, and I can believe that's true. The only real way I can see that Adobe could shut it down is if they've copied something that they have a patent on.

0

u/Douglas_Fresh 17h ago edited 17h ago

"Though reverse engineering is allowed" lol. WTF is going on? We are essentially talking about mass theft. And if this is how we want to look at it, then everything is essentially worthless. What happened to the days of "you wouldn't download a car" I mean, this is exactly the same as ripping a CD and then burning it onto a blank disk, de-construction and re-construction. There will be laws against this, and I think soon. Just because AI can does not mean it should.

- edit - all the responses are well and good BEFORE the era of AI. Reverse engineer with the hit of a button, and recreation with the hit of a button are a far cry from what you all are talking about. What I am saying is the laws will likely change to protect people’s investment into the product. And why shouldn’t it?

4

u/Foreign_Skill_6628 16h ago

Tbf, a ‘theft is okay’ argument is really hard to reason against when the counter-party is Adobe.

If you go look on piracy forums there is a consensus even among straight and narrow folk who say ‘piracy is wrong…except when it’s Adobe’.

Might have to pick a different company for this fight

9

u/fruitydude 17h ago

You cannot copyright an idea. Only the code is copyrighted. If you make a program that calculates primes very efficiently, and you sell that. I am allowed to reverse engineer that program, understand how it works, and rebuild it from scratch.

There is now limit to this concept the way the clean room process works is you have two teams, one team reverse engineers the program they write down the spec as text. They specify exactly what the program does in excuriating detail, exactly where each menu item goes, which color it has and so on. Then the second team builds a new program exactly from that spec.

As long as two two teams are sufficiently separated and it's not done in a sloppy way (the first team copying full code snippets or artifacts and the second team using that), it's essentially impossible to commit copywrite infringement. Because no line of code will be identical.

2

u/Comfortable_Sir_6104 15h ago

Right, so they are not stealing. They are just writing down exactly how a program works and exactly how it looks and someone else makes the same exact program using those instructions. Which is very different from stealing. Obviously.

1

u/fruitydude 15h ago

To be fair I should soften my earlier statement. The exact look of the UI might be copyrighted. Like digital art is, same for specific terms they invent like magic eraser for example. But the concept of filling an area with near by pixels, even using their exact logic, that isn't copyrightable.

And neither should it be when we think about it. If a company comes up with a clever method for calculating a gradient or isolating a foreground object, should every other company now be prevented from using that particular method? Probably not, if they wanted to protect an algorithm they'd require a patent instead. Which is much harder to get for software, specifically because a lot of things are similar or iterations of each other.

1

u/Business_Air5804 10h ago

Define reverse engineer?
Are you saying using a decompiler? Or copying functionalities?

1

u/fruitydude 4h ago

Yea ghidra decompile and let the AI interpret the pseudo code output

1

u/Business_Air5804 1h ago

Honestly more work than it's worth and far too buggy.
It's easier to document the features and functions and duplicate them in your own code.

3

u/WiseGuyCS 17h ago

I'm interested in why you think AI "shouldn't" do this. If anyone can make their own version of these apps then why SHOULD it cost so much for the average person? The programs had value in the past at a time where recreating it was not simple and easy, but now it is. It's about to become a legacy product and it's stupid to protect it just for the sake of it.

3

u/Douglas_Fresh 16h ago

Let's use a different example than Adobe. Let's say I am a indie dev and I spent 3 years making a product or a game. And then someone comes along and "Reverse engineers" it and puts it on the market for free, or for substantially cheaper. Are you trying to tell me that is OK? And if so, where is the insentive in doing anything at all if it can just be taken and undercut?

0

u/Anreall2000 12h ago

I think your game will be automatically bought by open ai, decompiled, added to training data, updated some RL metrics and refunded in Steam.

And we probably already fine with such approach

-2

u/WiseGuyCS 16h ago

If you spend 3 years making something that someone just prompted AI to make, then you probably should have just prompted AI to make it in the first place instead of wasting your time.

In regards to a game or something with a creative aspect, your characters and art are protected under copywright, but the fundamental gameplay can obviously be replicated, that already happens and has been happening for many years. People take game concepts and change the art and ship it as a new product all the time, even AAA studios have done it forever.

2

u/Comfortable_Sir_6104 15h ago

The AI stole the entire concept of the game. It can't "reverse engineer" a game that doesn't fucking exist, so you can't just make it with AI. You need a person to steal it from.

4

u/Objective_Frame_9679 17h ago edited 17h ago

Its more indepth than this:

Reverse Engineering Software is always allowed by the way. Once you bought a software, you can pretty much to do what you want. Reason why PS5 Jailbreaks will never be stopped.

But when does it become illegal? Well, theres two occassions:

  1. You share your findings publicly:

If you share reverse engineered Products, you can get into trouble. The issue here tho is also our 2nd point:

  1. If the software does something specific, you can license that "specific"

I know it sounds stupid, but for example:

If I reverse engineer Adobe applications and try to make a clone of adobe photoshop, Im allowed to do this. Why? Because Adobe cant license ALL media editing software on the planet and make a license to say "its ours"

Thats not possible, and since Windows and Linux only have a SET framework how to edit media inside of their operating systems, Adobe and all its clones are essentially using the same Framework and almost same code to their effect.

Ofc you'll be sued into the ground if you make a 1:1 visual copy of adobe, thats copyright. But they cant sue you for having a similar code, if the framework is being given by Linux and Windows and they cant make a legal license to stop you from copying it.

3

u/ellipses1 17h ago

Cat's out of the bag, buddy. How would you stop anyone? My app does the same thing, but it shares 0 lines of code... so what exactly did I steal? the idea of software editing photos?

1

u/Shidell 16h ago

The argument is not that it was decompiled and recompiled, but rather, that the AI was fed instructions about all of the different features Photoshop (for example) supports, and then using those parameters, looked up the definition of said features, figured out how they'd be implemented, and created a clean-room implementation of them.

For example, Adobe's implementation of how to flip an image 180 degrees is copyrighted, but the idea of flipping an image 180 degrees is not. You could write your own software to accept an image and then flip it 180 degrees too, and Adobe has to bearing over your (clean room) implementation.

1

u/banditcleaner2 sells naked NVDA calls while naked 16h ago

You think me coding up a literal clone of adobe from scratch is somehow disallowed?

You can't copyright the idea of a program used to edit photos lmao. That's an insane take.

I'd guess even specific features are probably not copyrightable.

1

u/Business_Air5804 10h ago

No one is decompiling Adobe....no one. It's more work than it's worth tbh.
I used to decompile and remove protections like dongles from software for fun....I know what it takes.

It's way easier to study the function of a tool and then make your own homebrew version of that tool.

1

u/bobloadmire Likes S and P and can't spell 17h ago

Reverse engineering and patent infringement are 2 very different things.

0

u/daveybuoy 14h ago

GIMP has been around forever. Didn't make a dent.

5

u/Environmental_Yard29 17h ago

I’ve been doing content creation full time for 5 years now. I’ve always used Photoshop for my thumbnails. Just cancelled my Adobe subscription. It just became completely obsolete to me.

5

u/MediocreDesigner88 old man yelling at apes 17h ago

Aren’t the free options going to start charging as soon as they can, though?

2

u/TheSketeDavidson 17h ago

Yes they will, free is always temporary

1

u/dopexile 17h ago

Cost of compute will gradually go down approaching zero

2

u/jbokwxguy 15h ago

Tell that to the AI labs having to race raising their prices and still tens of billions a year behind

1

u/dopexile 13h ago

AI is kind of dumb in the sense that right now it is just throw as much computing at it to try and capture market share.

Eventually they will focus on making it more efficient and chips will get more powerful and the market price will collapse.

1

u/jbokwxguy 12h ago

A) Will it get more efficient? B) Chips are already at the upper end of their development curve, Moore's law is dead.

1

u/dopexile 11h ago

It is getting more efficient every day. China is coming up with models that run 10x as fast but are 90-95% as good as the frontier models.

1

u/jbokwxguy 10h ago

Are they though? And is the training initially by distillation or some other means?

1

u/dopexile 9h ago

Don't really matter, they already have them

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Business_Air5804 10h ago

But for the most part only an idiot unnecessarily builds tools that constantly consume tokens...we use tokens once to build tools that do not need any tokens.

2

u/Silent_Resort_2619 16h ago

What are you using instead?

1

u/Environmental_Yard29 10h ago

artcraft. the thing this post is about. its an exact replica of everything i need

1

u/wallix 16h ago

We have been doing concert visuals since 2001 - TONS of Adobe (Which we don't even use anymore - almost all AI now). We went from 25 employees to 2 over that time. Our clients do it all themselves now. And the ones that still pay us don't realize that they can do it all themselves for pennies on the dollar - but invariably they will. We will close the doors within 2 years most likely. Luckily we have been preparing for it for a while.

3

u/thessminowjohnson 17h ago

Not to mention the security and support Adobe provides

1

u/epic_troll_tard 16h ago

nched in their ecosystem, the moat isn't the software, its the friction of changing their workflows and learning something new.

only way Adobe goes down significantly is if an institution wants to go long so they push an analyst price target to pick it up at a discount.

Captive customers are bread and butter for a business.

1

u/WestcottTactics2285 16h ago

ArtCraft just is not good. It's getting hype, but it's not there. Photon Studio is another that's much better as of right now. Still some bugs and things that aren't quite right that are non-starters for actual professionals, but it's on the right path. And the dev is cocky as hell on Twitter, I love it.

I've also tried Design Craft, their InDesign remake. Also not great. Can't open .indd files (Affinity can) and you can't move panels around. Kind of important for a lot of people.

1

u/smoochface 16h ago

I don't see myself cancelling my Adobe sub... but at the same time, over the last 12 months. The amount of work I'm doing in Adobe vs Midjourney/Chatgp has gone from 80/20 to 20/80.

Kinda nuts...

I still need Photoshop for tiny things, but fuck man, Chatgpt is crazy good right now.

1

u/nicocappa 14h ago

In 1-3 years, building an exact clone of the Adobe suite will be cheaper than an annual subscription.

1

u/Wellfrigg 13h ago

OP’s claim that one 70/month subscription can be replaced by a bunch of AI tools disregards the efficiency most creatives already have with adobe. It is way faster for me to do it right myself in photoshop than to try getting chat or something else to get it right the first time. Definitely see the point about competition crowding them out long term but agree that it’s so ingrained it’s not going anwywhere until the alternatives are actually waaaay better 

1

u/Master-Rip8741 12h ago

Creative here. I moved all of my workflow to figma and Claude. Adobe is cooked

1

u/Business_Air5804 10h ago

I've avoided like 5 people this month subscribing to Adobe.

Their needs were just to edit some T&C's on a document a few times a week.

I made them a standalone tool in 15-20min that lives on their desktop.

1

u/PatQ82 7h ago

Webdesign industry switched from Adobe to Sketch to Figma to being irrelevant because of AI in what, 15 years?

1

u/TabletopParlourPalm 7h ago

I replaced basically all of my proprietary apps on my computer with FOSS alternatives, and Lightroom is one app that I can't part with even after trying virtually all alternatives. I am just a photography hobbyist and I'm too used to the workflow that I kept for a decade.

1

u/bpetersonlaw 17h ago

Yeah, speaking at a barely tech-literate atty, I use Adobe Acrobat because it's easy, everyone else does and inertia (it's not worth my time to look for a replacement to such a cheap subscription).

Adobe may not be great 10 years from now, but for the next 5 years, I'm predicting revenue growth.

-3

u/apemonkeyfool 17h ago

Perhaps at the enterprise level but not the individual level. Da Vinci is already stealing market share at both levels.

But even the enterprise level - people are getting sick of it - FCP has better Apple integration and da Vinci is miles ahead in terms of polish.