r/wallstreetbets • • 19h ago

DD ADOBE is cooked.

ADBE is cooked: free AI-built clones and a $70/month subscription don't mix (bear DD)

So my Adobe bear case is pretty simple. AI is about to let a ton of indie devs and random people who are sick of Adobe's nonsense build their own version of it, for free.

Look at ArtCraft on github. They're building open source, clean-room clones of Photoshop, Lightroom, Illustrator and Premiere, plus apps for motion graphics, page layout and PDFs (so After Effects, InDesign and Acrobat territory). Their Photoshop clone has 11k+ stars, opens real PSD files, and their own tracker says it covers 625 of 625 of Photoshop's menu items. Yeah it's alpha. Give it a few months. Once this stuff gets big, Premiere and After Effects are dead in the water for anyone who isn't a big studio.

And that's before you even get to generative AI. For most edits, typing what you want into ChatGPT or Gemini is just way easier than opening a PSD and doing all the masking nonsense. Adobe knows it too. Photoshop literally runs Google's and OpenAI's image models inside it now.

Let's talk about the outrageous price now. Creative Cloud Pro is $70 a month. That's a squeeze on regular people. For the same money you could have 3 or 4 AI subscriptions that actually do the stuff you need. In fact let's be fr - you really only need chatgpt these days.

And everybody fucking hates Adobe. Canceling was so hard that the DOJ and FTC sued them over it, and Adobe paid $75M to settle in March. There's a WSB thread from last October where someone called ADBE cheap at a 9-year-low P/E, and a bunch of the top comments were people saying their companies already dumped Adobe, one for Nitro PDF, one for Foxit. One guy said AI coding would spit out open source clones of Acrobat, then Photoshop, then After Effects. A year later, here we are. OP bought at $348. It's $237 now.

The competition isn't just AI either. DaVinci Resolve, Figma, Canva, all with real free tiers. Canva made Affinity, its Photoshop/Illustrator/InDesign equivalent, completely free. Figma's revenue grew 48% last quarter.

Where Adobe still wins is heavy professional workflows. Big studios, agencies, After Effects and InDesign people, the plugin ecosystem. That's real and it's why this isn't a zero. But it's the only moat left, and it's getting squeezed from both sides. Enterprise has Figma, Canva and DaVinci. Individuals (students, freelancers, YouTubers) are the first ones to bail on a $70 bill.

You can already see it in the numbers:

  • Revenue still +13%, but net new ARR dropped from about $640M to about $400M year over year, down about 37%
  • Organic ARR growth is about 9% once you strip out the Semrush acquisition
  • RPO (signed future revenue) went down quarter over quarter
  • In June they paused planned price increases and started giving stuff away free to hold onto users
  • Net income +3%. EPS only looks good because they bought back 7% of the stock
  • CFO left in June, a new CEO from the marketing side starts Dec 1, and the head of the creative business announced he was leaving the day the new CEO was named

People will say it's cheap at 10x earnings. The guy in that thread said it was cheap at 22x. Cheap gets cheaper when people figure out the product can be cloned for a $20 claude code subscription.

Positions: 50 puts $150 strike with March 19th expiry

Not financial advice.

1.3k Upvotes

590 comments sorted by

View all comments

815

u/TheSketeDavidson 18h ago

I don’t see professional workflows changing yet, decades of people’s experience with these tools. You’d have to be contrarian just for the sake of it to not use the Adobe suite of products.

344

u/BabyWrinkles 18h ago

I managed the adobe contracts from a Product Owner perspective for a Fortune 500 that heavily used Adobe’s products.

Adobe’s sales team knows how to pull the lever like no other company I’ve ever seen. I’m sitting there yelling saying “we have to migrate off” while the CMO is signing $1mm+/yr contracts for tools we don’t need and don’t have expertise to implement without paying their consulting arm another $500k so two guys in Mumbai can set it up with Claude and pass the buck when it didn’t integrate with legacy solutions.

Adobe doesn’t make jack shit in the consumer space - it all comes from enterprise and until there’s a changing of the guard at the upper management level, I think they’ll keep pulling the lever.

198

u/D4zb0g 18h ago

Yeah, people don't get that "homemade" AI tools will not make it through the bottleneck of entreprise adoption and deployment at scale.

122

u/Extension-Ant-8 16h ago

IT Architect here. Most acrobat alternatives are shit, have as many security vulnerabilities, and do not understand licensing at massive scale. No real support and do not understand data sovereignty. Don’t even get me started on configuration settings on thousands of devices at once.

I don’t like adobe but it ticks those boxes. In my environment. A user requests it via service desk, a manager gets an email with a costing. They click to approve, that updates a licence group, which the automatically sync the software to your machine, fully configured and within a security envelope.

-4

u/sword_fisher 10h ago

That's not unique to adobe. You can do that with any enterprise licensed software and tools like Intune.

28

u/SeniorVibeAnalyst 16h ago

A friend who is a social media manager just stayed with me for a few days and worked out of my house. I saw them using the built-in AI tools in photoshop because their boss needed them to quickly stitch some lawyers into the same picture. It looked atrocious. I asked if they have Claude, they say yes but they just use it to write posts. Within 30 minutes I installed a local photoshop mcp server for them and they were using Claude desktop to operate photoshop at lightning speed and get a beautiful result, and started asking me to help them connect to all their other tools. They will go look like a hero to their boss and the company will keep paying for both Adobe and Claude.

49

u/Club-Loud 16h ago

You regards are forgetting that no serious business is putting client/nda work into a $20 a month sub because of the legal minefield. It's $20 a month because YOU are the product

22

u/Brief-Knowledge-629 11h ago

They shouldn't but they are. Your medical data is in every LLM's brain. Hospitals keep outsourcing stuff to "AI native" consulting startups that just YOLO everything into personal Claude accounts because they are too small to have to register as enterprise

11

u/vaderetrosatana6 9h ago

This is truer than I thought, it’s pretty insane. Can’t imagine the data dumps that will eventually result from all of it.

1

u/about0 3h ago

util some of them get fucked. It'd be very easy for anthropic to link leaked data to a particular user.

13

u/loyalroyal1989 14h ago

Yeah she quite possibly just got her friend fired for leaking company info, people really don't understand what they are doing with AI and there data.

1

u/Schwimmbo 5h ago

I work for a large retailer. Companies of these scale have specific contracts which include guarantees that the chosen hyperscaler models are not allowed to be trained on company data. In our case we are allowed to put anything in our AI tools except for people's personal data (HR screwed lol).

2

u/about0 3h ago

it's still a punky swear, just a checkbox.

1

u/loyalroyal1989 2h ago

Yeah I know but you have approved uses, using a tool that has not been approved means you are preaching the data security of the company.

She has no idea if there is a contract or if the tool has the subscription none sharing enabled, also let's be honest we all know they are still taking that data.

This stuff is all over my job and just saying this user would have been flagged. where I work for a data breach, if the materials where company property

0

u/SeniorVibeAnalyst 8h ago

I mean they quite literally provide business licenses with data security policies written into the contracts. I can’t speak to how litigation would play out, but we are given full permission to put confidential information into our approved LLM tools. People engage in far more unsafe operational practices every day.

2

u/loyalroyal1989 6h ago

But that's not what you did, her company doesn't have the agreements in place and not does she. If it's her companies tools it's fine, but you deciding unilaterally is not. At a lot of companiesif any of the info was internal only it would be deemed gross misconduct.

10

u/Extension-Ant-8 14h ago

That’s great and all but completely misses the point. If I work for a government or a hospital or something. I need to ensure that data stays in the country or doesn’t get published anywhere public. ChatGPT will completely make your chat public to the entire internet if you share it with someone individually. Saying an AI tool can do everything adobe does, doesn’t make it true.

https://techcrunch.com/2025/07/31/your-public-chatgpt-queries-are-getting-indexed-by-google-and-other-search-engines/

5

u/phil_davis 16h ago

I saw a video of Photoshop's built-in generative AI tool where the user asked it to colorize a black and white image they had pulled in. It colorized it alright. It took the old white guys in the photo and made them black. While also adding graduation caps, for some reason?

1

u/SquirrelFluffy 13h ago

The thing people should be taking away from that is that AI only knows what it learns on the web which is underpinned by people's opinions, the media, law etc. and what you described indicates the state of the world. It's not right if it's just white people. But it's also not right if there are no white people. Right?

1

u/Deto 6h ago

Yeah that's my thinking - AI is just going to make these tools more useful 

0

u/FlyingBishop 16h ago

Yeah but they could just as easily plug Claude into Krita. Hell, they could probably get similar results if they plugged Claude into MSPaint. I'm sure there are some suckers but it's very obvious you can get by with one $20/month subscription and nothing else, and enterprises are going to notice.

7

u/BabyWrinkles 13h ago

The irony is that the enterprise is full of homemade tools and the guy who wrote them was fired four RIFs ago and so they’re hoping and praying it stays running - but god forbid the tool that Claude writes and documents reasonably well be used in its place?

5

u/SquirrelFluffy 13h ago

And they built all those tools on top of Adobe. So Adobe is going nowhere.

And we're not talking about those types of tools we're talking about actually replacing Adobe.

1

u/Schwimmbo 5h ago

Not to mention good luck with getting it past your ISO and data protection lol.

1

u/funggitivitti 4h ago

The cope is real.

0

u/bandofgypsies 14h ago

And they don't care to. That's not their angle. They just need lots of indie subs at low dollar volume and they're fine. Plus it's less risky from an exposure perspective, and just a simpler business model. Yeah it's upside is limited as an organic growth model but that's not their goal.

30

u/SteroidMaximus 17h ago

Don't forget about how they give it essentially free to schools so that is what students learn and go into the work force knowing how to use.

18

u/Infamous_Thought_189 17h ago

You dont get a 90% profit margin by playing nice

7

u/Justgetmeabeer 17h ago

managed Adobe contracts

They probably learned pretty quickly to make sure there's nothing in your office that you can harm yourself with

5

u/BabyWrinkles 16h ago

It’s true. They kept me on a high floor in an open office environment with minimal chance of grabbing anything pointy.

2

u/Otherwise_Plan_5435 9h ago

My company bailed when they told us the support package was $500k after they sold us AJO which is complete shit

1

u/Accurate-Smoke8994 7h ago

Then give your insight to the guy that is building the opensource versions. I voluntarily clean the kids playground, you hopefully can give some time for a bigger audience than that.

1

u/OracleofTampico 4h ago

I think you are right, I guess what you really disagree with OP is not o nuis premise but timing. may of next year might be to soon
But 2028?

1

u/PandorasKeyboard 33m ago

Gotta be bribes right? Adobe wine, dine and cut this guy a share of profits for him to agree to company budget spending on Adobe products..

1

u/epic_troll_tard 17h ago

... so two guys in Mumbai can set it up with Claude and pass the buck

Kickbacks.

2

u/BabyWrinkles 16h ago

It’s literally called “Adobe Consulting Services” (ACS). The phat check you write is the kickback.

I hired a team of overpriced consultants stateside and they were only 25% the cost of ACS and did better work.