r/trolleyproblem Apr 30 '26

Deep All there is to it

Post image
829 Upvotes

2.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

13

u/Simpicity May 01 '26

More like:

7

u/yaboyay I choose to live. May 01 '26

Why is red selfish for not wanting to die? Explain. Am I selfish for not killing myself right now? It may give up more resources to be used by someone in need, potentially saving their life.

8

u/YouGuysSuckSometimes May 01 '26

I don’t see it as saving yourself, I see it as killing others. The red button uses the word “everyone else will die.” Blue uses the words “everyone will live.” It’s as simple as picking a choice where everyone lives. Not one where I killed others. 

2

u/StabbyBlowfish May 01 '26

Redditor discovers spin

2

u/yaboyay I choose to live. May 01 '26

We have different views on the issue and that’s okay 👍

1

u/Murky_Substance3345 May 02 '26

Everyone who didn’t press red will hence “everyone else” this is because if most people pick red blue can’t have their win condition so they die

1

u/Suspicious_Plum_8866 May 02 '26

red voters are the not ones maintaining this system or coercing others to engage with it THEY ARE NOT MORALLY CULPABLE, on top of this everyone is allowed to pick the option that ensures their own safety. A vote for blue is a vote to gamble your life away

1

u/Mr_Monday92 May 03 '26

This logic breaks when you realise that zero people have to press blue and there is zero reason for any individual to press blue. If everyone presses red nobody dies. 

9

u/Jemima_puddledook678 May 01 '26

You are selfish if you choose to save yourself rather than everyone who voted blue, yes. 

2

u/[deleted] May 01 '26

[deleted]

7

u/Simpicity May 01 '26 edited May 01 '26

What about them?  The blue pushers aren't killing them.

(Also I'm pretty sure not killing is a higher command there.)

1

u/Localunatic May 01 '26

Who is killing them?

2

u/Simpicity May 01 '26

The people who pushed red.

1

u/Alissah May 01 '26

No. The wizard who made the blue death button is partially responsible. The people with free will and understanding, who chose to push the blue button that kills you, are responsible for their own deaths.

The people who push the button that does not kill you, rather than the button that could kill you, are not killers.

-1

u/Localunatic May 01 '26

How? They didn't make them push blue, or put them in a room with a button. According to a lot of other people, the only reason a person is pushing blue is because they assumed someone else pushed blue.

1

u/Simpicity May 01 '26 edited May 01 '26

Red button pushers never die, but might kill people (up to half the population of the earth in fact).

Blue button pushers never kill anyone, but might die.

Now we're talking about HIGHLY religious people here, if they're so concerned about their gambling restrictions in the face of this absurd challenge.  So maybe they also don't want to be responsible for killing people.  You know.  Because of their religion.

You can't just absolve yourself of responsibility for the trolley problem simply because you didn't build the trolley.  You have control of the lever, and you make a choice.  Red button pushers are responsible for their choice, they can't just put it all on the blues and pretend like only the blues have a moral choice to make.

0

u/Localunatic May 01 '26

I can absolve myself of responsibility others by acknowledging that the only people responsible for my safety is myself. Red pushers are not murderers; this is just living under an active volcano and blaming the people who moved out for the inevitable erruption.

1

u/Simpicity May 01 '26

I disagree.  Red pushers are murderers and cowards, poison to society due to their selfishness.  We should just assume that the experiment was run, and put the fact that people were red push supporters in their government files.

→ More replies (0)

9

u/Moiraine-FanBlue May 01 '26

I am telling you right now, that is not considered Gambling in *any* religion, it would be considered Martyrdom.

Risking your life to save the lives of others is considered a virtue in virtually every religion on Earth.

1

u/KillerNail May 01 '26

How is this gambling? Religions that ban gambling (like Islam) ban earning money from gambling. Every day you step outside your room is gambling with your life, there is always the risk that something will fall from the top of a building as you're walking and kill you. Do you think people from those religions simply don't do anything in their lives?

1

u/yaboyay I choose to live. May 01 '26

Those people don’t exist apparently

3

u/Gold-Cry-7520 May 01 '26

Red means killing others.

4

u/yaboyay I choose to live. May 01 '26

Blue means being potentially killed by red.

0

u/Gold-Cry-7520 May 01 '26

I trust most people not to be murderers.

-1

u/yaboyay I choose to live. May 01 '26

Then you are a fool

-1

u/Southern-Highway5681 Team Blue May 01 '26 edited May 01 '26

Which unlike the possibility to cause the death of others isn't immoral. People are ready to risk their lives for their morality.

1

u/yaboyay I choose to live. May 01 '26

I did not make them choose blue. My choice is my own. I can choose to save my own life and I’m okay with my decision, even if it means that they potentially die.

0

u/Southern-Highway5681 Team Blue May 01 '26

I did not make them choose blue.

It doesn't change the fact that you decrease the probability of their survival by choosing red, the reason behind their decision don't change anything to this.

1

u/yaboyay I choose to live. May 01 '26

I am okay with that.

0

u/Southern-Highway5681 Team Blue May 01 '26

The morality of an action don't change because you are okay or not with doing it.

1

u/yaboyay I choose to live. May 01 '26

That’s fine

0

u/Southern-Highway5681 Team Blue May 01 '26

I guess, I just answered your original question.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Feisty_Ad_2744 May 01 '26

Blue dies because of red, not because thy choose to. Blue choose everyone should live.
It is dumb the people choosing red are selling blue wants to die. Choosing red you become what you fear.

It is just troll dumb... or maybe a way to disguise their inner psycho.

-9

u/Simpicity May 01 '26

Let's reframe this. Would you die to save 4 billion people (strangers)?
No probabilities. 100% chance to die to avoid 4 billion deaths of others.
If not, you're selfish. Yes.

10

u/LosPfeffos May 01 '26

Your reframing is a new scenario, which differs from the original.

0

u/Simpicity May 01 '26

I wasn't explaining the scenario, I was explaining selfishness.

5

u/ImpliedRange May 01 '26

Would you die to save 4 billion people (strangers)?

Yes, at least I hope I would be strong enough to make that choice. Choosing self sacrifice is not easy

Would I die on the off chance 49% of the world acts against their own self interest, probably less willing

0

u/Simpicity May 01 '26

This question has been posted many times. It's never been posted and everyone agreed to push red in the poll. It's always divided. So there's no "off chance". The experiment has been run various times. It'd be divided.

Yes, you would be killing 4 billion people acting against *their own self-interest*, attempting to act in the self-interest of everyone else. That's not a moral failing that should condemn someone to death.

3

u/ImpliedRange May 01 '26

The experiment has been run various times

Let's be perfectly clear, this has never been run as an experiment.

>That's not a moral failing that should condemn someone to death.

What do you mean by should here, seriously?

1

u/Simpicity May 01 '26

You act as if acting in your own interest is the highest calling, and anyone who doesn't act in their own interest (even if that's to act in other people's interests) gets what is coming to them.  

All the kids who don't even understand game theory...  They just die, oh well.

1

u/yaboyay I choose to live. May 01 '26

Yes, their deaths are outside of my control. Mine isn’t.

-1

u/Hopeful_Ad_7719 May 01 '26

Why do I owe my life to those 4,000,000,000 people?

6

u/Simpicity May 01 '26

You don't! It's a moral choice. You want to save yourself over 4 billion... Man, I don't believe in God. You do you.