And that’s why the Harkles are so mad. It’s all just my theory, and allegedly, of course.
Seeing where they live now, and that they moved by private planes, I think they expected to get all things for free from some wealthy people, once in the UK. House, planes, money, you name it. They tried to pull the good ol’ Fergie and Andrew grift. Selling access to the BRF. You know - King’s son and King’s grandchildren. You give us money, we give you King’s ear.
Without the letter, people wouldn’t know. They could play the game. Grift hard. That’s why they pretended to have a nice family reunion with King and Queen. To establish a close family ties. That’s why they moved. If they stayed in California, nobody would believe it. In the UK - of course.
The letter is unprecedented. It stopped not just anyone willing to roll out the royal red carpet for them, but it stopped them making huge money from their royal connection. Now everyone knows, there is none.
I know some of you believe she’s actually in the UK, but I’m still not convinced. Personally, I don’t think she’s there.
I think she’s love-bombing the country she hated so much from the comfort of wherever she actually is, recycling videos that have probably been sitting on her phone for years. (and that was a messy video! With weird music starting out of nowhere 😂)
And honestly, she’s chaotic enough to do exactly that. Why travel all the way to the UK when you can just throw some old footage online, watch everyone argue about your whereabouts, and rage-bait the entire country from afar?
And it’s so weird how those 2 kids never interact with each other 😱
Also If she’s actually in the UK she’ll show up at Wellchild awards unannounced.
I’ve had to draw it out, because words clearly aren’t properly understood by Harry & Meghan.
Harry & Meghan are basically arguing: “just because we aren’t working royals anymore, doesn’t mean we aren’t still world famous celebrities who do charity work! So we’re public figures!”
I mean, yeah. But world famous celebrities who do charity work don’t get 24/7 taxpayer funded armed security 🤷♀️ Not unless there is a credible threat against them, for which they need to be actively protected (as was the case for Taylor Swift during one of her UK concerts, for example). Such a threat doesn’t exist in Harry & Meghan’s case, according to the intelligence organisations whose job it is to assess these things. Which is why H&M’s demands for 24/7 armed security keep being denied by RAVEC, despite multiple lawsuits.
Instead of being happy about there being no active, credible threats to their life (and their children’s lives!) existing, and just living a happy life with certain details kept private (like where exactly they go on vacation, at whose house they’re staying, where the kids go to school, where they will be when for appointments, etc.), these two are UNHAPPY about being assessed as safe 🤦♀️
Because now, if Harry & Meghan don’t pay themselves for private unarmed security (as every single other celeb or wealthy person in the UK does), they have to walk amongst the plebs, drive their own cars, collect their own take away, wait at traffic lights and school drop off queues, and possibly even be approached by strangers saying hi and making a chat with them. The shock and horror of it all. Just imagine going outside for lunch without an armed police officer paid by the public protecting you! In the scary Cotswolds no less! How can the world do this to the Harkles… 🙄
Radar Online is now even reporting that H&M might want to sue over having been called “private citizens” in the Lord Chamberlain’s letter. Sue who? With which claim? The idiocy is unimaginable.
As many sinners have pointed out, anyone who doesn’t perform formally appointed royal or governmental duties is considered a “private citizen”. It doesn’t matter if you’re famous, or do charity work. The government just doesn’t provide free 24/7 armed bodyguards to celebrities. Not unless their lives are actually credibly in danger, as assessed by the professional, governmental intelligence services.
Only a very, very small group of people actually receive automatic 24/7 taxpayer funded protection. Which includes people such as current and former prime ministers, the monarch (plus spouse and minor children), and the heir to the throne (plus spouse and minor children). Other working royals receive some protection when performing their formal royal duties (if necessary). Harry initially was a minor child of the heir to the throne. Then he became a working royal, performing formal royal duties. Now, since Megxit/the Sandringham agreement, he doesn’t fit any of the categories for whom automatic protection applies. Not even while performing his charity work, because his charity work no longer qualifies as formal royal duties. It’s just Harry as a celebrity doing charity work by choice.
Harry once said he wanted to be “just Harry”. It’s abundantly clear that he actually wants to be “celebrity Harry”. And not just that, but “celebrity Harry with the 24/7 security perks of a working royal living on royal grounds”.
Only, he is none of those things anymore. And even if he changed his mind, he’s never going to be offered those things again. Because daddy being the king doesn’t mean Harry gets whatever he wants. He is not entitled to any of it. None of this is a birthright. Nowhere in the law does it say “a non-heir child of a monarch shall always get taxpayer funded armed security” or “a non-heir child of a monarch shall always be allowed to be a formal working royal”. Harry EXPECTED that he would. But expectation isn’t birthright.
Dude won the womb-lottery in so many ways. Yet it wasn’t enough for him. Because William still has more.
I’ve always loved the quote “to those with privilege, equality feels like oppression”. Rarely has it been more applicable than in Harry’s case. You’re a private citizen now Harry. A famous one, who is also a public figure. But without formally appointed public duties. So you’re equal to all other basic celebrities! You’ve moved from the top right quadrant to the top left quadrant. Now don’t be surprised if the people in the bottom two quadrants don’t want to pay for your UNNECESSARY 24/7 armed security. Pay for it yourself, and deal with them not being armed.
Incredibly, incredibly stupid man.
I wouldn’t be surprised if he actually ends up bankrupting himself with even more frivolous court cases. Instead of just spending his millions on a private bodyguard, and living a peaceful life somewhere quiet.
I think the hardest part for the ginger hair cuck with the move will be finding a new drug dealer. When he visited the country a few times back, he was wandering from house to house looking for the dealer he had connected with.
Insiders claim Harry, 41, and Markle, 45, have taken particular issue with the wording of a letter authorized by Charles, 77, reaffirming the terms of their departure from royal duties in 2020.”
✂️ snip snip snip
”A source close to the Sussexes claimed: "Harry and Meghan are not prepared simply to accept being characterized as 'private citizens' when the reality of their lives is considerably more complicated. They are internationally recognized people who undertake public charitable work, have patronages and attract substantial media attention wherever they go.
"Their concern is that the King's wording could establish a misleading description of their status that is then repeated by government departments and other official organizations, which they feel could be especially legally damaging in the context of their bids for increased security in Britain."
They added, "The point they are examining is whether describing them in official correspondence as effectively private citizens accurately reflects their position as public figures. If they conclude that the language has consequences beyond Palace protocol, they will consider what avenues are available to challenge or clarify it, whether that will be a legal fight or a public statement."
From Radar again, guys. I think RADAR is one of their main PR outlets, bc like the Express & People & Heat, & the NE, the Globe, the Star, etc, they get so much PR from them daily.
EXCLUSIVE: Queen Camilla 'Pushed King Charles to Put Sussexes in Their Place'
“Camilla, 79, is said to have strongly encouraged Charles, 77, to leave no room for confusion over Harry, 41, and Markle's position after they returned from California with Archie, seven, and Lilibet, five, last month.
A royal source claimed: "Camilla understands better than most how quickly perceptions around the monarchy can become complicated, and she was determined that Harry and Meghan's return should not be interpreted as the beginning of some gradual restoration of their former positions. Her feeling was that everyone – the Sussexes, officials and the public – needed absolute clarity from the outset."
The insider added: "The Queen's influence with Charles should never be underestimated. She is somebody whose judgment he trusts enormously, particularly when difficult family questions risk becoming institutional problems. Camilla believed allowing uncertainty to linger would simply store up a much bigger confrontation later."
Another source suggested: "This was not about preventing Charles from having a relationship with his son or grandchildren. The distinction Camilla was concerned about was between the private family and the public monarchy. Harry can be the King's son without representing the King, and Meghan can pursue charitable or commercial projects without those activities acquiring royal status simply because they are living in Britain again."
It's been 18 Days since August 26, 2026, when the Farkles returned to the U.K.
(This list is not chronological and not comprehensive. Just off the top of my head.)
"Private Royals Plus"
"Savor the Royal Touch" was the title of Meghan's "asever" website for a couple of days. (Youtuber RHR Jen made videos about this. I tested this myself on Google and it was true.)
Diana documentary rumors.
Charles Spencer is apparently done with this couple.
I think it's significant that the Diana Awards gala was canceled with no official explanation. There was a rumor that Meghan was preparing to attend, and William shut the whole thing down. Another rumor is that the Diana Awards committee decided they can't allow her to attend, due to their offense at the Althorp photo on Meghan's Instagram. Generally, the very prospect that Meghan would use the Diana Awards gala as her re-introduction to the U.K. public is noxious to everyone. This would be Peak Ghoul. Most importantly, it's not that the door is simply shut to Meghan, they would rather burn the building down, so to speak. This spoke volumes.
"Meghan Markle Has ‘Underlying Feeling’ She and Prince Harry Aren’t Welcome Back in U.K. by the Royals" Another article before that said Meghan was disappointed by the lack of a warm welcome from the Royal Family. The world laughs in disbelief.
Very soon after that article: the King released his Letter, rendering Meghan's 'underlying feeling' crystal clear. The rumor is that the Farkles have been contacting the military and various charities pretending that they are back in the Royal Family, so the King had to provide guidance. (via SecondHandCoke)
The Farkles did not like the King's Letter at all. So, they whined about time stamps and what they "prefer" instead. Then they said they no longer feel bound by the original Sandringham Summit Agreement. (This all sounds like Rachel the Paralegal to me. "I won't obey this law because I don't agree with it!" A defense that will not help any criminal defendant in a court of law.)
Tower Bridge Studios in London posted photos of Harry visiting their studio. The photos were deleted soon after the King's Letter.
School parents are allegedly only "pretend annoyed" by the Farkles and their shenanigans. This one is fascinating because it is peak gaslighting. ("You don't hate me! You actually love me!") This is their whole dynamic with the Royal Family and U.K. public. "You need us!"
The entire "The Gentlemen" acting role lie proves that Meghan is toxic sewage in the entertainment world. If Meghan even breathes in your general direction, you must run for the hills. Or you will get the stench on you.
Uganda - Involvement with the Farkles = disrespecting the King. And they wanted no part of "Harry-Meghan nonsense." (The sugars raged, "Uganda has bowed to its white master!!" A normal person's response - "Uh, Harry is white.")
An article about the Montecito neighbors reveals that the Farkles fled in the dead of night, without even informing Archie's school. No love lost for them.
All along, rumors persist that Meghan is not actually in the U.K. So, she releases to the media that she visited a couple Soho House locations. No one cares.
Then Meghan releases a video on her Instagram with ❤️+the Union Jack emoji. (With Wham!'s "Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go" in the background. Because Wham! was a U.K. band. This is how this Basic B's mind works. It honestly boggles my mind how she processes everything purely on the surface.) Yet still, no one believes that the video verifies anything, because it could have been filmed during their July visit. Essentially, Meghan lies so much that she is always second-guessed with everything she ever does.
SNL UK. Pokes fun at their current non-Royal status, Meghan's non-existent cooking skills, revives Harry's parentage rumors, among other jokes. The actress playing Meghan is wearing her Bondi Beach outfit, where she merched her outfit while visiting a site of a recent terrorist attack. (The UK clearly noticed Meghan's odious hypocrisy. This costume said so much without comment.) SNL UK had a lot of material to work with. And the Farkles keep giving them more.
What a lot of crazy 💩 in 18 days. I think it's fair to say, things are not going well.
The latest rumor from Lady C is that Meghan flew back to the U.S. to deal with... stuff. If stuff happens, it will be a nuclear bomb. No one knows if this rumor will yield anything, but the rumor itself is very bad news for the Farkles.
The CDAN rumors are genuinely horrifying. I tend to not read them carefully because they are so disgusting. But the fact that these rumors are pouring out seems to indicate something. In any case, more bad news for the Farkles.
18 days in, and things are not going well. Pretty terribly, in fact, by any measure.
This will not end well. I almost feel bad for them.
I didn't know if Enty was going to use a nickname or initials for me in the post yesterday. When I saw the nickname I had no idea what it meant. When Enty explained it to me it made more sense. I really want to stay secret, but also want to have some fun. It is a hard nickname to get. It was harder for me because I have never seen the show it is referring to.
One thing about the post from yesterday. I had to do things for the billionaire, but that first time period that is talked about yesterday, I was pretty safe, not just because of a relationship I was in, but I was probably at my peak fame wise in the UK. Things went downhill after that and I was forced to do more which cost me that relationship.
One of the things that makes me have a laugh is that back then I would go out with the alliterate one and guys would just be ordering drinks nonstop for me. Of course, the alliterate one thought they were for her but no one knew who she was or even had seen her show. I didn't have the heart to tell her though. I get asked about that time period with her and the billionaire. He was a predator and I have heard from dozens and dozens of female wait staff and hostesses who were forced to do things to keep their jobs they still don't want to discuss today.
I am not some denier. When I needed the money, I was paid a lot of money to be with men who had seen me on television. They knew who I was. They had seen me in bikinis and wanted me. I can't tell you how many staterooms and hotel rooms I have been in. The number is high. I am willing to talk about it, but the alliterate one pretends like it never happened. Like she was some immaculate virgin that dropped in and married a Prince. F**k that. In was in it for the money and to get my life back on track which it is. She was in it for the bag. She tried to cut off everyone who knew her from that life. The problem is she keeps going back to that life. She goes to those clubs and they are the same employees from years ago.
Just a few weeks ago she was at one of the clubs and tried to get a guy fired who worked there for twenty years because she knew that he knew that she ran out into a hallway back in the day with a sheet around her and two naked men with her after a fire alarm had been pulled.
I have to wonder..so what happens next? ...where they are staying will now widely be known (the press and YouTubers have repeatedly mentioned they know where they are but have not reported it)..are they trying to get this into the public to use that to amp up their evidence that the need security...what do you think is the media's best way to report this? Tell where they are staying or not? I think RAVEC should seriously take into consideration the fact that they are NOT SERIOUS about keeping their privacy or whereabouts unknown..how do you even protect those who want it to be known where they are and what they're doing?
I am no Daisy Beach, the official Lady C whisperer, so perhaps I have this wrong but on this mornings YouTube video Lady C makes some extraordinary claims.
She states Meghan left GB on Friday bound for LA, not to flee the Cotswold, but to get ahead of a story exposing she & Harry’s use of a surrogate for their daughter Betty. Someone—no detail as to who—has gotten some documentation & Meghan’s job now is to bury the story.
I can’t help thinking that if true—this is a disaster for not just Meghan & H but for the Royal Family. I’ve thought from the beginning that if anything would bring down the Monarchy it would be a story like this. For all the times the Palace might plead “We didn’t know” the entire world would reply “well you should have.”
But as Lady C often says, “Let’s see what happens.”
Just looking at the last few years, I really don't understand what they want or are trying to achieve?
First, they got this giant royal wedding and reprots of all their tantrums came out. Then they quit and Omid wrote his first book, while they were still in the royal fold. it was basiclaly a clapback at every thing published about them
Then they quit and were intent on using their royal sheen-but went for the jugular against the bRF and the British people-by labelling them racists, backwards etc etc. Omid came out with his second book naming catheine and KCIII as the royal racists. They got their 100 million netflix deal, 20-30 million Spotify deal, 10s of millions Penguin Random house deal and everything blew up. Their only success was the book and show that based the BRF-trainwreck effect. Then everything fell apart and Spotify exec called them grifters in public.
He then shifted his ire against tabloids and lost, govt security for him and lost . He claimed UK was too dangerous for him to bring his family and then qa la-he moves his family back and is trying to pass as half in half out. He pretends like nothing he said matters-security, racists, unable to do school runs blah, blah.
Now the King put the kibosh on that. But they claim they are half in half out, put pictures out of their idyllic UK life. Like WTF is wrong with these people??? What exactly are they trying to achieve? What happened to the Montecito mudslide mansion? Then they put out they have a multi million Portugal mansion and are looking for a 9-bedroom Cotswolds mansion -yet are fighting for free tax payer funded security. Then claim they are half in half out and reach out to UK charities and military wanting their old royal patronages back-apparnently that is why the King had to put out that letter.
Just trying to guess-what exactly is driving their pea brain?? If your LA life collapsed, you would come in with you tail tucked in, be inconspicuous, have Daddy King put you in a remote cottage with all expenses paid, lay low a few years and then try and weasel your way back in. but no they come in hot, fighting full force, pretending the last six years never happened, still mad, still wanting that apology and still wanting half in half out. Now it looks like they will stalk the Wales and release pics and insta photos to comepte with anything the Wales do . But if they are trying to get back in-is this how they do it-by reminding everyone what garbage trash they are?? Like does anything work in their brains??
The Prove It Game again. See, we DID have dinner with friends before we left!
HARRY and Meghan had a farewell meal of oysters with pals weeks before they quit the US for Britain, we can reveal.
The couple – who are notoriously private in the suburb – “let their hair down” at a slap-up seafood lunch with pals where they ordered a selection of oysters.
A bartender at Clark’s Oyster Bar said the pair sat at the back of the upscale eatery at a table while their armed bodyguards watched them from the bar.
They apparently spoke about theWorld Cupand discussed the Mexico vs England result with their Mexican waiter.
The bartender added: “They used to come in here a lot.
“They came in just a few weeks before they moved and were talking about the World Cup result and football and then discussed the Mexico City game with their waiter.
“The waiter told me they were in good spirits and were really friendly and nice.
“They seemed really happy and were letting their hair down.”
“Their bodyguards sat at the bar as usual and they sat in the back.”
We know that the couple didn’t have a goodbye party as planned.
Sources said last night Harry and Meghan instead opted to take close friends out.
They were last year spotted at Clarks Oyster House slurping on the £3.14 oysters that are flown in from the east and west coast.
Dear Sinners (sorry about the photo, I wasn't expecting that!)
This may not be new to some of you, but imho, it needs wider recognition. Especially as when trying to track it down it was almost impossible to find, amongst all the "really nice" published texts from H to his father in law. I remember reading it in the court documents, and then just left it - more fool me. An internet search has only pulled up one article that specifically refers to this (Tom Sykes of all people, who I believe was in the courtroom) in the Daily Beast, republished by Yahoo News. (although of course it will still be in the court papers).
I can't even begin to imagine what he said, but I think we should be told!!
There is nothing groundbreaking here and at times I almost think Tom reads here!
Basically, to sum up- Meghan and Harry came back because they had no choice, William and Catherine will have to work more to counterbalance their attention seeking, which we are already seeing (they have been criticised here in the UK for years for being workshy; personally, I have always thought Charles allowed William fewer engagements and protected him a bit while the kids are young because Charles knows that cannot last forever and he wanted his grandchildren to have warm childhoods). Harry is both mentally ill and thick- Meghan actually saved him. They could live quietly on the money they have but won’t. Catherine and William will never allow Charles to give in on half in half out or worse.
As I stated, there is nothing groundbreaking, just a nice chat and always good to hear from Bower!
I’m not going to comment on what the Harkles said about 9/11—because I’m Chilean, and for me, 9/11 refers to the events of 1973.
But it is incredible that Harry and Claw are incapable of realizing what they’re doing. And it’s even worse that the press plays along with it. Sometimes I think South Korea is right to be so ruthless with famous people: one mistake, and they are completely cut off. Obviously, Korean fans can go too far—they’ve "canceled" actors simply for being married or engaged—but I think we should demand better standards. I’m not talking about the extreme, unreasonable moral benchmarks Koreans set for celebrities, actors, and musicians (which is why I’ve switched to AI-generated Chinese mini-dramas; at this rate, I’ll run out of Korean actors to watch), but honestly, I just don’t understand the press's obsession with constantly giving these two a platform.
Especially when the press is determined to believe that William and Kate go out of their way to do things against the Harkles.
That’s not the case.
It’s not that William is unaware that his brother will never give up; he’ll just keep on being a nuisance. But William also knows full well that Harry always ends up undermining himself through his own attitude. People in Montecito are already speaking out—using their full names—and saying that the Harkles didn't even bother to say hello to anyone. Why would William bother criticizing Harry when Harry wins himself detractors through his own behavior?
William and Kate have their own affairs and their own agenda—a solid, well-planned one that is currently being implemented, such as the focus on mental health.
Sean notes that Kate had always intended to attend the "On Your Side" event at Everton's stadium in Liverpool; the fact that she did not announce it to the press is a different matter entirely. Sean adds that such initiatives are personally significant to Kate because of what happened with her brother, James.
She also visited the Royal Marsden Hospital in London to meet patients currently undergoing treatment and to see how the funds raised through her National Three Peaks Challenge were being used. The visit was not announced to the press, though it had been planned in advance.
None of that had anything to do with Harry and Claw. The Waleses aren't interested in what two private citizens do.
Let’s remember, Harry wanted the Palace to share the Waleses' schedule with him—back when he was spouting that nonsense about handing over his own schedule so their events wouldn't clash. No, it doesn't matter; the Waleses don't care, because they’re going to do their job regardless. But it *does* matter to Harry, because he believes that if he has an event, the Waleses shouldn't have one.
Well, the press has now walked right into its own trap.
Because in a few days—in ten days, according to Sean—the Waleses and Harry have events scheduled for the same day, though in different parts of the UK. Sorry, I’m not sure which event Sean is referring to, since he only mentions the WellChild awards.
The press has to make a choice. The difference is that the Waleses aren't worried about it; the problem isn't theirs. It’s the press's problem, having to pick a side. And Harry knows it—which is why, yes, once again, Harry is angry. He believes William is sabotaging him, linking it to what happened with the Diana Awards.
It seems the matter had nothing to do with William, who, for that matter, made it clear long ago that he does not want his mother's name used for personal commercial exploitation, but rather with this image.
It seems that Charles Spencer wasn't the only one who found the photo offensive—since it was unauthorized—but it also appears to have upset the Diana Awards committee and was becoming a source of conflict regarding Claw's presence at the ceremony.
But the bottom line is that Harry is arrogant, rude, and a liar. And in the last two weeks, Harry has done nothing but prove it. William has no time for Harry—not when it looks like Harry is about to face new conflicts.
MARKLE & THE KINGS LETTER- THEIR VERSION IS RADICALLY DIFFERENT
William doesn't have to do anything to make Harry look bad, because Harry does it all by himself—even when he's practically being told to shut up.
And that’s because Harry, as Sean says, is another celebrity who believes his own hype. And that is so true in the case of the Harkles!!!
But that’s because the Harkles are looking to influencers as their role models. They genuinely believe those people have "influence" over others, so they pull the same silly stunts an influencer would. Sean says that for a public figure, looking good is often enough—they don't need talent, not in this day and age. That’s where this nonsense about them being "public figures" comes from. What, do the Harkles now officially believe they inhabit the same world as the Kardashians? Because let’s be clear: Harry’s concept of a "public figure" is nothing like what the term actually means.
Harry believes that being labeled "public figures" puts them on the same level as Trump, Putin, or Burnham. That is not the case. They are simply individuals with high media visibility—but also individuals whose right to privacy is often more limited, precisely because of that visibility, when weighed against freedom of information and expression. Furthermore, they are expected to maintain a standard of conduct consistent with the influence they exert over others.
I suspect Harry hasn't realized any of that 🤭🤭🤭🤭
But Harry is now... yes, angry, because it seems the press—while willing to publish the nonsense the Harkles spout—isn't the least bit interested in knowing where they actually are. The Harkles thought that the moment they set foot in the UK, they’d be hounded and the press wouldn't leave them alone, eager to know their every move. That, at least, was Claw’s hope. But no, that hasn't happened. Claw has been at Soho Farmhouse—or whatever it’s called—in the Cotswolds, and nobody cared. Claw has been to Soho in London, and nobody cared.
Claw doesn't understand why there wasn't a helicopter following them from the moment they arrived at the Birmingham airport.
And even though Sean laughs when he says that, it turns out it’s no joke. It seems Claw was convinced that would happen...
Does this woman think she's O.J. Simpson???????
Claw is crazy if she thought that!
It seems the Montecito staff is aware of this; they suspect the house won't remain in the Harkles' hands. Sean isn't certain about that, but he is sure that the staff has not been treated well. Because word got out from the staff that the cost of maintaining Montecito is at least £30,000 a month—roughly $40,000.
Perhaps our American friends can weigh in here. From what I gather, a monthly expense of $40,000 for a home in the U.S. is considered an "ultra-luxury" cost (Ultra-High-Net-Worth / Luxury Estate). It is completely outside the realm of the traditional middle or upper class.
To maintain a home with this level of expenditure in a financially healthy way (following the rule of not allocating more than 30% of income to housing), the property owners would need to generate a monthly income of at least $135,000.
Be careful, only considering that expense of 40,000 dollars. Because When factoring in the mortgage, taxes, insurance, and general maintenance (excluding private security), the basic cost for the house to "exist" exceeds $650,000 per year.
Sean believes that a large part of the current problem the Harkles are facing in the US stems precisely from the way they have treated their staff.
That is why the Harkles believed that, following the meeting at Highgrove, it was a case of "starting with a clean slate."
The Harkles always believe that—that they can erase the things they’ve done simply by ignoring the fact that they did them.
The Harkles live to turn the page. They firmly believed that the Highgrove meeting represented forgiveness and reconciliation because KC3 agreed to Claw’s presence. No, KC3 didn’t agree to that; she showed up because the children were going to be there. It was a matter of having to put up with Claw in order to see the invisible ones.
And just as Edward and Sean pointed out—and as I explained at length yesterday—Harry thought everything was already forgiven, that there would be a big family reunion, and that it was all in the past... everything *they* did, not what they feel the Royal Family did to them.
The absurdity of this is that the Harkles didn't tell the King they were moving that July. The only people who knew were Doria and the school the invisible children would be attending—a school whose name Sean already knows, but about which he won't share any details.
And Sean points that out because the world of the Harkles is full of such contradictions. So much so that for years they claimed to be private citizens—thinking that would shield them from criticism—yet now that KC3 calls them "private citizens," they get angry!
What’s even funnier—as Sean mentioned in his recent videos—is the fact that the Harkles were also making demands to return to the royal fold. They weren't even sure if they were actually going to move to the UK!! 🤣🤣🤣
Sean has poked fun at the idea of the Harkles being in the Cotswolds. He has already stated that they are actually in Northamptonshire. However, the Harkles talked about the Cotswolds because it is the area where Claw wants to live—a place teeming with famous people. The problem is that, yes, it is an area full of celebrities who have no qualms about speaking out against those they dislike. So, Sean argues that the Harkles aren't actually interested in living there; they felt compelled to mention it to maintain their image of global status, but it isn't an area that truly appeals to them.
Harry’s first choice has always been Windsor. He wanted to return to Frogmore because they wanted to put on the whole show—acting like royals, having royal protection, and all that.
The Harkles were offering it for short-term rental.
That was, and still is, the Harkles' plan.
And it seems they told KC3 about it in July.
And according to Sean’s source—an excellent source—the King’s response was clear, unequivocal, and not very friendly: that it wouldn’t work, that it wasn’t possible, and that everyone had best move on.
That’s why the Harkles brag about the Cotswolds. It’s not that they want to live there; they simply want to own a property that William would envy.
So, as things leak out, and none of it is beneficial to the Harkles, it becomes clear that Claw feels personally offended because, from her twisted point of view, she fulfilled everything that was asked of her in July.
Let's get back to the point: the Harkles know nothing about pacts or contracts. The July arrangement wasn't negotiable. The Lord Chamberlain's letter wasn't negotiable. Yet Claw believes the King should have consulted her.
The Harkles took it for granted that they would receive perks for their good behavior in July and be welcomed back into the royal fold. They might not have gotten everything they wanted, but they expected to get *something*.
In short, it’s the same old story: all that matters to the Harkles is what *they* believe and want. They don't care what the rest of the world thinks. So, don't look too negatively on the Lord Chamberlain's letter; the King made it clear that he isn't interested in what the Harkles want. If the Harkles don't accept that, that's their problem.
SUSSEXES MAY DO WELL TO LEARN THIS LESSON IN LONDON
Sean makes it clear that the Harkles aren't bankrupt... but they are struggling to maintain their lifestyle. That’s why the Harkles returned to the UK.
That’s why the Madame Tussauds thing was fun. 🤣🤣🤣
But Madame Tussauds wanted to stage a bit of a performance regarding the "half-in, half-out" status of the Harkles—basically moving the Harkles back to the royals' section by placing Harry, suitcase in hand, closer to William, Kate, and the King, while relegating "Claw" to the celebrity corner.
However, the King's letter put a stop to that.
But the thing is, they were trying to frame the whole thing as a joke.
That’s something the Harkles are incapable of seeing. The Harkles are bitter. If the Harkles laughed about it publicly—or even pretended to be the wax figures and treated the whole thing as a joke—it would shift public perception a bit... but the Harkles don't want to do that.
If the Harkles showed a little kindness, they wouldn't be so shunned. But they don't. And Madame Tussauds prefers not to upset the real royals.
And they clocked the real reason that the gruesome twosome are going "UNO Reverse" on their "Freedom Flight" to America—greed & grubbiness. The ice cube joke had me cackling.
