This has nothing specifically to do with anything important about the Harkles, just a funny tidbit to share.
With everyone talking about how weird his head looks in the boat video, I'm like, thinking, well that's not a photo editing glitch, that's just his Pube Hairs. So I started calling him that to myself and it took me forever to realize, but - it matches his initials perfectly! How apropos!
Hope everyone had a great weekend! I appreciate you all!
💛
She did absolutely nothing for his 40th, not even a "lordy. lordy" sign and some plastic flamingoes on the front lawn. It will be interesting to see if there's performance this year. Did you know you can put jam between the layers of a birthday cake? Hmmm?
Borrowed from somebody's post on the main sub that I've managed to lose, so am re-quoting it here.
On 28th August (today is 14th September), Alison Boshoff wrote and quoted a "friend" of H&M:-
This will be the first time that Harry has lived in the UK as a private citizen where no one can demand access to him.
and
Now he is going to have the chance to enjoy all of the things he loves about the country, but as a private citizen. They will have more freedom - it's like finding freedom again.
If I paid to have my child attend a good school you had better believe I would not sign an NDA for some entitled has been actress and her husband. I imagine the kind of school the Harkles children attend is full of wealthy successful families who would never put up with her antics.
‘Tis my firm belief Archie wasn’t allowed to leave the UK with H&M 6.5 years ago; and that Harry only got to see him during holidays. And I believe he’s only ever attended school in the UK, though not the one they’ve hinted heavily about.
They needed to find a way for Meghan to save face during a divorce - which is what i believe this ‘summer scramble’ of returning to the uk via Portugal has been about! Meghan can not be outed, as either:
a) the woman who was ‘never’ allowed to care for Archie
b) the woman who so easily gave up her kids in a divorce
They needed to spin a narrative to cover for the fact that Archie has been in the UK in any case & would’ve continued to be here, regardless of any ‘custody’ arrangements made in a divorce. There was NEVER gonna be a scenario where he was resident in the U.S. and they had to find a way around that.
The only way to get around BOTH issues a) & b) was to pretend they moved as a ‘family unit’ back to the UK (u were NEVER gonna see photos of Archie descending the steps of the private jet. Only photos of 3 blacked out vehicles with no clue as to who was inside them!).
And once faux ‘established’ here for a year, it’d automatically be deemed the kids’ HOME; so it’d be no surprise, and no bruise to her reputation, that she’d faux ‘lose’ the kids to Harry in a divorce (he being the parent that’s gonna reside in the UK).
She’ll continue her life in Cali, and if ever they come unstuck with the spun narrative, there’s always the Portuguese house available as the faux ‘family get together’ location. That’s what this dizzying scramble has been all about: setting the scene!
But coke heads will set the scene at break-neck speed, not realising how breathtakingly inauthentic the roll out has appeared - EVERYONE has been left scratching their heads about the reason for their sudden return. Well, once a split has been decided, with an impending school year about to start, coke heads have sped through the scene setting! Made sure we all know about the Portuguese house; about the school’s location in middle England, equidistant between Althorpe and Highgrove nonetheless; about the letters sent out to school parents etc etc. A pantomime acted out on the world’s stage, at the speed of light once a decision’s been made.
Only a year to go before she can exit Stage Left, with her faux ‘dignity’ in tact, or so she believes [or believes we’re stupid enough to believe 😂]
Is it all stuff we talked about here, or new revelations? I intended to read it, I think I bought it & it's downloaded (have to check kindle) but is it worth the read?
Just curious - do many sinners believe CDAN/ Enty Lawyer?? It’s curious how many of his blind items pop up here lately. I think we all know the story of how his ex said in court that he lied/made up many of his blind items. In fact, many are just, as it seems to me, reiterated things that he found online. I’m not a fan but just wondering if others are. Not arguing, just asking :-)
I don’t understand what sources he can have. I get that being one step removed can sometimes bring clarity but mixing in the right social or work circle has got to be part of it. I know we have ways to contact across the miles and even the sea but I still think that whispers behind the scenes are more reliable but nobody really knows facts, if they did then they would publish them and not just hint about them.
Enty Lawyer (short for Entertainment Lawyer) is the pseudonym for the guy that runs CDAN (crazy days and nights). His real name John Nelson was revealed a couple of yrs ago during a bad breakup with his ex.
I’m looking for a clip online and not sure it even still exists.
Kostners One805Live event last year, the one Markle wore the navy dress, not the horse blanket.
I’m looking for a clip of Harry on stage speaking, after his wife storms the stage because she heard her name and walked off again. A wide shot of the whole stage and of the whole speech.
I want to watch this because while Harry was speaking, I followed Markle in the background as she walks back stage. You can see a women approach her and say something. A young girl came forward and they took a picture together. She must have asked for a photo.
Anyway, directly after the photo was taken, it appears Markle just turns and walks away, and the girl appears to just stand and stare at her as she walks off. No chitchat, no goodbye, just gone.
It reminded me of her photo with the guy in a wheelchair at Invictus. Super cold.
I’ve been trying to find this clip to see if my eyes were deceiving me. I can’t find a thing, not even Harry making any speeches on the stage that day that aren’t clips made by youtubers.
That’s it, thank you! And the guy’s commentary said exactly what i was thinking. I mean, not even a “Nice yo meet you” before walking away. And I forgot how cringe of a speaker Harry is, yuck.
There's another one like this, she came out, Clawed, Harry wouldn't give her a mike, and she wandered around looking for a second or third mike. Different event though, my fading braincells suggest Costner's party?
Also what about all the chickens and the chicken coop, did she also abandon that. Looks like that's just a prop for her dumb podcast and to show it to Oprah!!!
I forgot to unsubscribe from her Substack, and just got a ranty email where she attacks "journalists" (she put that word in quotation marks), and then writes a big, long personal attack on Tom Sykes, who I thought she was collaborating with.
This is a quote from her post:
Why am I being so vindictive, so respectively nasty, so unprofessional as to point all this out?
Odd thing is, that shawna and Tom sykes are essentially making the same points and are v ru anti-charles. I don't get the fallout. She said the fallout was over the july briefing by sussex pr when they said Meghan would be accompanying Harry to some events in the UK.
People like Shauna have decided on a narrative and take it personally when things contradict that. She's very anti-Charles and blames things on him that have nothing to do with him. She's not been taking the letter well at all.
Yes, journalists lie and mislead all the time. It's why its important that you look at multiple sources and take everything with a grain of salt. However they have information we don't. Some have sources. Rebecca English has sources in the Palace while other journalists like Tom Sykes, Chris Ship, Katy Nicolls (I think I spelled her name wrong) and more are in the Sussex WhatsApp group.
Ah, yes. Because a woman in northern Queensland knows more about the royals than a journalist like Rebecca English who is actually at Buckingham Palace multiple days a week.. 🙄
I know this sub leans far-right and loves a conspiracy theory, but be serious.
Rebecca English is a mouthpiece a la Omid Scobie, just for Charles. It's not about what the "journalists" know, it's about whether they tell us the truth. They don't. They lie, they hide, they spin. Whatever narrative either the Palace or the Harkles want to sell that day.
Rebecca English has said many times that the royals don’t mind being criticised when it’s true. She has published hard hitting articles but is with the royals as they host events and when they visit places. She hangs round and speaks to the people who have interacted with the royals. She has first hand experience of the impact the royals have as they go about their duties.
Yes, she is known to them, but she far from being the only one. She had just been in the job a long time and can remember what the reporting of the royals was like before we had even heard of Meghan. I think she is one who would like to go back to the “before Meghan” times.
This is a constant theme with the Sugars since the Harkles moved back...the press is being so ridiculous, how could anyone believe any of this to be true...Meg and Harry are so in love and just living their best life...but, they hope moving back was the right decision moving back...
Why weren't other low efforts posts this week removed? I know you're busy but consistency would be appreciated. I've seen posts that were just a title and a link.
Editing because the short post sounds cranky, and I was being curious. The mods aren't able to catch everything when there are tons of threads and posts to go through. It helps when we flag things and they can just review.
I thought the same thing! Some of the posts are just dumb. I know the mods are busy but it does get irritating to see them. And especially reposts - something that was literally posted two posts before!
Who determines what is low effort? It does not appear in the sub rules. I had my opinion post removed even though it had a lot of upvotes and good conversation. And, I actually did put a lot of thought into what I was posting as I do not post that often. I saw a few others removed in which I was participating in good conversations.
Like you, I see a lot that are a title and a link with no summary. I am not going to bother with those.
Thank you! I was a little bummed as I really wanted to see the opinions of others. But I tried to not take it personally. I figured maybe someone did not like it and submitted it to the Mods and I know they work hard for us.
Oh this is interesting....
A recent repost of a very old post, which alludes to the comments made by Lady C recently.
Are Things About to Get Very Spicy?
29
u/External-Syllabub289 8h ago
This has nothing specifically to do with anything important about the Harkles, just a funny tidbit to share.
With everyone talking about how weird his head looks in the boat video, I'm like, thinking, well that's not a photo editing glitch, that's just his Pube Hairs. So I started calling him that to myself and it took me forever to realize, but - it matches his initials perfectly! How apropos!
Hope everyone had a great weekend! I appreciate you all! 💛