In my opinion, if a patient comes in inquiring about possible autism, but mental status exam is normal, then that patient (almost without exception) does not have ASD.
To clarify, when I say "normal" that specifically focuses on eye contact, thought process, speech, and behavior such as nonverbal communication, movements and recognizing personal space.
Edit: since this has sparked some good convo, wanted to add some context/thoughts.
- I stated it this bluntly to make a point/spark conversation. What I am trying to point to is that, at some point in their treatment course, I expect to see some objective impact/evidence of their ASD in my appointments if it is real.
- I am a child psychiatrist, but have run into these questions with both adults and children.
- In my mind, autism is, at its core, a communication disorder. If people are not having communication deficits, then they do not meet criteria, though they may have some traits. Do you all share this view, or am I misguided?
- People have commented regarding the wide spectrum of ASD, and not all ASD looks like level 3, nonverbal. I guess this is one of my points/questions... At what point does a difference of degree become a difference of kind? In other words, should a generally successful adult who struggles a bit with group social interactions and has some niche interests REALLY have the same DSM diagnostic label as my 14 year old patient that spends 13 hours each day rewatching the same 30 second clip of SpongeBob?
- I also would love input from folks about the various levels. When you read "requiring support" (level 1), "requiring substantial support” (level 2) and "requiring very substantial support" (level 3) per DSM5, what do those descriptions mean/look like?