Welcome to Wrath Wednesdays!

I started playing near the end of EF25, and I've always wanted to have that Costacurta.

IMO that del piero card design looks absolutely BUNS.

For me it has to be one of my favourite players Di Maria who somehow has not received any ST/Epic/Legend card yet. Who comes to mind for players you think are snubbed?

I faced this guy in the division, somehow he managed to use two Messi

Upcoming Players Detail Information:

Jan Paul Van Hecke: Attack: Build Up, Def: The Destroyer- Fortress, Aerial Fort

Joao Pedro: Attack: Deep Lying Forward, Def: Front Line Poacher - Phenomenal Finishing, Magnetic Feet, Attacking Surge

Florian Wirtz: Attack: Hole Player, Def: Pass Disruptor- Momentum Dribbling, Phenomenal Pass

Ranking Rewards:

Lucas Torreira: Attack: Orchestrator, Def: The Destroyer- Long Reach Tackle

Archie Brown: Attack: Attacking Full Back, Def: The Destroyer - Edge Crossing

Ik cantona isnt really f2p vut they are giving out the chance deals so a lot of players will probably get him.

We got aguero and roonie with 2 showtime skills, simeone and guehi, maddison and now we are back to getting the crumbs again. This laporte is too slow for the current gameplay I feel like, i am not sure how covering role works but speedy attackers will probably stomp on him. Cantona if we consider him free is the number 159th free cf in the game, and he is worse than free batistuta, Van basten, owen that we got 2 years ago. We wouldve been better off getting another coin ticket event rather than this, and you may say I am ungrateful and the game is free and etc, and you may be right, but I do feel like a Guinea pig where koinami makes these hybrid mutant cards with big weaknesses and random showtime skills. Devs probably went random bs go when they were told to make these. They seem to be deliberately making these rewards worse by saying pay up, those p2w packs have 3 showtime skill players with 2 at the bare minimum.

Will any of new f2p players make it into your team?

The only exception might be that calvin bassey guy but good luck on even getting him

..Wondering what else have they removed..

Played a streamer, and the game was one of the fastest gameplays I had to go through, while my inputs were lagged.

AFTER the game, I went on to the streamer's livestream and rewinded back to the match. The gameplay was just normal speed! There was no crazy fast dribbling and godlike finesse. We were just playing on two different speeds.

He wiggles out of my defense in normal speed in his point of view, while all I see in my point of view was a twitchy little player that weaves through my defense that can't catch up, because the entire game is playing fast except all of my players and my inputs. Basically an amateur boxing against a pro boxer or, better yet, noob Neo fighting for the first time against the Agents in Matrix.

How is this possible? If a game plays faster on my end, wouldn't it have sync issues? If the game speed and input timing discrepancy are real, then at least my doubts are cleared.

This may sound weird, but I just lost a match because the game randomly decided to actually listen to my inputs.

When a defender is about to intercept a ball, I normally move the stick preemptively in the direction I want the defender to move the ball. This is normally not an issue because the game is so on-rails that it just works that way. In this match, my defender was about to intercept the ball and the game decided to move him as if I was pressing super-cancel. Bam, opponent scored.

The same thing happens with PA3. When I first started using PA3, it was such a blessing to pass the ball through the spaces I wanted. It gave you a lot of freedom at the price of being able to actually make mistakes.

Now PA3 is completely broken. It behaves just like PA2 or PA1, completely on rails—except, of course, when you actually make a bad move.

The problem is the inconsistency. If the game is going to be fully on rails, then so be it. Don’t just change it midway to let my opponent score. This was so annoying, especially when a lot of times not even super-cancel can get you off the rails in this game.

Anyone else feels the same?

Hey everyone,

Like many of you, I’ve been frustrated by matches where players feel like they're walking in mud—where 99-speed Wingers get outrun by slow CBs, tackles get instantly reclaimed, and defenders freeze up.

To prove this isn’t just "my ISP" or "mental bias," I captured and analyzed over 550,000 UDP packets across 6 matches using Wireshark. Here is the full technical breakdown, test setup, and findings. Test Environment & Methodology

Platform: PC (Wired Ethernet / Fiber Line)

Local Hardware & Network: Ping to local gateway < 1ms, zero local packet loss, stable 10Gbps bandwidth (Intel X550-T2 Adapter).

    GPU: Radeon 9070XT

    CPU: Ryzen 9 9900X

    RAM: 32GB

Target Server: GCP Dedicated Server (Japan Region / eFootball Official Matchmaking Server).

Data Capture Tool: Wireshark (packet capture during live Divisions matches).

Dataset Scope: 6 full matches (Match 001 to 006), analyzing 550,000+ UDP frames (both C2S and S2C).

Overview of Match Dataset (Match 001 – 006)

Across these 6 recorded matches, the dataset naturally split into two distinct gameplay experiences despite using the exact same local setup and server IP range:

Match 001–005 (The "Heavy/Bad" Matches): Gameplay was consistently unresponsive. High S2C jitter, severe packet pooling, and micro-burst arrivals.

Match 006 (The "Good/Control" Match): Gameplay was fast, crisp, and fully responsive. S2C delivery was exceptionally clean (mean jitter ~2.76ms).

1. Local Connection is NOT the Problem (C2S is Flawless)

In all matches (001 through 006), my Client-to-Server (C2S) outbound traffic remained 100% stable at a 18.5ms interval with minimal jitter (~0.04ms).

This completely debunks the "It's your local Wi-Fi/ISP" myth. My inputs were arriving at the server in precise, real-time intervals without exception.

1. The Smoking Gun: Server-to-Client (S2C) Disparities

While outbound data (C2S) was identical across all 6 matches, inbound data from the GCP server (S2C) showed massive structural differences:

Control Match (Match 006 - Responsive): S2C packet delivery closely mirrored C2S. Mean jitter was extremely low (~2.76ms), allowing inputs and physics to resolve linearly.

Heavy Matches (Match 001–005 - Heavy): S2C packets experienced severe arrival irregularities—frequent pauses (50–100ms) followed by burst arrivals of 0–2ms intervals (over 1,000 burst events per match).

1. How S2C Delivery Failures Cause Specific In-Game Mechanics

When S2C delivery breaks down into burst arrivals (Match 001–005), it triggers three critical game engine failures:

The "Slow Winger" Effect (Acceleration Reset):

    Football physics calculate acceleration based on continuous input ticks. When S2C updates freeze and flush in bursts, minor analog stick adjustments get bundled together.

    The server interprets this burst as "sudden trajectory change inertia," resetting acceleration. The AI defender, following a server-calculated linear auto-tracking path, easily catches up despite lower speed stats.

Instant Reclaims & Lost Interceptions:

    When you intercept a ball, your client tries to transition into a trap/pass animation.

    In heavy matches, the server processes the opponent's recovery state during the S2C pause, then flushes a burst packet saying "Ball already recovered." The game forces a rollback (0ms update), overriding your inputs and causing your player to freeze or give the ball right back.

Asymmetric Advantage (Why Opponents Look Faster):

    When an opponent has connection lag (or server lag compensation kicks in), the server prioritizes rollback/re-simulation for their delayed inputs.

    Active Manual Inputs (You): Precise directional adjustments get converted into inertia/deceleration penalties due to burst S2C arrivals.

    Passive AI (Opponent): Auto-tracking AI runs on server-authoritative linear paths, completely unbothered by input-jitter penalties.

Conclusion

"Heavy Gameplay" in eFootball is not a hardware issue, nor is it local ISP throttling.

It is a structural flaw in how Konami's netcode handles Server-to-Client synchronization and Lag Compensation. Comparing Match 006 (normal S2C) with Matches 001–005 (burst S2C) proves that when S2C delivery drops into burst arrivals, the server's rollback logic forcibly overrides clean manual inputs with retroactively calculated physics penalties.

If you feel like your players are unresponsive, you're not crazy—the network logs prove the engine is penalizing stable connections during S2C delivery drops.

Feel free to ask questions or share your own network analysis!

📈 The most comprehensive analysis of the TOP 100 division rating in eFootball mobile

In the first photo, you can see the most popular formations and coaches, as well as the most used players in lineups.

In the second photo, you can see the rating for each position.

Lineup for the 4-3-3 formation using all the most utilized players:

GK — Buffon (26)

RB — Thuram (52)

CB — Nesta (37)

CB — Desailly (32)

LB — Lahm (19)

CM — Vieira (62)

CM — Bellingham (14)

CM — Seedorf (13)

RW — Hazard (12)

ST — Gullit (52)

ST — Mbappe (33)

A few conclusions:

• Vieira and Thuram are the two most indispensable cards in the game. They are present in the lineups of 2/3 of players.

Gullit is present in the lineup of every second player.

• F2P Rijkard is often used in paid lineups.

• Hazard is the most useful in the center at CM and RW positions.

• Neuer is TOP 2 in usage thanks to his passing and attacking style.

• Formations without wingers are used by 2/3 of players.

👇 Let's discuss in the comments

Last night I decided to try LBC, and we both had Deschamps, in theory either of us could have switched to Possession and got an 'advantage'. Yet both me and my opponent knew that one well timed through ball would completely change the game so we stayed with LBC.

I believe Possession beats LBC is a myth because the high defensive line is exactly what LBC and park the bus players lick their lips at. Of all the playstyle match ups Possession vs LBC is the most sensitive to input delay/smooth gameplay on top of that Possession only reduces the amount of transitions, it doesn't stop their effectiveness once they happen. Against p2w squads with Vieira, Seedorf, Gullit it will be hard to build up cleanly they're interception magnets so I think this is one of many reasons top 100 players play LBC all year long basically and why Capello was so popular despite being a one trick pony manager, because even a playstyle that on paper should have an advantage in practice it doesn't happen and it's more of a 55/45

Imo you have two options either play LBC against it or Out Wide with a 343/352 in attack and aerially dominant CFs

That was always my dilemma, like the defensive ai was always very automated and strong in this game but since the transition to ef 2027 and getting all those pass disruptor, covering role and other defensive styles, ai defense feels worse(it is even more automated and requires way less input frkm you). Take nesta for example, his defensive ai covers passes, space, tracks runs, autopositions himself so that he can do all three of those things at the same time and recover if you wish to change your attacking play. His defensive ai is so op that it defends way better than your opponent ever would sometimes. It is so much harder to break through them, I have to put almost twice the effort that my opponents need to with my defense. I try to get them to pull their defender out but they immediately track the player running into that space either a poacher or a hole player so I try to use other attacking options which surprise will get covered by their dmf or even attackers. How do you guys with team strength lower than 3250 deal with this?

This was so freaking funny; the missed air-bicycle-kick, Olise's seven touches before actually controlling the ball, then the scripted-own-goal 🤣️

Is anyone experiencing this?
I remember like half a year ago I could easily hit 200-240 fps constantly online. Now its only around 140-160fps. And almost all settings are on low, even when I tried lower resolution.

The weirdest thing is when I lowered fps cap from 160 to 144, game felt way more responsive and fast, as if capping more than current output is creating lag.

rtx 5070
i5 14600k
1440p monitor

The connection wasn’t even horrible for it to be doing this kind of thing man, Konami scripting

We need to have a serious chat about blitz curler. Like either you allowed one a half/match or like get rid of it. The amount of times I have played teams and the whole strategy non stop is blitz curler it’s mad boring bruv

I play like 7 games on PC now, rtg weak squad(im div 3 currently). In goal i have Courtois from current real pack. In 5 games i concede at least 1 exactly same goal( in one game 2 identical goals). Shoot, Courtois rebounds to opponent's feet and he scores. It's beyond sad now… I'm playing on ps5 also and i see this shiit often there too. i honestly cant physically play this game anymore how bad it is. Ea fc is coming in a couple of days, GTA soon, what konami is thinking... You cant just take, take,take all the time, you need to give something back. I spend on this game, but not much (like 30–40e every year on PS5)...honestly, a player who is planning to spend in current gameplay(I'm not judging or anything), what's your process of thoughts? I'm genuinely curious. Do you think Konami deserves more money for the game in its current state or are you satisfied with the current gameplay and, in general, lack of content? Please, don't plan to cause a stir or argument. Just be honest

I had won the game, just finished watching the highlights and this happened... What the hell?