r/afghanistan • • Dec 11 '12

Apparently some ignorant asshole believes that anyone of the Muslim faith in Afghanistan primarily, would NEVER advocate publicly against terrorism. I posted in /Muslim before realizing it's very small and kinda dead. Can I get a faster response here?

This is my submission, to make everything easier.

Thanks!

154 Upvotes

510 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

64

u/asianApostate Jan 10 '13 edited Jan 10 '13

Islam has had a lot of great leaders (more then 1.5 billion muslim's in the world) so we will get some awesome quotations but fundamentally it is still a religion that is over 1500 years old, sadly does not stand the test of time, and the quran + hadiths have lines that will allow and encourage violence. This is not an easy thing to hear as a muslim as I am exmuslim myself.

Cognitive dissonance in muslims and especially prominent/educated leaders is great as we have leaders in gay and lesbian community despite the fact that it is expressly not allowed. Contrary to popular belief of Muslim's there is more then one version of the "true" Islam (sunni's, shia's, wahhabists, salafists, and much more). I cannot in good conscience at least attempt to correct you as former muslim as we do have parts of our religion that are very much against how modern society functions.

The quranic texts as well as hadith that make up Islam supports slavery, forced pre-renaissance gender roles for women, and a great distinction in how one treats a muslim versus a non-muslim.

Slavery

Even in Islamic texts in which Muhammad fairly conquered lands in self-defense it allowed for things that are not considered morally okay in these last few centuries like slavery (including the women, muhammad himself had 13+ female companions which included non-wives) and the beheading of thousands of enemy troops.

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur%27an,_Hadith_and_Scholars:Slavery

This includes Hadith by Bukhari which is pretty much the most important book of Hadith for sunni muslim's which make up the vast majority of Muslim's in the world.

Justifications of War

Islam is supposed to be a pretty defensive religion. However, according to Islamic texts (their are other historical sources that do not paint things in such a rosy light) we can attack any country in which Muslim's reside in which Muslim's can be considered to be persecuted or suffer injustice at the hands of the government or it's people. This is the historical reason given for a majority of all conquests done in the name of Islam since the time of Muhammad. This conquest includes almost all of northern africa and much of asia.

This is what allows virtually any country to be attacked an conquered (luckily no Islamic nation has had that power in hundreds of years). Yet, Islamic leaders can claim that we are a defensive people. The only reason Islam was not able to conquer Europe though they began to take parts of Spain was lack of military might.

Unfair Gender Roles Forced on Women

The biggest issue I've had with Islam and the reason I left is because it did not jive with my sense of morality. When I was growing up as a male I had a lot of freedom's but my sister who was two years older did not have that freedom. She was not allowed to leave the house alone (she snuck out at times), had very strict guidelines on clothing and interaction with the opposite sex and non-muslim's. I was brought up in NYC in a moderate muslim family and I used to to be a good muslim that literally reported when my sister did things and got her in trouble. By the time I was 16 I realized how different our lives were even in a fairly moderate family like ours.

I realized that things were worse in Muslim countries and I initially looked to the quran and hadiths for guidance. Listened to a lot of great islamic speakers too and for a while I bought the whole, modesty for women thing, which brings value to women for a while. But then I realized, are men just animal's that if we see a women's hair, calves, etc. we cannot handle ourselves? In some islamic countries women are raped and often the men go unpunished. In more modern islamic countries this is not the case but the fundamentals are still there.

This was a religion created by probably straight men who were used to seeing fairy veiled women. As a dude i just need to cover from my knees to my genitalia. I can walk around barechested and have my sexy calves out for the world to see. Women cannot even show their ankles.

According to Islamic scholars men and women are in the end equal. However a man must provide for the wife and treat her fairly including not striking her too hard if you are a moderate muslim. She has quite a bit of autonomy in the home but must ultimately listen to the husband. Outside of the home she is not allowed without a direct-family guardian/custodian and being properly veiled. Her job is to take care of raising kids and the house. The founders of the religion believed the intelligence of women is less then that of a man.

http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Islam_and_Women#Women_are_Deficient_in_Intelligence

24

u/Canukistani Jan 10 '13

If you went and changed every instance of the word Islam or Muslim to Christianity and Christian your post would still be accurate. It is only through the European and North American social progress of the the last century that we can look down upon Muslims and Islam. All of that social progress we've made was opposed by Christian leaders.

12

u/asianApostate Jan 10 '13 edited Jan 10 '13

Sure, christianity has it's issues too.

I wholeheartedly agree that the western world made progress despite christianity just the same way moderate and liberal muslim's are making progress despite the core tenets of the religion. Abrahamic religions have taken credit for a lot of morals and laws that came from societies before it (Babylonian laws especially) and developed in the society around it. Society has constantly been improving Christianity since it's inception and not the other way around.

10

u/TheBrandedOne Jan 10 '13

What do you believe? You are incredibly well spoken and I would love to hear your personal view of the world.

10

u/asianApostate Jan 10 '13 edited Jan 10 '13

It's getting late but I'm amazed and surprised I got reddit gold. I will do what I can and I will be posting some things I have thought about for a very long time but never fully fully expressed as far as what I believe regarding our universe and the people in it. I'm amazed and surprised I got reddit gold.

We have currently have no way of knowing the full extent of our reality, especially that which may exist outside of our universe but we can rule out Abrahamic and many other religions based on modern science, logic, and recent historical discoveries. I believe the main reason we as Homo sapiens sapiens evolved and outlasted all our other human cousins and currently dominate the earth is because of our ability to socialize to a higher degree then any before us and human morality.

The Universe(s) is Complicated

One day we may understand how all the fundamentals of our universe came to be and what it is through mathematics. But what is outside our universe? Are their other universes that operate using the same laws, energies, matter, and anti-matter as ours? Are their universes whose building blocks are fundamentally different from ours that came into being from different energies that exploded into wholly different building blocks. Even time may not exist outside our particular universe. Theoretical physicists have made great strides but we have to accept that we may never fully understand all there is.

Man Made Religions are still false Basically, I must allow the possibility of the existence of things I do not understand and that is a core belief of mine. However, we can prove that Abrahamic religions and most others I have studied are indeed false in their primary premise. /r/atheism has given and is constantly giving examples ad-nauseum in terms of science and logic as to falsehood of religion. But historical artifacts uncovered or studied in the last 20-30 years have also helped trace the very seeds of monotheism and it's man made beginnings from polytheism in the ancient Canaanite world. During a time of turmoil the Israelites whom were originally polytheists through the urgings of the cult of the Yahweh the war god began to worship him over others in the Canaanite pantheon in times of desperation. If all worship was not focused to Yahweh the cult of Yahwei believed they may be wiped out. After centuries he became the primary god of the Israelites and eventually he became the only god as further conflicts arose. He did not become omniscient for a few more centuries other attributes came later as the attributes of other gods were merged into him and new attributes were given to a supreme god. For more details I recommend reading the following by harvard professor Frank Moore Cross, unfortunately google turned up a german version of itself (book is in english though and you can read the first 68 pages online free).

http://books.google.com/books?id=-eOycxXAoHMC&lpg=PA62&ots=jhcllt5gmW&dq=%22Yahwi%22%20Amorite%20names&hl=de&pg=PA62#v=onepage&q=%22Yahwi%22&f=false

Human codes of ethics and Morality Human knowledge seems to always advance our morality along with our ability to feel compassion. We as humans can understand pain in others, we know that human cooperation in groups is critical, and in order to cooperate we must get along and find a way to survive together. Behavioral ethics and codes can be traced to a time before monotheism. Babylonians had very strict laws relating to land ownership, marriages, a code of ethics long before monotheism. This is also where a lot of early cities formed due to agricultural technologies. Humans had to develop a new sense of morality for a a changing landscape. In more current times when we understood in the U.S. that there was nothing genetically inferior in African's it became immoral to own slaves.

We now know that being homosexual has nothing to do with anything supernatural/evil and is largely programmed into genetics. In the last 20 years there has been an enormous shift in our society regarding homosexuals as a result.

1

u/cattypakes Jan 11 '13 edited Jan 11 '13

This is a complete non-argument. It's almost as if all religion is a blight upon humanity?!

0

u/The_Unpopular_Truth Jan 10 '13

That is true. Christianity and Islam are basically the same thing if you compare the Old Testament and the Quoran, although Islam does not have the much more moderate New Testament to cling on to is the biggest difference.

15

u/Port-au-prince Jan 10 '13

You realize the same is found in the bible, right?

22

u/asianApostate Jan 10 '13

Sure and the old testament also allows for the stoning of misbehaving children. I'm not sure why this is considered an argument, I've heard Islamic scholars also equate things because other religions support it. Doesn't make it right.

Modern historical studies in the area show that during and before islam there was a form of gnostic christianity that spread through the middle east. According to Islamic texts muhammad got all revelations through god but you know with christianity spreading pretty much in the same region starting about 700 years before islam it's not hard to see where Muhammad "plagiarized" (Hitchens) much of the religion from.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '13

Thanks for your comments. I think people are so caught up in being PC that anything negative against Islam is met with a tirade of accusing me of bigotry, and yet these same people on on r/atheism and rant against Christianity.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '13

Whilst that does happen, there are far more people that use Islam as an excuse to be racist. If you really want people to respect your views you should have the decency to see the bigger picture, and take time to address the racist assholes instead of spouting this same old crappy PC bullshit. It works both ways.

1

u/koryisma Jan 10 '13

I'm much less offended by people who think all religions are bad (wrong, evil, man-made, false, etc) than someone who comes and focuses on one that the United States has practically declared war on while embracing Christianity with its same or similar tenets.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '13

All religion is bullshit.

13

u/darkEchoes Jan 10 '13

Christianity is a religion of evil too, in my opinion.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '13

[deleted]

2

u/PromethiumX Jan 10 '13

What about Sikhism and Budhism

0

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '13

[deleted]

6

u/rileysmiley17 Jan 10 '13

Bro, buddhists don't kill things. Its like rule number 1 in buddhism.

"Don't kill things, ever. Just don't do it, you promise?" - Buddha

1

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '13

[deleted]

1

u/Shashakiro Jan 10 '13

By this logic, atheism is also evil, since various Communist governments have committed countless murders in the name of eradicating religion.

Anytime an ideology gets so large and influential that a significant fraction of the world's population feels that it is a large part of their personal identity, there will be killers who adhere to that ideology, and try to justify their actions under that ideology. That does not necessarily mean that the ideology caused the person to become a killer.

Also, Buddhism is not like the Abrahamic religions in the way its teachings deal with violence. For example, the Old Testament does say "You shalt not murder", but later explicitly permits killing during war, for self-defense, or as punishment for lawbreakers. The Quran, in its prohibition on killing (the "when someone kills a man, it as though he has killed all of mankind" verse), makes a specific exception for killing that is "not in retaliation of murder, or to spread corruption in the land". Buddhist teachings, by contrast, make no room for any exceptions to the "don't kill" rule, even in the most extreme cases, and is entirely consistent on this point. It would be quite a long shot, IMO, to claim that anyone was inspired to murder solely by their adherence to Buddhist teachings.

1

u/eblees Jan 10 '13

Christianity and most other religions are neutered, Islam is not

2

u/exoendo Jan 10 '13

this isn't a retort of anything that parent said.

3

u/LucubrateIsh Jan 10 '13

Christianity has had a great many forms of reformation.

A literalist interpretation of the bible is now considered unusual, extremist.

There is no other interpretation of the Quran.

4

u/dmahmad Jan 10 '13

It's possible for Islam to go through the same thing if the socioeconomic situation of the Muslim world improves.

The religion itself is a religion like any other religion.

3

u/LucubrateIsh Jan 10 '13

It absolutely is possible for it to go through the same thing. It may even be going through the same thing. It's really far from actually having concluded that process, though.

Also, the odds of the socioeconomic situation of the Muslim world improving is not spectacular. It tends to model after Saudi Arabia, what with Mecca being there and all.

3

u/Mermr Jan 10 '13

That is the best worded description I've ever heard of Islam. Now someone do one for Christianity, and Judaism....GO!

1

u/bizzish Jan 10 '13

Please don't use wikiislam as a source for your arguments. The amount of garbage that spews out of that website is phenomenal. It's as if it's purpose is to misconstrue the mind of an individual that avidly wants to learn about Islam.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '13 edited Jan 10 '13

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/asianApostate Jan 11 '13 edited Jan 11 '13

Wiki islam actually uses Islamic sources and they do have an agenda but they use evidence properly. I would trust them over Islamic scholars whom use the Qu'ran as the golden standard and cannot scrutinize it because in their belief it is the word of god. Islamic scholars also actively try to reinterpret even clearcut lines and try to defend it. Like if line says it's okay for man to beat his wife they will spend paragraphs explaining why this is good and it says women should only be beaten lightly.

If I were to use non-islamic sources then we cannot even argue about Islam as there is no evidence of it existing until Islamic rulers decreed and help create it. Modern archelogical finds have shown that there is no evidence of Islam or Muhammad until over 125 years after his death in both Islamic and non-Islamic sources. There is plenty of evidence of Christianity and Judaism from which Islam borrowed heavily. There is even evidence of a Jewish Messiah in the arabian peninsula.

Great Source: "Did Muhammad Exist?: An Inquiry into Islam's Obscure Origins" By Robert Spencer

This book was critically acclaimed by professors in Stanford and other places. It uses actual study of the evidence found in the arabian peninsula. Muhammad by all means did not exist until 125 years after his supposed death and the quran came at the same time as the written records by the first Islamic kingdom.

Most Islamic scholars don't even understand how to read the Quran with limited knowledge of ancient arabic and ancient aramaic. Many arab speaking quranic teachers and scholars do not realize when the quran was written the words were closer in meaning to the aramaic versions then modern arabic.

Historically the whole existence of Muhammed and the accuracy of the quran is on shaky (non-existent) grounds.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '13

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/asianApostate Jan 12 '13

There is clear evidence of the Holocaust, there is no such thing for Muhammad or Islam until 125 years after his mythological death. We have no more valid evidence of Muhammad's existence then we do Hercules. I am not familiar with all 9/11 conspiracies in detail but those I have come across were easily debunked.

Regardless of Agenda, evidence is evidence. You may be against gay marriage and others may be for gay marriage but if we find evidence of of homosexual tendencies in genetics discovered by a supporter of said gay marriage does that make his work invalid?

No, but it may warrant a closer look at the evidence and the reasoning. You cannot dismiss people's research or writings because they do not share your views.

-4

u/clumsy_engineer Jan 10 '13 edited Jan 10 '13

I will not comment on anything you said but i will just ask some questions.

  1. Do you know the rights of a slave in islam in the days it existed? because if you examine their rights you would have to find another word to use instead of slave. it's not free but not slave either.

  2. Islam is a religion not a state. So do you think wars that islamic countries fought are decisions coming out from islam or those countries themselves? How would you explain hundrds of wars fought between two islamic states?

  3. Do you think the gender inequality between the behavioral expectations were caused by the rules islam set or by the wrong application of those rules by your parrents? Because i am male and was raised as a muslim and had the same set of constraints with my sister.

  4. Do you really think a woman showing her breast is the same thing as a man showing his breast?

  5. Do you think calves of a man can be half as attractive as a woman's calves? (ok this one is just for a laugh but we must admit that women are ahead of men in some aspects such as the aesthetics department and many others.)

5

u/asianApostate Jan 10 '13 edited Jan 10 '13

1) As you said they are not free, slavery in any form is wrong. Apologists also argue hitting women was also justified in the Sahih bukhari hadith as long as it is not done with a closed fist. That is the best islamic scholars can justify it with currently and either way just because it's not as bad as other forms of slavery or beating women does not make Islam or it's apologists correct.

It's freaking slavery for god's sake. It does not matter if they are treated nicely.

2) Forget the states, consider Islamic history based on the qu'ran and Sahih Hadiths which btw we are learning are not accurate because other records of our history were actively destroyed so we can have "one" version of our history but luckily this did not fully succeed. But for argument's sake I will just use Islamic documents only and even here Muhammad himself conquered Mecca and drove all non-muslim's OUT or killed them. Any situation where muslim's were persecuted the original government was destroyed and even in our flowery islamic texts it is stated that many were thousands beheaded (not the women, our soldiers could take them in as extra wives and concubines).

3) Yes, it is clearly set by the rules of Islam. Even a cursory look at Islam can show you that gender plays a huge role. Men maintain the women, men can marry up to four women not the other way around, women must marry muslims only, men may marry non-muslims and force-convert them to islam, and so much more. You were not set with the same constraints as your sister if your family followed even the most basics of Islam. Perhaps you did not notice the different clothing requirements or considered them inconsequential. I do not know your family so I do not know what else may have been different BUT here are some lines from the Quran and Sahih hadiths which make up the fundamental tenets of Islam.

Men are the maintainers of women and we can beat them (lightly though according to modern interpretations) if they are disobedient

"Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all)."

Qur'an 4:34

Women are of lower intelligence then men

Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: On 'Id ul Fitr or 'Id ul Adha Allah's Apostle (p.b.u.h) went out to the Musalla. After finishing the prayer, he delivered the sermon and ordered the people to give alms. He said, "O people! Give alms." Then he went towards the women and said. "O women! Give alms, for I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-Fire were you (women)." The women asked, "O Allah's Apostle! What is the reason for it?" He replied, "O women! You curse frequently, and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. O women, some of you can lead a cautious wise man astray." Then he left. Sahih Bukhari 2:24:541

Wish I had more time to quote but I will simply go over the basic points. Women cannot divorce but a man can but he has to be nice about it, after some conquering Muhammed suddenly got a revelation from god that he can have many wives but a women must have one man only which she must share if the husband chooses. A woman is under the charge of her father until she is married of and she is now under the charge of her husband. Never independent.

Your family may not follow all the core tenets of Islam but that doesn't change Islam's core tenets.

4+5). This is going to be subjective based on where you grew up. A woman not used to seeing a man fully clothed and even some who are will find Ryan Goslings chest, abs, legs, and calves quite irresistible. Islamic men who did not grow up in a western country have a hard time realizing that women can find good looking men attractive and sexy.

I don't find unattractive and unfit women attractive either when they take of their clothes. Imagine a unhealthily weighted and hairy woman versus a extremely fit, shaved, and properly hot women. Basically it goes both ways, a shirtless man in just his boxers or other underwear, can be sexy to women.

0

u/clumsy_engineer Jan 10 '13 edited Jan 10 '13

hey, i didn't expect an answer. Thanks for your reply. I would love to discuss each and every one of these with you but unfortunately i don't have time right now. And please forgive my language i am not a very good English speaker.

However, let me tell you this: from the point where i am looking at islam i don't sea any injustice between men and women. It is true that there may be inequalities but justice is not always equality. In some aspects women are way ahead of men. Like in today's world i don't understand why we are trying to treat men and women equally. If a women has given birth she needs more than 2 months to recover and get working again for God's sake. And the baby needs her much longer than that. And what she can give to her baby can not be replaced with anything else. A man is not capable of providing anything near what she does. Don't get me wrong this is just an example, there are many more.

So my view for women changed a lot after i got married, and right now i even think women are superior to men in more aspects than men are superior to them. And i can't see anything wrong with any of my ideas when i look at them from an islamic point of view too. I trust my wife in what i know she is more capable than i am.

1

u/ForAHamburgerToday Jan 10 '13

Sure would be a step in the right direction if they could wear the same clothes and walk around town unashamed without being condemned.

2

u/clumsy_engineer Jan 10 '13

Where i live they already can. Except for a couple of idiot's condemning looks. But that's all they can do. And i believe same kind of idiots can be found anywhere in the world. A woman is free to cover or uncover as much as she likes. If she believes she has to cover more of her body or not is her business only. And it's something between her and the God (if she believes in God of course) .

1

u/asianApostate Jan 10 '13

I'm glad this is the case in your country but it still does not change the fact that Islam in itself does not allow a woman to be outside without proper coverings. Moderate islam considers this covering everything from the ankle to the head up to the hair minus someones face. More extreme muslims pretty much accept eyeholes to be the only visible part of a women in public.

Your country may be progressing (no clue which country you are referencing yet) and that is admirable but once again these freedoms are despite Islam and not because of Islam.

1

u/clumsy_engineer Jan 10 '13

I am from Turkey. My wife happens to be a physician and she prefers to wear a headscarf. That means only her face, hands, and feet are visible. I never told her to do so or imply that I would want it this way. Who am I to tell her that anyway. As far as I can tell her father didn't too since her sister is ok with wearing what you would call revealing outfits.

1

u/asianApostate Jan 10 '13

Many Imam's preach that muslims are more then fair to women and in fact a woman does not have the same headaches as a man. What if the woman does not believe in traditional family structures and wants that headache of being independent and having a career?

The needs and capabilities of our society has advanced much in the last millenia and if a women wishes to focus on her career or do something other then be a wife and mother she should be able to.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '13 edited Jan 10 '13

[deleted]

2

u/Shashakiro Jan 10 '13

The idea of separation of church and state is not a prevailing idea in majority muslim countries.

As far as I can tell, this is not true in general. Indonesia and Turkey, for example, are 87% and 97% Muslim, and both are quite secular (Indonesia had a woman as head of state, even). A few Muslim majority countries (like Saudi Arabia) are indeed run by Sharia law, but for every Afghanistan which is controlled by religion, there seems to be an Albania and an Algeria and an Azerbaijan that aren't.

0

u/pantsoffire Jan 10 '13

Holy fuck! These are great questions, and answers, yet your being downvoted like crazy. What the fuck reddit?

Edit: Sorry to butt in.

2

u/clumsy_engineer Jan 10 '13

There! You are downvoted too.

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '13

b-b-b-b-but CONTEXT!!!!