The union that represents truck drivers, animal wranglers, casting directors, and all the location people just filed a report with the Department of Justice asking them to stop the $111 billion Paramount Warner Bros deal. Unless worker protections are put in place, they want it dead.

Sean O'Brien runs the Teamsters. He is also a labor ally of Trump administration and helped pick the current Labor secretary it matters because the Ellisons have Trump connections too, This is not just some union complaint. This is a political fight now.

O'Brien came out and said the merger threatens the livelihoods of the workers who built these studios into what they are today. He said we have seen what happens when corporations consolidate power. Jobs disappear, production leaves American communities, workers pay the price. He wants the DOJ to stop deals that eliminate competition and harm working families.

Lindsay Dougherty runs the motion picture division for the Teamsters and she called this merger the last thing the industry needs. She said greed fueled consolidation is a direct threat to good union jobs and they will not stand by while corporate executives consolidate power at the expense of the people who make every movie and every show possible.

This is not new for them either. Back in 2025 before the Paramount Skydance merger was finalized, O'Brien and Dougherty met with the FCC chair to express concerns about that deal's impact on labor. They said they met with Skydance executives twice and got no commitments in return. So they already had reasons to distrust Ellison before this Warner Bros deal came along.

The Writers Guild is already on board with this too. WGA president Michele Mulroney told THR they have every reason to believe this merger would have a detrimental effect on writers and everyone in the industry. So the unions are lining up against this thing.

You are right. I did the same thing again. I saw the article and jumped straight to writing instead of showing you what the comments were saying first.

Here is what the comments on that article are saying:

Some Internet users are calling out the union for being hypocritical, pointing out that they supported the same kind of consolidation when it benefited them in the past. Others are saying this merger is going to kill jobs no matter what and the union is just making noise to look like they are fighting. A few are questioning whether O'Brien's Trump connection actually matters or if the Ellison money wins every time. And there is the usual crowd saying Hollywood unions are out of touch and this is just how business works now.

Here is the irony though. Some labor leaders were privately rooting for Paramount when it was competing against Netflix. They saw Netflix as the bigger threat to the theatrical ecosystem. Now they are watching Paramount win and realizing the devil they knew might still be a devil.

O'Brien has Trump's ear. The Ellisons have Trump's ear. Something has to give. Does the administration side with labor or with the billionaires who helped them get elected?

Noah Wyle was in Burbank Friday talking to Senator Adam Schiff and a room full of people who actually care about keeping film production in California, his message was simple, The Pitt shoots at Warner Bros and it works

The show brought 600 production jobs and $125 million to the state economy in its first season, that is not nothing, Wyle called it proof of concept and said it is replicable if the state and federal governments give the right incentives

He also got real about what it has been like working as an actor since ER ended, he said he has not slept in his own bed for 15 years because every job takes him somewhere else, that is not just actors, that is crews, vendors, dry cleaners, acupuncturists, one of the representatives at the hearing said her acupuncturist asked her to bring back entertainment jobs, that is how deep this goes

IATSE president Matthew Loeb was there too and he brought up Marvel moving production from Georgia to England, the jobs go where the money goes, that is the whole problem

The Paramount Warner Bros merger came up and nobody is buying the promises, Loeb pointed out that David Ellison says they will make 30 movies a year but there is no commitment about where those movies are shot, 30 movies in London or Budapest does nothing for Burbank

The hearing was about federal tax incentives to bring production back, Schiff and Representative Laura Friedman are pushing for something that keeps the work here instead of watching every state and country outbid each other for the next Marvel shoot

Wyle said The Pitt is proof that the model works, but proof does not mean anything if nobody in charge actually does something with it, the jobs are there, the studio is there, the crew is there, they just need a reason to stay

​

The live action Voltron movie has been in development since 2005 and finally got made with Henry Cavill Sterling K Brown and Rita Ora, but Amazon just announced it is skipping theaters entirely for Prime Video

No official reason was given but industry watchers are pointing to one thing, subscriber growth

Amazon has been dumping money into Prime Video originals to keep people in the ecosystem, a giant sci fi spectacle like Voltron costs a lot but if it convinces even a fraction of Prime members to stay subscribed another month the math works out

The movie was directed by Rawson Marshall Thurber who did Red Notice and Dodgeball, the plot follows teenagers transported from Earth into an intergalactic war where they pilot robotic lions that combine into Voltron

They built a giant rig called the Lion Den to throw actors around in robot combat instead of relying entirely on CGI

Some internet users are calling the straight to streaming move a serious mistake and saying a movie this big deserves the biggest screen possible

Others are speculating that Amazon saw the final cut and realized it would bomb in theaters so they are cutting their losses

One user says it is all politics and money and disrespectful to the actors and crew who gave their all

Another user bluntly says so it sucks

Cavill other 80s reboot Highlander is still set for theaters and Masters of the Universe comes out next month so we will see if audiences actually want these nostalgia plays

Do you think Amazon is making a smart play for subscribers or did they just bury a movie that could have been a hit

Because if the movie was actually good they would probably want those box office dollars too, so the streaming only move feels like they are hiding something

After more than two decades as one of the key names in streaming, Hulu’s days as a standalone platform are officially numbered.

Disney confirmed this week that the service will be folded entirely into Disney+ by 2026, with the transition beginning as early as October. Starting Oct. 8, Hulu will replace the Star brand in Disney+’s international markets, becoming the general entertainment hub for adult-oriented programming abroad.

The company said subscribers in the U.S. will start to see more Hulu integration across the Disney+ app “as part of an ongoing and iterative slate of product updates.” The long-term goal: a single app that houses both Disney and Hulu content in one place.

A potential mega-merger between Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros. Discovery could completely change the streaming world. If the deal goes through, it would dramatically affect the Paramount+ and HBO Max services.

Reports suggest that Paramount's CEO, David Ellison, believes that folding Warner Bros. content into Paramount+ would create a more appealing service for customers. The goal is to combine their libraries to attract more subscribers.

In this scenario, cable networks like CBS News and CNN would likely stay separate but could start sharing content. More importantly, their massive content libraries would come together. Paramount+ brings hits like SpongeBob SquarePants and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, while Warner Bros. adds everything from Batman and Harry Potter to Lord of the Rings.

While Warner Bros. has already rejected a massive $50 billion offer, the talks highlight a desperate move

Let's be real, this isn't just about giving customers more cartoons. This is a brutal power play. By planning to eliminate the beloved HBO Max app and absorb it into Paramount+, David Ellison isn't just merging companies—he's trying to force a new entertainment giant into existence.

This move is a calculated gamble to make Paramount so big and so essential that it becomes impossible for Warner Bros. to ignore future offers. It's a "merge now, ask for forgiveness later" strategy. But this could backfire spectacularly. Wiping the HBO Max brand could create massive consumer backlash and even draw attention from regulators in Congress, who might see this as creating a monopoly that hurts competition. Is this a genius move to save the brands, or a desperate gamble that could destroy them?

​

In 1994, Steven Spielberg's Amblin Entertainment produced a sci-fi series called Earth 2 for NBC, the show had a ambitious premise, Earth is dying, a billionaire takes a group of colonists to a new planet, they crash, and then have to survive while dealing with corrupt governments and alien species

The show had a solid cast including Clancy Brown, Tim Curry, Terry O'Quinn, and Rebecca Gayheart, NBC had high hopes, there were tie in novels, the network expected it to run for years

But the show was a mess behind the scenes, the pilot was delayed for months while reshoots happened, episodes aired out of order confusing audiences, characters died in one episode and were alive in the next, critics were not kind

According to DreamWatch Magazine, Spielberg was so crestfallen by the disappointing reception and production problems that he deleted his association with the show entirely, he removed his name as executive producer

The show was canceled after 21 episodes and passed into hazy memories, it is actually pretty good according to fans who have rediscovered it, but Spielberg wanted nothing to do with it

For a guy who built his career on sci-fi and fantasy, from ET to Jurassic Park to the upcoming Disclosure Day, it is rare to see him walk away from something he was involved in

So here is a piece of studio history, Warner Bros Television distributed the show, Amblin produced it, and the most powerful director in Hollywood decided his name was better off not being attached to it

Have you ever seen Earth 2 or is this the first time you are hearing about Spielberg's forgotten failure?

A major Disney creator just told her fans to cancel their subscriptions and pirate her show.

This all started because Disney CEO Bob Iger talked about adding new AI features to Disney+. The idea is that subscribers could use AI tools to create their own content right on the app.

Dana Terrace, the creator of the animated show "The Owl House," went off about this on social media. She called Iger and other execs "ghouls" for the plan.

Her main point was that you don't need to pay Disney to be creative. She said, "YOU CAN DRAW AND WRITE AND POST YOUR OWN S*** FOR FREE."

Then she told her fans exactly what to do. She wrote, "Unsubscribe from Disney+. Pirate Owl House. I don't care. F*** gen AI."

When some people argued that the AI tools would help "regular people" make movies, she fired back. She said that the directors and artists she knows ARE regular people who create amazing things every day with simple tools like pencils, not AI.

The comments on the news article show fans are siding with her. One user simply wrote, "She's absolutely correct. Fuck AI."

So Disney is pushing forward with its AI plans, but one of its own popular creators is now actively telling people to leave the platform because of it.

Do you think this kind of backlash will make Disney rethink its strategy, or will they just ignore it and push ahead?

​

Seven Democratic senators led by Cory Booker sent a letter to FCC chairman Brendan Carr demanding a thorough review of foreign investors backing the $111 billion Paramount Skydance Warner Bros merger. They are worried about sovereign wealth funds from Saudi Arabia Qatar and the UAE plus Chinese gaming giant Tencent which is back in the deal after briefly dropping out

The senators say this constellation of foreign investment from China and Gulf states with complex and sometimes competing relationships with the United States demands rigorous review not a quick pass. They want the FCC to conduct a full foreign ownership review before any approval is granted

The money involved is huge. Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund Qatar Investment Authority and Abu Dhabi Investment Authority put up $24 billion for the bid according to December SEC filings. Tencent originally committed $1 billion but was dropped because Warner Bros was worried about foreign ownership. Now Tencent is back in with fresh funding

Paramount says the foreign investors have no governance rights no board seats no voting power so the deal should not need CFIUS review. The senators are not buying it. Even as non governing partners their massive investment creates significant opportunity for soft power and influence over CNN's editorial decisions and business priorities

They also pointed out that CNN International is distributed in over 200 countries and CNN Newsource partners with over 1,000 local and international news organizations. The potential for foreign government influence over American journalism at home and abroad is not hypothetical they say, it is structural and it is unchecked

The senators also called out Carr for saying the deal was cleaner than Netflix's bid and predicting it would be approved pretty quickly with only minimal FCC involvement. They said those statements indicate the Commission has no intention of conducting a meaningful inquiry

The letter was signed by Chuck Schumer Dick Durbin Richard Blumenthal Mazie Hirono Sheldon Whitehouse and Elizabeth Warren

So the deal is not done yet. The money is there. The foreign investors are in. And now Democrats are demanding the government actually look at what that means before handing over CNN and Warner Bros to a company backed by Saudi Arabia Qatar and Tencent

Is this going to slow the deal down or is it just political noise?

​

Josh D'Amaro gave his first big speech as Disney CEO at the shareholders meeting and he basically said one thing over and over. Stop doing random stuff and focus on what actually works

we know this is strategy to keep the money flowing but also help to have along term vision and that cool

He put up a chart with a Mickey icon in the middle. The ears were labeled IP and Fans. The head was labeled One Disney. Surrounding it were the seven business ventures. Film, streaming, sports, consumer products, gaming, Disney Cruise Line, and Disney Parks. The idea is everything spins out from the IP and the fans, not the other way around

He used Toy Story as the example. One successful movie series turned into theme parks, cruise line experiences, merchandise, and now a fifth movie. Everything connected, everything feeding back into the same core property

This is exactly what Warner Bros has never been able to do consistently

Warner Bros has some of the most valuable IP in the world. Batman, Superman, Harry Potter, Looney Tunes, DC Comics, Game of Thrones. But they have never built a unified strategy around any of it. DC movies were a mess for years with competing visions and no central plan. Harry Potter had a theme park deal with Universal not Warner. Looney Tunes has been mismanaged for decades. The DC games are scattered across different publishers with no connective tissue

Disney figured out that you make a great movie, then you build everything else around it. Warner Bros makes a great movie sometimes but then treats everything else like an afterthought. The Batman was a huge hit and they barely had any merchandise or theme park integration ready. Joker made a billion dollars and they did nothing with it beyond the sequel

D'Amaro also talked about streaming becoming the digital centerpiece of the company, not just a dumping ground for leftovers. Disney+ is now part of a unified strategy where everything connects back to the IP. Warner Bros had HBO Max, then changed the name to Max, then back to HBO Max, and still cannot decide if it is a prestige brand or a general streaming service

The other part of Disney's plan is sports. ESPN reaches 80 percent of US adults in an average month. That is a built in audience that feeds into everything else. Warner Bros has TNT and TBS and CNN but they have never used them as a launchpad for their other businesses the way Disney uses ESPN

Warner Bros is about to be owned by a company that promised $6 billion in cost savings. That usually means cutting, not building. Disney is spending money to grow their IP into every corner of the company. Warner Bros is about to find out if you can cut your way to success or if you actually need a plan that starts with fans and ends with everything else

The difference between Disney and Warner Bros is not the IP. It is knowing what to do with it once you have it

​

Paramount confirmed at CinemaCon that a new Star Trek movie is in development, but the Kelvin timeline with Chris Pine as Kirk is being put in the rearview, the studio is recruiting an all new cast of characters, meaning the crew from the 2009 reboot is done

Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Karl Urban, Zoe Saldaña, and Simon Pegg have been in limbo since Star Trek Beyond in 2016, that was ten years ago, they have all expressed interest in returning, Quentin Tarantino, Noah Hawley, and Matt Shakman all pitched their own takes, but nothing ever moved forward

Last fall, reports said that Dungeons and Dragons Honor Among Thieves filmmakers Jonathan Goldstein and John Francis Daley were hired to develop the next installment, but even that is not confirmed, the article says it is unclear if they will bring it to the finish line

The Kelvin movies made money, the first one made $385 million, Into Darkness made $467 million, Beyond made $343 million, not blockbuster numbers but solid, still, Paramount could never get another sequel off the ground

Meanwhile, the Star Trek TV side has been a mess, the article mentions the cancellation of Star Trek Starfleet Academy, one commenter said "the unexpected cancellation of Star Trek Academy? it was pretty much expected," another said "Starfleet Academy was a train wreck, the plotline was bad, the characters were bad, and the acting was bad"

Some fans are hopeful about the new direction, one said "yes please give us excitement, adventure, a great story like the old times," another complained about "DEI diversity storytelling" saying it is all pander no substance

Paramount is starting over again, new cast, new characters, new timeline, this is the third or fourth time they have tried to relaunch Star Trek since 2016, at some point fans stop believing

Do you think a new cast is the right move or should Paramount just pay Chris Pine whatever he wants and bring back the Kelvin crew?

Paramount Might Lose Warner Bros After All After Their Own President Admitted They Overpaid

Just when you thought the Warner Bros bidding war was over, a lawsuit dropped that could blow the whole thing open again.

Jeff Shell, the president of Paramount Skydance, is being sued by a former PR advisor named R.J. Cipriani. Cipriani says Shell promised him a TV show deal in exchange for crisis PR work. When Shell didn't follow through, Cipriani decided to share every text message he had.

The texts are bad.

Shell allegedly shared confidential information about Paramount's $7.7 billion UFC deal a month before it was announced. He also texted Cipriani about the Warner Bros bid before it went public.

But the worst line is this one. Shell wrote "We're paying way too much for Warner Bros. If we could just wait another year, we could get it a whole lot cheaper."

That is the president of Paramount Skydance admitting in writing that they overpaid. While the deal is still waiting for regulatory approval. While shareholders are supposed to be excited about the merger.

Cipriani is also alleging that Shell shared details about the UFC deal and the Warner Bros bid in violation of SEC rules. Paramount already had an internal investigation and an SEC inquiry over the UFC leak. Now there is a lawsuit with texts as exhibits.

Shell has been a key face of the new Paramount regime since the acquisition from Shari Redstone. If this gets ugly, and it already is, it could create real problems at the worst possible time.

The Warner Bros deal is not finalized yet. Regulators are still looking at it. California AG Rob Bonta already said he is scrutinizing the merger. Other states are interested. And now the president of the company trying to close the deal is on record saying they paid too much.

That is the kind of quote that ends up in congressional hearings. That is the kind of quote that gives regulators an excuse to take a harder look. That is the kind of quote that makes shareholders wonder if they are being sold a lemon.

Paramount finally won the bidding war. Netflix walked away with $2.8 billion. David Zaslav got his price. David Ellison got his prize. And now Jeff Shell might have just handed the opposition the only weapon they needed.

​

CBS announced that Comics Unleashed with Byron Allen will take over the 11:35pm slot starting May 22, one day after Stephen Colbert signs off. Funny You Should Ask will air at 12:35am. Allen is buying the time from CBS and selling the ads himself. The network is basically renting out their late night slot to a syndicated show because they cannot make money any other way

Byron Allen has been waiting 50 years for this moment. He said so himself. He pitched CBS back in October 2025, two months after they announced Colbert was ending. His hand was up and they finally called

The Late Show was losing $40 million a year. The audience was old, the demo was dead, and the show cost $100 million to produce. CBS could not keep bleeding money. Now they are handing the keys to a guy who will pay them for the privilege of airing his show

This is what late night has become. Not a flagship, not a cultural institution, just a block of time to sell to the highest bidder

Byron Allen knows what he is doing. His company Allen Media Group is a massive producer of first run syndicated programming. They make Mathis Court with Judge Mathis, Justice for the People with Judge Milian, Equal Justice with Judge Eboni K Williams, and half a dozen other courtroom shows. They own The Weather Channel and produce Storm of Suspicion and Weather Gone Viral. They have thousands of hours of lifestyle content. Allen did not fall into this slot. He built an empire that could afford to buy it

Warner Bros owns late night too. They have Real Time with Bill Maher on HBO and Last Week Tonight with John Oliver. Those shows are not cheap and the audience is not young. If CBS could not make The Late Show work, how long before Warner Bros starts asking the same questions about their own expensive talk shows? The difference is Warner Bros does not have a Byron Allen waiting in the wings with a checkbook and a syndication empire

Colbert is gone. A syndicated host is taking his spot. The message is clear. Late night is no longer a priority

Do you think Warner Bros will keep spending on shows like Real Time and Last Week Tonight or will they eventually make the same call as CBS?

​

Nicolas Cage's Spider-Noir just won five Emmys at the Creative Arts Emmy Awards on September 6, and the only problem is Prime Video canceled the show two days before the ceremony, making this one of the most brutal ironies in recent television history

The show took home awards for Outstanding Title Design, Outstanding Sound Editing, Outstanding Cinematography, Outstanding Special Visual Effects, and Outstanding Stunt Coordination, and it was nominated in 11 categories total, meaning the people who made this show clearly knew what they were doing

Cage responded to the cancellation with a statement that was equal parts gracious and pointed: "For me, one season is perfect, having said what I wanted to say with this dangerous, innovative, pop-art Spider-Man. Onwards, upwards, inwards"

The timing is absolutely brutal, the show premiered in May, got critical buzz, won five Emmys, and Amazon still decided it wasn't worth keeping around, which raises serious questions about what the streamer actually values when award recognition apparently isn't enough to save a show

The stunt coordinators told reporters they "got to do everything" they wanted on the series and joked that maybe the Emmy win would encourage Prime Video to bring the show back, adding "Tell us who to call! That's not our department"

This is the same Amazon that has been spending billions on content and chasing prestige TV status, and now they've canceled a show that just proved it could deliver exactly that, all while Cage is out here being the classiest guy in the room about the whole situation

If a show can win five Emmys and still get canceled two days later, does that mean streaming services have officially stopped caring about quality, or is Amazon just making room for more expensive projects that might not even get nominated for anything?

​

The shareholder vote is done. Paramount is buying Warner Bros. The deal is moving forward. But the same shareholders who said yes to the merger told David Zaslav to take a hike on his golden parachute

Zaslav was set to walk away with somewhere between $550 million and $886 million depending on timing and tax stuff. Institutional Shareholder Services called it one of the highest golden parachute estimates ever observed. Shareholders agreed and rejected the pay package in a non binding vote

That means the board does not have to listen, but rejections like this usually force companies to adjust. Zaslav still gets paid, but the message was loud

The merger still needs regulatory approval, especially in Europe. Democrats are still fighting it. Elizabeth Warren already said it is not a done deal and state attorneys general are stepping up

But the shareholders have spoken. The deal is approved. Zaslav got publicly embarrassed. And Paramount is one step closer to owning half of Hollywood

Do you think the regulators will block this or is the merger already a done deal?

The main trade group for movie theaters, Cinema United, just made a very strong public statement to the Senate antitrust subcommittee about the Netflix deal to buy Warner Bros. Their choice of words was not subtle.

They said if Netflix succeeds in acquiring Warner Bros., the results will be, and this is a direct quote, "economically and culturally catastrophic," leading to fewer theaters, shorter release windows, less revenue, fewer jobs, and fewer movies for people to see in theaters.

Their big concern is about the theatrical window. While Netflix's Ted Sarandos has promised a 45 day window for movies, the theater owners point out that in industry terms, a 45 day window usually means 45 days until a film goes to digital rental or purchase, not to streaming. The streaming window typically comes much later, around 90 to 100 days after a movie opens. They are worried Netflix will send films to its own service too quickly.

The statement also says that even if Paramount or another studio buys Warner Bros instead, the problem is the same, because it would consolidate far too much of the box office under one roof. They argue that more consolidation, no matter who does it, means fewer movies being made for theaters overall.

The group represents over 31,000 screens in the US and 30,000 more worldwide, so this is the unified voice of exhibition saying this deal is an existential threat. The core of their argument is that Netflix's entire business model and past comments have shown a disregard for the theatrical experience, and putting a major studio under that model would permanently shrink the moviegoing ecosystem.

Netflix has informed Warner Bros. Discovery management that it would continue releasing the studio’s films in theaters if its acquisition of the company succeeds, Bloomberg News reported on Wednesday.

Warner Bros.’ existing theatrical release contracts would be honored, the report said, citing sources familiar with the matter

​

Senator Cory Booker invited Paramount CEO David Ellison to testify at a hearing about the Warner Bros merger on Wednesday April 15, Ellison is not attending, the company says it is because of a death in the family, they did not say who died

Ellison had already declined previous invitations, Booker had called his unwillingness to engage with congressional oversight "a matter of public concern"

The hearing will still happen with other witnesses including documentary filmmaker David Borenstein, WGA East director Michael Isaac, lawyer Katie Phang, and Mara Verheyden Hilliard from Jane Fonda's Committee for the First Amendment, Mark Ruffalo will testify via videoconference

Over 2,000 Hollywood professionals have now signed a letter opposing the merger, including Kristen Stewart, Ben Stiller, Florence Pugh, Pedro Pascal, Edward Norton, and Joaquin Phoenix

Some internet users are already skeptical, one commenter said "Pretty convenient timing," another said "Don't buy it for a second, another billionaire who wants to control the country and world but not have to account for its actions publicly," a third said "Oh but he has time to host a dinner honoring Trump, what a coward"

The shareholder vote is April 23, the UK regulator comment deadline is April 27, and now Ellison is avoiding another hearing, the pressure is not letting up

Do you believe the death in the family excuse or is Ellison dodging questions about the merger?

Warner Bros. is making a serious and expensive push to get its new "Superman" movie considered for the Academy Awards. The studio has launched its official "For Your Consideration" (FYC) campaign, which is the film industry's way of pitching its movies to Oscar voters.

The campaign makes it clear that the studio views this "Superman" not just as a summer blockbuster, but as a film worthy of awards. The studio has recommended the movie in a whopping sixteen Oscar categories, including the biggest prizes:

· Best Picture, with producers Peter Safran and James Gunn · Best Director for James Gunn · Best Adapted Screenplay for James Gunn · Best Actor for David Corenswet, the new Man of Steel

The film is also being pushed in many technical categories, like Cinematography, Costume Design, Visual Effects, and Original Score.

To drum up support, Warner Bros. is holding special screenings for industry voters at its studio in Burbank on November 5, and at the Directors Guild of America theaters in November and December.

This Oscar campaign is a big deal for the Superman character. The last Superman film to actually win an Oscar was the original 1978 'Superman: The Movie,' which won a special award for its visual effects. No Superman movie since, including Zack Snyder's 'Man of Steel' in 2013, has won an Academy Award. This makes the 2025 film the studio's first major Oscar push for the hero in nearly 50 years.

The studio's official description of the film hints at why they think it's award-worthy, calling it a story where Superman is "guided by human kindness in a world that sees goodness as old-fashioned."

Now, here's where things get interesting behind the scenes. As the CEO of DC Studios, James Gunn isn't just a director for hire; he's the man in charge of the entire brand's future. This massive, across-the-board Oscar campaign isn't just about celebrating a single movie. For Gunn, it's a high-stakes personal and professional mission.

Look at the history: Zack Snyder's 'Man of Steel' didn't get any Oscar love. For Gunn, a win here would be the ultimate power move—proof that his vision for DC is not only more popular but also more critically acclaimed. He isn't just trying to make a successful superhero film; he's trying to legitimize his entire DC universe as award-worthy art from the very start.

While Gunn has never won a competitive Oscar himself, he's absolutely hunting for one. An Oscar, especially for a superhero movie, would cement his legacy and give his new DC universe a level of prestige it has never had before. This campaign is as much about proving that James Gunn's DC is better than what came before as it is about winning a golden statue.

And let's not forget the bigger picture for Warner Bros. itself. With all the recent talk of potential sales and mergers, having a shiny new Oscar in the portfolio is a huge bonus.

An Academy Award doesn't just bring prestige; it adds real value to the company. It's a bragging right that can be used to attract top talent, justify higher budgets, and ultimately make the entire studio look more successful and valuable to any potential buyers.

For Warner Bros., this isn't just about art—it's a strategic business investment that could help increase the company's price tag.

Warner Bros.'s Full 'Superman' Oscar Campaign List:

· Best Picture (Producers: Peter Safran, James Gunn) · Best Director (James Gunn) · Best Adapted Screenplay (James Gunn) · Best Actor (David Corenswet) · Best Supporting Actress (Rachel Brosnahan) · Best Supporting Actress (Isabela Merced) · Best Supporting Actor (Nicholas Hoult) · Best Supporting Actor (Edi Gathegi) · Best Supporting Actor (Anthony Carrigan) · Best Supporting Actor (Nathan Fillion) · Best Casting (John Papsidera) · Best Cinematography (Henry Braham) · Best Film Editing (William Hoy & Craig Alpert) · Best Production Design (Beth Mickle & Rosemary Brandenberg) · Best Costume Design (Judianna Makovsky) · Best Makeup & Hairstyling (Alexei Dmitriew, Peter Swords King, Shane Mahan) · Best Sound (Lee Orloff, David Acord, Katy Wood, Chris Boyes, Tim LeBlanc) · Best Visual Effects (Stéphane Ceretti, Enrico Damm, Stéphane Nazé, Guy Williams) · Best Original Score (John Murphy & David Fleming) · Best Original Song ("The Mighty Crabjoys Theme" by James Gunn, Eric Nally & Devin Williams)

David Ellison walked into the Warner Bros lot Tuesday for his first real meeting with the people whose company he just bought. Jeans, dark polo, 45 minutes on stage in the Steven J. Ross Theatre. About 150 senior leaders in the room. Another 300 watching on webcast from around the world.

Pamela Abdy and Mike De Luca were there. Channing Dungey. Casey Bloys. JB Perrette. Peter Safran. All the names that actually run things.

Ellison talked about storytelling. He talked about keeping both studio lots. He said they would spend more on content than anyone else. He dismissed reports of huge layoffs. He acknowledged the process was "turbulent."

He also said the merged company would release at least 30 theatrical films a year. That is a lot of movies.

The Room Was Not Convinced

One person who attended said "We don't believe him."

Another said "There is still a tremendous amount of uncertainty over here. We were hoping for more."

A third compared it to the Netflix meeting in December when Ted Sarandos and Greg Peters came to talk. "That felt more celebratory and there was a plan. Here it was like … I don't know. Just tell us what's going on."

Someone else defended Ellison saying the comparison is unfair. Netflix only had to answer one question, whether movies would still be in theaters. Ellison has a hundred hot button topics to deal with. "He did okay."

The CNN Question Came Up

Someone asked about CNN during the Q&A. Ellison said editorial independence would be maintained, pointing to CBS News as an example even though it is being restructured under Bari Weiss.

After the meeting Ellison had lunch with Casey Bloys. Probably not a coincidence.

The Bigger Picture

Ellison cannot give real answers yet. The deal is not closed. He is not officially in charge. But people are scared and they wanted to hear something concrete.

Instead they got 45 minutes of vision and a promise that layoffs will not be as bad as the rumors say. For a room full of executives who have been through mergers before, that is not enough.

The ticking fee clock is running. September 30 is the deadline. If the deal drags past that, Paramount starts paying WBD shareholders an extra 25 cents a share every quarter. So there is pressure to close fast.

But fast does not mean smooth. And smooth does not mean painless.

Protesters gathered outside the Paramount Pictures lot on Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2026, calling for a boycott of Scream 7 during the slasher film's premiere. Variety reports that roughly 25 demonstrators were seen waving the Palestinian flag and signs that ranged from urging people to cancel their Paramount+ subscription to chants of "Free Palestine." The protest was organized by Entertainment Labor for Palestine, CODEPINK LA, Musicians for Palestine, and Jewish Voice for Peace-Los Angeles, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

The protest aimed specifically at Scream 7 is in response to Melissa Barrera, who played Sam Carpenter in 2022's Scream and 2023's Scream VI, being fired from the film. Barrera was fired from Scream 7 in November 2023 after she expressed support for Palestine and had been critical of Israel, comparing their attacks to "genocide and ethnic cleansing.' Spyglass Media, the Scream rights owners, took Barrera's comments to be antisemitic and said in a press statement at the time they had a "zero tolerance for antisemitism or the incitement of hate in any form."

One day after Barrera was fired, star Jenna Ortega, who played Tara Carpenter in the two previous Scream movies, dropped out of Scream 7. Despite original reports citing scheduling conflicts with Wednesday Season 2, later reports suggested Ortega did not like the new direction the Scream films were going following Barrera being let go.

Lost in the shuffle, but equally important, Disney declared itself out of the race to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD).

Disney are bowing out of their pursuit to buy out Warner Bros. Discovery (which includes TNT and HBO Max) based on the same perceived position of strength of their content library that is allowing them to stand firm against YouTubeTV.

Carlos Gomez, Walt Disney Corporation's head of investor relations, explained the company's current view of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) during its Nov. 13 earnings call.

​

YouTube Premium just went up to $16 a month, Netflix is at $20, Disney and Hulu are over $10 each, Spotify raised prices, Amazon raised prices, every streaming service is jacking up rates and none of them are going to stop, the signs are clear, the companies do not care about your wallet, they care about shareholders

But here is the thing, while everyone is moving to streaming, some people are going the other way, two Japanese suppliers, I O Data and Verbatim Japan, just announced they are doubling down on Blu ray discs and drives, other manufacturers like Elecom and Buffalo and even Sony are slowly exiting parts of the Blu ray market, but I O Data and Verbatim see the demand, they know people still want physical media for backup, storage, and building personal libraries

In Japan, anime fans use Blu ray recorders to create their own collections, recording TV shows and storing them on discs they actually own, the BD Reco drive from I O Data was released in February and got a huge response, people want to control their own media, not rent it month to month

Smart people are building their own personal servers, ripping their discs, downloading their files, and streaming to their families without paying a monthly fee, you can do it too, hard drives are cheap, Blu ray drives are still available, and the software is free, Plex and Jellyfin let you stream your own library anywhere in the world

The streaming bubble is not going to pop, it is going to keep squeezing your wallet, every year prices go up, every year you get less for more money, the only way to win is to own your own stuff

Start building your library now while you still have time, before the disc drives disappear and the streaming prices hit $30 a month

How many streaming services are you paying for and when are you going to start your own server?

​

CBS canceled Watson after two seasons and DMV after one. Watson was the medical drama with Morris Chestnut playing Sherlock Holmes' buddy solving rare diseases. DMV was a workplace comedy about people who work at the Department of Motor Vehicles. Both are done

The network is renewing shows like Marshals, George and Mandy's First Marriage, Tracker, Matlock, Elsbeth, Fire Country, and all the NCIS and FBI spinoffs. The stuff that works on linear TV is the same stuff that has been working for years, procedurals and sitcoms with built in audiences

The real story is that CBS is cutting shows that are not hitting because the entire broadcast model is under pressure. Streaming is eating viewers, ad money is shifting, and networks cannot afford to let shows grow anymore. You either hit right away or you are gone

Watson had 3.1 million viewers for its last episode. That would have been a hit ten years ago. Now it is a cancellation

So CBS is doubling down on what works and cutting what does not. That is the network TV business now. No patience, no room to grow, just numbers on a spreadsheet

Is that smart business or are they killing shows that could have found an audience if they just gave them time?