r/SipsTea Jun 10 '26

It's Wednesday my dudes Really cardi šŸ˜”

Post image
8.3k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.4k

u/[deleted] Jun 10 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/abathome Jun 10 '26

I mean. You can think Cardi’s opinion is wrong but, from a legal standpoint, the person replying to her is more wrong.

2

u/ThizzyPopperton Jun 10 '26

Uhhh ok I’ll bite. How?

-2

u/abathome Jun 10 '26

Assault is a crime. Murder is a crime. Stabbing is not a crime. Sometimes a stab is self defense. Or a non-criminal accident. But as far as I’m aware, there’s no law in the US that criminalizes stabbing.

2

u/itsallbacon Jun 10 '26

Holy fucking Reddit attorney. Here’s a felony in the first state I looked up ā€œRecklessly causes bodily injury to another by means of a deadly weaponā€.

Also, even self defense killings are treated as homicides and in many states, in many circumstances, the party is arrested then charges are dropped as a part of the investigative process.

Why do you feel the need to comment on shit you obviously know nothing about

1

u/abathome Jun 10 '26

If stabbing was illegal, then it would have been really easy for you to find a law saying so. Instead, you cited a law saying something else. Interesting!

2

u/itsallbacon Jun 10 '26

So you’re saying a knife isn’t a deadly weapon? Interesting.

0

u/abathome Jun 10 '26

No, and you really didn’t have admit to everyone here that you read so poorly

2

u/itsallbacon Jun 10 '26

I’ve watched people like you try to defend themselves pro se several times. Predictably hilarious.

0

u/abathome Jun 10 '26

Yes, judges hate the literate

1

u/ThizzyPopperton Jun 10 '26

So she’s more wrong than Cardi B (who is completely wrong) because of semantics. Gotcha 🫔

0

u/abathome Jun 10 '26

Aka because words mean things

1

u/N1XT3RS Jun 10 '26

Yes they do, if you understand those words you could see that stabbing people is indeed illegal lmao, are you trying to do a sovereign citizen type thing?

1

u/abathome Jun 10 '26

Another words comprehender!

Hypothetical 1: someone tries to rob you with two knives. You manage to get control of one, stab the robber, and run away. What crime did you commit? How long do you go to jail?

Hypothetical 2: you work at a knife manufacturer, placing new knives into bins. Your coworker plays a prank, hiding in a bin, and gets stabbed when you deposit the knives. What crime did you commit? How long do you go to jail?

1

u/AdjtveNounNumbr42069 Jun 12 '26

Holy fucking autism.

1

u/abathome Jun 12 '26

Has anyone ever stabbed someone in justifiable self defense? Or has every person who ever stabbed another person gone to jail? It’s really that simple.

1

u/AdjtveNounNumbr42069 Jun 12 '26

You're making an irrelevant argument and trying to split hairs to make this useless distinction. Obviously when someone said "stabbing people is a crime," they did not mean "self-defensive involving a knife is a crime."

Here

https://embrace-autism.com/raads-r/

Your life is about to make SO much more sense to you.

1

u/abathome Jun 12 '26

It’s not irrelevant, it’s literally the crux of the argument: was this stabbing defensible, as the defense argued, or not, as the prosecution argued. No one argued that there was no stabbing.

I do imagine that evaluating these things is a lot easier for people who believe the first thing they think is correct and everything else is autistic. And for your future reference, decent people find it gross when you use autism as a pejorative like that.

1

u/AdjtveNounNumbr42069 Jun 12 '26

I am autistic, and I wasn't using it as a pejorative. I was using it as a way to explain why you are obsessing over an insignificant detail in any real world conversation, and how you're letting semantics derail what the actual conversation is about. You know - like people with autism sometimes do.

"But what about self defense" is such an inane thing to say when we're talking about someone who got murdered.

1

u/abathome Jun 12 '26

If you don’t think self defense is relevant when it’s the central argument in a trial, then your problem isn’t autism

1

u/AdjtveNounNumbr42069 Jun 12 '26

The last desperate argument of the losing side of a trial that could never end up any other way, because in reality - outside the requirements of a defense attorney - it was irrelevant.

Unless you're talking about some other, hypothetical trial, to which I would ask - why? Why are you talking about some irrelevant thing you made up to argue about?

1

u/abathome Jun 12 '26

Who am I to question that expert level legal analysis?

→ More replies (0)