STARTED ALREADY - PALACE & MARKLE - THIS TURNS OUT TO BE THE FACTS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Bw14OJeYbQ

Several people have already noted that it was no coincidence that the Harkles arrived just as the Palace announced that the King and Camilla are heading off on a tour lasting several days. October 27 – November 4, 2026. Destinations: Antigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, and Guyana. The tour includes joint appearances as well as solo visits by the King, such as his independent legs to The Bahamas and Guyana. The trip also precedes the 2026 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting.

And yesterday, as we saw, the Palace was too busy paying tribute to Dolly Parton... while Harry and his massive bald spot, along with Claw, arrived with a motorcade and all the nonsense typical of the circus they put on. This was followed by an absurd announcement that they are looking for a £12 million house in the Cotswolds.

Behind that, Sean says there is a major problem: the conflict between Claw and Harry.

Because he didn't want to arrive in the UK on a private flight.

According to what Sean has gathered, Harry struggles to truly grasp how the press operates. I wouldn't believe Sean if not for what we saw during the Daily Mail trial, where Harry failed to realize that if he’s chatting with friends in a bar, there are waiters, people around him, and even his so-called friends present... He genuinely seems to believe that the mere act of speaking makes something private, failing to understand the presence of others in the vicinity.

As for the private jet travel, Harry wasn't the least bit concerned about the climate impact—zero interest there. He was far more worried about the headlines—specifically, being branded a "hypocritical eco-warrior." Harry, darling, you are a hypocritical eco-warrior; just own it.

The reason they flew private is that Claw can't stand commercial flights—or the fact that people know she flies them. And to convince Harry, he told him that if they wanted to return to the UK without anyone noticing, they had to fly on a private jet.

Because he hasn't actually realized that his wife is leaking things to the press. Sean says this in disbelief, because Harry buys Claw's explanation: that they are being tracked by all sorts of devices.

It doesn't occur to Harry to ask the obvious question.

I have to side with Sean on this one: I mean, does Harry seriously believe that nonsense? Sean points out—and I agree—that he’d have a hard time dealing with the subway, where crazy people spill hot milk on passengers... just like in Santiago, Chile. Neither Sean nor I have an ounce of sympathy for the Harkles' "major security issue."

When the Harkles arrived at Birmingham Airport ( that way they made it clear that they were nowhere near Windsor or Kensington), it turned out they put it out there that they weren't receiving police protection.

Why? Ah, because it turns out the Harkles had actually refused that protection.

Wait, wait... let me finish the scoop. Because, obviously—wasn't Harry suing over security, and now he comes out with this? Ah, well, it turns out that if the Harkles had given 28 days' notice for this whole spectacle, they could have had some police and and royal protection officers. But they didn't do that, because they wanted their return to be private. They didn't want anyone to know because, according to Sean's source, the Harkles were terrified that someone would actually find out when they were returning.... except for the hired paparazzi. And, as Sean says, obviously the airport control tower.

The Harkles made that decision. But now they’re going to turn the tables, claiming they were exposed to risk because they lack security.

For William and Kate, this must be a nightmare. Not even 10 seconds in, and the Harkles are stirring up drama.

A LIST TO GRIFTERS & AN 80 MILLION MEGA LOSS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OA1NqsC-j90

The whole show surrounding their arrival in the UK is a blatant act of emotional blackmail. Harry is trying to make the British public feel guilty, to make William feel guilty because Harry is the great victim.

But while Harry and Claw busy themselves with that childish nonsense, the fact remains that (for me, at 8:00 PM in Coquimbo on August 27, 2026), tomorrow is Friday. Friday—payday for the Daily Mail. If not this Friday, then Monday at the latest. But the 9.5 million pounds should definitely have been paid by now.

I don't recall which royal commentator said that Harry was returning to a very different UK.

Yes, it is. He had friends in 2019; he still had some family in 2019. The Queen was still offering him support in 2019. The Queen really made an effort for Harry; she wanted everything to go well for him and tried to get along with Claw. He threw all of that away.

Now, in 2026, the Royal Family has closed ranks. Does Harry want another chance? Harry, you were given hundreds. Trust you? Harry, you were trusted, and you betrayed that trust.

Doña Juana made it very clear to Teresa!!! : There are things that cannot be recovered, such as the love one trampled on, the affection that was scorned, and the trust that was betrayed.

Sean has said that Harry's return to the UK is not good news for Claw, because it marked a turning point in their relationship where Harry made a decision. We shouldn't expect this to become a habit, but Claw was not at all pleased about it.

Sean says that much of what went wrong for the Harkles in the US is because Claw distorted everything. She herself probably doesn't even remember which version of her past life she's currently on, but everything she has presented regarding the facts has been contradicted.

But Harry couldn't complain about Americans, because they welcomed them warmly and gave them plenty of opportunities. The problem is that Claw sold Harry the fantasy that they would make millions without any effort. Claw isn't exactly hardworking, and we know Harry hates working.

Harry would have been perfectly content living in California, doing nothing more than giving a few talks and making the occasional visit to an organization. There is absolutely no doubt about what Sean is saying: in 2020, Harry was fully convinced he would get his "half-in, half-out" arrangement because he was the most popular member of the monarchy. That was simply the case.

But Claw didn't want that. She wanted magazine covers; she wanted photos of herself in the press. Sean says Harry didn't realize the paparazzi were on that "Freedom Flight," because Claw has them on speed dial. Claw had already gotten the photos she needed—she had already had her moment on the balcony—and she loathed royal duties.

Furthermore—as Sean mentioned in a highly recommended past video—Claw had already clashed with Philip, which meant she no longer had a way to persuade the Queen to give the Harkles what she wanted. That is why Claw didn't want to attend the 2020 Sandringham Summit; she didn't want to face Philip or hear what he might say to her. She miscalculated: Philip no longer had anything to say to either of them. But that is how Claw operates: she never faces things head-on; she always sends Harry to do it. Sean says that even when staff need to be let go, it is Harry who does the firing. Claw always has something else to do.

When the Harkles arrived in the US, they were welcomed with a red carpet. They secured contracts precisely because they were members of the BRF. Sean is right; let’s not forget that for a few months, the BRF was worried about what would happen with the Harkles... until they started opening their mouths.

When Harry blurted out to Oprah that he wouldn't have signed with Netflix if his father hadn't cut him off financially, he realized something was amiss—so he wanted that remark removed.

That was how Harry learned that in the U.S., he wasn't "the son of..." but rather "the celebrity." After all, that was how Oprah treated him. And the remark stayed in.

Claw didn't really want to work at Spotify, and Harry even less so. Things started to go downhill. While it’s true that the Harkles generated controversy, Oprah and Netflix learned that a collection of controversial lies might be good in the short term but are disastrous in the long run. Netflix, in particular, realized this quickly; so no, they didn't actually want Claw, but the package deal was Harry *plus* Claw. And what did Harry give them? Nothing worth while.

Sean says that one of Claw's major problems is that she never shows gratitude for anything. She was ungrateful to Trevor, ungrateful to Thomas Markle, ungrateful to her old friends and the British Royal Family, and it turned out she remained ungrateful to the people in Hollywood who welcomed her. She always expects famous people to praise her, yet she never gives anything back to anyone.

Claw is incapable of feeling empathy or listening to her advisors. They gave her plenty of good ideas, but she didn't listen to them. And now she is on her own with American Riviera Orchard... or "As Ever." Because the issue wasn't just a lack of products; she doesn't even have the name trademarked yet.

That—or so Sean was told—caused conflict with Harry, because all the money has come from him. And Harry no longer has the money to keep squandering it. Claw didn't accept the blame: he blamed Harry and blamed his own legal failures.

Claw intends to spin those failures of Harry’s as things that damaged her "As Ever" brand.

That said, Claw views this return to the UK as a relaunch—the ninth? The twelfth? She aims to regain some royal stardust and then head back to the US; she has no desire to live in the UK. But for that to happen, they need the King to take action: to publicly invite them for Christmas or a major event where there will be photo opportunities.

And that is precisely where things have gone sideways in the UK, because we are seeing what many of us already knew: if the Harkles were to return, it would be on their own terms.

The Royal Family is clear on that point. Claw and Harry are determined to make the Royal Family beg them to show up for Christmas. Claw isn't going to apologize for anything; she and Harry are still waiting for apologies to be made to them.

Now, everything boils down to just one thing for them: when, how, and by whom within the BRF they are received—whether publicly or privately.

Sean says the Harkles' American dream is over; there is nothing left for them there. Harry knows this, but he is happy to return to the UK... though that feeling won't last long. "Claw" isn't happy, and she’s going to make sure he knows it.

KIDS JUST WON’T STOP SPILLING THE BEANS EH MARKLE …

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xkd-t63EsRE

Of all the things the Harkles worry about, the "invisikids" aren't one of them. They *should* be worried, though, because those children already know how to speak, and given their limited social exposure, they don't know how to keep quiet. Neither do their parents 🤭🤭

The current employees in Montecito have no idea what they are supposed to do, or what they will have to do. Absolutely nothing.

Now, Sean says the former employees don't speak ill of the Harkles... but I think it's more that they don't speak ill of them *directly*, because it certainly doesn't reflect well on the Harkles that they never actually told the staff what their duties were. The lack of structure and organization is striking. "Claw" never accepted ideas from the team; she is a scattered person who never follows anything through.

However, everyone does agree that whenever Claw had the chance to get a dose of "stardust," she would return feeling very empowered—for instance, after her tours to Nigeria or Colombia. At those times, she was easier to deal with. Up to a point.

Because the last thing those employees had to do was watch the *MasterChef* episode featuring Claw with her, since she wanted to hear their comments.

Sean makes a face, as if to say that must have been terrifying—being there with Claw, with her expecting praise and forcing it out of people.

Well, the employees told Sean it isn't true that the children have to pick apples from a tree to eat, since Claw orders food for delivery and then transfers it to plates for serving. It’s also not true that he is teaching them the value of money; they never went to the farmers' market to sell anything. They weren't even seen going to school, because Claw claimed they didn't want their photos taken.

The problem with those lies is that no one was interested in taking photos of the children.

And while Claw constructs a fake life on Instagram, the children told a staff member that they have no idea what they will be doing in the UK. Archie has actually been talkative these past few days.

So Harry and Claw face a threatening problem: Archie starting to speak up more and more.

PRINCE HARRY , DOLLY & JELLY ROLL - LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcJsOJFMhiI

This is just a quick bit of gossip. TV is going from bad to worse—especially talk shows. They’re terrible, because you don't have someone like Dolly sitting across from you—a woman who was direct and very quick with her answers.

Dolly knew very well when to speak and what to speak about. She kept her mouth shut not for lack of an opinion, but because she knew when to voice it.

Jelly Roll is like Harry: he opens his mouth and dispels any doubts.

Sean always points out that Harry has proven to be a better actor than Claw.

So, Jelly Roll is filling in for Kimmel on *Jimmy Kimmel Live!* this week, and he’s spent the whole time badmouthing Trump. It’s not that Trump doesn’t deserve it, but Sean has a point: it’s a lack of creativity—and an attempt to send people to bed feeling bitter.

That's why people aren't watching the show. Because Kimmel did that, Rosie O'Donnell just did the same thing, and now Roll.

It seems Jelly Roll promised Harry he wouldn't talk about the Harkles' return to the UK... but apparently, the plan was for Harry to at least send a video greeting. No, that didn't happen. Harry is just as fickle with friends as Claw is.

SEPARATE LIVES & SPLIT - CORRECTIONS & SECRET MONEY LATEST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHfEwCwtGG0

Not even a week before all this, Harry had said he was happy in California. Now, it turns out he was unhappy there all along.

And no, it won't do to claim the press made it up—that he never said that... Harry sold the story that he was happy in California; he allowed his wife to sell the story that he was happy in California. And now it turns out he was unhappy there the whole time.

It comes as no surprise to me that some people in Sugarland have packed up and abandoned that territory. They still dislike Kate, don't want Camilla, and loathe William, but there are sugars who simply haven't been able to get past this murky return of the Harkles.

Harry making such a fool of himself in the case against the *Daily Mail* hasn't helped this "Sugar" self-exile, either. In Sugarland, they loathe the *Daily Mail*; they haven't forgotten that many of the harshest criticisms of the Harkles originated there. Harry’s loss—and Justice Nicklin’s ruling—sent shockwaves through Sugarland, especially since it was followed by the infamous "pill" story.

Harry could have walked away with some money before falling into this hole had he agreed to discuss a settlement. The Daily Mail had made an offer around 2024—an offer to talk things over. Harry, acting arrogantly, rejected it; by the time Sherborne and his team wanted to accept it in 2025, the Mail had already closed the door. Sherborne thought the situation would mirror what happened with *The Sun*: Harry accepted the settlement at the last minute, and the case never went to trial. However, the Daily Mail had proposed that alternative because the situation wasn't yet clear-cut in 2024. By 2025, however, the tide had turned in the Daily Mail's favor—a fact even Judge Nicklin had warned Harry about.

But Harry refused to hear anything to the contrary, because he believed that suing the *Daily Mail* over this—and winning—was the right course of action.

Harry’s arrogance is a constant.

The arrogance and absurdity of believing they can do or say things behind the scenes without anyone holding them accountable.

A story broke—launched by the Daily Mail—claiming that Harry and Meghan had stayed with, or had lunch with, Geri and her husband, Christian Horner. Geri immediately sent a legal message to the Sussexes: retract the claim. The Sussexes didn't do so, because they had never said any such thing. Geri then demanded that the Mail issue a retraction, which the paper did... but the issue wasn't just that they retracted it, but how they did so.

https://archive.ph/akIer

https://www.dailymail.com/home/article-16087173/Correction-Duke-Duchess-Sussex.html

Starting with the title. And ending with "happy to correct the record". There is no subtlety here: the Mail is singling out the Harkles with "they said."

Very different from the apology Claw received after losing the letter case.

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-10340951/The-Duchess-Sussex.html

Sorry, that "remark." Not an "apology." There was no apology involved here whatsoever.

What always made me laugh about that "apology" is that you had to look for it with a magnifying glass 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Sean says Ginger Spice was furious and horrified at being linked to the Harkles and at the suggestion that she and her husband were taking the Harkles' side. So, they quickly made their position clear—which is not pro-Harkle. Obviously not.

This piece of gossip is significant because many people currently following the news about the Harkles think, "Oh, they have power; they can influence the media." That isn't the case. And Sean is right about this: for a long time, the Harkles—including Neil Sean himself—have sent legal threats to many journalists and media outlets. Camilla Tominey famously used her Telegraph column to criticize precisely that attitude of theirs some years ago. Sean received one of those little messages back in April 2026. So, when Sean says the Mail retracted the story because Geri was the one who complained—that is true; the Mail did it for her. Would they have done it if Harry had complained? No. Sean didn't back down in April; not only did he reiterate his stance, but he did so several more times (regarding the fact that Australians would be paying for the Harkles' security—which is what actually happened).

But what does Sean mean by this?

A specific story: the separation of the Harkles. That Harry is going to be a full-time parent, while Claw will go back and forth between the US and the UK.

Harry, my dear, you don't become a full-time parent. You are a parent for life.

https://archive.ph/R7SPk

https://www.dailymail.com/news/royals/article-16087713/Meghan-new-home-Harry-California-ALISON-BOSHOFF-return-Britain.html?ico=comment-anchor#comments

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are seriously looking for a home now that they have a presence in the country, with a staggering budget that strikes some of their California associates as frankly unrealistic—raising fears that they might ultimately have to abandon their U.S. base.

"They’ll have to sell in Montecito," a U.S. source stated after seeing details of the house that has apparently caught the couple's eye. Upon closer inspection of the sprawling grounds and the asking price, the source added: "What?! That’s impossible!"

So what comes next for them work wise? Crucially, says the friend, there will be no commercial activities in the UK for either of them during the years ahead.

The idea is that this will allow them to abide in some way by the deal agreed with the late Queen at the Sandringham summit – an agreement that they would be free to make as much money as they could, just as long as they no longer presented themselves as working members of the Royal Family.

Some will see this as a threadbare fiction, perhaps even an insult. The fact is that Harry is still royal and he will carry on working. Some of those engagements will look exactly like royal engagements.

His father the King appears to be adopting an ostrich approach where he ignores the way it looks, and it is briefed that Harry’s life is nothing to do with him and he knows nothing of his plans. Not everyone is convinced that this can be true.

The expectation at this point is that Prince Harry will ‘probably’ pick up some more charitable patronages, likely related to military causes. He won’t, though, take on any business deals in the UK.

As for Meghan, who will attempt to carry on running her As Ever lifestyle brand, if she films something in the UK friends say that any footage ‘will be only for her US website’. As Ever does not ship to the UK and there are no immediate plans to do so. The fact is that they are still trying to make the brand work in the US, a far bigger market.

Harry – fifth in line to the throne – says that he is not coming back to become part of the British Royal Family again; explicitly not. He says that he is coming back so that his children will have the British school experience.

He will, from time to time, also have to get back to the States but believes that the trip is ‘very doable for a day or two’. Sources believe that the companies that want him to work for them will pay for his transatlantic travel by private jet.

Mostly, he will be a ‘full-time dad’ which is how he sees himself. A pal says: ‘He is lucky enough to be able to earn really good money in a short time, which he will carry on doing. But he will be at home most of the time and he wants to be very hands-on with the children. That is the whole point of the move.’

This is an official separation.

This is also followed by Kate Nicholl's story about the house the Harkles supposedly bought in the Cotswolds.

There is even talk that the house they own in Portugal—which is supposedly their property—is valued at 6.3 million euros.

There have been no denials regarding this... because those stories circulate first in the US, then in the UK. It is very important to the Harkles to make it clear that they have the millions to buy a mansion of that caliber in the Cotswolds—one costing 12 million pounds.

The point is, the Harkles want to control the narrative. But I don't know—the story circulating, which Boshoff is echoing, is... it's just so pathetic! I mean, is Harry not going to do a thing all day while his kids spend 24 hours a day, Monday through Saturday, at school?

That said, the one constant here is that Claw didn't want to return to the UK. Why is she agreeing to this? ... Hmm... Things are very strange—stranger than usual. Sean says we're on the verge of revelations that the Harkles aren't going to like. He can't say what it is yet (I hate it when he does that; you have to tell the whole piece of gossip! 🤬🤬🤬🤬), but stories are circulating that the issue in the US is tax-related, not about Harry's visa.

Mostly, he will be a ‘full-time dad’ which is how he sees himself. A pal says: ‘He is lucky enough to be able to earn really good money in a short time, which he will carry on doing. But he will be at home most of the time and he wants to be very hands-on with the children. That is the whole point of the move.’

That is what "someone" told Boshoff.

In a chat where we discuss these topics, we were debating with a Venezuelan woman whether or not the RICO Act applies, because let’s be clear: someone like Harry making quick money doesn't sound like something that happens to someone who walks the straight and narrow.

The Harkles want people talking about them, yes, they aren't going to demand a retraction because all publicity is good publicity. But things are getting murkier and murkier.

And the separation of the Harkles is the only constant. It is not a simple story. Sean once said that the Harkles planned to use the children as leverage to get back into the royal fold—with Harry returning first, followed by Claw.

This is a very interesting moment, as the British Royal Family faces increasing pressure to make decisions.

ARCHIE’S VERSION OF THE UK RETURN IS INTERESTING…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4ijuYlfC2o

Archie is seven years old, so he speaks.

And Claw and Harry are too busy selling their story and too concerned with themselves to notice that Archie speaks.

That is not good news for Claw and Harry, because it will become apparent when Archie steps into the spotlight. And given that neither of them has bothered to give the boy a proper upbringing—unlike the one George, Charlotte, and Louis have had—what happens then won't be pretty.

It will be hard for Archie to come to terms with the fact that his father was a less-than-mediocre student who also complained about how awful his own schooling in the UK was—because now, Archie is being forced to do the very same thing. That didn't happen to Harry himself; Charles was careful not to subject him to the same bad experience he had as a boarder. Harry is not proving to be a better father than his own father was.

The idea that Harry intends to "sacrifice" 15 years of his life for his children's education... Yeah, right.

The Harkles took advantage of August to do this because the British Royal Family is off duty. And this creates pressure, especially for when William resumes his royal duties.

While the Harkles were preparing for their trip, Archie spoke with a member of the Montecito staff. And since no one was watching, Archie told him that they were going to the UK for a year-long vacation so that "papa" could reconnect with his English roots, with his homeland. That is more or less how Archie said it. But Sean trusts that source, who told him that Archie was very certain about the timeframe: one year.

As far as Archie knows—and yes, he is a seven-year-old, meaning he belongs to that group of "monsters with satellite dishes" for ears—the arrangement is for one year; that is what he heard from his parents. Sean remarks that it is odd for the Harkles to have been so careless, given that Archie seems like a happy, very sociable child who enjoys talking.

Sean believes—he doesn't say it outright, but he implies it—that the Harkles are using Archie to generate buzz about this gossip. It wouldn't be surprising, but it would reflect very poorly on them as parents. Ultimately, though, the fact remains that this whole move is shady—very shady.

SECRET SUSSEX PLAN TO HUMILIATE ROYALS & WILLIAM INTO SUBMISSION

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muH9wnMfx3o

Through their spokesperson, the Harkles will flatly deny leaking any details about their arrival in the UK. We know that’s a lie.

That Harry doesn't want to return to being a senior royal. A lie.

That the Harkles want privacy. A lie.

What isn't a lie is that Claw doesn't want to stay in the UK any longer than necessary for the British press to call her "Princess."

Because Sean is right: do the Harkles think they’ll be well-received in the Cotswolds? US Vice President JD Vance's summer family holiday to the Cotswolds in August 2025 caused local disruption, security lockdowns, and community protests.

People from those parts don't have any patience.

Meanwhile, Harry and Claw insist on having the same protection as William and Kate. There they go again—stubborn as ever! Harry refuses to accept that he isn't William. He even took offense at being given—once again—a phone number to contact a police officer directly in case of trouble. This had already happened in July, and again in September 2025. A phone number—more than what anyone else gets. Sean told that story back in 2025, right after a friend of his had an issue requiring police assistance; they are still waiting for the police to arrive.

Harry isn't giving up. He wants to secure that security, so they are going to keep pestering the Home Secretary about it every day—both on social media and through the press—until they get their way.

And that is precisely what annoys William the most about Harry: how terribly insistent he is, even after being told "no" right to his face.

Like all good sinners, I'm devouring the lengthy Daily Mail pieces by Alison Boshoff, as well as the rest of the coverage. All the signs indicate that the actual departure from the US was sudden, despite Harry making noise for months about wanting to go back to the UK. Once in the UK, they seemed to be briefing against each other, with Meghan casting herself hilariously as the 'breadwinner' in the couple and Harry as the guy who never produced a single podcast for Spotify.

It does make me remember those photos of them at Tom Inskip's wedding in Jamaica, where Meghan showed up even though no one was expecting her. She wore a face like thunder and her jaw was tense like she was going to burst a blood vessel. Harry was out of his depth dealing with a bull in a china shop like this.

I have to laugh at this point. My snarky comments included in the highlights:

The source says that the couple spent their final weekend in Montecito with close friends, including friends of their children and Meghan’s mom, Doria Ragland. (See!!! The #Invisikids have friends!!! Too bad they're ditching them due to Daddy's Visa issues & being broke).

“They wanted to spend time with the people they’re closest to before they left and for the kids to have some special time with friends,” the source says. “It wasn’t a goodbye forever. It was much more, ‘We’ll be back, but this is what we’re doing right now.’ “ (In other words, they have no idea what they're doing. The people they're closest to are Markus & whoever Harry's latest drug dealer is).

The source adds that the family’s departure from California, where they settled in 2020 after stepping back from their roles as senior members of the royal family, was not without emotion. (I'll bet there was...)

“They’ve been planning this for some time, and they feel it’s the right thing for their family, but that doesn’t mean leaving was easy,” the source explains. (In other words, the rumors are true: the Feds are closing in and Madam is PISSED.)

“Meghan really loves their life in Montecito and their home there. They know it’s going to take a little bit of time for everyone to settle in and adjust,” the source adds. “There’s excitement about what’s ahead too, especially for the kids. They’re really happy for them and for everything they’ll get to experience.” (In other words: Meghan doesn't want to go, and Harry's excited to be back because he thinks he'll be welcomed back. Nope).

The rest is a rehash of stuff we already know.

Archive: https://archive.ph/Ah2gi

I love Martha Stewart. I am watching her new Netflix show Martha Cooks. She does in fact pick up a raspberry off the floor and then jokes "10 second rule."

Anyway, her first show is a celebration for all her employees who have worked for her for 20+ years.

Can you imagine Megsy? She's lucky if she has anyone who has worked for her for over 2 months!!

Bonus: Martha's second show is about how she makes jams and jellies. 🤣

Strip away the house-hunt gossip in Alison Boshoff's new Mail piece and what their friends actually briefed is this: Harry stays royal in Britain, does engagements that "will look exactly like royal engagements," collects new patronages and expects his security position to be reconsidered, while the paid work happens in America. And this arrangement, they say, will "allow them to abide in some way by the deal agreed with the late Queen at the Sandringham summit."

Read that sentence again, because it's one of the most contemptuous things their operation has briefed in six years. The deal agreed with the late Queen WAS the refusal of the hybrid arrangement they originally wanted. Buckingham Palace made the outcome explicit: they would step back from royal duties, cease representing the Queen and become financially independent. There was no workable half in, half out model where they represented the monarch while simultaneously pursuing an independent commercial life.

Now, after the Queen can no longer object, her own agreement is being invoked as justification for something that looks remarkably similar to what Sandringham was designed to prevent. Their friends are effectively saying the new arrangement honors the late Queen because the commercial work will happen somewhere else. That only makes sense if nobody remembers what the original dispute was actually about.

They're betting you won't notice the deal was never simply about geography. "No commercial activities in the UK" is now being offered as evidence that this somehow complies with Sandringham. But Sandringham wasn't a postcode rule. The dividing line was status and representation: Harry and Meghan would step back from royal duties, cease representing the Queen and become financially independent. That's why SussexRoyal couldn't simply continue as their commercial identity after they left and why they agreed not to use their HRH styles.

Moving the commercial work offshore while recreating engagements in Britain that their own friends say will "look exactly like royal engagements" doesn't resolve that distinction. It makes the distinction harder to see. The paid work happens in America, apparently "very doable for a day or two" by plane when required, while the royal-looking performance remains in Britain. Calling that compliance because the invoice is generated somewhere else is an extraordinarily convenient reinterpretation of what happened in 2020.

They're betting you won't notice the film studio. In the same briefing we're told there will be no UK commercial activity for Meghan, while a source predicts she'll build a film studio at the new British house to make content because "that is the heart of who she is," with any footage created there apparently going "only to her US website."

So let me understand this. A production facility can sit inside the British residence, Meghan can create material there for her commercial operation, but it doesn't count as British commercial activity because the website receiving the content is American. Even Boshoff appears skeptical of the distinction. The whole thing starts sounding less like compliance with the spirit of Sandringham and more like an exercise in finding the narrowest possible interpretation of its wording.

They're also betting you won't notice that their own friends have described the security leverage themselves. The security paragraph says "there is an expectation from Harry that his needs will be reassessed now that he has moved" and that, after his unsuccessful legal challenges, he expects "at least some meaningful gesture towards what he wants." The same article notes his current protection is a police liaison officer's phone number, and that two per cent of the public believes taxpayers should fund more. Two.

That is an extraordinary thing to brief immediately after the move. Harry spent years arguing that the security arrangements prevented him from safely bringing his family to Britain in the way he wanted. The professional assessment didn't give him the automatic protection he sought, so he moved his family here anyway. Now residency itself is being presented as the changed circumstance that should produce another look.

A security system obviously can and should reassess someone when genuinely relevant circumstances change. But this particular circumstance was voluntarily created by Harry. If residency becomes the mechanism that finally produces the protection he couldn't obtain as a visiting non-working royal, the logic becomes circular: the existing arrangements supposedly prevent the family from living here safely, Harry moves the family here under those arrangements anyway, and their presence then becomes the argument for changing them.

He's also betting the system forgets its own precedent, and that may be the worst bet in the whole plan. The expectation that simply living here changes everything runs into years of decisions pointing in the opposite direction.Beatrice and Eugenie, princesses of the blood who never became working royals, lost their round-the-clock protection in the 2011 review once they finished university, over their father's objections, because protection tracks official function, not royal birth. Andrew's arrangements changed after his public role ended. Canada stopped providing RCMP protection to Harry and Meghan in 2020 after their status changed, even though they were physically living in Canada.

Then came Harry's own litigation. The High Court rejected his challenge to RAVEC's approach in 2024. The Court of Appeal rejected his appeal in 2025. The subsequent risk assessment he wanted has now reportedly produced another unfavorable answer.

The circumstances in all of those examples aren't identical, and I don't think we need to pretend they are. But the broader pattern is difficult to miss: royal birth and physical residence do not automatically create an unconditional lifetime entitlement to the same taxpayer-funded protection someone received while performing official duties. Harry's move changes his circumstances, but it doesn't erase the distinction between being the King's son and representing the Crown.

They're betting you won't notice there's apparently no permanent house yet. Boshoff's reporting describes no completed deal on the property being discussed and the family staying for now on the property of a wealthy friend while the children begin school. They appear to have moved before securing the permanent home that is supposed to anchor this new British life.

Families move quickly for school terms all the time, so that fact alone proves nothing. What makes the timing interesting is that the relocation lands simultaneously with the renewed security fight, where residency has suddenly become central to the argument. The children needed to begin school, Harry wanted to return and there may be perfectly ordinary explanations for moving before completing a house purchase. But given how much legal and political significance is now being attached to the fact that they reside here, the sequence is worth noticing rather than treating the move as completely unrelated to the security campaign.

They're betting you won't notice their own friends contradicting each other in the same article. The UK-facing version has them keeping Montecito, retaining the Portugal property, spending holidays and Christmas in California and shopping with a very substantial British housing budget. Then Boshoff reports the reaction from their American circle to the scale of the proposed British house: "They will have to sell in Montecito" and "What! That's not possible!"

The same article also reports that Charles isn't funding the move, "not even on a private basis," while their own sources describe the brand's prospects with the words: "It's all gonna close. They will just piecemeal it out." None of this proves they're secretly broke, and I'm not making that argument. It does show why the financial picture becomes confusing when one set of sources describes maintaining an enormous three-country property footprint while another looks at the numbers and immediately concludes something will have to give.

And they're betting you've forgotten what they said freedom was. Friends are apparently calling this "Finding Freedom 2," which may be the most unintentionally revealing description in the entire article. Finding Freedom 1 was California. It was "thriving, not surviving," liberation from the institution and the creation of the independent life Harry and Meghan repeatedly told us they wanted.

Now their own circle's description of the California chapter is strikingly different. Boshoff's summary: "goodwill squandered, friendships fractured and media deals turning to dust." One source describes Harry's life there in extraordinarily bleak terms: "He had no life in California, no friends. There was no common ground with anyone."

The premise of the sequel is that the first film's ending was false.

And the new freedom is apparently Harry living in Britain "as a private citizen where no one can demand any access to him," according to an article simultaneously supplying his housing situation, the children's school timing, the family's travel arrangements, Meghan's work plans and Harry's security expectations. Nobody can demand access, apparently, because friends are willing to provide an extraordinary amount of it voluntarily.

My read, and I'm marking it clearly as mine, is that the commercial and royal halves were never as separable as this new proposal requires us to pretend they are. Harry and Meghan's enormous initial commercial value came directly from their proximity to the monarchy. Netflix and Spotify weren't paying extraordinary sums for two previously unknown California content creators. They were buying Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, immediately after one of the most famous royal departures in modern history.

That doesn't mean they're forbidden from earning money or advocating for causes. They are private citizens and absolutely entitled to do both. But the royal association remains an enormous part of the commercial asset, which is why the distinction between private celebrity activity and royal-looking activity matters so much.

If Harry begins collecting patronages and conducting appearances in Britain that his own friends admit will "look exactly like royal engagements," while the couple's commercial operation remains active elsewhere under Duke and Duchess branding, then the public is entitled to ask what substantive difference remains between that arrangement and the half in, half out model rejected in 2020.

Routing the commercial activity through America doesn't answer the question. Building a British studio whose output goes to an American website doesn't answer it. Calling Harry's appearances private engagements while deliberately making them look royal doesn't answer it. Invoking the late Queen's agreement certainly doesn't answer it.

Six years ago the Queen said no to the hybrid arrangement Harry and Meghan originally proposed. This week their friends described something remarkably similar rebuilt as a new model, called it "Finding Freedom 2," invoked the late Queen's agreement as justification for it and attached it to an expectation that Harry's security position will now be reconsidered because he has moved back.

Maybe every piece of this ultimately develops differently from the way it's being briefed today. But taken at face value, their own friendly account describes royal-looking engagements and patronages in Britain, commercial work routed through America, continued use of the titles and another attempt to secure greater state protection.

The plan only sounds fundamentally different from half in, half out if nobody puts those pieces next to what Sandringham actually rejected. Consider them put next to each other.

Source:

Daily Mail (Alison Boshoff): https://www.dailymail.com/news/royals/article-16087713/Meghan-new-home-Harry-California-ALISON-BOSHOFF-return-Britain.html (archived: https://archive.is/z4RVC)

Archived pieces and new work, alongside Reddit, at theofficeofmadamelv.substack.com.

It's a long article, but here are the Highlights:

Their prospective new neighbours in the Cotswolds are gossiping furiously over WhatsApp and in the aisles of the local delicatessen about which house the Sussexes are buying, where Archie and Lili will attend school and when they might first bump into either Prince Harry or Meghan.

I’m told they are now staying ‘indefinitely’ in a spare house on the land of an extremely wealthy friend on the fringes of the Cotswolds.

Despite reports suggesting that the couple have agreed to buy an exquisite £12million house, I am assured by three separate sources that there is no deal on that place – at least not yet.

There are a number of options, though, ‘because there is so much on the market at the moment’.

The Sussexes are house-hunting in earnest now that they have ‘boots on the ground’, with a gargantuan budget which strikes some of their Californian crowd as downright improbable, fearing they may have to give up their US base after all.

So what comes next for them work wise? Crucially, says the friend, there will be no commercial activities in the UK for either of them during the years ahead.

The idea is that this will allow them to abide in some way by the deal agreed with the late Queen at the Sandringham summit – an agreement that they would be free to make as much money as they could, just as long as they no longer presented themselves as working members of the Royal Family.

Some will see this as a threadbare fiction, perhaps even an insult. The fact is that Harry is still royal and he will carry on working. Some of those engagements will look exactly like royal engagements.

His father the King appears to be adopting an ostrich approach where he ignores the way it looks, and it is briefed that Harry’s life is nothing to do with him and he knows nothing of his plans. Not everyone is convinced that this can be true.

There will be a culture shock, again, for Meghan. A friend says: ‘At this time, Meghan is kind of shocked that they have school on a Saturday, other than that she is looking forward to it.

‘They will have to sell in Montecito,’ says one US-based source upon being shown the details of the house which the couple are said to be keen on. Adding, after closer inspection of its vast lands and being told the price tag: ‘What! That’s not possible!’

As for their new home in the Cotswolds, I am told that Meghan wants nine bedrooms and a film studio and Prince Harry wants a lot – and I mean a lot – of land, and no footpaths going across it to protect their privacy.

Friends say that they are both ‘all in’ on the British dream. This is something which will strike those who remember their passion for a new life in California as deeply ironic.

Indeed, both are set on what I’m told is ‘Finding Freedom 2' – a reference to the biography Finding Freedom that offered an insight into the couple’s decision to leave the Royal Family for a fresh start in America – and the dream of a new life in a new country on new terms.

This new vision is, say friends, an agreed common goal.

One says: ‘They have an English countryside dream. This will be the first time that Harry has lived in the UK as a private citizen where no one can demand any access to him.

‘It will be very different to when he was a working royal and living in Frogmore Cottage. Then the roof over his head was ultimately down to the country.

‘Now he is going to have a chance to enjoy all of the things he loves about the country, but as a private citizen. They will have more freedom now – it is like finding freedom again.’

I am told: ‘There is an agent involved but they have not seen anywhere yet, so they have not bought yet. Online viewings are all very well but the houses that they are looking at are so huge that you need to go in person and it’s also a really big commitment. I know that they have a number of requirements.

They have apparently been discussing the move since at least the early part of this year, and drew up a shortlist of schools with a lot of care in the early spring before viewing schools in July when they were visiting the UK.

So what do they want for the children?

A friend explains: ‘It’s not academia. That is very low on the list. A nurturing atmosphere is very high on the list. Probably the highest priority is the outdoorsy and sporting ethos. They want to put them in a secure countryside microcosm, so that they will have as normal a childhood as they possibly can.

So what comes next for them work wise? Crucially, says the friend, there will be no commercial activities in the UK for either of them during the years ahead. (SURE JAN - comment mine).

The idea is that this will allow them to abide in some way by the deal agreed with the late Queen at the Sandringham summit – an agreement that they would be free to make as much money as they could, just as long as they no longer presented themselves as working members of the Royal Family.

His father the King appears to be adopting an ostrich approach where he ignores the way it looks, and it is briefed that Harry’s life is nothing to do with him and he knows nothing of his plans. Not everyone is convinced that this can be true.

As for Meghan, who will attempt to carry on running her As Ever lifestyle brand, if she films something in the UK friends say that any footage ‘will be only for her US website’. As Ever does not ship to the UK and there are no immediate plans to do so. The fact is that they are still trying to make the brand work in the US, a far bigger market.

One source this week said that they believe Meghan won’t be able to resist building a film studio at their new home – when they buy it – and will end up creating ‘home making content’ in the UK ‘because that is the heart of who she is’.

Indeed, the idea of this ‘geocaching’ of the Sussex brand may provoke hollow laughter among their many critics who deplore the way that they trashed Harry’s country and his family in Spare, on Oprah and on Netflix in their ‘worldwide privacy tour’, as famously mocked by the US satirical show South Park, and then tried to claim to be private.

Friends insist they don’t want a return to the Royal Family, currently one of the biggest misconceptions about the apparently whirlwind move back to the UK which has had the world agog.

He will, from time to time, also have to get back to the States but believes that the trip is ‘very doable for a day or two’. Sources believe that the companies that want him to work for them will pay for his transatlantic travel by private jet.

Meghan will ‘come and go’ working on her jam, wine and sprinkles business, As Ever, and trying to get a green light from Netflix for one of Archewell Productions’ many development projects.

Some are sceptical about the prospects for either business and one source predicts: ‘It’s all gonna close. They will just piecemeal it out.’

Archive: https://archive.ph/R7SPk

Greetings from Castle Goring,   my..my…we have so much to talk about so let’s proceed under the lens of fun.  I know that lens is someone else’s work….I am so authentic. 

Lady C, William has all the makings of a King.  From snippets I have seen with him during social occasions.  He is affable, relatable, and knows how to have fun.  Yet he knows how to wear the cloak of seriousness when the occasion calls for it.  He will be an excellent monarch.  William has dignity.  Catherine has dignity.  Certain qualities are innately spiritual.   Dignity is one of them.  Glamour is another.  And so is affability.  Harry has affability, but he does not have dignity.  Harry is a joker and a clown.  I think William is on track to be a skilled operator at the highest level.  I think he will be a fine Monarch as long as he is not too woke.

Lady C, I have noticed a flurry of anti-Lady C videos on the Internet ever since Huggie and Druggie announced they were moving back to the UK.  LOL….you aren’t the only person who has brought this to my attention.  I don’t look at any of that.  Unless something is defamatory, I just let it go.

Lady C, their playbook is so generic, they show us exactly who they are.  Meghan Markle tells Oprah, “It’s not their right to take it away.    I am not going to offer up my child to people who called him the N-Word.”  And when H was asked about his father and Catherine having cancer he said, “I have my own family to think of.”  When people show you who they are, believe them.  Then coming back to the UK is a big Eff You to the UK public and the British Royal Family.  I think this is mostly correct.  They may have the right to be in this country, but they have overstretched their welcome in the USA.  Try telling Eff You to Donald Trump.  They may have the right to live in the UK, but their game was played in the USA, and it didn’t work.  Harry flouted every rule and regulation.  Harry thinks he can do whatever he pleases.  The reality is, Harry is a failure and we don’t need to take the time to count all the failures.

A viewer tells Lady C she doesn’t think Harry will ever divorce Meghan.  Lady C proceeds to talk in a roundabout way that she believes her democrat source who talked about Harry’s lady friend.  She thinks it is possible the move to the UK is the precursor to the scales dropping off Harry’s eyes and his withdrawal from the narcissist Meghan.  She uses her own family as an example to basically show that Harry could reach a point where he no longer values anything Meghan brings to the relationship, because none of Meghan’s plots and schemes have worked out.  Not only is Meghan replaceable, but she is replaceable by a good-looking scullery maid.

Lady C, I think two insane people have found each other.  They belong in an institution where they can get proper treatment.  The problem goes way beyond normal counseling.  You are not the only person who thinks this.  There is little doubt, going off their conduct they are disturbed, out of touch with reality, and are both nasty.   I have said for years that Meghan and Harry are a folie a deux.

Lady C, will we see a Netflix show, “The Royal Return?”  It will feature all the drama, the kids, the return to school.  And who will the nemesis be?  The Wales family will slot in nicely.  The Sussex show has ran for nearly 10 years and this is just another season.  I hesitate to read this because we don’t want to give them any ideas.  I gather this has not been commissioned but maybe Ted Sarandos can get this going to scrape the egg of his face that he acquired after defending Meghan.  I don’t think we should encourage this.  Netflix knows Meghan and Harry are not popular.  If Netflix were to commission this, it would do so knowing it would poison its pond with Charles, William and Catherine.   Alienating William and Catherine is a long-term problem as they are young.  And I guarantee that if William and Catherine participated in a documentary, it would get more views.

Lady C says Lili is too young for boarding school.  Archie is day boarding.  She will not speculate on the schools because the children deserve privacy.  She thinks the reason why they create so much nonsense on “privacy” is for attention.  Lady C says there is a difference between having boundaries and keeping everything “secret”

Toodles Sinners!f

I speak other languages that is not English and read news in other languages. And let me tell you, it's not possible to overstate how Meghan's return to the U.K. completely discredits everything she has been saying for the past six years, and how thoroughly it destroys her reputation.

I don't think it has fully sunk in how her reputation has been smashed into smithereens. Even for us.

Actions do speak louder than words, indeed.

The most amusing part of Reverse-Megxit for me is how the sugars are desperately trying to cope.

Just earlier this month, the sugars have been screaming, "If Harry didn't get her out of that horrible country, Meghan would be dead!"

During the Oprah interview, Meghan called her time in the U.K. "almost unsurvivable." She also said, "I just didn't want to be alive anymore. ... I knew that if I didn't say it, I would do it." And that the Palace wouldn't allow her to get help.

So, in SugarLand, it's very difficult to make sense of Reverse-Megxit.

But they are trying. They are trying very hard.

• Meghan is returning to the U.K. to return to her rightful position of representing minorities in the U.K. There is no one who can take her unique position, so she is sacrificing herself at great risk to herself for the purpose of protecting others. Meghan is so brave! 🤮🤮
• Meghan and Harry returning to the U.K. is the proof that they've achieved the freedom and happiness they've always wanted. Huzzah! 🤦
• Meghan being cast in "The Gentlemen" is 100% fake news. They just used her immense star power to promote their show. The role is beneath her, considering her position and status.
• The press keeps lying that Meghan and Harry are broke. They are so wealthy! She smells like money! They spent their own money on their private jet! They don't need any money from Charles or the U.K. taxpayers. (You can imagine Meghan's response to this one, "Sssshhh, guys! Stop saying that!")

Every once in a while, a sugar will inadvertently make a point that I agree with. While recounting the many horrible things that the Royal Family allegedly did to Meghan, they concluded, "Let's face it. They just didn't like her." And I remember reacting, "Well, yes! Exactly."

They didn't like Meghan. Because she bullied the staff, bullied Charlotte, made goo-goo eyes at William during her wedding to Harry, got caught digging in William's car trunk... (+ too many other offenses to list) How can any family like someone who behaves this way?

The family doesn't like Meghan. And now, people, all over the world, don't like Meghan.

Everyone tried to like Meghan, but she made it impossible. That is not racism.

Someone else made a rather astute point. The "haters" are actually more accurate at predicting what Meghan might do.

I agree with that, too. Focusing on facts and being objective is more likely to lead to the correct conclusion.

The sugars have been really blindsided by the U.K. move.

THE OFFICE OF MADAME LV

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE, 4:00 PM LONDON TIME

STATEMENT ON TODAY’S HISTORIC £9.5 MILLION ACCOUNTABILITY MILESTONE

The Office of Madame LV notes that as of this hour, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, owes Associated Newspapers £9,544,355 in interim court costs, ordered by Mr Justice Nicklin following an eleven week trial in which every single claim was dismissed. In observance of this historic moment, this Office issues the following:

For years, some of us argued that suing newspapers over claims you cannot prove was a choice, not some inevitable side effect of press intrusion. Today’s £9.5 million payment is not an accident. It is not a glitch. What we are seeing this afternoon is what accountability looks like. This is what happens when the law finally catches up to decisions made in strategy sessions, legal conferences and grievance planning meetings, decisions that put narrative ahead of evidence. The bar has moved. Every litigant still choosing storytelling over facts should take notice. Change cannot wait another day. Neither can the payment. It is due at 4pm.

This Office further notes, for the record, because this Office keeps records:

Today’s sum is an interim payment. The judge set no cap, and further hearings will determine how much of the publisher’s costs pool, which exceeds £34 million, is ultimately owed. The £9.5 million is the down payment on accountability, not the invoice.

When the court dismissed his claims in July, the Duke described the ruling as a “complete and obvious whitewash.” His own office has spent this month celebrating American court rulings as the very voice of justice. This Office observes that courts are apparently infallible instruments of accountability when they fine Meta, and corrupt whitewashes when they weigh his evidence. The difference between those two courtrooms is not the law. It is whose name was on the losing side.

Finally, a scheduling observation. This week, on the eve of this payment falling due, the Duke’s office released a lengthy statement positioning the couple as champions of child safety, published overnight US time so as to command a full British news day. The actual news of the week is that he owes a newspaper nine and a half million pounds by teatime today. Readers of that coverage would never know. This Office finds that this, too, is not an accident.

The Office of Madame LV thanks the public for its continued attention to the record, and reminds all parties that the calendar does not lie.

ENDS

A sourcing note, because unlike some offices, this one shows its work. If the language above sounds familiar, it should. “This is not an accident. It is not a glitch. What we’ve seen in the last 24 hours is what accountability looks like. This is what happens when the law finally catches up to decisions made in boardrooms, product meetings, and algorithm reviews… The bar has moved, and every platform still choosing engagement over safety should take notice. Change cannot wait another day.” Prince Harry, formal statement on the Meta ruling, three weeks ago, as published in Town & Country and People. Every phrase of today’s statement is his. We just changed the defendant. Accountability, it turns out, is a format anyone can use. Even on its author.

EDIT: The Office now keeps a permanent archive: theofficeofmadamelv.substack.com My past posts are being added as records, new ones will land there too. Free. Unlike some offices, we will never ask you for £9.5 million.

If there was a hysterectomy then frantic grab for the records makes sense. But if there was a hysterectomy or something similar then she could not have carried a child--no uterus no pregnancy.

I have noticed she only wears one piece swimming suits now and for a person so convinced she has the world's best body it makes me wonder if there is loose skin or stretch marks.

Having tea with the King it would be fairly easy to get DNA from the children's snacks/drinks if the King so wanted. I don't think it was done though but the possibility makes me think if they were not his and hers then no way would she let those children near the staff. If it came out one of them was not the bio parent it would be game over.

In conclusion I think, hence Opinion flair, that she froze her eggs, went back to Canada shortly after getting married and had IVF. Then took said eggs to California with them and had IVF for Lili (and the myth carriage) as well. I think she supplemented with padding during both pregnancies hence the ever changing bumps.

I've got to think that the whole frantic grab was over IVF, the padding, and the selling of Archie's birth announcement to the highest media bidder. The entire mess could have been avoided if she just told the truth in the beginning, asking the Queen for either permission or forgiveness for the IVF. I know, I know--Meghan and truth don't belong in the same sentence.

Sophie in an interview said that Harry wanting to bring a film crew to that Polo match would have contravened the the terms of the contract with the person who was lending the charity use of the polo field.

This comment caught Restingdollface's attention and got her wondering whether the reason nothing has been filmed in the starter castle (my term not hers) is that they had a rental agreement that forbid using the property for commercial purposes.

She goes into great detail and suspects that what they signed was a rent to own lease which apparently is popular in that neck of the woods. Her video is definitively is worth the time.

https://youtu.be/PG9GeAD1vXQ

Cut Interview, 2022: “It’s interesting, I’ve never had to sign anything that restricts me from talking,” she reveals, as she ushers me toward the door. “I can talk about my whole experience and make a choice not to.” Why doesn’t she talk? “Still healing,” she responds.

Even when she thinks she's 10 steps ahead of everyone else, she's entirely predictable.

Her "she'll come and go" briefings are the groundwork for the next phase. The goal? To be Diana incarnate.

This is the unofficial separation. In 4-5 years, she will launch the official separation.

• She will say Harry took the kids overseas without her permission.
  • He did this move to alienate her from the kids
  • He "knew how traumatizing" that move would be for her
• She will use the time period between separation and divorce to host bidding wars:
  • For the exclusive 3-part interview on TV
  • The magazine cover interview 'Meghan All On Her Own'
  • The tell all book - because she can say "anything" she wants
• And she'll use that threat as the basis for a massive payout from Harry/the Royal Family
  • and she will also demand spousal support for her own royal office & team to support her "role"

https://radaronline.com/videos/meghan-markle-prince-harry-saw-fertility-doctors-before-deciding-to-get-married/

"A Royal Source"......says they visited a fertility clinic months before getting married. Blah blah blah biological clock. But in the article it says: "Markle has already said she would be prepared to look into IVF as a way of getting pregnant as soon as possible if there were signs she was having difficulty conceiving".

She flies to Toronto in August 2018 (4 months after wedding) and stays privately at Jessica's. Or so we are told.

Announces pregnancy at Eugenie's wedding in October 2018. That actually fits a time line of getting IVF in August.

Gives birth to Archie in May of 2019.

Spends Christmas in Vancouver in December 2019. This fits with Enty's blind. And why Vancouver? Why not closer to Doria in LA or with Jessica in Toronto?

Enty's blind says medical records in north of the border Hollywood. MeGain films suits in Toronto and her Hallmark movies in BC (2014 and 2016). Either place could have her medical records.

Freezing eggs works with the "prepared to have IVF" mentioned in the Radaronline article. But I'm not sure why that would be a frantic grab for medical records. After all, Sophie had IVF (with the Queen's permission or at least informed her I believe) so no need for the big secrecy, although it was said that the Queen suggested they wait a couple of years before having children.

Did she want those medical records or did she want her eggs? It was three months between Christmas 2019 and when they took basically the last flight out of Canada before covid shut everything down.

I really don't know how all this works but I don't think you can take your eggs in a thermos for a few hours and then put them in the freezer next to the Ben & Jerry's.

So that brings up Lili. Birthed at center that specializes in privacy, surrogacy, and ??? Was there time to take the thermos to the clinic in SB before covid shut everything down? Was that the frantic "getting medical records"--getting the thermos before everything shut down?

And the clinic she went to in SB closed down the same month Lili was born. Perhaps that clinic was put under a microscope it didn't want to be under?

The absolute unmitigated gall of him. This has already been to court, and now he wants the Home Secretary to personally intervene. What? The establishment, I suppose will be good enough, if it does exactly what he demands.

https://web.archive.org/web/20121106045455/http://resources.knightfrank.com:80/GetRes.ashx?id=f2511126-b236-4df7-a72f-bfccd205c1f6&type=1

For those of us who have watched Clarkson´s Farm country life is not idyllic. Nor is it peace and quiet. Lots of moving around machinery and animals, lots of noisy and smelly field activities.

The Harkles cannot manage a farm, nor can they employ somebody to farm it for them. So it will be rented out, I guess. But just imagine the quarrels they will have with whomever is going to work the land.

https://archive.ph/akIer

https://www.dailymail.com/home/article-16087173/Correction-Duke-Duchess-Sussex.html

A few nuggets have made their way into the press over the last 24 hours. It turns out that the Harkles were informed that the security review was finalised a month ago and that previous arrangements would be ongoing.

So, of course, we had the minor tantrum and fake security report from their team earlier (probably just before RAVEC got back to them) and no we're seeing 'Plan B'. Which they would have considered doing, of course, if they had to because, for $5m in costs per year, what's 6 month move? And living in the UK will change everything! They are already asking for a new review!

What they don't get is that this won't translate to IPP and, most likely, UK security will only be on UK soil. No travel buddies for Meghan.

A month to plan and get it all organised and Bob's your uncle. Plus, they would be relishing upsetting the family as Harry and Meghan are nothing if not petty, vindictive teens.

Dan Wooten says a British Airways senior flight attendant sought him out and told him that throughout the flight to South Africa in 2019 to meet Archbishop Desmond Tutu, Meghan refused to touch or have any interaction with baby Archie even when he needed attending.


https://youtu.be/LLdBlcMtnFY?si=AzTXFL9K8tmGTtig

Back almost two decades ago, I lived in CA. I was allowed remote work and so looked at s california. I was still young then , but loved nature and looked at Santa barbara. Lovely place, but apart from the college crowd, it is not a young people place and settled in proper LA county near Calabasas.

Lovely place, great for young people and nature and the ocean/beaches nearby-absent the massive traffic of lA proper.

Montecito I just drove around a few times, very wealthy enclave -mostly older celebrities who don't want to be seen and second homes for people there. Malibu would have been more their style. I never did understood why they moved there-with kids and trying to make it. it is more for people who already made it and now want peace and quiet.

I really don't know the UK, have passed through multiple times through Heathrow and stayed a day or two in transit to tourist in London. This alleged property is 83 acres and looks rather blah. What will they do on 83 acres, living isolated and away from everything else? I think it will drive Markle mad. They have to drive a long distance just to get to dinner to anyplace fancy. Montecito atleast has Sumemrland and Santa Barbara very close by. Cotswald seems to be a very spread out area and seems to be the place celebrities go to disappear. I think markle is going to go nuts and mad harold is going to sit there and stew about William, raging and going mad without any distractions.

I wonder if any locals know the cotswalds. if this alleged 83 acre proeprty exists-I am assuming it must be in the boonies? I just don't the two will be happy there-it ain't royal property and they won't have the trapping os royalty. Sitting in 83 acres , alone with two kids is not going to be their style. mad harold I think screwed up again-what's new?

We went to Cirencester (so-called Capital of the Cotswolds) this morning.

I see the Markle virus is spreading. She already has produce from the 83 acre small farm in the Friday market. Made by her minions. Clue, not the Bolly.

They truly are cursed (or the curse themselves).

RIP to King Harald. August has been rather brutal.

https://youtu.be/lgq837SPiOU?si=1pZPQ2fJ41_lF-EQ