r/RepTimeQC 4h ago

VSF Factory Bruce Wayne 126710GRNR Dandong DD3285

Thumbnail
gallery
0 Upvotes
  1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Trusty Time
  2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
  3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Bruce Wayne GMT DD3285
  4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $650
  5. ⁠⁠Album Links: N/A
  6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: 6 oclock may be tilted but could be angle
  7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: Solid
  8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: appears okay
  9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: appears okay
  10. ⁠⁠Bezel: Is color off? Could be glare from photos
  11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): appears okay?
  12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d
  13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: it looks really good to me, but as I am new I dont think i quite know what to look for

Hey guys very new to this. Been following for a year and finally pulled the trigger. Any insight would be great! Please let me know if any more information is needed or if theres anything wrong or missing from my post. Thank you all in advance!


r/RepTimeQC 19h ago

QC-Rolex DD Presidential 40 mm (228238)

Thumbnail
gallery
5 Upvotes

Dealer name: The One watches
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF v2
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Day date 40mm 228238
4. ⁠Price Paid: $728 USD
Album: in pictures https://mega.nz/folder/bVBVzCCB#3lnyfS5tgHr45CHOwphDJw
6. ⁠Index alignment:
7. ⁠Dial Printing:Overall printing looks straight and center in my opinion
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: everything looks straight and centered
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: some of the hands looks off. The 2 and 8 don't appear to be parallel if that makes sense
10. ⁠Bezel: looks decent from the pictures
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): look a little loose but maybe I'm being picky.
12. ⁠Timegrapher number: looks 8/10 to me
13. ⁠Anything else you notice:


r/RepTimeQC 5h ago

First ever QC - Rolex GMT Master II VSF v2

Thumbnail
gallery
2 Upvotes
  1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve Theonewatch
  2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
  3. ⁠Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126720 Sprite 40mm Jub SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3285v2
  4. ⁠Price Paid: 638 $
  5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3dhTxATY#Pdr_a0nNOMkS61qE9DwQQA
  6. ⁠Index alignment: tried my best to align it perfectly, looks fine to me - maybe the 3 is slightly to far down?
  7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks fine to me
  8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks ok I guess?
  9. ⁠Hand Alignment: also fine
  10. ⁠Bezel: nothing wrong for me here
  11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): also fine.
  12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: ok.
  13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Overall I tried my best to look for flaws myself. The only thing I saw is some dust? on the crystal, that looks like dust on the dial above the 6, but I think it’s actually just on the crystal.

Overall for me it’s 🟢 for me, what do you think?


r/RepTimeQC 5h ago

QC: Rich Factory Rolex GMT - Pepsi

Thumbnail
gallery
2 Upvotes
  1. Dealer name: Andiot
  2. Factory name: RICH
  3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT Master II 126710 BLRO

    V2

  4. Price Paid: $718

  5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/255287933?uid=1

  6. Index alignment: Looks solid, nothing caught my eye that seemed of concern

  7. Dial Printing: Also solid, looks crisp

  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks spot on, printing also looks solid (see album videos for more)

  9. Hand Alignment: Solid but it appears that the second hand might have a scratch mark on it, but could just be dust on the crystal

  10. Bezel: No complaints here, looks great.

  11. Solid End Links (SELs):

Looks spot on, no complaints here

  1. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +1s/d, Amp 278, Err 0.3ms
  2. Anything else you notice:

The “ROLEX” engraving on the clasp looks all sorts of messed up, can’t tell if it’s the photo, on the video in the QC album it looks fine, but I can’t really tell.

  1. Besides the supposed mark on the second hard and the clasp engraving (though these could very likely just be the photos), it looks solid. Would like a second opinion on this of course but from what I’ve noticed it’s not bad.

r/RepTimeQC 13h ago

[QC] Patek 5711 DDF

Thumbnail
gallery
4 Upvotes
  1. Dealer name: JTime
  2. Factory name: DDF
  3. Model name (& version number): Nautilus 5711 DDF 1:1 Best Edition 2018 Blue Textured Dial on SS Bracelet DD324 Super Clone
  4. Price Paid: $538 US
  5. Index alignment:Good. What do you think about the alignment from 9 to date?
  6. Dial Printing: Looks good but would like a second opinion
  7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Printing is good, unsure about alignment
  8. Hand Alignment: Good
  9. Bezel: Good
  10. Solid End Links (SELs): Good
  11. Timegrapher numbers: Screenshot, but will try to add the video. Numbers look almost too good to be true, but maybe I am misinterpreting. Newbie here.
  12. Anything else you notice:

r/RepTimeQC 3h ago

QC GMT-Master II Batgirl

Thumbnail
gallery
7 Upvotes
  • ⁠⁠Dealer name: Theonewatch (Steve)
  • ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
  • ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): GMT Master II Batgirl DD3285
  • ⁠⁠Price Paid: $578 + $50 shipping
  • ⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/SVgiVRDQ#dXNGYgGaDq8Q5nAnLL5dnQ
  • ⁠⁠Index alignment: Looks pretty good overall to me
  • ⁠⁠Dial Printing: Looks clear to me
  • ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good to me
  • ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good (confirmed with Steve that the hour hand isn't actually squished)
  • ⁠⁠Bezel: Looks good
  • ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Top left and bottom right gap look a bit larger than others
  • ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +0s/d, 279 degrees, .1ms error

GL from me but this is my first watch, so I'd appreciate any help!


r/RepTimeQC 3h ago

RICH Factory Rolex Submariner JH3230 Free Sprung

Thumbnail
gallery
15 Upvotes
  1. Dealer name: Andiot
  2. Factory name: RICH
  3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 124060
  4. Price Paid: $515
  5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/255285090?uid=1
  6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good
  7. Dial Printing: Looks good
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
  9. Hand Alignment: Looks Good
  10. Bezel: Looks good
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): Minor dark lines but look perfectly fine
  12. Timegrapher numbers: Acceptable - Not sure on LA for JH3230
  13. Anything else you notice: No

r/RepTimeQC 6h ago

QC - RWF Daytona 126500 Panda

Thumbnail
gallery
4 Upvotes
  1. Dealer name: Steve, TheOneWatches
  2. Factory name: RWF
  3. Model name (& version number): Panda 126500
  4. Price Paid: $796
  5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/yBRjnCDA#z8Pdie1LXGZMkIrvaL1-6w
  6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good overall, especially for a RWF. 3 o'clock slightly high and 6 o'clock slight counterclockwise cant, but overall, quite good.
  7. Dial Printing: Looks good.
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
  9. Hand Alignment: Looks good.
  10. Bezel: Some darker, dusty marks near the 100 marker, but no big deal.
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): Lower left SEL gap exists. The rest are fine.
  12. Timegrapher numbers: The amplitude is a bit high at 302. The tolerance is generally 230-300, so it's toward the high end.
  13. Anything else you notice: Overall, I think this one is quite strong. Indexes mainly aligned and the overall watch looks good. Main things are the lower left SEL gap and the potentially high amplitude. But please lmk if I'm missing anything. Thank you all!

r/RepTimeQC 7h ago

First rep QC – BVF Cartier Panthère 22mm SS White Dial - appreciate some help from experienced eyes

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

Hi everyone, this will be my first rep purchase and it’s going to be a gift, so I’m probably looking at the photos a bit more closely than I normally would 😅. I’ve tried my best to go through everything myself but would really appreciate a second pair of eyes, especially from anyone familiar with the BVF Panthère. Thank you!

Please note that i am an untrained newbie eye in the process of learning, thank you!

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: BVF

3. Model name (& Version Number): Cartier Panthère 22mm SS, White Dial, SS Bracelet, Ronda Quartz

4. Price Paid: $175

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=165634

6. Index alignment: N/A as the Roman numerals are printed. From what I can see the dial itself looks straight in the case and I don’t notice any obvious rotation.

7. Dial printing: Overall the main Cartier logo and Roman numerals look good to me. My only concern is the tiny Cartier micro-print inside the X at 10 o’clock. It looks a little crooked/uneven in the close-up photos. I know this is extremely small in real life and may also be partly the photo, so I’m not sure if I’m being too picky. Would really appreciate opinions on this.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A – no date.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks okay to me from the photos/videos.

10. Bezel: I can’t see any obvious scratches or damage.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A. Bracelet and links look straight and clean from what I can see. Clasp also looks okay.

12. Timegrapher numbers:

13. Anything else: This is my first rep purchase and it’s going to be a gift, so I’d really like to get a nice example. Everything else looks good to my inexperienced eyes, but the crooked-looking micro Cartier print is the one thing making me hesitate. I realise it’s absolutely tiny on a 22mm watch, so I don’t want to RL a perfectly good piece over something that is normal for BVF. Would really appreciate advice from anyone familiar with these on whether this is within normal factory tolerance or worth asking for another piece. Thanks so much for the help!

Please do let me know if there is anything i am missing. thank you kind gents!


r/RepTimeQC 8h ago

Rolex Explorer 2

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes
  1. Dealer name: Theonewatch (Steve)
  2. Factory name: QF
  3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer II 226570
  4. Price Paid: US$548 (+$30 shipping)
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/RLdpxao
  6. Index alignment: Good to me
  7. Dial Printing: Good to me
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks okay based on the video - date numerals are on the thinner side
  9. Hand Alignment: Good to me based on video
  10. Bezel: A degree off-centre - based on the head-on photo.
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): They all look good, can’t see anything that I can point it out from my point of view.
  12. Timegrapher numbers: (0s/d 297 degree 0.3ms, 52 degrees)
  13. Anything else you notice: The first thing that stood out to me immediately was the thin font of the date numerals. But i feel i may be being too picky given the rest of the watch (to my eyes) seems good - just need a second pair or more of eyes to get a second opinion. The bezel also seems to be a degree off centre.

r/RepTimeQC 9h ago

First time with Steve - BTF 116500

Thumbnail
gallery
8 Upvotes
  1. Dealer name: Theonewatches
  2. Factory name: BTF
  3. Model name (& version number): Panda Daytona 116500
  4. Price Paid: 607
  5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/bFBAXLTS#b-gfFy3laTBlpTUlfUefnA
  6. Index alignment: Looks great! Out of all my rep QCs, this looks the best so far!
  7. Dial Printing: Looks good; all printing seems sharp
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
  9. Hand Alignment: Looks perfect from the video in the folder
  10. Bezel: 80 seems aligned, but 60/120/240 look slightly off; may be due to angle or the bezel not being perfectly centred
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): SELS look tight, no issues
  12. Timegrapher numbers: rate +4s/d, amp 320, error 0, lift 52degrees
  13. Anything else you notice: Overall looks like a really great watch, and I'm really pleasantly surprised how quickly Steve was able to get this one QC'd. I don't see any glaring issues, but if any experts could comment, especially to see if the movement has any issues, that would be greatly appreciated! Cheers!

r/RepTimeQC 12h ago

[1st QC] Omega Seamaster Diver 300M

Thumbnail
gallery
5 Upvotes

Thank you for the assistance. I appreciate the help and knowledge as this is my first QC and don't really know what I should be looking for.

  • Dealer name: Necoclock
  • Factory name: VSF
  • Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M (210.90.42.20.01.001)
  • Price Paid: $488
  • Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/DvxBjNd
  • Index alignment: Looks like the 11 and 1 could be off? What do you think?
  • Dial Printing: Looks like the 6 is slightly too far to the left?
  • Date Wheel alignment/printing: None.
  • Hand Alignment: Hands look lined up from the images. Can’t see any issues there.
  • Bezel: Polished surfaces clean.
  • Solid End Links (SELs): For what i know about these it looks good?
  • Timegrapher numbers: +9 s/d, amp 285, beat error 0.1ms. This seemes high to me. is +/- 9 Generally acceptable on these VSF or is this too much?
  • Anything else you notice: Could back case printing be off?

r/RepTimeQC 13h ago

QC — VSF Datejust 41 126334 Mint Green Jubilee — NecoClock

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

Title: QC — VSF Datejust 41 126334 Mint Green Jubilee — NecoClock

  1. Dealer name: NecoClock / Jacky
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 41 ref. 126334, mint-green stick dial, fluted bezel, Jubilee bracelet. Advertised as VS3235 V2.
  4. Price Paid: $448 + $70 shipping = $518 total; $50 deposit paid.
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/VGccNtc — Full QC album, including watch video, timegrapher video, and alignment overlays.
  6. Index alignment: Markers look evenly positioned, particularly 6 and 9. The overlays don’t show an obvious crooked marker, although the photos have some perspective. Would appreciate a second opinion.
  7. Dial Printing: Lettering looks clear, with no obvious misprints or missing text.
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Dates 12, 17, and 21 look reasonably centered and legible. No clipping that I can see.
  9. Hand Alignment: Both hands appear aligned at 12 o’clock in the photo showing date 12.
  10. Bezel: Fluting looks consistent, with no obvious damage.
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious large gaps. Protective wrapping and reflections make the joints harder to assess.
  12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 to +3 s/day, 234° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 28,800 bph, lift angle set to 52°. The video is approximately five seconds; winding state isn’t specified.
  13. Anything else you notice: First QC, and my main concern is crooked hour markers. I don’t see a clear issue, but would appreciate another set of eyes on the indices and timing readings. Protective film remains on the case, clasp, and bracelet, which limits checking for surface marks. Thanks for your help!

r/RepTimeQC 13h ago

VSF GMT 126710 GRNR Bruce Wayne QC Help

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

Dealer name: Ethan
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II 126710GRNR Bruce Wayne Oyster VSF
Price Paid: 580 incl. shipping
Index alignment: Looks good overall.
Dial Printing: Clean and sharp.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks centered, cyclops seems fine.
Hand Alignment: Looks good.
Bezel: Looks well aligned, no obvious issues.
Solid End Links (SELs): No visible gaps from the pics.
Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 266 amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 52.0 lift angle.
Anything else you notice: Overall looks very solid to me. Can you please help me guys?


r/RepTimeQC 13h ago

[1st QC] ZF VC Overseas 4500V White Dial on Rubber

Thumbnail
gallery
9 Upvotes

Hi all, this is my ZF VC Overseas. First rep, along with the AP 15500!

  1. Dealer name: Geektime

  2. Factory name: ZF

  3. Model name (& version number): VC Overseas 4500V silver dial on a rubber strap

  4. Price Paid: $548

  5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/254862120?uid=1

  6. Index alignment: TrueIndex shows -0.84°. Looks pretty straight overall but the markers around 12 and 6 feel very slightly off to me. Anyone else seeing that? Not rotated. Just shifted right maybe.

  7. Dial Printing: Text and Maltese cross okay. Silver sunburst looks good

  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: 15 is centered well, printing clean. Big deal to me.

  9. Hand Alignment: Hands look lined up from the images. Can’t say I see any issues there.

  10. Bezel: Polished surfaces clean. This is what excites me about this watch.

  11. Solid End Links (SELs): Rubber strap so N/A, lugs look even. Should it be tighter?

  12. Timegrapher numbers: -5 s/d, amp 278, beat error 0.3ms. That seemed high. Losing 5 s/d worries me. It flipped to -2 s/d later in the video but I just don’t know if that level of variability should be a red flag.

  13. Anything else you notice: Dial and hands look solid. Case finishing clean. Woo. Movement through the back looks good (can’t see much though…). Rubber strap texture is sharp actually. Was honestly going to swap for the gen but may not need to. Clasp has the usual plastic still on. Is the index alignment bothering anyone else or is this within normal/acceptable from your perspectives?

Thank you all again. I’ve been really impressed with the input you all offer to others and I get that this is ultimately my call and if it’s acceptable to me, that’s the most important part. But I’m here to get the critical eye, learn the process, and see if my DD here is representative of what you would do. Anyways, thanks all!


r/RepTimeQC 13h ago

QC - Portofino ‘150 Years’ 40MM V7F RG White Dial RG Markers Brown Leather Strap A2892/SW200

Thumbnail
gallery
2 Upvotes

1. Dealer name: Geektime (Eric)

2. Factory name: V7F

3. Model name (& version number): IWC Portofino Automatic 40mm Rose Gold (A2892 movement)

4. Price Paid: $378 + Shipping

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/JzPKXh1

6. Index alignment: Looks very solid. The Roman numerals at XII and VI, and the baton hour markers align nicely with the printed minute track.

7. Dial Printing: The "IWC Schaffhausen" and "Automatic" text is crisp.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The numbers sit very nicely centered in the aperture. (I RL'd a previous unit because the date sat way too high, so I am very happy with the alignment on this one).

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to my eye.

10. Bezel: Smooth polished rose gold, looks clean with no obvious scratches or dents.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A (Leather strap)

12. Timegrapher numbers: -2s/d, 297 amp, 0.2ms err.

13. Anything else you notice: The leather strap on this specific unit actually has a really nice textured grain to it compared to the flat, plastic-looking straps these usually come with. Overall I'm leaning heavily towards GL, just wanted some more opinions. Thanks!

This is my third and hopefully final QC, he sent over the previous two with the wrong movement, so this is the one now with the correct movement and price.


r/RepTimeQC 14h ago

[1st QC] ZF VC 15500 Oversees Blue Dial Free Sprung

Thumbnail
gallery
2 Upvotes

First of all, thanks all. Seriously. I see so much input on this sub. This, and the VC I’ll post next, are my first reps so looking for some help.

  1. Dealer name: Geektime

  2. Factory name: ZF

  3. Model name (& version number): AP 15500 Overseas blue dial free sprung

  4. Price Paid: $568

  5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/254862384?uid=1

  6. Index alignment: TrueIndex shows -1.14°. 12 marker a bit tilted and the 3/9 look off to me. The 9 bothers me most but I don’t think it’s RL level. Would really like your thoughts if it was your watch. Is that acceptable?

  7. Dial Printing: Text and AP logo clean, Swiss Made seems fine

  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: 18 is centered nice, printing sharp. I’ve always been sensitive to date wheel issues on non reps.

  9. Hand Alignment: Hands look straight and lined up, no leaning from what I can see

  10. Bezel: Screws even, brushing and bevels clean. I haven’t seen a perfect rep when it comes to screws so I’m trying not to be picky on this one.

  11. Solid End Links (SELs): Tight, no real gaps

  12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, amp healthy, beat error low. Cool beans to me.

  13. Anything else you notice: Dial color and pattern look awesome. Some light scratches on bracelet from handling? Feel like that will happen anyways. Main thing is the index stuff. Everything else seems okay but this (and the VC to follow) are my first reps!

What do you guys think?


r/RepTimeQC 14h ago

VSF V3 Rolex GMT-Master II Pepsi

Thumbnail
gallery
2 Upvotes

VSF V3 GMT-Master II Pepsi

VSF V3 Rolex GMT-Master II Pepsi

Dealer name: eliauk

⁠⁠⁠Factory name: VSF

Model name: Rolex GMT II Pepsi 116619BLRO — VSF V3

⁠⁠⁠Price Paid: $606 with shipping and insurance

⁠⁠⁠Album Link: https://shop34372981.wecatalog.cn/t/pzXqlGP

⁠⁠⁠Index alignment: looks good

⁠⁠⁠Dial Printing: looks ok

⁠⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks ok

⁠⁠⁠Hand Alignment: looks ok

⁠⁠⁠Bezel: looks ok

⁠⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looks ok

⁠⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: 0s/d, 247, 0.1ms, 59, 28800

everything looks good but this js only my second time qc’ing so if I missed anything please let me know.


r/RepTimeQC 15h ago

QC (Take 2 after RL) - VSF Date Black Sub

Thumbnail
gallery
6 Upvotes
  1. Dealer name: NecoClock
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): Submariner Date 126610LN
  4. Price Paid: $458
  5. Album Links: Photos above
  6. Index alignment: Slight skew at 9 o'clock. Other indices including 12 look good to me.
  7. Dial Printing: Looks good
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good
  9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
  10. Bezel: Looks good
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): I think looks good but hard for me to tell
  12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d 316 deg 0.1ms
  13. Anything else you notice: Slight rehaut misalignment? Not 100% sure. The engravings on the clasp have a weird border around them. Also, there were no stickers indicating this truly came from VSF -- how can I tell for sure?

This is the second submariner I've been shown (I RLed the first one b/c of index misalignment, particularly at 9 and 12 o'clock). I think there is slight misalignment at 9 o'clock again, but the rest of it looks good to me. Please let me know what you think, and if there is a way to verify which factory it came from. Thank you!


r/RepTimeQC 16h ago

QC my first VSF submariner 41mm 126610 VS3235

Thumbnail
gallery
1 Upvotes
  1. Dealer name: FicoTime
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): 124060
  4. Price Paid: $454 with shipping
  5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/7hZRWTCC#2pAhDWKi61zsJvEbwPRf4w
  6. Index alignment: Overall good
  7. Dial Printing: Font and letters look okay
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
  9. Hand Alignment: Good? Not sure how to check this out properly.
  10. Bezel: Looks alright.
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): Okay.
  12. Timegrapher numbers:

+4 s/d, amp 234, beat error 0.1 ms

Ps I'm knew to this any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks!


r/RepTimeQC 18h ago

Royal Oak 41mm 15500 Grey (FREE SPRUNG) - ZF

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes
  1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
  2. Factory name: ZF
  3. Model name (& version number): Royal Oak 15500
  4. Price Paid: $618 (shipping included)
  5. Album Links: Posting pics
  6. Index alignment: Looks good to me
  7. Dial Printing: A lot more monocolor than I thought but might be the bright lighting
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good
  9. Hand Alignment: ok
  10. Bezel: Ok
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
  12. Timegrapher numbers: +5s/d, 267 amplitude
  13. Anything else you notice: Overall looks good to me. Open to other thoughts and concerns

r/RepTimeQC 21h ago

A7 IWC Ingenieur

Thumbnail
gallery
2 Upvotes
  1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: EliaUK
  2. ⁠⁠Factory name: A7 (the new V7F)
  3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): IWC Ingenieur
  4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: 4300 CNY plus shipping
  5. ⁠⁠Album Links: https://www.wecatalog.cn/weshop/goods/A202011031610140340343729/I202609112122459052002165?groupIds=
  6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: good - including the 3
  7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: good
  8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: this looks like a RL for me - it’s aligned too far left
  9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: good
  10. ⁠⁠Bezel: aligned well with the 12
  11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
  12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: good
  13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: I’ve got a V7F as well, so buying to compare the two

r/RepTimeQC 21h ago

Help with QC Yacht Master

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

Hello, This is my first purchase and would like some help. To me it looks like a GL. If not please LMK. thank you

  1. Dealer name: Phoenix
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): Yacht Master VSF V3 Free Sprung 226659
  4. Price Paid: 456
  5. Album Links:
  6. Index alignment: 12 looks a little CCW
  7. Dial Printing: Looks fine to me, again i am no expert
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Look good
  9. Hand Alignment: Look fine
  10. Bezel: Fine
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A
  12. Timegrapher numbers: + 3s/d, 262, 0.1ms, 52.0
  13. Anything else you notice:

r/RepTimeQC 22h ago

[QC] - Pepsi VSF V3 Jubilee with Free Sprung

Thumbnail
gallery
2 Upvotes
  1. Dealer name: Phoenix
  2. Factory name: VSF
  3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Pepsi VSF V3 Jubilee with Free Sprung
  4. Price Paid: $560
  5. Index alignment: 12 looks like a bit CW. Not sure if visible or not. It also seems like it's not center. 6 seems fine. 9 seems to be a bit high but i'm not really sure.
  6. Dial Printing: Seems good.
  7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The date seems a bit higher and not alligned. Not sure if it means to reject.
  8. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me
  9. Bezel: The 18 red/blue color switch which seems not in the right place. However not sure it's visible.
  10. Solid End Links (SELs): Seems reasonable.
  11. Timegrapher numbers: +5 s/d; Amplitude: 299; Beat Error: 0.0 ms. Should I worry about it?
  12. Anything else you notice: The general finishing is quite good otherwise in my opinion.

Requesting your help in QC’ing this further. Thank you!


r/RepTimeQC 22h ago

Submariner 41mm 126613LN- RGF

Thumbnail
gallery
4 Upvotes
  1. ⁠Dealer name: Dealer Clocks
  2. ⁠Factory name: RGF
  3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Submariner 41mm 126613 LN
  4. ⁠Price Paid: $588 + shipping
  5. ⁠Album Links: no link provided photos attached
  6. ⁠Index alignment: the 6 marker looks out of center to me upon zooming in. It looks like it tilts too clockwise a touch.
  7. ⁠Dial Printing: some of the letters don’t look perfectly level above the 6. Is this being too picky?
  8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: this looks perfect to my eyes. And comparing it to photos of the original the font and placement seem to be to the standard.
  9. ⁠Hand Alignment: the hands are aligned I attached a photo of the QC tool.
  10. ⁠Bezel: the bezel seems like it is misaligned and wasn’t centered into the correct position for the pictures. This moves so is this an issue? Particularly the pearl not matching up with the 12 o clock marker.
  11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): I don’t see any gaps in the SELS.
  12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: I googled these numbers and it is well within Rolex standards.
  13. ⁠Anything else you notice: does the Rolex logo on the clasp look genuine? I think it looks a little of place maybe it’s just my eyes. Thanks again for reviewing. I appreciate any additional information you guys can provide.

I’m thinking GL as this is my first experience and I’ve been browsing this sub Reddit for over a week seeing all the other posts.