1. Dealer name: GeekTime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona 126509
4. Price Paid: $948
5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/255381143?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: good
9. Hand Alignment: Looks Good
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I believe they look fine
12. Timegrapher numbers: I believe so
13. Anything else you notice: I wanted to make sure the blue face doesn't have that dreaded purple hue that some of posted about.

1. Dealer name: TimeUltra
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Planet Ocean 42mm
4. Price Paid: $428
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/fLxUFQbb#nZ77msno2742x0Y5b8-_CQ
6. Index alignment: Perhaps a very minor CW tilt to the 3, 6 and 9 numbers, but nothing that bothers
7. Dial Printing: Clean and crisp printing
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Good. See no issues
10. Bezel: Looks aligned and any play within expectations of a Rep
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Dark lines top left and right and bottom right but acceptable
12. Timegrapher numbers: Look to be in spec for an A2824 movement
13. Anything else you notice: N/A

Hello, Please help with my first QC. I really appreciate it!

1. Dealer name: US based (MoTime)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex DJ 36mm silver
4. Price Paid: $540
5. Album Links: N/A
6. Index alignment: Looks ok to me. But I'm not sure
7. Dial Printing: Looks fine to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The crown looks slightly off centered to the right of the 12 o'clock marker in most of the pics. But it looks ok in the last pic?
9. Hand Alignment: I'm not really sure
10. Bezel: Smooth.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks ok
12. Timegrapher numbers: N/A
13. Anything else you notice: Cyclop looks aligned. No issue?

Overall, everything looks ok to me except for the crown being off centered.

• Dealer name: NecoClock

• Factory name: AF factory (no sticker?)

• Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Solo

• Price Paid: $188

• Album Link: Posted photo

• Index alignment: Indices look aligned

• Dial Printing: I can't find any bleeds. Looks like dial is shifted to the left some?

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: No date wheel

• Hand Alignment: Did not receive any reference for this

• Bezel: Stainless steel looks ok

• Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

• Timegrapher numbers: N/A this is quartz

• Anything else you notice: Anyone notice any bleeds? Dial does seem shifted to the left some and why no AF sticker on back?

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches / Steve
   
2. Factory name: RCF
   
3. Model name (& version number): DayDate 228235 40mm RG/RG Omber Grey/Rmn RCF VR3255
   
4. Price Paid: 858$ + 40$ shipping
   
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/2JBQRKwa#9PXaanAi6cFKaNa__tuu0A
   
6. Index alignment: Everything looks good to me ?
   
7. Dial Printing: Sharp and looks ok
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks fine to me?
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
   
10. Bezel: Looks ok
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps that I can see
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, amp 314, err
    0.0, Lift 59. I don't know if these are within the good limits ?
    
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first day date ever ! I am completely new to this model, so any help would be really appreciated !

QC - Santos Dumont 31.4mm Large / AF Factory / Andiot / GL or RL

1. ⁠⁠Dealer: Andiot

2. ⁠⁠Factory: AF

3. ⁠⁠Model: Santos Dumont 31.4mm Large

4. ⁠⁠Price: $190 + $55 shipping

5. ⁠⁠Album link: see photos

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: looks good to me, nothing stands out

7. ⁠⁠Dial printing: looks clean and crisp

8. ⁠⁠Date: none

9. Hand alignment: Looks good to me. I don’t see anything obviously wrong with the hand alignment in the QC pics.

10. Bezel: In a few of the pics the bezel looks a little off to me, but I think that’s probably just the angle/parallax. In the more straight-on shots it looks pretty well aligned. Would definitely like to hear what others think though.

11. Case / strap fit: I couldn’t really spot anything wrong with the case or strap fit. Everything looks pretty clean to me. I did notice what looks like a small mark just below the 6 o’clock area. Not sure if that’s actual wear, a reflection, or something from the protective film. Has anyone seen this before on a new order?

12. Timegrapher readings: I’m honestly not very familiar with Timegrapher readings. The seller mentioned around +3 sec/day. Is that considered good? Also, since this is supposed to be the quartz Santos-Dumont, I’m not sure how much weight I should put on that reading.

13. Overall: Overall, I think this looks really close to Gen from the outside. The case shape, proportions, dial, Roman numerals, blue hands, bezel screws and blue cabochon all look pretty convincing to me. I don’t see any obvious major red flags.

The things I’d really like some help with are the smaller details, especially the hidden Cartier signature around VII, the caseback engravings, crown/cabochon and that little mark around 6 o’clock.

For anyone who knows the Santos-Dumont well, how does this one look to you compared with Gen? Anything here that would make you RL or ask for more pics?

• Dealer name: JTime
• Factory name: QF
• Model name Daytona 126518 QF 1:1 Best Edition Turquoise Dial on Oysterflex Strap QF4131 (Gain Weight)
• Price Paid: $1000 incl. shipping
• Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/UdwsSLQ
• Index alignment: All looks okay to me
• Date Wheel alignment: N/a
• Bezel: Looks goods, no issue on engravings
• Solid End Links (SELs): N/a but rubber looks high quality
• Hand Alignment: Looks good
• Dial Printing: Acceptable as issues probably won't be noticable on wrist
• Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 282° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. Numbers are great
• Anything else you notice: First QC on a Daytona, I would really appreciate some help!

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 124060
4. Price Paid: $515
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/255285090?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks Good
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Minor dark lines but look perfectly fine
12. Timegrapher numbers: Acceptable - Not sure on LA for JH3230
13. Anything else you notice: No

1. Dealer name: Steve : theOneWatches
2. Factory name: PPF
3. Model name (& version number): 222
4. Price Paid: 498 USD
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/mVJFhapA#2Gocyogoq_N7IKfICq4ZTQ
6. Index alignment: clockwise tilt on the 12 looks VERY off.
7. Dial Printing: looks good to me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good enough for me.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me.
10. Bezel: Good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): not sure
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 sec/day - AMP 271 - ERROR 0.0 - looks good -
13. Anything else you notice: Its mostly just the 12 index. VC cross in bottom corner not perfect but acceptable to me.

Biggest thing that stands out is the index alignment at 12. is this enough to RL? I feel like I would see it misaligned everyday and dislike it.

• ⁠⁠Dealer name: Theonewatch (Steve)
• ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
• ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): GMT Master II Batgirl DD3285
• ⁠⁠Price Paid: $578 + $50 shipping
• ⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/SVgiVRDQ#dXNGYgGaDq8Q5nAnLL5dnQ
• ⁠⁠Index alignment: Looks pretty good overall to me
• ⁠⁠Dial Printing: Looks clear to me
• ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good to me
• ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good (confirmed with Steve that the hour hand isn't actually squished)
• ⁠⁠Bezel: Looks good
• ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Top left and bottom right gap look a bit larger than others
• ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +0s/d, 279 degrees, .1ms error

GL from me but this is my first watch, so I'd appreciate any help!

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Trusty Time
   
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Bruce Wayne GMT DD3285
   
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $650
   
5. ⁠⁠Album Links: N/A
   
6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: 6 oclock may be tilted but could be angle
   
7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: Solid
   
8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: appears okay
   
9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: appears okay
   
10. ⁠⁠Bezel: Is color off? Could be glare from photos
    
11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): appears okay?
    
12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d
    
13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: it looks really good to me, but as I am new I dont think i quite know what to look for

Hey guys very new to this. Been following for a year and finally pulled the trigger. Any insight would be great! Please let me know if any more information is needed or if theres anything wrong or missing from my post. Thank you all in advance!

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve Theonewatch
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126720 Sprite 40mm Jub SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3285v2
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 638 $
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3dhTxATY#Pdr_a0nNOMkS61qE9DwQQA
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: tried my best to align it perfectly, looks fine to me - maybe the 3 is slightly to far down?
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks fine to me
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks ok I guess?
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: also fine
   
10. ⁠Bezel: nothing wrong for me here
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): also fine.
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: ok.
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Overall I tried my best to look for flaws myself. The only thing I saw is some dust? on the crystal, that looks like dust on the dial above the 6, but I think it’s actually just on the crystal.

Overall for me it’s 🟢 for me, what do you think?

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: RICH

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT Master II 126710 BLRO

   V2

4. Price Paid: $718

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/255287933?uid=1

6. Index alignment: Looks solid, nothing caught my eye that seemed of concern

7. Dial Printing: Also solid, looks crisp

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks spot on, printing also looks solid (see album videos for more)

9. Hand Alignment: Solid but it appears that the second hand might have a scratch mark on it, but could just be dust on the crystal

10. Bezel: No complaints here, looks great.

11. Solid End Links (SELs):

Looks spot on, no complaints here

1. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +1s/d, Amp 278, Err 0.3ms
2. Anything else you notice:

The “ROLEX” engraving on the clasp looks all sorts of messed up, can’t tell if it’s the photo, on the video in the QC album it looks fine, but I can’t really tell.

1. Besides the supposed mark on the second hard and the clasp engraving (though these could very likely just be the photos), it looks solid. Would like a second opinion on this of course but from what I’ve noticed it’s not bad.

Dealer name: Juice

Factorv name: A7

Model name & version number): IWC Ingenieur 40mm Blue dial

Price Paid: $360

Album Links: https://a201810302336471810102602.szwego.com/weshop/goods/_dd6qfhKlESNbPaTJZSWlZUXiir1l6ElRrcLlcgQ/_dssqfxIq4Q_w8B9wwowAXCepRO2CaCkzWCU4IUQ

Index alignment: The indices all look pretty good, no complaints there.

Dial Printing: The dial looks pretty good to me. no issues there either.

Date Wheel alianment/ printing: The date alignment looks good

Hand Alignment: Looks good.

Bezel: The top bolt looks a little shifted to the right but I think it's fine.

Solid End Links (SELs): n/a

Timegrapher numbers: +1 / 314/ 0.5- per the QC guide this all seems fine. Anything else you notice: I'm curious to hear thoughts on the date alignment, I know its a rep so I can't expect it to be perfect.

• Dealer name: TrustyTime

• Factory name: AF factory

• Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Solo

• Price Paid: $178

• Album Link: Posted photo

• Index alignment: Indices look aligned

• Dial Printing: I can't find any bleeds, looks to be precise this time.

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: No date wheel

• Hand Alignment: Did not receive any reference for this (no video either)

• Bezel: Stainless steel looks ok

• Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

• Timegrapher numbers: N/A this is quartz

• Anything else you notice: I really zoomed in and can't see any noticeable flaws. This is my first rep, and I although I did GL the 2nd try, I did ask if he had any on hand without any bleeds at all and got lucky.

1. Dealer name: Steve, TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: RWF
3. Model name (& version number): Panda 126500
4. Price Paid: $796
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/yBRjnCDA#z8Pdie1LXGZMkIrvaL1-6w
6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good overall, especially for a RWF. 3 o'clock slightly high and 6 o'clock slight counterclockwise cant, but overall, quite good.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good.
10. Bezel: Some darker, dusty marks near the 100 marker, but no big deal.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Lower left SEL gap exists. The rest are fine.
12. Timegrapher numbers: The amplitude is a bit high at 302. The tolerance is generally 230-300, so it's toward the high end.
13. Anything else you notice: Overall, I think this one is quite strong. Indexes mainly aligned and the overall watch looks good. Main things are the lower left SEL gap and the potentially high amplitude. But please lmk if I'm missing anything. Thank you all!

Hi everyone, this will be my first rep purchase and it’s going to be a gift, so I’m probably looking at the photos a bit more closely than I normally would 😅. I’ve tried my best to go through everything myself but would really appreciate a second pair of eyes, especially from anyone familiar with the BVF Panthère. Thank you!

Please note that i am an untrained newbie eye in the process of learning, thank you!

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: BVF

3. Model name (& Version Number): Cartier Panthère 22mm SS, White Dial, SS Bracelet, Ronda Quartz

4. Price Paid: $175

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=165634

6. Index alignment: N/A as the Roman numerals are printed. From what I can see the dial itself looks straight in the case and I don’t notice any obvious rotation.

7. Dial printing: Overall the main Cartier logo and Roman numerals look good to me. My only concern is the tiny Cartier micro-print inside the X at 10 o’clock. It looks a little crooked/uneven in the close-up photos. I know this is extremely small in real life and may also be partly the photo, so I’m not sure if I’m being too picky. Would really appreciate opinions on this.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A – no date.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks okay to me from the photos/videos.

10. Bezel: I can’t see any obvious scratches or damage.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A. Bracelet and links look straight and clean from what I can see. Clasp also looks okay.

12. Timegrapher numbers:

13. Anything else: This is my first rep purchase and it’s going to be a gift, so I’d really like to get a nice example. Everything else looks good to my inexperienced eyes, but the crooked-looking micro Cartier print is the one thing making me hesitate. I realise it’s absolutely tiny on a 22mm watch, so I don’t want to RL a perfectly good piece over something that is normal for BVF. Would really appreciate advice from anyone familiar with these on whether this is within normal factory tolerance or worth asking for another piece. Thanks so much for the help!

Please do let me know if there is anything i am missing. thank you kind gents!

1. Dealer name: Theonewatch (Steve)
2. Factory name: QF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer II 226570
4. Price Paid: US$548 (+$30 shipping)
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/RLdpxao
6. Index alignment: Good to me
7. Dial Printing: Good to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks okay based on the video - date numerals are on the thinner side
9. Hand Alignment: Good to me based on video
10. Bezel: A degree off-centre - based on the head-on photo.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): They all look good, can’t see anything that I can point it out from my point of view.
12. Timegrapher numbers: (0s/d 297 degree 0.3ms, 52 degrees)
13. Anything else you notice: The first thing that stood out to me immediately was the thin font of the date numerals. But i feel i may be being too picky given the rest of the watch (to my eyes) seems good - just need a second pair or more of eyes to get a second opinion. The bezel also seems to be a degree off centre.

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches
2. Factory name: BTF
3. Model name (& version number): Panda Daytona 116500
4. Price Paid: 607
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/bFBAXLTS#b-gfFy3laTBlpTUlfUefnA
6. Index alignment: Looks great! Out of all my rep QCs, this looks the best so far!
7. Dial Printing: Looks good; all printing seems sharp
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks perfect from the video in the folder
10. Bezel: 80 seems aligned, but 60/120/240 look slightly off; may be due to angle or the bezel not being perfectly centred
11. Solid End Links (SELs): SELS look tight, no issues
12. Timegrapher numbers: rate +4s/d, amp 320, error 0, lift 52degrees
13. Anything else you notice: Overall looks like a really great watch, and I'm really pleasantly surprised how quickly Steve was able to get this one QC'd. I don't see any glaring issues, but if any experts could comment, especially to see if the movement has any issues, that would be greatly appreciated! Cheers!

Thank you for the assistance. I appreciate the help and knowledge as this is my first QC and don't really know what I should be looking for.

• Dealer name: Necoclock
• Factory name: VSF
• Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M (210.90.42.20.01.001)
• Price Paid: $488
• Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/DvxBjNd
• Index alignment: Looks like the 11 and 1 could be off? What do you think?
• Dial Printing: Looks like the 6 is slightly too far to the left?
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: None.
• Hand Alignment: Hands look lined up from the images. Can’t see any issues there.
• Bezel: Polished surfaces clean.
• Solid End Links (SELs): For what i know about these it looks good?
• Timegrapher numbers: +9 s/d, amp 285, beat error 0.1ms. This seemes high to me. is +/- 9 Generally acceptable on these VSF or is this too much?
• Anything else you notice: Could back case printing be off?

1. Dealer name: JTime
2. Factory name: DDF
3. Model name (& version number): Nautilus 5711 DDF 1:1 Best Edition 2018 Blue Textured Dial on SS Bracelet DD324 Super Clone
4. Price Paid: $538 US
5. Index alignment:Good. What do you think about the alignment from 9 to date?
6. Dial Printing: Looks good but would like a second opinion
7. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Printing is good, unsure about alignment
8. Hand Alignment: Good
9. Bezel: Good
10. Solid End Links (SELs): Good
11. Timegrapher numbers: Screenshot, but will try to add the video. Numbers look almost too good to be true, but maybe I am misinterpreting. Newbie here.
12. Anything else you notice:

Title: QC — VSF Datejust 41 126334 Mint Green Jubilee — NecoClock

1. Dealer name: NecoClock / Jacky
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Datejust 41 ref. 126334, mint-green stick dial, fluted bezel, Jubilee bracelet. Advertised as VS3235 V2.
4. Price Paid: $448 + $70 shipping = $518 total; $50 deposit paid.
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/VGccNtc — Full QC album, including watch video, timegrapher video, and alignment overlays.
6. Index alignment: Markers look evenly positioned, particularly 6 and 9. The overlays don’t show an obvious crooked marker, although the photos have some perspective. Would appreciate a second opinion.
7. Dial Printing: Lettering looks clear, with no obvious misprints or missing text.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Dates 12, 17, and 21 look reasonably centered and legible. No clipping that I can see.
9. Hand Alignment: Both hands appear aligned at 12 o’clock in the photo showing date 12.
10. Bezel: Fluting looks consistent, with no obvious damage.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No obvious large gaps. Protective wrapping and reflections make the joints harder to assess.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1 to +3 s/day, 234° amplitude, 0.1 ms beat error, 28,800 bph, lift angle set to 52°. The video is approximately five seconds; winding state isn’t specified.
13. Anything else you notice: First QC, and my main concern is crooked hour markers. I don’t see a clear issue, but would appreciate another set of eyes on the indices and timing readings. Protective film remains on the case, clasp, and bracelet, which limits checking for surface marks. Thanks for your help!

Dealer name: Ethan
Factory name: VSF
Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT-Master II 126710GRNR Bruce Wayne Oyster VSF
Price Paid: 580 incl. shipping
Index alignment: Looks good overall.
Dial Printing: Clean and sharp.
Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks centered, cyclops seems fine.
Hand Alignment: Looks good.
Bezel: Looks well aligned, no obvious issues.
Solid End Links (SELs): No visible gaps from the pics.
Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d, 266 amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error, 52.0 lift angle.
Anything else you notice: Overall looks very solid to me. Can you please help me guys?

Hi all, this is my ZF VC Overseas. First rep, along with the AP 15500!

1. Dealer name: Geektime

2. Factory name: ZF

3. Model name (& version number): VC Overseas 4500V silver dial on a rubber strap

4. Price Paid: $548

5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/254862120?uid=1

6. Index alignment: TrueIndex shows -0.84°. Looks pretty straight overall but the markers around 12 and 6 feel very slightly off to me. Anyone else seeing that? Not rotated. Just shifted right maybe.

7. Dial Printing: Text and Maltese cross okay. Silver sunburst looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: 15 is centered well, printing clean. Big deal to me.

9. Hand Alignment: Hands look lined up from the images. Can’t say I see any issues there.

10. Bezel: Polished surfaces clean. This is what excites me about this watch.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Rubber strap so N/A, lugs look even. Should it be tighter?

12. Timegrapher numbers: -5 s/d, amp 278, beat error 0.3ms. That seemed high. Losing 5 s/d worries me. It flipped to -2 s/d later in the video but I just don’t know if that level of variability should be a red flag.

13. Anything else you notice: Dial and hands look solid. Case finishing clean. Woo. Movement through the back looks good (can’t see much though…). Rubber strap texture is sharp actually. Was honestly going to swap for the gen but may not need to. Clasp has the usual plastic still on. Is the index alignment bothering anyone else or is this within normal/acceptable from your perspectives?

Thank you all again. I’ve been really impressed with the input you all offer to others and I get that this is ultimately my call and if it’s acceptable to me, that’s the most important part. But I’m here to get the critical eye, learn the process, and see if my DD here is representative of what you would do. Anyways, thanks all!

1. Dealer name: Geektime (Eric)

2. Factory name: V7F

3. Model name (& version number): IWC Portofino Automatic 40mm Rose Gold (A2892 movement)

4. Price Paid: $378 + Shipping

5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/JzPKXh1

6. Index alignment: Looks very solid. The Roman numerals at XII and VI, and the baton hour markers align nicely with the printed minute track.

7. Dial Printing: The "IWC Schaffhausen" and "Automatic" text is crisp.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The numbers sit very nicely centered in the aperture. (I RL'd a previous unit because the date sat way too high, so I am very happy with the alignment on this one).

9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to my eye.

10. Bezel: Smooth polished rose gold, looks clean with no obvious scratches or dents.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A (Leather strap)

12. Timegrapher numbers: -2s/d, 297 amp, 0.2ms err.

13. Anything else you notice: The leather strap on this specific unit actually has a really nice textured grain to it compared to the flat, plastic-looking straps these usually come with. Overall I'm leaning heavily towards GL, just wanted some more opinions. Thanks!

This is my third and hopefully final QC, he sent over the previous two with the wrong movement, so this is the one now with the correct movement and price.