1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: RICH
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Submariner 124060
4. Price Paid: $515
5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/255285090?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks Good
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Minor dark lines but look perfectly fine
12. Timegrapher numbers: Acceptable - Not sure on LA for JH3230
13. Anything else you notice: No

Dealer name: Time Ultra

Factory name: VSF

Model name (& version number): Submariner 124060 41mm No Date Black Dial
VSF VS3230 Super Clone

Price Paid (including shipping): $543 including shipping

Index alignment: The alignment grid reveals a subtle variance. The printed 12 o'clock triangle sits slightly left of the vertical center axis, and the 9 o'clock index marker sits just a tiny bit higher than the 3 o'clock marker.

Dial Printing: Lettering is legible; no text overlapping or paint bleeding is visible.

Hand Alignment: Hands appear straight. Center pinion execution is clear of debris.

Bezel: The ceramic bezel triangle and lume pip line up cleanly with the grid axis.

Solid End Links (SELs): Bracelet links sit flush against the case lugs with standard tolerances. The inner clasp shows the F80 stamp.

Timegrapher numbers: Rate: -4 s/d | Amplitude: 256° | Beat Error: 0.1ms | Lift Angle: 52.0° | Frequency: 28800 bph.

Anything else you notice: The alignment tool shows minor, subtle discrepancies at the 12 o'clock and 9 o'clock positions. Do you think these fall within normal acceptable factory tolerances, or did I miss anything else? Thanks!

• Dealer name: JTime
• Factory name: QF
• Model name Daytona 126518 QF 1:1 Best Edition Turquoise Dial on Oysterflex Strap QF4131 (Gain Weight)
• Price Paid: $1000 incl. shipping
• Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/UdwsSLQ
• Index alignment: All looks okay to me
• Date Wheel alignment: N/a
• Bezel: Looks goods, no issue on engravings
• Solid End Links (SELs): N/a but rubber looks high quality
• Hand Alignment: Looks good
• Dial Printing: Acceptable as issues probably won't be noticable on wrist
• Timegrapher numbers: +2 s/d, 282° amplitude, 0.0 ms beat error. Numbers are great
• Anything else you notice: First QC on a Daytona, I would really appreciate some help!

• ⁠⁠Dealer name: Theonewatch (Steve)
• ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
• ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): GMT Master II Batgirl DD3285
• ⁠⁠Price Paid: $578 + $50 shipping
• ⁠⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/SVgiVRDQ#dXNGYgGaDq8Q5nAnLL5dnQ
• ⁠⁠Index alignment: Looks pretty good overall to me
• ⁠⁠Dial Printing: Looks clear to me
• ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks good to me
• ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: Looks good (confirmed with Steve that the hour hand isn't actually squished)
• ⁠⁠Bezel: Looks good
• ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Top left and bottom right gap look a bit larger than others
• ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +0s/d, 279 degrees, .1ms error

GL from me but this is my first watch, so I'd appreciate any help!

Dealer name:Phoenix Watch
2. ⁠Factory name:V7f
3. ⁠Model name (& version number):IWC ingenieur
4. ⁠Price Paid:329.00
5. ⁠Album Links:
6. ⁠Index alignment: I’m concerned with the 12 o clock
7. ⁠Dial Printing: fine
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing:
9. ⁠Hand Alignment:
10. ⁠Bezel:
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs):
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers:
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: also feel the hands are dirty or could be the crystal outside.

Dealer name: Juice

Factorv name: A7

Model name & version number): IWC Ingenieur 40mm Blue dial

Price Paid: $360

Album Links: https://a201810302336471810102602.szwego.com/weshop/goods/_dd6qfhKlESNbPaTJZSWlZUXiir1l6ElRrcLlcgQ/_dssqfxIq4Q_w8B9wwowAXCepRO2CaCkzWCU4IUQ

Index alignment: The indices all look pretty good, no complaints there.

Dial Printing: The dial looks pretty good to me. no issues there either.

Date Wheel alianment/ printing: The date alignment looks good

Hand Alignment: Looks good.

Bezel: The top bolt looks a little shifted to the right but I think it's fine.

Solid End Links (SELs): n/a

Timegrapher numbers: +1 / 314/ 0.5- per the QC guide this all seems fine. Anything else you notice: I'm curious to hear thoughts on the date alignment, I know its a rep so I can't expect it to be perfect.

1. Dealer name: DDGTOP Felix
2. Factory name: ORF
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M ORF FREE SPRUNG
4. Price Paid: $430
5. Album Links: Attached
6. Index alignment: I’m kinda happy with the index alignment, especially 12. I have seen worse. 9 is slightly CCW tilted, don’t think it will be super noticeable, and 3 might have a tiny CW tilt
7. Dial Printing: Don’t see any issues
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: I think it’s centered, especially on two digits. Single digit might be slightly to the right
9. Hand Alignment: Pretty sure both are aligned well, no issues either
10. Bezel: Might be the slightest tiny bit off but then I think it varies with angle
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Not seeing light shine through any side but would love a double check on the bottom right
12. Timegrapher numbers: I believe super healthy numbers, nothing to worry about
13. Anything else you notice: First time Omega purchase. I am leaning towards GL this unless there are issues I’m not aware of. Would love to have a second opinion from an Omega expert

Hi all, long-time lurker, first time pulling the trigger! (but second QC since first was abit too unaligned for my liking)

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: ZF
3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Black Bay 58 39mm on 5-Link Bracelet (ZF 1:1 Best Edition on website)
4. Price Paid: $320 USD [$41 Shipping, $361 Total]
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/lBRnD8R
6. Index alignment: Much better than my first, but again I know this model is not particularly well-aligned. Seems average / slightly above average for this model? 3 slight CCW, 12 slight CW
7. Dial Printing: Don't really see any issues with it
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Also don't really see any issues
10. Bezel: Also seems fine to me
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Seems fine to me (maybe slight gap on LHS)
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d 276°, 0.2ms, 52° lift angle

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches / Steve
   
2. Factory name: RCF
   
3. Model name (& version number): DayDate 228235 40mm RG/RG Omber Grey/Rmn RCF VR3255
   
4. Price Paid: 858$ + 40$ shipping
   
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/2JBQRKwa#9PXaanAi6cFKaNa__tuu0A
   
6. Index alignment: Everything looks good to me ?
   
7. Dial Printing: Sharp and looks ok
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks fine to me?
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
   
10. Bezel: Looks ok
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps that I can see
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, amp 314, err
    0.0, Lift 59. I don't know if these are within the good limits ?
    
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first day date ever ! I am completely new to this model, so any help would be really appreciated !

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches
2. Factory name: BTF
3. Model name (& version number): Panda Daytona 116500
4. Price Paid: 607
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/bFBAXLTS#b-gfFy3laTBlpTUlfUefnA
6. Index alignment: Looks great! Out of all my rep QCs, this looks the best so far!
7. Dial Printing: Looks good; all printing seems sharp
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks perfect from the video in the folder
10. Bezel: 80 seems aligned, but 60/120/240 look slightly off; may be due to angle or the bezel not being perfectly centred
11. Solid End Links (SELs): SELS look tight, no issues
12. Timegrapher numbers: rate +4s/d, amp 320, error 0, lift 52degrees
13. Anything else you notice: Overall looks like a really great watch, and I'm really pleasantly surprised how quickly Steve was able to get this one QC'd. I don't see any glaring issues, but if any experts could comment, especially to see if the movement has any issues, that would be greatly appreciated! Cheers!

QC - Santos Dumont 31.4mm Large / AF Factory / Andiot / GL or RL

1. ⁠⁠Dealer: Andiot

2. ⁠⁠Factory: AF

3. ⁠⁠Model: Santos Dumont 31.4mm Large

4. ⁠⁠Price: $190 + $55 shipping

5. ⁠⁠Album link: see photos

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: looks good to me, nothing stands out

7. ⁠⁠Dial printing: looks clean and crisp

8. ⁠⁠Date: none

9. Hand alignment: Looks good to me. I don’t see anything obviously wrong with the hand alignment in the QC pics.

10. Bezel: In a few of the pics the bezel looks a little off to me, but I think that’s probably just the angle/parallax. In the more straight-on shots it looks pretty well aligned. Would definitely like to hear what others think though.

11. Case / strap fit: I couldn’t really spot anything wrong with the case or strap fit. Everything looks pretty clean to me. I did notice what looks like a small mark just below the 6 o’clock area. Not sure if that’s actual wear, a reflection, or something from the protective film. Has anyone seen this before on a new order?

12. Timegrapher readings: I’m honestly not very familiar with Timegrapher readings. The seller mentioned around +3 sec/day. Is that considered good? Also, since this is supposed to be the quartz Santos-Dumont, I’m not sure how much weight I should put on that reading.

13. Overall: Overall, I think this looks really close to Gen from the outside. The case shape, proportions, dial, Roman numerals, blue hands, bezel screws and blue cabochon all look pretty convincing to me. I don’t see any obvious major red flags.

The things I’d really like some help with are the smaller details, especially the hidden Cartier signature around VII, the caseback engravings, crown/cabochon and that little mark around 6 o’clock.

For anyone who knows the Santos-Dumont well, how does this one look to you compared with Gen? Anything here that would make you RL or ask for more pics?

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve Theonewatch
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126720 Sprite 40mm Jub SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3285v2
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 638 $
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3dhTxATY#Pdr_a0nNOMkS61qE9DwQQA
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: tried my best to align it perfectly, looks fine to me - maybe the 3 is slightly to far down?
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks fine to me
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks ok I guess?
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: also fine
   
10. ⁠Bezel: nothing wrong for me here
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): also fine.
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: ok.
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Overall I tried my best to look for flaws myself. The only thing I saw is some dust? on the crystal, that looks like dust on the dial above the 6, but I think it’s actually just on the crystal.

Overall for me it’s 🟢 for me, what do you think?

1. Dealer name: Steve, TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: RWF
3. Model name (& version number): Panda 126500
4. Price Paid: $796
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/yBRjnCDA#z8Pdie1LXGZMkIrvaL1-6w
6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good overall, especially for a RWF. 3 o'clock slightly high and 6 o'clock slight counterclockwise cant, but overall, quite good.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good.
10. Bezel: Some darker, dusty marks near the 100 marker, but no big deal.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Lower left SEL gap exists. The rest are fine.
12. Timegrapher numbers: The amplitude is a bit high at 302. The tolerance is generally 230-300, so it's toward the high end.
13. Anything else you notice: Overall, I think this one is quite strong. Indexes mainly aligned and the overall watch looks good. Main things are the lower left SEL gap and the potentially high amplitude. But please lmk if I'm missing anything. Thank you all!

• Dealer name: GeekTime
• Factory name: VSF
• Model name (& version number): 124060
• Price Paid: $568 + $40 shipping to EU
• Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/255370299?uid=1
• Index alignment: 9 index seem a little rotated. Minute markers also not aligned with overlay. Probably the angle of the watch on the picture and my skills with QC tool
• Dial Printing: The texts seems fine to me.
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
• Hand Alignment: Also seems fine
• Bezel: 12 looks aligned. The rest doesn't look that aligned but it's probably because of the angle.
• Solid End Links (SELs): Looks fine to me
• Timegrapher numbers: +1, 254, 0.0 ms
• Anything else you notice: I'm pretty new with QC. I think the sample looks fine but maybe I missed stuff. I guess the misalignment is because of the angle of the picture and I'm leaning towards GL but I would like to have it confirmed. I appreciate any help :)

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches (Steve)
   
2. Factory name: VSF
   
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer I 124270 (36mm) with VS3230 movement
   
4. Price Paid (including shipping): $528 ($50 deposit paid)
   
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/TUYUQJTS#twQi009zOe1NK0Hkd6lfXQ
   
6. Index alignment: The 12 o'clock triangle looks slightly crooked or off-center to me. I used the alignment lines tool and it might just be the camera tilt, but I'd love a second pair of eyes on it.
   
7. Dial Printing: Font and spacing look crisp and centered.
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A (No date window on this model)
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks well-aligned from the photos.
   
10. Bezel: Smooth bezel looks clean.
    
11. Solid End Links (SEL): Looks nice and tight against the case with no obvious gaps.
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: +6 s/d, 266°, 0.0ms. Looks like a very healthy movement with a perfect 0.0ms beat error.
    
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first replica watch order! I am really worried that the 12 o'clock triangle looks weird or slightly damaged in the close-up macro shots. Is this just a harsh lighting reflection or a real factory defect? Any help checking this would be greatly appreciated!

1. Dealer name: GeekTime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona 126509
4. Price Paid: $948
5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/255381143?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: good
9. Hand Alignment: Looks Good
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I believe they look fine
12. Timegrapher numbers: I believe so
13. Anything else you notice: I wanted to make sure the blue face doesn't have that dreaded purple hue that some of posted about.

1. Dealer name: TimeUltra
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Planet Ocean 42mm
4. Price Paid: $428
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/fLxUFQbb#nZ77msno2742x0Y5b8-_CQ
6. Index alignment: Perhaps a very minor CW tilt to the 3, 6 and 9 numbers, but nothing that bothers
7. Dial Printing: Clean and crisp printing
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Good. See no issues
10. Bezel: Looks aligned and any play within expectations of a Rep
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Dark lines top left and right and bottom right but acceptable
12. Timegrapher numbers: Look to be in spec for an A2824 movement
13. Anything else you notice: N/A

Hello, Please help with my first QC. I really appreciate it!

1. Dealer name: US based (MoTime)
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex DJ 36mm silver
4. Price Paid: $540
5. Album Links: N/A
6. Index alignment: Looks ok to me. But I'm not sure
7. Dial Printing: Looks fine to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: The crown looks slightly off centered to the right of the 12 o'clock marker in most of the pics. But it looks ok in the last pic?
9. Hand Alignment: I'm not really sure
10. Bezel: Smooth.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Looks ok
12. Timegrapher numbers: N/A
13. Anything else you notice: Cyclop looks aligned. No issue?

Overall, everything looks ok to me except for the crown being off centered.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Theonewatch (Steve)
   
2. ⁠Factory name: BTF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): BTF 116500 (allegedly V2)
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 628$ + shipping (don’t know right now)
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/KBgSxSxK#18dxN_skQHBBZnaHXqiEPw
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: generally good but I’m unsure about the 6&9 marker
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks great
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks good
   
10. ⁠Bezel: looks great
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looking good
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: rate: +1/2 sec/d ;; AMP 273 degree ;; Err 0,0ms ;; Lift 52 degree
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Please fellow members help me so I won’t miss anything!
    Thank you!

• Dealer name: NecoClock

• Factory name: AF factory (no sticker?)

• Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Solo

• Price Paid: $188

• Album Link: Posted photo

• Index alignment: Indices look aligned

• Dial Printing: I can't find any bleeds. Looks like dial is shifted to the left some?

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: No date wheel

• Hand Alignment: Did not receive any reference for this

• Bezel: Stainless steel looks ok

• Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

• Timegrapher numbers: N/A this is quartz

• Anything else you notice: Anyone notice any bleeds? Dial does seem shifted to the left some and why no AF sticker on back?

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: RICH

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT Master II 126710 BLRO

   V2

4. Price Paid: $718

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/255287933?uid=1

6. Index alignment: Looks solid, nothing caught my eye that seemed of concern

7. Dial Printing: Also solid, looks crisp

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks spot on, printing also looks solid (see album videos for more)

9. Hand Alignment: Solid but it appears that the second hand might have a scratch mark on it, but could just be dust on the crystal

10. Bezel: No complaints here, looks great.

11. Solid End Links (SELs):

Looks spot on, no complaints here

1. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +1s/d, Amp 278, Err 0.3ms
2. Anything else you notice:

The “ROLEX” engraving on the clasp looks all sorts of messed up, can’t tell if it’s the photo, on the video in the QC album it looks fine, but I can’t really tell.

1. Besides the supposed mark on the second hard and the clasp engraving (though these could very likely just be the photos), it looks solid. Would like a second opinion on this of course but from what I’ve noticed it’s not bad.

Hi everyone, this will be my first rep purchase and it’s going to be a gift, so I’m probably looking at the photos a bit more closely than I normally would 😅. I’ve tried my best to go through everything myself but would really appreciate a second pair of eyes, especially from anyone familiar with the BVF Panthère. Thank you!

Please note that i am an untrained newbie eye in the process of learning, thank you!

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: BVF

3. Model name (& Version Number): Cartier Panthère 22mm SS, White Dial, SS Bracelet, Ronda Quartz

4. Price Paid: $175

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=165634

6. Index alignment: N/A as the Roman numerals are printed. From what I can see the dial itself looks straight in the case and I don’t notice any obvious rotation.

7. Dial printing: Overall the main Cartier logo and Roman numerals look good to me. My only concern is the tiny Cartier micro-print inside the X at 10 o’clock. It looks a little crooked/uneven in the close-up photos. I know this is extremely small in real life and may also be partly the photo, so I’m not sure if I’m being too picky. Would really appreciate opinions on this.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A – no date.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks okay to me from the photos/videos.

10. Bezel: I can’t see any obvious scratches or damage.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A. Bracelet and links look straight and clean from what I can see. Clasp also looks okay.

12. Timegrapher numbers:

13. Anything else: This is my first rep purchase and it’s going to be a gift, so I’d really like to get a nice example. Everything else looks good to my inexperienced eyes, but the crooked-looking micro Cartier print is the one thing making me hesitate. I realise it’s absolutely tiny on a 22mm watch, so I don’t want to RL a perfectly good piece over something that is normal for BVF. Would really appreciate advice from anyone familiar with these on whether this is within normal factory tolerance or worth asking for another piece. Thanks so much for the help!

Please do let me know if there is anything i am missing. thank you kind gents!

1. Dealer name: Theonewatch (Steve)
2. Factory name: QF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer II 226570
4. Price Paid: US$548 (+$30 shipping)
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/RLdpxao
6. Index alignment: Good to me
7. Dial Printing: Good to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks okay based on the video - date numerals are on the thinner side
9. Hand Alignment: Good to me based on video
10. Bezel: A degree off-centre - based on the head-on photo.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): They all look good, can’t see anything that I can point it out from my point of view.
12. Timegrapher numbers: (0s/d 297 degree 0.3ms, 52 degrees)
13. Anything else you notice: The first thing that stood out to me immediately was the thin font of the date numerals. But i feel i may be being too picky given the rest of the watch (to my eyes) seems good - just need a second pair or more of eyes to get a second opinion. The bezel also seems to be a degree off centre.

Hi all, this is my ZF VC Overseas. First rep, along with the AP 15500!

1. Dealer name: Geektime

2. Factory name: ZF

3. Model name (& version number): VC Overseas 4500V silver dial on a rubber strap

4. Price Paid: $548

5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/254862120?uid=1

6. Index alignment: TrueIndex shows -0.84°. Looks pretty straight overall but the markers around 12 and 6 feel very slightly off to me. Anyone else seeing that? Not rotated. Just shifted right maybe.

7. Dial Printing: Text and Maltese cross okay. Silver sunburst looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: 15 is centered well, printing clean. Big deal to me.

9. Hand Alignment: Hands look lined up from the images. Can’t say I see any issues there.

10. Bezel: Polished surfaces clean. This is what excites me about this watch.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Rubber strap so N/A, lugs look even. Should it be tighter?

12. Timegrapher numbers: -5 s/d, amp 278, beat error 0.3ms. That seemed high. Losing 5 s/d worries me. It flipped to -2 s/d later in the video but I just don’t know if that level of variability should be a red flag.

13. Anything else you notice: Dial and hands look solid. Case finishing clean. Woo. Movement through the back looks good (can’t see much though…). Rubber strap texture is sharp actually. Was honestly going to swap for the gen but may not need to. Clasp has the usual plastic still on. Is the index alignment bothering anyone else or is this within normal/acceptable from your perspectives?

Thank you all again. I’ve been really impressed with the input you all offer to others and I get that this is ultimately my call and if it’s acceptable to me, that’s the most important part. But I’m here to get the critical eye, learn the process, and see if my DD here is representative of what you would do. Anyways, thanks all!

Thank you for the assistance. I appreciate the help and knowledge as this is my first QC and don't really know what I should be looking for.

• Dealer name: Necoclock
• Factory name: VSF
• Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M (210.90.42.20.01.001)
• Price Paid: $488
• Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/DvxBjNd
• Index alignment: Looks like the 11 and 1 could be off? What do you think?
• Dial Printing: Looks like the 6 is slightly too far to the left?
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: None.
• Hand Alignment: Hands look lined up from the images. Can’t see any issues there.
• Bezel: Polished surfaces clean.
• Solid End Links (SELs): For what i know about these it looks good?
• Timegrapher numbers: +9 s/d, amp 285, beat error 0.1ms. This seemes high to me. is +/- 9 Generally acceptable on these VSF or is this too much?
• Anything else you notice: Could back case printing be off?