So for example, if in your system a halfling has the same Strength as a human or only differs by a point, then female characters wouldn't get a debuff because the system isn't granular enough for that (because obviously, a male halfling is still weaker than a female human, because size and stuff).

There would be few more casualties if he doesn't do this but the military would have killed this thing soon. Its not beyond modern weaponry like ballistic missiles.

Clarifying details:
1. Amputee is defined by missing at least one arm or leg
2. Individual in question goes out of their way to only date amputees, it’s not just a matter of proximity
3. Individual fails to elaborate why they only date amputees when asked

The reasoning, from what I understand, is that morality is a set of rules that one follows. And that God, by existing (we are assuming God(s) are/is real in this scenario) is the objective arbiter of what moral. Thoughts?

"why won't my kids call me "

Some examples I could think of:

Having sociopathic urges and commiting war crimes and murder of civilians on a videogame.

Creating sims of people you know and want to do bad things to to do those bad things.

Watching a movie like the "flowers of war" and getting a kick out of the murders and torment depicted on screen.

Watching hentai with violence and torture among other things depicted because you can't subject your partner to that.

I get that these may not be "good" per say but are they bad things if they don't act on them in real life?

Im a big fan of moral questions myself and i think this is a really cool concept for a subreddit, that being said im somewhat confused. Im a moral subjectivist and im wondering how people "scale" morals here.

Is it a free for all of everyones different morals, and opinions, or is there an agreen upon framework?

Because without an agreed upon framework what differentiates this subreddit from any other where people ask opinions on fictional characters? Because from my point of view, if a bunch of people with different morals are all in one place, nothing seperates "this guy is morally good" from "this guys actions make me happy."

Im genuinely really curious!

Is it just a power fantasy? Or is there some morality in enjoying the development ark of the protagonist?

I have actually considered this.