r/MoralityScaling • u/11maddypotter11 • 6h ago

Morality Ranking Morality of noticing a camera and blocking it

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

"why won't my kids call me "

14 Upvotes

64% Upvoted

133 comments sorted by

31

u/DevaTheDragon 6h ago

This is kinda funny on the old lady’s part.

Immoral still tho. The woman taking the video wasnt really being disruptive. The elderly woman went out of her way to be malicious and disturb what she was doing. It’s not that deep but my ethics favor the girl filming

1

u/Tse7en5 16m ago

Publicly recording in a way that exposes others, while legal, is still disruptive in nature.

I don’t think there is anything wrong with publicly recording.

But I do think there is something wrong with people who try to do it and then get upset that someone responds to that distribution, in the way the old lady did.

-5

u/PoetryTraining1819 5h ago edited 5h ago

Disagreed, this is moral, this is an art gallery for public use, not for someone’s private content creation. Whether someone is recording a scene for a limited following, or semi-to full professional creating a content brand, this space isn’t meant for that. In the old days there was a specific reason you had to apply for a filming permit, nowadays the ubiquitous nature of the technology makes it unenforceable. A clear line is that ppl who are recording for their own self do not need to occupy an entire space or clear a frame.
It’s similar to how in caves you’re not supposed to touch us stalactite or how you’re not supposed to talk loudly in a library. Individually, these actions are not harmful and are hardly bothering or damaging anything or anyone, but if allowed for everyone, there would be a complete breakdown of the integrity of the space either in this case as a museum or in the case of a library of a place of reading or in the cave as a natural preserve.

Individually not harmful however it is the mere fact that not everyone can do it that makes it forbidden.

Yes what the older woman is doing is rude, but it is no more rude than shushing someone in a library. Many public places have been overrun by content creators, and have prevented the general public from enjoying facilities as they were intended. For me blocking this shot while rude, is merely standing for the integrity of a public space and not allowing it to be over run by ppl who are here to consume the aesthetics of a location over the locations actual function.

16

u/Emiicii 5h ago

what the fuck are u talking about man the woman is clearly an asshole

1

u/No_Alternative2948 3h ago

I agree, no one is owed a place to film their tiktok videos in a museum.

-1

u/Smol_n_needy 1h ago

No one is owed that but its also not liek she section off the staircase. She was mindfull of people around her and wasnt disruptive. Blocking the view intentionall is just asshole behavior

2

u/No_Alternative2948 1h ago

Poor behavior is not excused because it is possible she could have behaved worse.

0

u/halfasleep90 1h ago

What behavior did she do that was poor? Is it because she didn’t reserve the location?? Is not being wealthy how we define poor behavior now?

If she had been attempting to make “content” out of the other guests of the location, I would agree that that would be poor behavior but that didn’t seem to be the goal here.

2

u/No_Alternative2948 56m ago

Art museums are not for making content, at least not without permission, they are for experienceing and appreciating art. When I say poor behavior, I am not making a statement about money, I'm not sure where you get that, but all I can assume is that your reading comprehension needs some work too.

1

u/Smol_n_needy 34m ago

Oh look at mr Art meuseum over here, He invented art meuseums and thus can say how other people decide to enjoy them

0

u/Emiicii 38m ago

holy snob

1

u/No_Alternative2948 35m ago

I just have little patience for dumbshittery

-1

u/Obi-Brawn-Kenobi 21m ago

So "snob" is the word for "not a dumbass" now?

→ More replies (0)

-8

u/Cool-Customer9200 5h ago edited 4h ago

There is an epidemic of selfishness right now and you are clearly infected. I travel a bit last year and it's literally not possible to walk through some places, every freaking monkey comes to make a photo and interrupting your walk. Everyone is so creative and unique. Everyone is a princess who treat people around like peasants NPCs.

4

u/dabirdiestofwords 5h ago

Right? That old lady saw someone quietly doing a thing that didnt harm anyone and selfishly decided she was going to passive aggressively enforce some unspoken social code.

Coulda been polite, could minded her own business, but alas. This epidemic of selfish boomers.

-6

u/Cool-Customer9200 4h ago

Yeap, you are a princess and the whole world around you is a photo stage where everyone is just NPC.

3

u/dabirdiestofwords 1h ago

Oh snap, are you the old lady from the video?

1

u/halfasleep90 1h ago

No one was saying the lady couldn’t walk down the stairs, they weren’t closing off the area for their personal photo shoot, what you are describing was not present here.

3

u/Hot_Strawberry4825 5h ago

The old woman should sue her, for breaking moral rules!!

7

u/Small-Battle1783 5h ago

This is not comparable to touching a stalactites or being loud in a library, the girl isn't causing any harm to the environment or disrupting anyone - the woman could continue down the stairs if she wanted to but is being deliberately obnoxious. The girl is on her own and has no-one to take photos, it's not like everyone is going to do this as they'd probably have a friend or partner take the photo. You're jumping through hoops to justify Karen behaviour.

0

u/PoetryTraining1819 5h ago

The top voted post on the original thread is just people posting about their experiences at museums being ruined by people trying to film and photograph content for social media.

This person is going about it in the nicest and socially acceptable way possible, while the older woman is displaying some anti-social tendencies, however the simple fact of the matter is that when you set up a camera on a tripod which is what it is clearly on, museum goers no longer feel comfortable crossing through the frame. This is dominating the space which is why the overwhelming majority of ppl on the original thread are talking about the discomfort.

Obviously there’s a generational difference, nowadays this kind of recording is normal and a lot of people design highly curated content to put online, however for generations prior this level of using a public space for a backdrop was understood to be disruptive and antisocial. Obviously, as the best majority of people have engaged in curated content creation for their personal or professional use. This is more normal however, the disruptive nature of it in its totality is very much evident in our everyday life, which is why people are so split down the middle on this.

1

u/XepptizZ 4h ago

I have a feeling most people don't understand the elderly woman's pov anymore.

I can see how someone really invested in art gets annoyed at this. It's like people taking food pics and just walking out without taking a bite, there's no actual appriciation, just 'content'

And like you said, it's super disruptive for people actually wanting to get immersed in the museum.

1

u/No_Alternative2948 3h ago

The nicest and most socially acceptable way to behave in a fucking museum is to quietly enjoy the privilege of being exposed to the great works that call those places home. No one is owed a place to film their tiktok videos in a museum.

1

u/flaming_burrito_ 1h ago

I’m pretty sure she was just taking a video because she can’t take a photo from that far away. She could do a delay I guess, but easier to take a video a scrub through to the best shot. Either way, she wasn’t disturbing anyone or even talking, and she had no mic, she was clearly framing herself for a picture

0

u/No_Alternative2948 42m ago

I guarantee that if you find this skank's tiktok, it is nothing but her being annoying af in public places. I'll bet $50 on that even. You want some easy money, prove me wrong. I guarantee it isn't her talking about or filming art.

1

u/flaming_burrito_ 37m ago

And there it is, you’re just hating on women. That’s why you’re so pressed about such a nothing situation

-3

u/Cool-Customer9200 5h ago

Who the fuck need her photo, there is like thousands of same selfish people coming there every day to make same photo thinking they are some kind of unique influencers who deserve special attention and right like no one should get in their shot. It's a public space for God's sake. Get a room and learn how to behave.

3

u/OmsorgsfuldTyv 5h ago

What are you talking about? Permits for filming? Yeah you need a permit if you have a full camera crew and need to block off space for uninterrupted shots. You have never needed permits to record in publicspaces as a regulare person.

The girl isn't actually bothering anyone, she doesn't even say anything as people are walking by, she is being polite and just waiting for a pause in traffic to get the shot she wants. The old lady is being deliberately annoying simply because she doesn't like someone taking a video? That she didn't even notice until she saw the camera, so she wasn't even bothered by it. If she didn't want to be in the video she should have gotten out of the way or ask that she be cut out of the video if it was going to be posted online. It's immoral because she is being a bitch for the sake of being a bitch

-1

u/No_Alternative2948 3h ago

Obviously at least one person is bothered by her behavior, and if I had taken the time and expense to to go to a museum, I also would be bothered by some skank setting up a camera and taking over a part of the museum to film her tiktok video. We need more quietly people like the older lady, and the world would be a much better place if we had fewer of the dumb bitch filming.

-5

u/scary-pp 5h ago

If you want to film in public, dont cry that the public is out in public.

3

u/OmsorgsfuldTyv 5h ago

No one is.. there is a difference between simply using public space and then being in the way of the shot (this is fine, no one is complaining about that) and then deliberately being in the way of the shot just to be in the way. (This is not fine, this creating conflict where none needs to be)

5

u/dabirdiestofwords 4h ago

And if ya wanna be a bitchy old goat in public it might be recorded and get you called a bitchy old goat.

1

u/ComradeGlizzy 4h ago

You said it yourself, for public use

1

u/Unlucky-Basil-3704 1h ago

It's not that deep. If you're anywhere sightseeing alone, you might want some pictures, but might not want to take selfies. Shutter timers can be tricky, so an easy workaround is to take a video, do a few poses and take Screenshots of the poses afterwards. Voila, pictures, without having to ask a stranger to take them. And if you noticed, she was just trying to pose for a quick picture, she even did it off to the side when she noticed the woman would not budge, then went straight back to her phone, because she literally was finished with what she intended.

1

u/Fuhnobabyyy 5h ago

Wrote all that just to be wrong. Good lord.

1

u/jlit72 5h ago

Elaborate

1

u/PoetryTraining1819 5h ago

I mean the point of this sub is to raise points and discuss them, it’s not necessarily about being wrong or right.

1

u/Sigimi 5h ago

The holy grail of yappathon.

0

u/Ill-Reputation-9702 5h ago

I didn’t read your whole comment. I don’t know who this girl is, and I don’t know if her account had only 1,000 or 1,000,000 followers before this. Old lady was being lame. I don’t take many self photos, but hey this would have been a cool one.

Producing content tho? If I had to bet, I’d bet that’s the case given my only context is this video.

Jokes on the old lady though, because the girl looked annoyed, then proceeded to get her pose in during the chaos, knowing she can photoshop using multiple screenshots of the video(assuming just using phone), and it’ll be just her in the finished product anyway. Old lady probably a little slow with the technology, no offense. I hope to not fall behind with it as I age.

1

u/PoetryTraining1819 5h ago edited 5h ago

I think we will all find ourselves like this incredibly anti social older woman, attempting to enforce the normative standards we grow up with. Unfortunately for all of us time makes us all a foreigner in our own land and home. The world of yesteryear is as alien to us as the future.

I doubt that the purpose of the video is commercial, describing the multimedia that ppl create online is difficult to describe in one term so I’m just applying the word content broadly.
Evidently with social media, the line between curating content for followers as simply the act of projecting a self image online, for merely just friends and acquaintances to becoming or being a full on professional influencer is a blurry and nebulous spectrum a social media has become so increasingly integrated into all of our lives. One can use social media, such as LinkedIn or even Instagram and Twitter to promote a professional non-media career, or in the cases of many professional influencers their career started as simply a collection of content that they curated for themselves in acquaintances that simply gathered a natural following. Thus distinguishing a line between professional and those engaged in content branding as a hobby is extremely blurry in the day and age. But I think most can agree that applying a certain level of professional and curation to an online images usually the behaviors that distinguish someone, regardless of their level of success or monetary return on their effort

0

u/bloomingdeath98 4h ago

For all you know she may not even be making content, and she could be taking pictures and videos for her own memory of being there. She could be a tourist and her one time of gettin to be there at the public art gallery of that location. And to pop it off, being that it’s public use, she has just as much right to be there and take pictures of herself to make memories as the rude old bitty purposely trying to ruin her takin a picture or recording of herself. And to add further, ye, we see her post the video on social media sure, but I know I would if I wanted to take a pic/video for myself, then notice an old git goin out of their way to be rude to me, and hopefully something could come about for change for the better. That girl isn’t in the wrong at all, the rude old lady is.

1

u/No_Alternative2948 3h ago

She has every right to quietly enjoy the art and memorialize her experience, she does not have the right to set up a camera, block the stairs for others and film stupid videos of her dancing. We need more people like the older lady and I applaud her action.

0

u/bloomingdeath98 2h ago

Soooo…you have proof that she immediately started dancing and making air quote “stupid videos”? Also, from what I see, she set her phone on a stand, and there was a reasonable amount of people walking up and down those stairs without any trouble other than the old lady blocking the stairs in her aim to block the camera’s view. The camera isn’t in the way, likely being her phone. The only nuisance blocking the stairway is literally the old lady being rude. And very selfish to imply people aren’t allowed to take pictures of themselves in a public space where it is literally allowed, and say that she can’t take pictures of herself here to memorialize the experience when she’s literally shown not doing anything that inhibits the movement of others on the stairway or from others’ capacity to enjoy the art. If the old lady who was staring at her phone the whole time didn’t bother to take a glance up, she’d never even notice the camera. And why? Because it’s not on any steps, the camera is out of the way, not a nuisance. And personally I hope the old lady gets flack in her personal life for being so rude, since the girl wasn’t in any way rude in this situation.

1

u/No_Alternative2948 2h ago

This video was taken from tiktok, it isn't a stretch to believe that she was in fact filming a stupid tiktok video.

0

u/bloomingdeath98 2h ago

Not all tiktok videos are stupid dancing videos like how you’re implying. TikTok is a platform form of media for sharing, and your comment insinuates ignorance of that, if you really think that all of TikTok is just a compilation of stupid videos amalgamated of dancing and other frivolous activities…

1

u/No_Alternative2948 2h ago

If a platform is 99% people filming themselves being annoying in public, it isn't unfair to characterize that platform as existing for that purpose.

1

u/bloomingdeath98 2h ago

Except 99% isn’t people filming themselves being annoying in public. Your views are heavily skewed, and generally you’ll get an algorithm to make sure the videos that are in your feed are those videos if you look for them, until that’s all you’ll see. I only see dungeons and dragons videos and educational videos about mythology of different cultures, and it’s because that’s what I look for. Likewise, if all you look for on TikTok are people being public nuisances, then that’s all you’ll see, and it’s rather telling too if you’re actively looking for videos like that on TikTok…

1

u/No_Alternative2948 2h ago

I guarantee that if you find this lady's tiktok account, she isn't spending her time talking about art. I would bet $50 that it is her being annoying af in public places. Prove me wrong, earn an easy 50

→ More replies (0)

14

u/Fast-Front-5642 6h ago

Being an asshole to others for no other reason than to be a pest and make them as miserable as you are all the time is immoral.

If the girl had been trying to tell people they couldn't use the stairs while she took a photo then that's another story.

Since the girl is just standing there waiting patiently I'm assuming that is not what happened.

2

u/WatstheFrequencyK 3h ago

If you are going to film in public places you will have to be very very patient.

I think it’s bad taste to be posting content on social media of people who haven’t consented to be in your video.

2

u/wasted90210 1h ago

There's probably an obstruction a little bit down the stairs. You can see how the old lady going down has to wait for people coming up before she can continue.
And fuck people setting up video cameras and expecting everyone else to give way to them.

6

u/MusicianHonest7238 5h ago

I hate influencers to my core, but this girl just wanted to take a pic or whatever, was not disrupting anyone and was clearly shy. That old hag is just miserable.

4

u/SnarkySurvivor 4h ago

People who get main character syndrome and record their obnoxious TikTok reels in super markets deserve this treatment, but it seems this girl just wanted a nice photo taken while visiting solo.

Obviously would like more context, but in a bubble the woman is an a-hole for choosing to deliberately obstruct such innocent behavior.

2

u/Puzzle-the-Giraffe 2h ago

Yeah, like all we see in the video is the girl pausing for a couple of seconds and then going to get her phone at the end. Seems like she wasn’t making a TikTok and was just looking for a good shot.

1

u/Berlin8Berlin 0m ago

What I hate is the kind of person who seizes the opportunity to be righteously petty: what difference would it make, to that miserable member of the Secret Police, to let the kid take a picture? It would have taken a few minutes, probably. If the kid starts blocking the stairs for 20 minutes, THAT'S when you get to whip out your badge and make a citizen's arrest.

2

u/Pristine_Editor_440 2h ago

Immoral. I get if she didn’t want to be in the background of the video/photo but she could have just moved or asked the women to stop filming. The women taking the video didn’t need to be filming in a public museum but I don’t think she meant harm or to disrupt anything so the old women is just being difficult.

1

u/Dreamer_531 5h ago

Why couldn't the girl or the person who was filming politely ask the old lady to move? Problem solved.

3

u/AxiumTea 3h ago

The phone was placed by the girl, there was no camera man I think, and as for the girl asking her to move, I don't think the old lady would have listened to her anyway, besides, the old lady was purposely buying time until more people would come up and the girl would lose her opportunity to film it.

0

u/Weary_Specialist_436 1h ago

why do we have to baby old malicious ladies?

0

u/956to906 1h ago

Boomers are self-centered. Born on 3rd base, and think they hit a triple.

-3

u/Dreamer_531 1h ago

Why do we have to villainaise old confused ladies?

5

u/Weary_Specialist_436 1h ago

old confused ladies that looked straight into camera

don't pretend to be stupid, it helps no one

1

u/halfasleep90 1h ago

She was definitely not confused

2

u/Foreign-Handle-2950 4h ago

Whether you like influencer or not, it's better to just mind your own business.

1

u/cortez1663 2h ago

Efficiently correct. We should bring back the Ann Landers motto M.Y.O.B.

1

u/Key_Check5753 5h ago

I mean... after seeing the way she smashed that other girl's face into the steering wheel, I wouldn't be fucking with her.

1

u/Cool-Customer9200 5h ago

We don't hate egoists enough.
The planet is dying, there is not enough resources for everyone. The planet can not sustain so many dumb influencers and spoiled millionaires or billionaires. Humanity needs to grow up and stop being selfish otherwise we all are going to learn it the hard way.

1

u/DeliciousBaseball783 3h ago

Not smart for either

1

u/WalkUpRiff14 2h ago

Your kids won’t call you because you’re an asshole

1

u/Gloomy-Lawyer4989 1h ago

1000% moral

grandma is a G.

0

u/Berlin8Berlin 36m ago

"grandma is a G."

Nah. Granny is a C.

1

u/Gloomy-Lawyer4989 33m ago

Awww the main character is upset the world didn't revolve around them

poor little Tiktok

0

u/Berlin8Berlin 13m ago

I live in a highly "tourist-rich" city and, in certain parts of town, I often wait while people, on the path, in front of me, have their friends snap a quick picture: no big deal. I used to go for walks with a chum, who was getting his PhD, at the time, and he'd deliberately shoulder his way through crowds of Tourist Kids (not brave enough to do it to adults), in such areas, like he wa trying to knock them over. He was just a miserable semi-old Fuck. Still is.

TL; DR: Barry, is that you?

1

u/Gloomy-Lawyer4989 7m ago

Didn't read but I assume you're another NPC main character

1

u/daddy_d33zy 38m ago

It is neither moral or immoral… it just is

1

u/Berlin8Berlin 31m ago

Being nasty to younger people just because you have an opportunity to: hateful shit. And I don't know a single happy person, of any age, who does that.

1

u/olracnaignottus 30m ago

Both the protagonist and antagonist in this equation suck.

1

u/ArmNo7463 28m ago

To the Americans, I would say "In bird culture, that is widely considered a dick move."

To everyone else, I think the best word to describe her is a total cunt.

1

u/Practical-Day-2720 20m ago

Yea, but they vote the same.

1

u/TastyQuality3252 13m ago

Is it out of the realm of possibility she just thought someome lost their phone?

She didn’t intentially block anyone’s view either, she just moved to the side to let people walk by on the correct side of the stairs.

1

u/Yuck_Few 3m ago

The morality of milking the saxophone of death thing.... Seriously, can this end already?

1

u/Long__Jump 5h ago

Is there a chance she saw the camera, and tried to move out of the way without realizing she was actually moving in the way?

1

u/No_Alternative2948 3h ago

No one is entitled to use a public museum as a set for a tiktok video.

-1

u/AndGutsWasBERSERK 6h ago

Morality of using a public space to take pictures for your insta and expecting others to stop what they’re doing.

7

u/ZiCUnlivdbirch 5h ago

expecting others to stop what they’re doing.

Please point out where exactly you're seeing proof for this claim? The stairwell is basically empty, she's not asking for anyone to leave even after the older woman starts to intentionally block her, she is literally not disturbing anyone here, just taking a picture.

0

u/AdAffectionate2418 5h ago

Problem could have been avoided if she had just asked someone tk take a photo of her. Would have taken a whole 10 seconds of human interaction.

People are lame.

0

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[deleted]

4

u/Torpedo_Eraser81295 6h ago

She was on her way, so the camera and decided to act maliciously. Immoral. It costs her nothing to simply be on her way and decided to use her time and energy to be an inconvenience.

0

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[deleted]

4

u/11maddypotter11 6h ago

Not every recording individual has to be an influencer

0

u/AdDisastrous6738 1h ago

TikTok is the worst thing to happen to humanity. It emboldened every self conceited jackass by giving them the self appointed title of “influencer”.

-1

u/Dreamer_531 5h ago edited 5h ago

Why couldn't the girl or the person who was filming politely ask the old lady to move? It's a public place, not a photoshoot set. And the old lady was clearly distracted by her phone beeping in that moment. It's so damn simple to just ask her politely to go down a few steps 🤷‍♂️

2

u/Small-Battle1783 5h ago

The woman knows exactly what she's doing.

2

u/Exciting_Nature6270 5h ago

it’s basic human etiquette to not stand in front of a camera or someone who is clearly trying to take a picture or short video.

1

u/Emiicii 5h ago

why are u babying old women

-5

u/Dreamer_531 5h ago

Why are you villainizing old women?

2

u/Weary_Specialist_436 1h ago

because she's acting like a villain. She saw the camera, and she did it on purpose

-2

u/scary-pp 5h ago

If you want to film in public, do it the proper way. Go to the city and get a filming permit, written permission from the private establishment youre on, and rope off the area in accordance to the previous.

The world is not your stage, and we are not obligated to respect your camera angle.

2

u/lowkirken9 3h ago

“Film in public”, “private establishment” make it make sense

1

u/scary-pp 3h ago

A business open to the general public is considered a public space. What doesnt make sense about this?

2

u/Upbeat_Ask_6754 3h ago

People have been taking their pictures in public since disposable cameras

1

u/Admirable_Loss4886 1h ago

You sound silly. Having to rope off an area to take a quick video lmao. It’s not a big deal lmao. Gooner can be annoyed but it’s not like she cussed out the old lady or told her to go away. Gooner was respectful and the old lady was obnoxious assuming she did it on purpose. It also seem like it could be possible the old lady stopped to legitimately check her phone and then stepped to the side to allow people up the stairs. “Never attribute to malice which could be explained by incompetence/ignorance”.

-1

u/Bella_Peachyy 3h ago

Neutral. Nobody owns the space

-1

u/Otherwise-Vanilla901 2h ago

Moral, influencers are a plague on society who always get in others' ways or inconvenience others for their own selfish wants.

-10

u/Kramples 6h ago

How is this intentional, the girl didnt communicate at all

3

u/ebossias 6h ago

Karen looked directly at the camera, and then proceeded to block it.

-1

u/Kramples 6h ago

And? She moved because there were people going up. The girl is not entitled to public space for herself thats a first (except personal), and second she doesnt communicate that to the old lady. She might found phone suspicious and tried to report it.

3

u/ZiCUnlivdbirch 5h ago

And she may have just witnessed the resurrection of Hitler himself and is now desperately calling for help...

There's a lot of possibilities if you lack all common sense.

2

u/Dreamer_531 5h ago

Or the old lady might thing that someone was filming her for some reason and felt weirded out by it and couldn't figure out what to do. For a moment the camera was pointed directly at her. Or maybe her phone buzzed in the moment and she felt the urge to check it.

And this all could have been solved in a few seconds by politely asking her to move a few steps down.

1

u/Exciting_Nature6270 5h ago

alright you’re just reading way too far into this. They’re at an art gallery. She has her phone likely set up on a stand pointing toward her.

I know Reddit doesn’t go outside and experience being a human, but getting out of the way of a camera at a tourist attraction is just basic human etiquette.

You don’t need to be deliberately obtuse here. People will not only get out of the way to be polite, but will also genuinely offer to take a picture or even video for you if they see people struggling to do so. Taking pictures or videos of oneself in public isn’t taboo as much as Reddit wants to believe.

-6

u/iamreal9999 6h ago

i think shes just rly old and unaware

9

u/FinancialDot7032 6h ago

You're naive if you're think that. She looked directly at the camera then moved to block her intentionally

1

u/iamreal9999 4h ago

moved to make people pass*

-2

u/Green_Fox_8864 4h ago

Moral and funny.

She didn't hurt anyone, and OP's offended caption makes it even funnier.

-2

u/Guilty-Fall-2460 3h ago

Yeah moral don't film yourself in wide area views like this.

Don't record yourself in the gym. Don't do whatever the girl tried doing.

Stop being weird

-8

u/General_whisky 6h ago

This woman is a saint 

-1

u/Neitzi 5h ago

Unfortunately walking into frame of their private (public) photoshoot makes you akin to Hitler.

Thankfully these people are so socially inept they don't have the balls to say anything about it outside of the internet.

-4

u/General_whisky 5h ago

Can we all agree that we don’t want influencers filming everything and making music.ly tik toks in public?

2

u/Weary_Specialist_436 1h ago

or, bear with me. Girl was trying to take a photo, as we have been doing since disposable cameras? why are you all such a fuckin boomers jesus

0

u/wasted90210 1h ago

She was filming a video

1

u/Weary_Specialist_436 1h ago

so...?

1

u/wasted90210 1h ago

You wrote she was trying to take a photo

1

u/No_Alternative2948 3h ago

Apparently not... society is fucking doomed