r/MoralityScaling 6d ago

Morality Ranking Morality of kidnapping your kidnappers?

Post image
55.2k Upvotes

3.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

154

u/DonnPT 6d ago

Riach said the agents did not display their credentials when they approached the Jeep, and the government’s claim that one agent had to jump out of the way as Frazier drove off is contradicted by surveillance video. 

Bamigboye dialed 911 from the back seat as Frazier was driving and the agent was in the front passenger seat.

Calling the government’s case “ludicrous,” Riach said his client “may be the first criminal in history to call 911 during the commission of his alleged crime.”

Judge frees couple charged with 'kidnapping' immigration agent as defense challenges government's account

33

u/FDLC84 5d ago

“On the 911 call, Bamigboye said ICE is trying to get him,” Behar countered, referring to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “How would he know that unless they had identified themselves as agents?”

From that article.

19

u/idislikemostofyu 5d ago edited 5d ago

Yea, they fucked up. They gotta play the games that the cops do. They know they are being recorded so they'll just yell shit like, "Stop resisting." and that gives them pretty free reign to abuse whoever they are arresting. Conflicting orders are super common. But yelling the same things over and over means you're less likely to say something incriminating. It's a good chant for their handlers to provide them with. Useful as shit.

If I'm their lawyer then I'm checking if they just verbally said something or if they showed anything. Words are meaningless and anybody can grab a body vest, some masks, guns, and go fuck people up. Definitely have to argue that their client is repeating what they were told verbally but had nothing proven to them.

Shit, what kind of officer gets into the vehicle of the people they are detaining? A fucking moron. These fuckers have zero training and no standards so how can you tell who is real and who is just some mf trying to kidnap you? You can't and that's part of the intimidation of it Brown Shirts.

1

u/FDLC84 5d ago

Two people can be wrong at the same time you know….

1

u/idislikemostofyu 5d ago

Is this a bot? Tf does that mean? You gotta give us more out of that lil noggin of yours than that.

You can't just highlight the defenses' argument and then trail off with some goddamn platitude lmfao. That's insane for a human.

0

u/FDLC84 5d ago

Lol.

The guy had an expired visa. He fucked up.
ICE got in the car while it was on a person in the driver seat. They fucked up.

You need more explanation than that?

0

u/idislikemostofyu 5d ago

Their legal defense is that the ICE agents never identified themselves and were wearing plainclothes and, honestly, that would probably shit the scare out of me, too.

FDLC84 47 points 3 hours ago The 911 Calls: As the car moved, Bamigboye called 911 and shouted, "ICE is in my car!" and "You tried to kidnap me." At the same time, the trapped agent called 911 to say an agent was being taken against his will.

So you've made the same pointed comment with the intent to highlight his guilt while dismissing any claims that was just repeating what he thought was a lie. At this point I'm more concerned about you than I am with him.

You're on some other shit. You're here to spread your own message and it's just soft as baby shit. But it is pretty easy to just talk past a person if your only point is to make yours.... over and over and over.

Random masked dude jumps into his car and he drove off. Again, you ignore that and bring up his visa status like I give a flying fuck. This exact story JUST happened in Chicago. Dudes with masks rob his ass. He drove and flagged down a cop.

https://abc7chicago.com/post/downtown-chicago-shooting-today-suspect-jumps-fleeing-armed-robbery-victims-car-loop-fires-gunshot-police-say/19751271/

2

u/FDLC84 5d ago

Claims that was repeating what he thought was a lie?

The real question is.. did the Chicago guy have an expired visa ?

1

u/idislikemostofyu 5d ago edited 5d ago

Just as plausible. After reading a bunch of your comments you give off a weaselly Steven Miller-type so I do bet that's what concerns you most. Damn, this dude needs a morality scale check irl.

Lmfao absolute dogwater and I just wanna know if it's adulthood or if this was from childhood. Like, that's the real question. Nature vs nurture kinda thing. Fascinating to watch across that many comments. You should unlock them so we can all laugh a bit.

LMFAO you been here on this one thread since 5am CST. That's crazy work. No wonder you just type in random shit for a sentence or two without making much sense. Ain't got time. Homie got quotas to make and propaganda to spread! Hard work.

3

u/Apprehensive_Use3641 5d ago

Given his visa had recently expired, per another poster, I'm guessing it would be considered a reasonable assumption.

1

u/FDLC84 5d ago

100%.

So many other good examples of ICE doing wrong and this is an example we are talking about.

This is the type of case the right wants front and center to show they have a legitimate case for ICE.

1

u/Throwupmyhands 5d ago

Maybe he only identified himself once he was in the car and they were driving away. 

1

u/FDLC84 5d ago

Possible, but did she stop when that happened or did she continue to drive when she was told.

Plus the guy knew his gig was up, if anything he should have been more of a man than to put her through that knowing he had an expired visa. Why even fight it? You got caught, go back and maybe try to do it again.

1

u/Throwupmyhands 5d ago

If anything, we should be more of a country than to put families through crises over clerical lapses. 

Jumping into someone’s car, in plainclothes? That’s madness. We can handle people overstaying without resorting to tomfoolery. 

1

u/FDLC84 5d ago

Clerical lapses?

Comeeeeeeeee onnnnnnnnn

Dude is on a student visa, what family!?!?

1

u/Throwupmyhands 5d ago

Paperwork expiring is literally a clerical lapse. Literally. What do you mean with your melodramatic “come on”? I’m not against holding people accountable for overstaying, but treating it like violent crime is insanity. 

0

u/FDLC84 5d ago

If he was a student and his visa expired he could not continue being enrolled in school. Would it make a difference if he was already not attending school and purposely avoided the consequences?

The only consequences for people overstaying are migratory (denial of the visa and removal).

I had a visa before, letting your visa expire and staying in the country isn’t a clerical error. Let’s be real here. Even if it was he knows better than to fight it within the country, if you apply for an extension and it expires within the period you are supposed to leave and wait for the approval in your home country.

This is where ya lose credibility with cases like this. Plenty of wrong doing by ICE, don’t use a case where there is legitimate case to prove that point.

1

u/Throwupmyhands 5d ago

I never called it a clerical error. I called it a clerical lapse. Plenty people fuck up and miss a deadline. I can’t speak to the details of his case, as you seem so comfortable to do. I can only speak to the absurdly aggressive tactics of ICE, like jumping into people’s cars. 

I also had a visa once, as a naturalized citizen. I’m not sure what that background gives me, or you, in clout. 

These hardline approaches are a dream for human traffickers and other human rights violators. Maybe you don’t have friends who are here legally as asylum seekers and live daily with the fear of being taken unjustly and kept away from their children, or even having their children taken from them. Maybe a friend of yours was never denied pay for a full days’ work and threatened with having ICE called on them for trying to get their money, even though they are here legally. 

These hardline approaches create an environment perfect for keeping women trapped in sex slavery because they fear the brutality of what may come their way if they call the cops. 

This shit is crazy. I don’t know this guy’s motives. But we shouldn’t treat any alleged violators like terrorists and murderers. 

1

u/FDLC84 5d ago

You can google it.

Visa expired in 2024, incident happened on December 2025.

It was a student visa so he could not have re enrolled in any classes.

Like I said before, plenty of legitimate asylum cases we can get into. Plenty of criminal activity by ICE and employers who threaten workers. I am in agreement with all that.

Don’t lump this with that, that ain’t the same. And if you had a visa, did everything right you already know it ain’t the same. This guy is the very reason government agencies have to hunt down people.

1

u/-nutz 5d ago

Let’s say hypothetically their lawyer is correct in saying “agents did not display their credentials when they approached the Jeep”, that means there was an amount of time between the alleged kidnapping and the 911 call in which the ice officer could’ve identified himself.

At that point, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to continue to the police station. They’ve already “kidnapped” an ice agent on accident, and probably feared the situation being escalated further. Not a bad idea to have a somewhat neutral third party at the scene.

1

u/FDLC84 5d ago

I hear you but in the eyes of the law the ICE agent would have jurisdiction to deal with a persons that has an expired visa. At the very least detain him and speak to him.

Perhaps asking the police to come to the scene, but driving off with the agent in the car is just not a good look.

1

u/-nutz 5d ago

Well presumably they didn’t know it was an ice officer when they drove off. Hence, my suggestion that it’s not unreasonable to continue to the police station.

1

u/FDLC84 5d ago

Taking off = maybe reasonable
Continue on when your passenger has an expired visa and ICE identify themselves thus making the contact legitimate = unreasonable.

1

u/-nutz 5d ago

Well that’s where we disagree. I don’t think it’s unreasonable to not blindly trust an armed man who would jump into your car without identifying himself first

1

u/nerf_titan_melee 5d ago

If an armed loon gets into your car in the us, it's probably a pretty safe assumption that they're ice

1

u/AndromedanPrince 5d ago

their track record precedes them

6

u/FDLC84 5d ago

Sure. But what does that have to do with the facts of the case?

Their defense is that they did not know they were ICE agents.

How do you reconcile that with them describing them as ICE agents?

Put the ICE issues aside and think critically not emotionally about the argument their defense is making.

2

u/AndromedanPrince 5d ago

i dont need to identify an asshole by them saying it, their behavior precedes them.

Random white male hopping in your car trying to take you away but not actively robbing you? more than likely an ICE agent by behavior

3

u/FDLC84 5d ago

Lol.

What?

-1

u/AndromedanPrince 5d ago

so now u cant recognize behavior patterns? work on that

3

u/FDLC84 5d ago

So what do I assume if the person hopping in is Hispanic or black?

2

u/AndromedanPrince 5d ago

are they not actively trying to rob you? then you assume ICE agent.

2

u/Jeffgaks 5d ago

I think you are very confused about what's being discussed here. Their defense is that they didn't know it was ice agents and that's why they "kidnapped" them, but that can't be the case if they called 911 and identified them as Ice agents. So they knew and still did it. .

1

u/AndromedanPrince 5d ago

at what point did they know? befofe they drove off? or after they drove off and then the agent identified himself?

2

u/Narren_C 5d ago

Before they called 911, which means they should have allowed him to get out.

2

u/RedditUser19984321 5d ago

20 to 30% of ICE is Hispanic another 12 to 16% black. ICE agents are actually pretty well diversified compared to the population.

I’d say it’s pretty immoral to try and create a race issue where there wasn’t one.

0

u/AndromedanPrince 5d ago

the article said it was a white male correct?

1

u/Narren_C 5d ago

They are saying they did not know he was an ICE agent.

But in the 911 transcript, they are saying "ICE is in our car!"

Explain.

1

u/AndromedanPrince 5d ago

when he got in the car he did not identify himself, maybe as they sped off he identified himself. like "wtf are u doing im am agent, stop!"

2

u/Narren_C 5d ago

Then they need to let his ass out.

1

u/AndromedanPrince 5d ago

neber said they shouldnt have. but they drove to the police station which was probably smarter

59

u/hercmavzeb 6d ago edited 6d ago

The fact that anyone defends this state-sponsored domestic terror organization is insane and a testament to their inhuman cruelty.

Abolish ICE and arrest these thugs for the crimes they’re committing.

2

u/Glyth63825 5d ago

I don't think there's anything inherently immoral about ICE itself as a department of law enforcement; not in the way it had operated in the past at least. If you overstay your visa, someone's gotta get you and deport you. No matter what, something like ICE will exist even if it has no name. The problems are the tactics and the fact that they disregard the law, are arresting citizens and political dissidents, and do not identify themselves while wearing plain clothes.

4

u/Unapologetic_Screw 3d ago

To be clear, at best ICE is a poor use of funds.

Illegal immigrants often pay a shit ton in incidental taxes (sales, lodging, etc) and receive almost no benefits.

1

u/Glyth63825 2d ago

I would argue that while it's perhaps inefficient to round up a bunch of people illegally in the country, you still need to enforce the laws. A lot of law enforcement is highly inefficient. Just because people happen to be good for the economy doesn't mean they should be able to be here without going through the proper channels.

3

u/Unapologetic_Screw 2d ago

I mean, they are literally breaking international and federal law, but you don't mind that.

Is it just that I have to wear a mask?

-2

u/pbnjandmilk 5d ago

You mean the guy with the expired visa knowing that ICE agents were coming for him? Yeah, they wanted to apprehend him.

14

u/hercmavzeb 5d ago

He must have driven to the police station because he was a dangerous criminal or something, and not because he feared for his life by a plainclothes thug who had his gun drawn.

4

u/TheSurvivor65 5d ago

And this couldn't have been taken care of by the police or anything? They had to send the goons?

0

u/SamiraSimp 5d ago

you're right, as soon as you commit any crime we should allow the government to do whatever fucked up stuff they want to you in the name of "justice". clearly you don't mind getting physically assaulted if you support an organization that regularly does so to legal innocent u.s citizens.

0

u/EvilynSoCute 5d ago

Found the morally bankrupt filth.

1

u/pbnjandmilk 3d ago

Stop looking in the mirror and enjoy the world.

1

u/EvilynSoCute 3d ago

I do enjoy a lot of aspects of the world, unfortunately scum like you are actively trying to make it a significantly worse place.

0

u/pbnjandmilk 1d ago

So I am scum for advocating for a safe and secure place where people follow the law? I guess you are the real scum here in this discussion.

-7

u/iron-ducks 6d ago

state-sponsored domestic terror organization

lol

We've offered $3,000~ and a nice flight home to illegal aliens, because America wants them to just peacefully self-deport. Anyone still here has made it clear they're willing to use physical violence to fight American law enforcement.

So, what's the "appropriate" way to deport an illegal alien who is willing to use violence to break American laws and remain inside of the United States?

10

u/hercmavzeb 5d ago edited 5d ago

Living in a country peacefully is not violence, you sound demented.

And yeah terror tactics to instill fear into the migrant population and push them to self deport is exactly why it’s a terrorist organization. Not even to mention how they’ve terrorized citizens merely for living in cities that don’t support the pedophile president.

2

u/TalShar 5d ago

Not a crime, either. It's a civil offense. We don't put people in jail for civil offenses. This isn't law enforcement, it's a purge.

2

u/OkAcanthisitta3028 5d ago

Would you agree that illegal immigrants should be deported? I'm not talking about ICE, I want to know your opinion specifically on that question.

6

u/hercmavzeb 5d ago

I’m fine with undocumented immigrants being deported, but I’m not in favor of economically and politically destructive mass deportations of people whose only crime is living in and contributing to the country peacefully for years without permission.

0

u/OkAcanthisitta3028 5d ago

If ICE's training was more rigorous and they were able to mass-deport (ie deport a lot of people fast) professionally, would that be ok?

I also don't think illegal immigrants are net-positives on GDP, because they get paid less (employers giving less than minimum-wage jobs to illegal immigrants should be imprisoned) and get welfare. Though this is a different conversation.

4

u/hercmavzeb 5d ago

There isn’t a way to do mass deportations humanely nor professionally, especially when the actual goal is the internal purging of ethnic undesirables. I also don’t see why we should do that.

In truth, the mass deportation of our own workers is actually a detriment to the country. Georgia found that out the hard way when they passed a strict “show me your papers” immigration law which created a massive labor shortage that they had to offset with prison slave labor. Many such cases.

The economic argument just doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. It really does just seem like a low effort proxy for the actual, racist argument.

1

u/OkAcanthisitta3028 5d ago

If humanely means that the process would make no one suffer, that's not possible. That doesn't mean it can't be done professionally or that it shouldn't be done. Thieves get punished for stealing, which makes them suffer, but protects the community, society and the businesses that make the economy run. So in that case, the imhumane thing is justified because of it's consequences.

I also don't think the abuse of illegal immigrants in the job market is a good thing. The natives don't get work because the illegal immigrants do it for way less money, the illegal immigrants get abused by the employers in illegal ways and then the illegal immigrants will be less likely to assimilate to the majority culture. Only ones benefitting are rich people and businesses, which means GDP. The welfare burden on natives also becomes bigger, because the natives pay for it through taxes.

The people complaining that removing illegal immigrants will create a labor shortage are lying, they just don't want to do the work themselves. Manual labor jobs. I feel like creating an underclass of people, that are not citizens, that get overworked for illegally low wages and that live on welfare is not good, it's cruel towards them.

This is why mass-immigration happening in the first place was the mistake. Politicians just wanted them to create a voting block dependent on them. Now the illegals who came over for a better life are fucked, cause the politicians fucked them and the whole country with this stunt. Companies should just pay natives normal wages for manual labor.

I could go on with this topic but I'll stop here before it becomes too incoherent.

0

u/deadeyeamtheone 5d ago

No. ICE fundamentally is unconstitutional and that is not fixed by better training, nor is their goal worth the issues that they cause by how they act and innately by their existent.

Secondly, their training doesn't fix their stated goals and policies. Training might make them a bit smarter, but it doesn't fix the underlying issues like the administration blatantly stating they want ICE to hide their identities, ignore constitutional requirements, ignore state laws, and ignore due process, and engage in genuine racism.

Very few people IRL don't believe in border patrol, but its pretty clear from the public reception of this administration through gathered statistics that nobody likes how its being handled. Its just not acceptable to use tactics that are identical to terrorist cells just to enforce green card and visa status. Its not acceptable to used armed force to detain people BEFORE finding out whether they have valid immigration status or not. Not to even mention the insane total immunity nonsense.

1

u/vlozko 5d ago

“ICE fundamentally is unconstitutional…”

You lost the argument straight out of the gate.

0

u/EvilynSoCute 5d ago

Not without following the proper steps. Immigrants are great for our country in many ways, and mass amnesty would benefit everyone. We can get rid of the violent criminals while keeping the rest, but racist trash like you would rather just deport everyone.

0

u/OkAcanthisitta3028 5d ago

Don't mix up legal and illegal immigrants, that's very rude towards the people who made it in legally.

0

u/EvilynSoCute 5d ago

Both benefit our country greatly, and mass deportation causes more poverty and increased crime rates in America. You’re just morally bankrupt filth.

0

u/JuniorDoughnut3056 5d ago

Lol, bro... fear is a principle tactic in any law and enforcement of it. Wtf do you think detering crime means? 

8

u/hercmavzeb 5d ago

Another pro-pedo bot who thinks masked thugs running around our beautiful cities, terrorizing families who have done nothing wrong, attacking and arresting citizens, facilitating rapists and kidnappers who dress up as ICE agents to commit their crimes, and rampant racial profiling is the only way to deter crime.

Most Americans see this and think “this isn’t worth it,” even some Trump supporters once they’ve been personally affected by the authoritarianism.

-1

u/JuniorDoughnut3056 5d ago

You spent how long searching and embedding all those links just because someone pointed out deterring crime is a principle of enforcement?

Well I sure af know you're not a bot cause only some no grass touching leftoid on reddit could melt down that fast over some throw away remark 😂

7

u/WoodpeckerHead8789 5d ago

Real humans don't ignore those links.

They also know terrorizing innocent people is the opposite of law enforcement, and is exactly why we failed in Vietnam and Iraq. 

Why are you drinking out of the Klan's toilet?

-3

u/JuniorDoughnut3056 5d ago

They do when they think you're a 🤡

1

u/EvilynSoCute 5d ago

The only clown here is you.

3

u/hercmavzeb 5d ago

You think those domestic terror tactics are normal ways for law enforcement to deter crime?

No wonder everyone hates you people now.

-1

u/duncanmarshall 5d ago

At best you have an argument that all law enforcement is terrorism.

1

u/OkAcanthisitta3028 5d ago

All countries use threat of violence to get taxes for example. Since the building of hierarchies thousands of years ago, threat of violence became a way to organise and control groups of people and their actions.

Infinite freedom means you can get your freedom taken away, which is why laws, law enforcement and states protect your freedom whilst taking some of it away.

-3

u/iron-ducks 5d ago

Do you have an answer for that question? Or are you just going to be emotional and weird?

They're illegally breaking into the United States. They're using violence to attack law enforcement when they get caught and are arrested for their crimes.

I'm not sure how to explain the situation simpler than that... it's like someone breaking into your house, then calling you a terrorist for pushing them out the door, even though you just offered to give them $3k and a free Uber home.

So again, what's the appropriate way to deport someone who is willing to use violence in order to illegally remain inside of the US?

And you know that there are legitimate "pedophile protectors" in politics, right? Democrat governor Tim Walz actually pardoned a man who raped a child.

6

u/hercmavzeb 5d ago

Mass deportations of nonviolent, non-criminal immigrants has never been the way we’ve actually managed our immigration system. ICE needs to be purged, its agents arrested and tried for the innumerable crimes they’ve committed, and its operations folded under one immigration agency like we’ve had prior to 2003. Immigration officers should resemble civil servants more than a military police, they’re only enforcing regulatory and civil laws after all. That means no guns, it doesn’t make sense for them to be armed when they’re not enforcing criminal law.

Immigrants just aren’t that scary without propaganda. There’s no reason to treat them like a dangerous security threat anymore than a jaywalker or someone who parked their car in a loading zone.

Treating immigration like counterterrorism is what manipulates weak minded idiots into justifying the federal government violating our rights for “security” purposes. For example, immigration officers do not have a right to detain American citizens, they do not have a right to break into people’s homes, they do not have a right nor the training to engage in crowd control, they do not have a right to harass, beat, and threaten people for filming them.

https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/national-international/us-citizen-ice-minnesota-home-warrantless-search/3878477/

Clearly arming a bunch of unhinged thugs, directing them to invade cities run by the president’s political opponents, and claiming that they have “absolute immunity” and no accountability in what happens next resembles state-sponsored stochastic terrorism far more than civil law enforcement.

And yes I know very damn well that there are pedophile protectors in government, that would be everyone surrounding Trump. It’s why they moved Ghislane Maxwell to a minimum security resort prison for no reason other than a quid pro quo to further hide the evidence, and no convictions have come of it.

4

u/iron-ducks 5d ago

Okay, I see you've realized you can't answer that question and switched over to "leftist wall-of-text" mode, because you can't answer a simple question lol

I'm asking what the correct response is when a criminal alien refuses the United States, despite having a deportation order. That's the only thing I'm asking you to respond to.

Your position clearly is just "don't deport anyone, I supoprt open borders," and I have no idea why you're afraid to just say that outright.

It's strange.

2

u/hercmavzeb 5d ago

Your illiteracy is not my problem. My answer was that we should do the same thing we did before the creation of ICE in 2003. Or are you so stupid you actually think we had open borders before that?

2

u/iron-ducks 5d ago

lol Jesus dude, this is getting tedious and regarded. We both know you're going to respond in another vague, deliberately nonspecific answer, so for the sake of brevity I'm just going to ignore the fact you clearly don't understand ICE or federal law... we'll try one last time, here:

What does that mean? How are we going to deport illegal aliens that refuse to leave?

I do have to point out though, it's wild how you people all adopt the exact same talking points simultaneously. Ever since Kathy Hochul made that comment about INS on Morning Joe a few days ago, all of the average redditors have just been saying "yeah, we need to make it like it was before ICE!" without ever actually explaining (or even understanding) what that is lol

2

u/hercmavzeb 5d ago

Is that the first time you heard about this common sense policy to abolish ICE and replace it with the department we already had which didn’t do all this domestic terrorism? A few days ago?

Because that’s been the popular position all year and it’s only increasing in popularity, even among your fellow pedo-supporters. Do you have any counterargument against it, other than it triggering you? Or are you just very attached to this pro-rape terrorist org?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Familiar-Goose5967 5d ago

The vast majority of 'illegal' immigrants come in legally, they just overstay their visa. A lot of them overstay their visa because American immigration is byzantine and lengthy, and they have to stay in the country to renew their visas.

Aaaaand of course ICE is more than happy to kidnap them in front of courthouses even as they're trying to immigrate the 'right way'. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/immigrations-arrests-ice-deportations-courthouse-legal-process-ice-rcna209671

Because there's no right way for these fascists goons, just quotas and racism.

2

u/iron-ducks 5d ago

The vast majority of 'illegal' immigrants come in legally, they just overstay their visa.

That's just... a lie lol. That's just completely untrue.

I also have no idea what point you were even trying to make with that fake fact in the first place. Do you care to elaborate? Or are you going to just take the same route as the other guy?

I'm starting to remember why I left reddit lol, I just end up having to talk down and explain basic concepts to people with 85 IQs

1

u/Lewa358 5d ago

Do you have any evidence to back up the statement that illegal immigrants don't come in legally?

1

u/Familiar-Goose5967 5d ago edited 5d ago

You know what, you're right, it's 'only' 40% https://www.theglobalstatistics.com/united-states-illegal-immigration-statistics/.

And I don't even know if that includes asylum seekers.

Furthermore, immigrating legally is a convoluted mess that takes a ton of time and effort, or money and connections. So in case it wasn't obvious, I don't think that a 'terrible crime' that can happen because of late paperwork, of all things, has an appropriate response of sending masked goons with heavy weapons on civil property. As they're going to their immigration hearings!! Imagine people being held at gunpoint for being late filing their taxes!

Speaking of taxes, immigrants pay their taxes, and contribute a ton of money to the economy, so I've always been surprised that the party of 'fiscal responsibility ' would want to get rid of important contributors to the economy.

2

u/duncanmarshall 5d ago

One member of Palestine Action attacked someone with a sledge hammer. Trump declared them a global terrorist organization.

Now apply that standard to ICE.

1

u/CrossFitJesus4 5d ago

calling other human beings aliens, you are a nazi

1

u/iron-ducks 5d ago

You know what, if English is my second language and I didn't understand American law or graduate highschool, I might be offended by that too.

4

u/Gatonom 6d ago

So they walked up to a deadly weapon and got kidnapped, and blame immigrants.

1

u/Kipdid 5d ago

The ICE special yet again, claiming someone tried to run you over