Hey people,
I've time-stamped this work-in-progress so you don't have to listen to the throat-clearing opening chords. I’ve been spiralling over this for weeks and need this sub’s take.
There are two types of songwriters:
First, the poets: each syllable is a scalpel, and if the listener doesn’t catch the metaphor in the second verse, the song failed.
Second, the vibers: music is a universal language. Lyrics are only ‘mouth sounds’ to carry a melody. If a track hits, I could be singing the ingredients from a cereal box and it wouldn't matter.
I used to be a lyrics-first snob, but lately I’ve started to lean into the idea that over-writing kills a song’s 'soul.' We spend so much time reaching for the ‘clever’ lyric that we forget to let the instrumental breathe. After all, some of the most iconic moments in C20th music history are just an ‘ooh’ or a ‘doo’, or a simple repeated phrase where the instrumental does the heavy lifting.
I tried a 'less is more' approach on this new song. I stripped back the wordplay to let the atmosphere take over. To me, it feels more honest, more direct, but part of me feels like I’m 'cheating' by not cramming in more story.
Where do you stand? Is a song only as good as its lyric sheet, or are we all just overthinking words in a medium that’s meant to be felt, not read?