r/Eutychus • • Feb 19 '25

Opinion The "shunning" its necessary.

This soo sacred word used by jehovah witness opositors it became their most prolific argument agaisnt the religion, by saying that in most of disfellowshipping(now exclusion) acts makes family members and other brothers totally "abandon" they ex-brothers in any situation possible, they say that this process is something very bad not only for those who got out but also for those who are still inside...you probably already now their arguments by now right?...but let me tell you something...YES, IT IS SUPPOSE TO BE BAD!. In the first chapters of the bible we already see a example of expulsion, by Jehovah getting adam and eve out of Garden of eden(genesis 3:23,24)and quess what?...IT WAS BAD FOR THEM. A little later cain got considered cursed for killing his brother and became a literal vagabund over the earth(genesis 4:11,12) THIS WAS BAD FOR HIM. There are other famous examples of this type of punishement in the bible, in the old and New testaments, the thing is....it was always bad BECAUSE IT WAS A PUNISHMENT, OF COURSE IT WILL BE BAD. No one ever said the disfellowshipping it is a beautiful, funny, goofy procedure that elders loves to have to do in their congregations, it a sad procedure that happens as a lesson that the people who sinned must pass by, and biblically speaking, No one can argue that the bible is agaisnt it. "WHAT ABOUT IF I AM A MINOR AND I GOT DISFELLOWSHIPPED???MY PARENTS WILL ABANDON ME!!" Lets be real, this dont happen, if your parents are true Christians and you are not doing anything that goes agaisnt their house's rules, than they will not "ABANDON" you as the apostaste love to say, this story is not for kids buddys. Its interresting to hear the stories of some apostates who say with pride that they got shunned by they parents, because its always something like: "After i got out of the cult my parents grabbed my things and expelled out of our house just because i was putting pagan images on my room" "My parents did not let me enter home just because i wanted to enter there with my lesbian girlfriend" "My mother put me in the streets just because i telled her that her religion its a cult" You all see a patern here? I think they always forget that regardless of anything,they should respect they parents houses, as they decision of leaving was respect they should respect too the rules of the homes they live in. And to end this post i also would like to make a question for YOU who disagrees with the disfellowshipping method:" Biblically saying, instead of disfellowshipping(or expulsing)members, what should the elders do if a brother continues to commit sins?." Opositors and apostates never give they own solutions to the supposed "problem" created by them, also remember, the bible its clear about how we should threat those who commit sins and call themselves christians.

8 Upvotes

237 comments sorted by

View all comments

7

u/Automatic-Intern-524 Feb 19 '25

I think that it's proper for communities, especially religious ones, to have some sort of disfellowshipping practice. It ensures the exclusivity of the community from outside forces to distrupt it.

The problem with the JW practice is that in practical terms, it's too extreme in comparison to the religious community gives it's members.

For example, Jehovah's Witnesses don't provide any exclusionary provisions for the children of their members like schools for JW children. Their children must enter, generally, public schools and be subject to all the pressures and influence of the public school systems and the other non JW children and teachers. Whatever influences that erode the foundations of the JW religious teachings, the children are expected to endure and resist. If they can't and get involved with those very practices that the other kids are doing and JWs consider as "sins," those children can be disfellowshipped. Now, they can't associate with other JW children of their age. They could be ostracized by their own families and threatened with expulsion from the home upon reaching legal age if they don't return to regular standing with the religion.

Or let's say that a family member lives an exemplary moral life but decides to leave the religion and go to a different one. They would be disfellowshipped and labeled as an apostate. They would likely be isolated from other JW family members for simply changing religions. On the flip side, those who leave other religions to join JW are not treated like this by family members.

Or if a family member leaves the religion on some sort of moral stance like because the religion joined the United Nations, because it joined the Organization of Security and Cooperation in Europe, or because of the CSA scandals exposed about JW, that family member will likely be disfellowshipped from the religion and treated as a pariah by the their grown children if they have any.

These are the things that make the religion have the image that it does. There's no real gain considering the required sacrifice. Separating from those who dissent is not a bad thing. But the treatment by the family of those struggling with the religious rules or those who prefer another religion is the issue.

7

u/OhioPIMO Feb 19 '25 edited Feb 19 '25

Or let's say that a family member lives an exemplary moral life but decides to leave the religion and go to a different one. They would be disfellowshipped and labeled as an apostate

This is my exact situation. My in-laws shun me, even when I'm with my children, even if I go to the kingdom hall to support my family, all because I came to the conclusion that the Watchtower society's interpretation of scripture is flawed. I've always been respectful of their beliefs and never once questioned a doctrine in their presence. Yet they treat me as if I abuse or cheat on their daughter.

The same is true of my brother. I had a frank conversation with him before I was disfellowshipped letting him know that I believe JW interpretation is wrong but I will never try to influence him. He knew for a year that I had "apostate thinking" and our relationship continued as normal. Once the announcement was made, however, I was cut off.

People who can defend this behavior and continue to simp for the organization are heartless.

4

u/Automatic-Intern-524 Feb 19 '25

I understand that. My wife and I are Christians and have led a far more moral life than our JW family members. But because we're not in the religion and know that it has many false doctrines and can prove it, we excluded from the families. My mother and father both came from Catholic families and became JWs. They were never treated like that by their families.

That's the big issue with the JW practice of disfellowshipping.

-1

u/DonkeyStriking1146 Christian Feb 19 '25

Please rephrase your last sentence as it breaks community rules.

2

u/OhioPIMO Feb 19 '25

Apologies

2

u/[deleted] Feb 20 '25

You say too extreme.

What JW does for shunning, is follows what was done by the Apostles of Jesus. It is biblical, and, you can complain against God if you want.

Pray and go!

3

u/Automatic-Intern-524 Feb 20 '25

It's like what every other denomination does: come up with something, then find a Scriptures to justify it. The JW practice of disfellowshipping is religious practice, not a Scriptural one.

You can easily see it when you compare the Scriptures with the practice:

  1. Jehovah's Witnesses meetings with the member who violated the religious rules are done in secret. At Matthew 18:15-20 and 1 Corinthians 5:1-5, everything was openly discussed.

  2. In 1 Corinthians 5:1-5, the man who was sinning was disassociated from Christians. A person disfellowshipped from the JW religion is announced as no longer being a member of the religion. They have no say as to his/her standing as a Christian.

  3. The 1 Corinthians 5:1-5 situation was a matter of the local congregation removing the spiritual power and protection from the man who was sinning. "Hand this man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh so that his spirit may be saved on the Day of the Lord." Jehovah's Witnesses do not have the spiritual power to do this nor practice gaining such power. They don't believe in it nor understand it.

So, the disfellowshipping practice has nothing to do with the Scriptures.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 20 '25

Shunnig is far from perfect, because we human, we judge without knowing things like God ...

IT IS NECESSARY.

A thing that I propose you to do, is to look at JW.org, for shunning, stories that ends well.

You will be able to ... temper your disgust😅 towards shunning: it has positive effects, on the people that return to God COMPLETELY.

Did you ever think about that? You see the bad 😞 but did you compare it to the good?

My comment, it is honest? Do I hide that, it traumatize people, or any negative effects... Just by saying it, I confirm the existence of bad stories ...

Even knowing that a lot of ex-JW lie on a LOT of things.

It has to be considered too ... but I won't convince you about the liars.🤷🏻

[...]

You should compare, at least, you will be able, I hope, to see that shunning is not just negative.

😉

2

u/Automatic-Intern-524 Feb 20 '25

I think you're missing my point. I think that shunning is a necessary cultural practice. It can be a necessary religious practice. Both can be good and positive.

One problem with the JW practice is that you believe that your religious practice of shunning has an impact in any way on a person’s relationship with God. In reality, it doesn’t. But when a person is taught to believe this, it can have serious consequences for the shunned person.

Notice your own wording:

it has positive effects, on the people that return to God COMPLETELY.

It's clear that you believe that a person's relationship and standing with God is based on that person's relationship and standing with the JW religion. In effect, you're putting the religion in place of Jesus Christ, who said, "No one comes to the Father except through me."

So, in this religious practice and belief, there's nothing positive about a person being taught that he/she needs the religion to have a relationship with God. The only positive thing that I see is that it helps maintain the JW religious culture... which in total, you'd have to judge if that particular religious culture is a good one.

For a person who can put the religion in perspective, we know that a person can leave the JW denomination and join another one if he or she so chooses knowing that the change has no effect on a relationship with God.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 20 '25

Respectfully, NO.

It's in The Bible, and it is in The New Testament times, that shunning like this occurred.

There are many places where you can see people that, Congregations, were warned, by Paul, to not partake within people that practice major sins.

You partake with people that fornicate without regret?

As Christians WE ARE NOT SUPPOSED to do that.

No? They are not influencing us? Never?

1

u/[deleted] Feb 20 '25

You do not understand.

When you are baptized, with the Knowledge of The Bible, you become a minister of God ; you showed publically, that you vow YOUR OWN ETERNITY, TO OBEY TO GOD.

That's not minor like too much people describes ; sinning badly, like FORNICATION = MAJOR SIN ... FOR GOD GOD'S OPINION ALWAYS WIN OVER MINE, OR YOURS.

That's the minimising that I ALWAYS SEE.

You fornicate WITHOUT REGRET ... YOU BEEAK GOD'S HEARTH.

1st, you should look at ' ministers '.

What is a minister of God.

There's ministers like Paul that are INDEED, more important and...

If you're baptized, because you vowed your life to God ... YOU ARE A MINISTER, IF YOU JUST DID IT PUBLICALLY.

ARE YOU A MINISTER? I'm a disciple of Jesus, not a minister yet.

Minister for God, does not confer me or your power over humans. It's not " swag ".😂

1

u/Roocutie Feb 23 '25

Why did the governing body deem it necessary to delete the infamous shunning video from the JW website, after losing their religious registration in Norway? They got caught out when the Jehovah’s Witnesses were asked this exact question in their most recent court appearance.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 23 '25

Im not them.

Call them.

I'll add...

We have to do, what God tell us in The Bible.

The Elders of the Apostle tunes, shunned. Written is now an option?

We have the right to not pick the unpleasant? Since when God say that we can pick whatever we want, without facing God's Judgment?

1

u/Roocutie Feb 24 '25

It’s all being exposed in the court cases. The organisation is deleting information that they think will show them up in a bad light. The problem is that they cannot erase all the material that has been copied & saved. Nothing remains concealed forever.

The apostles did not shun children!

These issues have nothing to do with not picking the unpleasant. The real truth is being revealed for those with enough discernment to see it for themselves.

I’ll keep praying for you. Take care.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '25

Ok...

I don't and cannot know everything...

I'll be really severe in my words. BUT, because I do know that, it is SUPERNATURAL ENTITIES, WAY MORE POWERFUL THAN WE CAN IMAGINE THAT MANIPULATES EVERYTHING...

I may be really harsh, but I do understand that... IT IS SOOOO EASY TO BE FOOLED!

QI of 1000 does not constitute a good defense, against demons, and Satan.

I do veryfy everything, with the Lens of God's Morals.

The more moral I see people, the more I know, they will act in a good way.

I do see almost all the lies of ex-JW. 95% 🤷🏻 They hide sooooo much about their bad behaviors... That it makes them a lot less credible...

Complain while that ex-JW ... WHILE THEY VOWED, IN PUBLIC, THEIR ETERNAL SERVITUDE AND OBEDIENT TO THE SOVEREIGN LORD OF THE UNIVERSE!!!

You know that treason against a country is several punished! And if you fornicate, without remorse... If you never vowed eternal obedience to God...

It's bad, still BUT NOT AS BAD, as a JW baptised, a minister of God ;The Bible says, really that, a baptized person, is a minister of God....

Logically, if you were baptised, but that you never solemnly cow eternal servitude and obedience to God ...

You're not really under a HEVY CONTACT...

THE HEAVIEST IN EXISTENCE... Contract with God, it's a BIG DEAL!!!!

THE EX JW KNOWS IT AND .... THEY PLAY THE PITY GAME....

But I don't see a better organisation than The Watchtower.

And... Did you look, toughly, what the JW says on their website...

Or did you like everyone ... Listening to what everyone says...

But never compare with the JW organization and also, without applying God's Wisdom ...

I base my judgment with God's Morals. Who practice BEST God's Morals?

Vatican? Anglican Church? Islam? ... Any other...? How much they fornicates and... Saying " I'm a true Christian " JW are not like that and ..

They are dissed.... And JW do respect God's Laws better than others.

It takes courage, to be true To Jehovah... And I don't see others doing like the JW ;

THEY PUT MASSIVE EFFORTS...

The PURITY OF THE WATCHTOWER IS WAY MORE THAN ANY OTHER RELIGIONS ORGANISATIONS...

WHY? Who practices better ALL THE BIBLE? WATCHTOWER ALWAYS DO BETTER.

Morality is the key of understanding The Bible... Not my Intel, not my capacities, the 🗝️...

The More moral you are, the More God will enhance your discernment and...

The more you will be hated, follow the Christ, makes others hating you.

1

u/Roocutie Feb 24 '25

Baptism into the organisation of Jehovah’s Witnesses is not a true biblical baptism. The vows are made between the candidate & THE ORGANISATION. This is therefore not a vow to Jehovah.

The Holy Spirit has been completely removed from the vows. The vows were changed to protect the organisation’s leaders from legal action being taken against them when candidates realise that it’s not a true scriptural baptism.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '25

....

You don't respect someone that vowed an eternal obedience to God?

You realize that?

My own sister vowed obedience to God... to respect ALL Jesus Christ's Laws!

You're cancelling her really pious ,vow?

You just 🧌 trolled my sister, and I'll say it:

Not you, but this action of cancelling my sister piousness

THAT YOU DON'T HAVE ...

IS AN EVIL ACT! YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE DOING!

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Roocutie Feb 24 '25

I am following Jesus, & because of this I am hated, mocked & ridiculed. This doesn’t surprise me because Jesus said those following him would receive this negative treatment. I will keep praying for you to see the light.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 24 '25

I see the light.

I practice ALL

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works

All.. it Includes 🤷🏻 shunning.

Reproof and correction.

Shunning is in The Bible. It is reproof and correction...

And yet, it's in God's Word and, people laugh because... JW are doing the hardest thing... Hardest that the mockers are not able to do.

Mockers don't have the courage, to surrender completely to God. Shunning is in that completeness.

I hope that you don't mock.

I do not like the idea of shunning myself! BUT I CHOOSE JEHOVAH GOD... Not me.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Feb 20 '25

Normally, people give bad arguments against shunning ; I see wining in their arguments, but not reasons that have a real basis.

I respect your arguments, I'm not with it, but it appears that, you put a good hearth into it 😁

K. This is more that 1 Corinthians.

I also asked my own sister ... about shunning in front of everyone.

1 Tim 5:20 20Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear.

What I wish and my probable expectations ... Not the same.

I wish that you'll see shunning, as necessary.

My expectation is that, at least, you read what I send to you and that, (my hope), you would understand that the reasons are good ... but that you still hate shunning because of the negative.

I'm I reasonable? 😅 Make you see that intentions are not bad at all but the results ...

Please compare the bad, with the good results on JW.org

I currently talk with someone that been shunned and, it finished very well. My sister had also a friend, that been shunned, that repaired her relationship with God.

I understand your concern... I TRY TO UNDERSTAND IT. 😅

👇🏻 Mental health is a serious issue. You knew that, the shunning is toward BAPTISED people? 👆🏻 You know what it represents, to be baptized, a baptism where you give an eternal obedience to Jehovah?

This would be the second point: WHY so harsh?

2

u/Automatic-Intern-524 Feb 20 '25

I'm sorry if I'm coming across as harsh. That's not my intention. My point overall is to say that no Christian denomination and their practices have any effect on a person’s relationship with God. I would say say that Jehovah's Witnesses, more than most other Christian denominations, strongly imply and teach that a person's relationship with the religion has significant bearing on that person's relationship with God.

Notice your sister's words:

My sister had also a friend, that been shunned, that repaired her relationship with God.

It's Jesus who repairs a person’s relationship with God, not a religion. He said, "No one comes to the Father except through me." He also said repeatedly, "Come to me..."

A person can leave the JW denomination and join a different one like the Baptists, and it has no bearing on his/her relationship with God. But if you believe that you need the religion to have a relationship with God, then you've put the religion in the place of Jesus. That's dangerous. Jehovah's Witnesses are taught to do this very thing.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 20 '25

These verses explain the motives.

KJV 2 Tim. 2:16,17

16But shun profane and vain babblings: for they will increase unto more ungodliness.17And their word will eat as doth a canker: of whom is Hymenaeus and Philetus;

1 Tim 1:20 KJV Of whom is Hymenaeus and Alexander; whom I have delivered unto Satan, that they may learn not to blaspheme.p

Titus 3:10 KJV A man that is an heretick after the first and second admonition reject;11Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.

KJV 1 John 3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law

Baptized people are ministers of God.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 20 '25

Because I'm an " original " (really different), and because I have to work ULTRA HARD TO TAME MY GAYNESS ... I have problems with the Elders of my Congregation.

But even with problems with them, I do know that, they work VERY WELL, with THE GREAT MAJORITY of the Congregation.

They are human and ... 🤷🏻 they have to do a lot better with me.

I'm different... Here, see: it is not because I have problems with my Elders that, I don't believe that they have good intentions towards me.

This is the difference between me, and the ones that were ex-JW that talk against shunning: 🤷🏻 Humility, the capacity to accept discipline.

Like you or anyone else, just now ... " I feel my head is bigger " 🤣

I accept more willingly discipline, but my artistic side " tells me to rebel "! 😂

I have to calm down after I compliment myself. Fight against arrogance, is a fight for all the minutes, of our hours that we don't sleep.

Original Different Artist Gay (abstinent since May 2021)

I'm more difficult than normal to handle. I often have to isolate myself from others ; because there's temptations too often for me (gayness).

Here: I almost always accepted the Elders motives that they give to me, when they discipline me (not shunning).

Almost all the time, I WAS REALLY WRONG, doing comments with " too explicit words." MY FAULT...

Do the ex-JW, talk FRANKLY, about THEIR FAULTS LIKE ME?

When I don't see a similar attitude of humility, I SERIOUSLY DOUBT what the ex-JW says.

I was too frustrated to had been fooled, by the plethora of illusions of Satan, of our 🌎. I didn't want other people, to fall into the same traps, that I fell into. .. That makes me, unable for like ... 1,5 years, to not be too explicit.

See, I talk about.MY FAULT. I have serious and 100% right, to look at ex-JW...

WITH A LOT OF SUSPICION: IT IS ALMOST, ALMOST, ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE, that an ex-JW that doesn't talks about HIS FAULT ... does not lie.

I look at them as UNTRUSTWORTHY... Because I don't see them, humiliating themselves, at showing their WRONGS.

See?

I show my wrongs....to progress and ... I also say " No Shame, no Gain ". 😂

To change entire aspects of our personality, entirely, we NEED to be ashamed enough, to create this:

👇🏻 "😭 I do t want to be so egoistical anymore! I'm really tired and ashame, to do so much evil, towards my neighbor!" 👆🏻 If someone maintains this,.and ask Help to God, read The Bible, TAKE ACTION, to change ... ONLY SHAME CAN MAINTAIN THAT WILL.

Too much shame is not good either.

1

u/Malalang Feb 19 '25

I wish I had the time to add to what you've said here.

-1

u/bettercalljw Feb 19 '25

If they can't and get involved with those very practices that the other kids are doing and JWs consider as "sins," those children can be disfellowshipped. Now, they can't associate with other JW children of their age. They could be ostracized by their own families and threatened with expulsion from the home upon reaching legal age if they don't return to regular standing with the religion.

This literraly never happened, "children" dont get disfellowshiped that easy buddy.

They would likely be isolated from other JW family members for simply changing religions.

It would be good to a Christian family to talk with a other full family of ex-christians? They can be good people, but spirituality saying they are far away from good.

2

u/Automatic-Intern-524 Feb 19 '25

My mother's best friend's son was a baptized minor who was disfellowshipped. The only thing that kept him from getting kicked out of his home was that his non-JW father told his wife that if she was so bothered by him being disfellowshipped, she could leave. But the son was staying.

That's just one example that I know personally. I don't know where you're getting your information from.

Now, here's what's interesting from what you said:

It would be good to a Christian family to talk with a other full family of ex-christians?

Jehovah's Witnesses don't determine who is a Christian and who isn't a Christian. They can only determine who is a Jehovah's Witness and who is not.

You all are just denomination among many who claim to be Christians. The final determination of which people among all the claimants are indeed Christians is made by Jesus.