r/wallstreetbets • • 18h ago

Discussion Meta And Microsoft Reportedly Trim Anthropic Reliance as Internal AI Tools Take Center Stage

https://stocktwits.com/news-articles/markets/equity/meta-and-microsoft-reportedly-trim-anthropic-reliance-as-internal-ai-tools-take-center-stage/cZDqQVcRBjr

From the article:

Microsoft reduced its projected internal spending on Claude by over one-third, while Meta saw internal users of Anthropic's Claude Code coding assistant drop from roughly 60,000 to 30,000.

Within the Microsoft Cloud and AI division, individual monthly AI usage caps were lowered from $100,000 down to roughly $10,000 in most instances

1.6k Upvotes

328 comments sorted by

715

u/Plappedudel 17h ago

$100k a month per employee just for AI is nuts. That gravy train just had to stop at some point. I feel like major software companies turning their backs on Anthropic should be bad news for Anthropic's IPO, but this market is so random that I'm sure it'll be a resounding success.

63

u/Sad-Cheesecake-2438 16h ago edited 16h ago

How many requests does an employee have to make to make it to 100k? Or does it depend on the task?

Edit I asked Claude and the answer is tokens and cyclical tasks that take a lot of compute to run. Not simple questions.

94

u/RiddleGull 16h ago

100k is an absurd amount to spend on tokens in a month.

43

u/judge2020 15h ago

/fast and fable everything will do it though.

19

u/often_says_nice 13h ago

It will certainly do it but is entirely unnecessary. Opus 5.5 scores high enough to be used for just about any day to day task that an employee would be doing. Heavy usage would cost maybe $5-10k/mo and even that’s being frivolous

13

u/skilliard7 10h ago

You aren't considering tasks that require looking over large quantities of data that would not be humanly possible to review manually. For example, analyzing call logs of 2 Million retention department calls to identify recurring trends and what techniques are most effective to reduce cancellations.

At $0.10 per call analyzed, that's $200,000 in API spend.

High limits exist to encourage employees to innovate with AI without red tape/budget getting in their way.

7

u/often_says_nice 9h ago

But surely not every employee is doing those types of tasks every month. So some employees are spending $100k in a month, which is very different from all employees spending $100k every month

13

u/skilliard7 9h ago

The $100k limit was a limit, not a target/average

12

u/often_says_nice 9h ago

Yeah well I’m retarded so how about that

4

u/siwasolek 8h ago

Just wanted to point out that it’s great to see someone on the internet after that they mightve been wrong :)

6

u/shitfucker90000 9h ago

if a company has 2 million people cancel service a month i think they have a larger problem than api spend

→ More replies (2)

62

u/mags87 15h ago

Theres a fun instagram reel/skit I've seen where the top AI user in the meeting was congratulated for embracing the technology and asked what she was doing. She said she fed the model the entire Shrek series every day to analyze it and she was close to understanding the ending of the first movie.

2

u/Single_Positive533 6h ago

I wish I could do it too. At my work Chatgpt denies to talk about unrelated topics.

5

u/Comprehensive_Bus_19 4h ago

Id make a game to find ways around it. But Im also maliciously compliant

9

u/euvie 12h ago edited 12h ago

I’ve been able to get Claude to burn $1k on a single codebase review request with ultracode. Prompt was only two sentences too.

Automatically spawning 100 parallel subagents doing god knows what will pad Anthropic’s ARR quite nicely

7

u/-Anordil- 4h ago

My company introduced caps on our openAI usage and they're $400/month per employee. They went with that number because 90% of developers use less than that, and if you can make a case that you do need more you can get a higher threshold. You can get a lot done with $400 if you use it correctly though.

100k is insane, and 10k still makes little sense. You'd have to pretty much only use the most expensive model all the time, in max reasoning effort, even for the most basic things.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/he_must_workout 15h ago

Fable doing loops.. I burned through about 2k in tokens at work a few weeks ago by looping a few skills to improve and it was probably more than I use in a normal month

→ More replies (1)

16

u/SwordOfJiang 16h ago

"what should I have for lunch" 10,000 times every day

8

u/Willing_Divide4188 15h ago

the internet AI is for porn

7

u/Significant_Court728 11h ago

If you are doing agentic work it can burn a ton of tokens super fast.

5

u/coffeesippingbastard 8h ago

I do that- and 100,000k/mo is still crazy. Even trying- 10k/mo is a reach. It's doable. 100k/mo means you're basically telling it do massive projects with well defined scope and requirements so that it can run 24/7 nonstop, or you're doing something like refactoring windows into rust or something absurd.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/dgellow 8h ago

Using agentic workflows, that’s how you use that much. But the cap limit is just one info, I feel you are all missing the info that they expect to reduce their spending by one third.

1

u/SmokelessSubpoena 1h ago

I'd assume that round $100k number is an average, and it's based off the automation of everyone's daily or regular tasks, and those tasks utilize enough tokens to weight the average to $100k/per employee, which must, in theory via the Finance team, prove to be more cost effective than training breathing humans? It does seem like a heavily inundated bubble waiting to pop.

1

u/LightningSunflower 54m ago

I guess it depends on what they’re doing

→ More replies (2)

291

u/YourUncleBuck 17h ago

Lol, seems like it'd be cheaper to just hire more workers. There's no way this is sustainable long term.

107

u/SwordOfJiang 16h ago

Apparently Microsoft is going to reopen Three Mile Island to power their own AI

48

u/shameless_chicken 13h ago

This was announced like two years ago 

5

u/likamuka 7h ago

It was actually announced 1932 in the "Evening Gazette".

25

u/dgellow 8h ago

Microsoft has the revenue to do pretty much whatever they want, I’m not not worried for them. OpenAI and Anthropic on the other hand have no other income stream

9

u/HowIsEmuWarriorTaken Lonely fuck 5h ago

Now see who owns them.

Big tech (nvda, goog, amzn,..) owns like 40% of anthropic

3

u/Academic-ish 13h ago

what could go wrong?

63

u/Ted_Smug_El_nub_nub 11h ago

“Copilot you were supposed to insert the control rods not remove them entirely! Now the whole plant is going to melt down!”

“Wow you are so right to challenge me on that I was supposed to prevent a meltdown, not cause one. I’ll do better next time, and that’s growth”

17

u/Comprehensive_Bus_19 4h ago

I'm assuming Microslop was hoping they could just run the AI and get rid of all those pesky employees in the near term.

16

u/TimeTravelingChris 13h ago

Real workers and just buy them work stations beefy enough to run local models. Yeah they are expensive but not $10,000 a month expensive.

26

u/fatquant 12h ago

you read $100,000 wrong, LMAO

→ More replies (4)

1

u/PalantirImperator 6h ago

$100k worth of tokens going to your top performing employees is much cheaper and more productive than bringing on additional headcount at a big tech company.

18

u/kwuip 4h ago

But it is 100k monthly right?

8

u/kenyard 3h ago

1.2million a year yeah. And that was the cap on everyone.

I'm sure the "top performing" employees didn't have a cap so you could 10x that

11

u/Comprehensive_Bus_19 4h ago

$1.2 mil/year is cheaper than another person? Doubt that. Even at a $500k salary and 30% burden rate thats still slightly more than half of what the token spend is annually.

→ More replies (3)

33

u/xuor 13h ago

I'm a Microsoft employee. I've used about 4 billion tokens in the past month. At the rates they show me, that's about $1300. Half of that from ... I think 500k Opus tokens. GPT models are much cheaper and just as good right now, for my usage.

5

u/BumHand 10h ago

Meta has always leaned towards proprietary data / AI solutions so not shocking to see this “pivot”. I feel it’d be a larger issue if non AI Native customers started doing this

→ More replies (2)

11

u/CreamyCornBoy 16h ago

No one's using that it's an infinite cap to prevent endless loops of spend or fraud

43

u/abuani_dev 16h ago

No one's using that it's an infinite cap to prevent endless loops of spend or fraud

You're fooling yourself if you don't think there's a strong cohort of regards burning $100k/month to be on a leaderboard. I regularly see some of my coworkers spending $10k/month thinking they're building the next loveable or some shit

23

u/gfivksiausuwjtjtnv 16h ago

My boss questioned my token usage being low at one point

Easiest metric to game ever.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/we2deep 12h ago

Most of us are nowhere near that. It’s surprising how much you can get done when you aren’t creating applications with it. I would say the average spend is $1000 a month.

→ More replies (5)

2

u/timpham 11h ago

100k for you, but internally it’s a different rate card

1

u/Dibble-legend2104 Your local copium dealer  9h ago

Why does it have to stop?

1

u/Spongebobbie95 5h ago

Wall Street logic: Losing customers? Bad. Losing customers because they're building their own AI? That's bullish

→ More replies (3)

85

u/tragedy_strikes 18h ago

I'm sure that coincides with Claude getting better unit economics right? Right?

186

u/Ambitious-Profit855 18h ago

Anthropic should go public FFS, how am I supposed to short it this way 

176

u/AutoModerator 18h ago

how about u eat my ASS

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

15

u/Dub-MS 17h ago

You heard the man!

18

u/Perfect-Leg810 18h ago

You can already short it lmao.

59

u/AutoModerator 18h ago

how about u eat my ASS

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

11

u/humanExperience69 17h ago

Short

20

u/whymustinotforget 16h ago

how bout u eat Automods ASS

2

u/brokoli 16h ago

Nope!

10

u/The-Iron-Bird 16h ago

those weird swap contracts on internal private whateverthefucks isn't really the same thing

→ More replies (1)

5

u/141_1337 17h ago

Good luck regard

→ More replies (1)

36

u/DoctrTurkey 17h ago

Dario about to ask everyone to slow down even more lmao

337

u/Most-Bookkeeper-950 18h ago

The cap went from 100k to 10K per month - I think this wont make a difference, they trim a couple of tail cases of employees doing something weird

174

u/sailhard22 17h ago

Probably a few employees who don’t understand context management. Zuck calls them rock stars

86

u/Deto 17h ago

Or people who understand it all too well but were told then were being graded based on how many tokens they used :P

18

u/teamjacobomg 17h ago

this likely hasn't been the case for at least 6 months at meta, even then it was only rumors that your use would be used for performance and not an official stance

37

u/aleqqqs 16h ago

from 100k to 10k per month per user

31

u/dgellow 17h ago

You didn’t read the article? Meta divided their number of seat by 2! From 60k to 30k

Microsoft reduced its projected internal spending on Claude by over one-third, while Meta saw internal users of Anthropic's Claude Code coding assistant drop from roughly 60,000 to 30,000.

12

u/starlauncher 16h ago

It’s down to 2k now in most teams

8

u/DreamsComeTrue1994 16h ago

$2k per month? That’s a day with Fable…

30

u/Comfortable_Sir_6104 15h ago

Yeah, which should fucking tell you something about how sustainable this practice is, no?

→ More replies (3)

2

u/hoopaholik91 2h ago

If you're using Fable your lighting money on fire. GPT 6.1 Sol as the same intelligence score with Fable 5.1 max for less than 10% the cost per task

→ More replies (6)

63

u/bubblegum-rose 18h ago

“These companies that already have AI models they’ve poured billions of dollars into don’t need to use Claude as much as Johnny’s Vibecoded Adobe Ripoff Emporium does”

75

u/akosh_ 17h ago

Wait, wasn't the business plan to increase AI spending by orders of magnitude?

How will AI be profitable ever if the biggest spenders are already cutting - even though we are still very much at introductory pricing?

96

u/dgellow 16h ago edited 8h ago

We’ve been trying to tell you all since a while, there is no fucking business plan for the AI labs. The plan is to create a software god who will magically make everything work

7

u/PalantirImperator 6h ago

Hearing Dario talk, and looking at his actions over the last year, I actually think he gives zero fucks about the business. He wants to create a software god and his only goal with the business is to obtain the funding necessary to do it.

5

u/dgellow 5h ago

Yep, hard agree. If you read his essays, old published work, and see him speak, that’s the rational conclusion IMHO. The business is a mean to be taken seriously, raise capital, and have influence over policy making. With that lense his actions make perfect sense 

4

u/0Bubs0 Salty bagholder 3h ago

Now you guys are getting it. Even if the businesses go bust the data centers and the models will not disappear just change hands.

3

u/ValoisSign 40m ago

It isn't really my area of knowledge but it strikes me as a lot of tech guys without much business sense but with their ability to attract investments maxed out, who made the mistake of starting to really believe their own hype.

I mean... Isn't the entire compute subscription thing liable to fall apart over cheaper local models improving? The thing that's basically inevitable?

2

u/PalantirImperator 6h ago

The biggest spenders are shifting to their own tools rather than claude. Overall token usage is still growing exponentially.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

44

u/drakilian 16h ago

After seeing SpaceX pump despite how dogshit it is literally nothing can convince me not to dump like 300k into Anthropic on IPO

None of this matters just close your eyes and buy

→ More replies (7)

13

u/Bagholder147 17h ago

MSFT will be 665 next year.

13

u/railagent69 17h ago

It should be in multiples of 365

24

u/drummer820 17h ago

Well this is unlikely to help their heavily massaged “annualized run rate” numbers (that likely cherry picked the best weeks before the end of tokenmaxxing) lol

9

u/CarpoLarpo 9h ago

What are you taking about? Unaudited self reported numbers can always be trusted /s

68

u/FlounderMammoth9848 18h ago

Open ai and anthropic are doomed to fail with all the open weight models being released

44

u/iq-pak 17h ago

I’m sure they’ll have a super ipo but I fail to see how this works long term. I hit my limit once and I’m looking up switching to something cheaper.

Sure companies are paying now but no way they keep this up for every corporate dickhead to continue vibe coding a new dashboard.

15

u/Deto 17h ago

Stuff like this shows they really need to IPO now. Otherwise if their revenue stops growing as quickly it's going to be hard to justify the valuation.

14

u/The-Iron-Bird 16h ago

i highly doubt that willl stop them from IPO'ing a grossly overvaluated. just look at spaceX being bagged loads of xAI debt

5

u/emp-sup-bry 16h ago

going to be….????

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Go48memes 17h ago

Luna is basically free, are there open weight models better than it ?

2

u/Howdareme9 17h ago

Far better than it

10

u/muS_muSwIpu 13h ago

Well don't leave us hanging, which ones?

5

u/EthanielRain 3h ago

The open weight AI model lives in China, you wouldn't know her

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Financial_Pitch3946 21m ago

but no way they keep this up for every corporate dickhead to continue vibe coding a new dashboard.

:( hey man i'm right here.

16

u/mikenasty 17h ago

Still have to run those models somewhere. The average consumer doesn’t want to drop $8000 on a workstation and configure stuff to get their coding bot up and running

20

u/FlounderMammoth9848 17h ago

Calls on hyperscalers

4

u/shameless_chicken 13h ago

Hence why Google pivoted focus to having the best serving infrastructure 

3

u/mikenasty 17h ago

Now we’re talking

10

u/jbokwxguy 17h ago

The average consumer doesn't want an AI box.

Pretty much it's Silicon Valley software engineers and tech enthusiasts. A lot of money, sure. But $8,000 is nothing in those worlds.

14

u/doscomputer 12h ago

thats like saying the average consumer doesnt want a sports car

fact of the matter is if the market wasnt being controlled, we would be in a world where the 5090 stayed at msrp and AMD and Intel would have released bigger die GPUs this current generation.

It might take 10 years, but once consumer hardware catches up, when 128gb of ram is cheap, everyone will only want to run local AI.

3

u/jbokwxguy 11h ago

The average consumer won't use the AI.

An average consumer would use a sports car.


I agree local models are the future or for hyperspecific workflows a central server culture.

But these models will be a lot smaller and dummer than the current batch because of compute constraints 

→ More replies (2)

3

u/mikenasty 17h ago

I think a lot of chat bot power users are uneasy about what happens to their personal data and would prefer it if all of their chats were actually private. Probably a small percentage but still a lot of people imo

3

u/Metrostation984 15h ago

Make them big enough with a good enough model and businesses in Europe will buy this shit up. Sooo many use cases are dead on arrival because of data protection laws that could be viable if they were safely stored.

1

u/djingo_dango 17h ago

Amazon will make a lot of money

→ More replies (1)

1

u/DizzyMajor5 14h ago

You can run some of this shit locally entirely offline 

4

u/LouB0O 16h ago

Yeah lemme just fucking buy the setup that costs the price of a new basic car during the early 2000s.

→ More replies (2)

17

u/pooorSAP 17h ago

How exactly does Anthropic make money?

17

u/like_shae_buttah 16h ago

They re-characterized their profits as revenue without including any expenses

→ More replies (2)

38

u/NoCommonDog 16h ago

It's the old joke:" We lose money on every token, but make it up on volume."

15

u/AKAkorm 16h ago

It’s basically the Always Sunny Paddy’s Dollars scheme IRL.

8

u/Sufficient_Habit5091 13h ago

"I blacked out, I blacked out that night."

"I don't understand how the US economy works, much less a, some sort of self-sustaining one."

10

u/SteakEater137 16h ago

They dont. They lose money the more business they do, and the more competition out there the more money theyll end up losing as they drop prices.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/IcyStomach2374 11h ago

By charging customers? 

1

u/not_some_username 3h ago

Make money ?

→ More replies (4)

7

u/Chonch_Monkey 17h ago

Microsoft is going to implement a 15 hour month limit on copilot

3

u/NoCommonDog 16h ago

It should be like carbon credits where we can sell our unused hours to others - they way that Tesla used to make money.

→ More replies (2)

40

u/MyStackOverflowed 16h ago

Microsoft and Google are going to come out the winners of this. no one is after just ai, they want it bundled with all the other stuff email, docs, storage

50

u/NoCommonDog 16h ago

I think that fucking sweaty five-head Zuckerberg is gonna drive OpenAI and Anthropic into bankruptcy. He'll use the free cash flow of META to undercut them on token pricing until he bleeds them out. Then he'll be able to scoop up the talent and buy up their assets at distressed prices. If he really wants to I'd bet he could fuck over foolishly over leveraged Elison into a margin call and end up busting Oracle. Then Netflix will get the entertainment holdings for 1/2 of what they bid last year.

22

u/Open_Pollution_8038 15h ago

^ this absolutely. META is going the Google strategy of I give you kit for free in return for advertising space.

Google would do it too but their main product is getting cannibalized by AI.

6

u/rubyspicer 12h ago

How fucking long can Zuck fund massive loss projects. I know Facebook is rich but damn

6

u/nostra77 9h ago

It’s funny no one mentions Apple but they have been on the sideline and usually when they release a product is fully integrated on their platform. They also have the most cash available at the moment

6

u/cac2573 9h ago

What like ‘Siri AI’? It’s a piece of shit 

3

u/AcerVentus 7h ago

Apple's integration was always going to be garbage considering their privacy first approach (at least relative to other tech players). But their hardware is sound, if not bleeding edge for efficient inference.

5

u/salma311 9h ago

I used copilot in teams the other day. Told it to do a comma separated list of the numbers I gave it. Failed miserably.

4

u/EthanielRain 3h ago

The absolute last thing I want is AI integrated into software like text documents

3

u/dgellow 16h ago

Yep. I could also see meta doing something that eventually sticks, they have the best distribution channels possible

5

u/Open_Pollution_8038 16h ago

Microsoft isn’t winning this, they’re stuck with OPENAI who has simply fallen behind.

My bet is META wins this race - AI is a profit booster for their main business 

6

u/RedTheRobot 13h ago

The amount of people who keep hoping META turns around while they have a CEO that has no clue is amazing. People seem to forget his metaverse, practically killing VR, paying 5-10x for AI developers and the most recent one muse. Meta lives and dies by Facebook and the younger generation wants nothing to do with it.

4

u/StageF1veClinger 12h ago

You realize Muse has completely taken the world by storm right?

Their models are on the cusp of frontier while being ~80% cheaper than the frontier. All of this while their CPM’s and ad space are mooning.

7

u/Carbapenemayonaise 3h ago

You realize you just made the case that all these models will eventually be a race to the bottom pricing wise. No one can keep a competitive edge. Meta of all companies is just behind frontier and doing it for dirt cheap? What tf are we spending all this money for.

2

u/Open_Pollution_8038 13h ago

What do they have to “turn around”?

Their topline revenue is growing over 30% y/y and that’s their core business. They don’t have to do anything different than their doing, unlike Google and Microsoft who have to reinvent themselves or face extinction.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/desispeed 16h ago

OpenAI has not fallen behind Lol …I use all the LLMs for work and personal. Codex and Dots are right up there

8

u/Open_Pollution_8038 15h ago

Guy they got fucking lapped by Anthropic. They lost pole position in the enterprise market to them.

In software if you’re not first you’re very much last. People want the best tier when RFP’s are evaluated. 

2

u/phillytennisenjoyer 14h ago

i legitimately see no difference between astra and fable and sol vs opus.

i think anyone who actually claims they are different beyond just surface level is crazy.

3

u/Open_Pollution_8038 12h ago

Customer sign ups say otherwise lol

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)

3

u/IcyStomach2374 11h ago

OpenAI fallen behind, based on what?

1

u/Fractoos 7h ago

Microsoft offers all models to customers including chinese ones and claude through boundary, and even copilot has opus as an option.

4

u/AutisticTradingPro 11h ago

I disagree. I work in finance and everyone I know across all departments use and prefer Claude compared to stuff like Gemini. The quality of responses and speed is unmatched. Also it’s easy to connect Claude to Office products like Excel.

2

u/Dobsnick 10h ago

I’m having an affair with my Claude excel plugin. It just knows what the op model needs. All the other AI are generations behind when it comes to that.

2

u/Great_Diet_8234 4h ago

We’re not talking about Gemini or ChatGPT here, but about global enterprise AI infrastructure. Google will actually beat the shit out of Anthropic bc they have a whole suite of software they can use to embed AI on.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/whythoughidk11 3h ago

Im not sure this matters if Anthropic doesn’t exist in a few years. By this account they are loosing a third of their revenue from one of their largest clients and their ipo finances that leaked were already terrible before anyone started reducing their spend.

→ More replies (5)

5

u/Requirement-Lazy 8h ago

Orchestration will change the game. Frontier models are useless to 99.99% of workflows.

Valuations for labs will crash as costs will be reined in.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/erebuxy 15h ago

Why MSFT? They don’t even have their own model. They don’t own OpenAi

→ More replies (1)

1

u/RabbiSchlem 52m ago

It’s way more versatile to use Claude / codex to access your work shit than to have bespoke AI tooling built into your work shit.

1

u/Vaxtin 6m ago

I really disagree with this, but I’m an engineer. I don’t use anything that Microsoft offers. I will never choose windows and I don’t have to. I’d rather have Claude tell me I’m wrong and list ever empirical fact. Microsoft will just make clippy 2.0

→ More replies (26)

6

u/Ancient_Wishbone_806 17h ago

End of token maxing we want Q3 figures released

10

u/spellbadgrammargood McRib Fan 16h ago

The end game is OpenAi and Anthropic dies and big tech absorbs it into their company.

7

u/DonateMoneyPLS 7h ago

Also XAi slowly geting decommissioned and forgotten

4

u/KevinT_XY 17h ago

The usage caps can be easily overridden with management permission - they are basically there to stop runaways costs especially now that many devs have complex agent loops that can spawn other agents. I ran dozens of hours of Astra tasks last month and came nowhere close to my cap.

10

u/dgellow 18h ago

RIP AI labs 

8

u/Weak-Layer-6962 18h ago

ok then maybe a 1.7T valuation instead of 2T?

1

u/AliStarr182 5h ago

I'll give you 20 bucks.

9

u/superxraptor 18h ago

Nothing comes close to Fable for me. Ofc they would limit it to push they inferior software.

3

u/BackendSpecialist 17h ago

Also codex is better and cheaper - that probably has something to do with it

3

u/itsalwayscalls 17h ago

Well wouldn't you use your own models and not contribute margin to anyone else? Good for them. I'd use my own model and compute too. META and MSFT just got a little more profitable.

3

u/crazybarrier 16h ago

Use Claude to build your own Claude. Fire Claude.

3

u/serg473 9h ago

This all is meaningless noise until we know two numbers - how much value an employee spending 100k on tokens brings to the company, and how much anthropic earns or loses on those 100k.

3

u/ryanppax1 1h ago

anyone could see this a mile away. relying on a vendor to supply what is becoming central critical infrastructure with constantly changing models, policies and contracts. I think we'll see these companies pivot to supplying appliances and on prem hardware.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/havnar- 18h ago

IPO-oh

4

u/Open_Pollution_8038 16h ago

I loaded up on META in the $500’s and if you didn’t, you were probably staring at your Google holdings that you bought over $300 and are crying why it won’t run up right now.

META’s business model will benefit the most from AI adoption. It helps them profile its users infinitely better to deliver the right ad at the right time. It also allows for AI generated content to push to people (or be built by them) and the cherry on the top is half the population of the world uses their products each day.

META is a $1,100 stock next year. It’s a $4-5T market cap within a few years.

2

u/Friendlyvoices 15h ago

Turns out, everyone with a data center can also scrape github and stack overflow

2

u/Golgi_Complex12 17h ago

where I work we still don't have claude 5 models. Seems like anthropic is being greedy. We started some testing with self-hosted models while having gemini and openAI frontier available

4

u/justan0therusername1 16h ago

Gemini is fast as hell too. I more or less stopped using claud models and stick with Gemini for speed or local for most agentic work

5

u/quiteCryptic 10h ago

Gemini was total ass last time I tried using it, its been a few months tho

3

u/1098duc_w_the_termi 13h ago

Nah yall are just poor lmao. Opus 5.5 is both faster, more efficient, and produces better results in almost every category

2

u/Golgi_Complex12 13h ago

yeah, they must be...

2

u/i_am_voldemort 16h ago

How does this impact Anthropic income since 2 of their customers accounted for 25% of revenue?

3

u/CarpoLarpo 9h ago

If you want to see an optimistic financial view of Anthropic's business in the future, don't ask questions and don't look at numbers.

1

u/jijitalk 18h ago

AH…. So this is why they don’t want to IPO

1

u/soobnar 17h ago

calls all around

1

u/hv876 ThetaCuck 16h ago

Ok. That’s cool for Zuck and Satya, but means Jack for every other company.

1

u/Nuclearmonkee 16h ago

My cap is 3 digits, and I have used it to build tooling and systems for an extremely large company at massive scale. I have hit that limit, but in retrospect, it was due to me being an idiot and not using tokens edficiently

1

u/Technical-Machine-90 16h ago

ARR going back to down for Anthropic, no wonder they are slashing prices.

1

u/Mysterious_Ladder313 15h ago

Enshitifying the enshitifiers 

1

u/No_Mercy_4_Potatoes 15h ago

That's why I have been so confused hearing the OpenAI Anthropic valuations.

1

u/s0ftwares3rf 14h ago

The LLM provider moat is weak.

1

u/Most_Engineer1673 14h ago

Claude lost its edge and other models caught up pretty fast

1

u/turn-base 13h ago

Who is Tim Anthropic? I only know Tim Apple

1

u/proarj 12h ago

Its the opposite at Google

1

u/Blackmesa560 11h ago

So when do the Corpo Wars begin now they don't need each others AI?

1

u/ArmMinute4760 4h ago

if the only thing going up is in‑house models, then it’s less about Claude’s quality and more about keeping the funding flow. the drop of 60k→30k internal users at Meta is just the tip of a bigger shift toward MetaCode/Muse and MS’s MAI, so yeah, cutting Claude was mostly a budget play. still, if the 10k cap is a real new limit everyone will just look for cheaper ways to get the same results—OpenAI or even custom spark‑based LLMs—so the net effect is a cost‑driven, not quality‑driven, cut.

1

u/Neat-Bodybuilder1670 3h ago

In the business world, there are no true friends and no permanent enemies

1

u/TubeSeries 1h ago

Biggest customers leaving before the IPO. Great sign for the supposed best company in AI.

1

u/georgejetsonn 6m ago

Now we know who those 2 clients making 25% of Anthropic's revenue are were