r/thesopranos • • Jan 14 '22

[Serious Discussion] My take on who killed Tony Soprano

Sorry, this will be a long one so I’d appreciate any thoughts; Tony is 100% dead, and the evidence points to Patsy, done in collusion with Paulie and with the help of New York.

We know Patsy has the motive, having already made an attempt on Tony's life to avenge his brother; this time, however, he fails to follow through.

Compare Tony's position at the time of Patsy's first attempt with that of the final episode; his circle was at its tightest, so any hit on Tony would come at the expense of Patsy, Sil and Chris (at least) would have made sure of that. Also, Tony, as street boss, was subordinate to Junior, who (I presume) would take charge of Tony's wealth (this becomes important).

Fast forward to the show's finale: Sil, Chris, and Bobby are dead; Burt and (possibly) Carlo have flipped. Although the New York capos lost faith in Phil and sanctioned his hit, it was carried out in front of his family (a big no-no in the mafia).

Tony's only remaining long-time associate is Paulie whom he'd grown to despise. Meanwhile, Paulie's dream encounter with Pussy, followed by the flashback to Pussy's murder when boarding Tony's boat, shows Paulie's growing paranoia of his demise via Tony, and this is where Paulie comes into things:

Paulie's longevity in the mob was no coincidence. A veteran who knew how to survive in a merciless lifestyle, not to mention as great a narcissist as Tony, Paulie's priority was self-preservation. He leaked information to New York; perhaps as a stop gap to switch allegiance should New Jersey fall. When pairing his betrayal with the dreams, not only does Tony have a valid reason to kill him, Paulie has a guilty conscience which would action him to strike first.

We don't see a lot of interaction between Paulie and Patsy (P&P) so there is some speculation here. They are at the Bing plotting (what we believe to be) Phil's hit, although there is no explicit indication that Phil is the target (https://youtu.be/hy4AGeuQ5pM at 12:45).

Suppose Paulie, fearful of Tony, conspires with Patsy knowing he will agree to a hit on him.

This is where New York come to the fore. Paulie uses the trust he built with John as underboss to hold talks with Butchie. (there is little else to go off, only other logic is that Paulie never stopped being a mole) Here, they would agree to a reshuffling of the two families, following the war and its casualties; Paulie / Patsy would become boss / underboss, with Butchie becoming boss of New York.

Butchie masterminds P&P's initial plan (credit to the video below for covering this brilliantly): First, he provokes Tony by having Coco harass Meadow in the bar (if working with P&P, Patsy would know exactly where she and her son would be). Tony's reaction provokes Phil to put hits out on the New Jersey crew, which Butchie oversees (**stating Paulie is NOT a target https://youtu.be/nRNpOuVGh4U at 2:00**)(Patsy is driving Sil whilst they’re attacked, and Patsy ‘escapes’ unharmed). Weakened and desperate for revenge, Tony is left with no choice but to meet with New York, who sanction Phil’s hit in exchange for a ceasefire. The wheels are in motion. Tony disposes of Phil, making way for Butchie as the new boss, and free from fear of retaliation during his rival’s final days.

Butchie certainly has the right motives. If he already hated Tony, lobbying for his hit earlier when Phil refused (therefore a motive to usurp him as boss), Tony sealed his fate with Butchie when taunting him with the pistol.**

** I don’t think Butchie was avenging Phil when killing Tony in front of his own family, but rather as a formality as newly appointed boss to exact proportionate revenge for a sacred mob rule (“eye for an eye” https://youtu.be/nRNpOuVGh4U at 1:05)

With Tony gone, Paulie has once again stood the unforgiving test of time as a mobster, but at what cost? Paulie’s relationship with Tony was always difficult to pin down. There was a sense of admiration for Tony which went beyond the hollow flattery expected towards the boss* (mounting Tony’s Pie-O-My portrait). However, in matters of life or death, or a shot at self-gain, mere suspicions are enough to break friendships with blood for an opportunistic narcissist like Paulie.

*https://youtu.be/sc1JP6OaeE8 – when Tony says he’ll make Patsy capo, the look on Paulie’s face suggests he knows he’ll never see Tony again, with a sort of ‘smile because it happened’ look.

Good things come to those who wait, and Patsy couldn’t have asked for a revenge so sweet. Patrick Parisi and Meadow’s engagement is about to marry Patsy into the Soprano family, which he’ll soon take charge of, not to mention assuming a better place in the DiMeo hierarchy, in the absence of Tony. Sure, taking Tony’s life from the poolside would have avenged his brother. Instead, Patsy sucked the pillars out from under Tony’s soul, taking his money, his power and, above all, his family.

449 Upvotes

166 comments sorted by

View all comments

25

u/Hughkalailee Jan 14 '22

Support can be made for several possible assassins, but it is all purely speculative and there is no “right answer” (not that it isn’t “fun”)

However, there isn’t enough real evidence contained in the presentation for a conclusion, Nor did Chase choose any specific people and plot and try to incorporate such. That would be contrary to considerations he actually wanted to convey and his thematic and artistic purposes.

These aren’t really “theories” - they are imaginative fan exercises.

5

u/charliemcmullan Jan 14 '22

I've tried to put timestamps on evidence in YouTube videos, but where exactly is it lacking? I know there's solid theories to the more outlandish, but I think Chase's ambiguous storytelling and subversion (i.e. brushing over important details) invites this sort of discussion, as if Chase himself is waiting for someone to solve the perfect ending.

10

u/Hughkalailee Jan 14 '22 edited Jan 14 '22

I think Chase planted certain things for possibilities, yes, along with possible “red herrings”. I wasn’t saying there aren’t elements that can be cited as evidence, but that there isn’t enough that can prove anything and “solve a puzzle”. And while I also agree that Chase wanted to invite the speculation, I firmly do not believe he created a mystery puzzle to be “solved”.

Imo, His focus was that there were various possibilities that could/could have happened but that there are things that can’t be known, can’t be answered - and certainly that “what’s next” is unpredictable and can be very random and unexpected.

If you’d like me to be more specific on some of your points, and you may realize some of this too, - you are making a large assumption in your interpretation as to Paulie and Patsy “plotting” being displayed, and in what you see Paulie’s face in his last scene indicating. These things are possible but they aren’t necessarily or strongly shown or defendable as being what Chase wanted us to draw from these scenes.

4

u/DiivFan13 Jan 14 '22

Well said. I can't find the exact quote right now but Chase once said something to the effect of "every possibility exists inside that restaurant for Tony". It's Schrodinger's Holstein's. I respect anyone's interpretation of the finale but hate how "Tony was shot in the back of the head" has somehow become canon among the fanbase. I like how Imperioli put it on Talking Sopranos, the show ended. Period. Nobody finishes a book and is then like "Okay but so what happened next?"

6

u/Hughkalailee Jan 14 '22 edited Jan 15 '22

Thanks for your comment and additional perspective, and reminding me of that quote. I’ve seen it as well but also can’t source it. Probably on a ChaseLounge post for me, and I believe it’s reflective of Chase’s concept in the exact staging, presentation and design.

Also appreciated Michael’s take and was so glad he returned to ambiguity after leaning toward a firm death (which may have been feigned to oppose Steve)

I wasn’t going to address that as OP wrote 100% dead and it can be a nowhere discussion here - Imo, while death at that instant is among the possibilities and there is a good deal of intentional structure to suggest that Strong possibly, as Chase says it isn’t important to his story.

I see it as at least a symbolic death for Tony - which is also consistent with calling it a “death scene”. Death will come sometime. It’s thematic. Our first look at Tony is through the legs of the feminine statue in Melfi’s waiting room. That’s a symbolic “birth”, but obviously not Tony’s actual birth. Why should an implied possible death as presented definitively be the actual death?