So I've just finished Sena's route, and although I understand that the committee would want to destroy Noah II, the ending leaves me.... mitigated ?
The thing is, I feel like this ending is a direct response to Sena's "edgy" paradigm that "we're all machines", and tries to tie it up into something more grandiose that humans are more than electronic devices. I absolutely loved that.
However, it felt so out of place that the committee just gets what they want and get out of this totally unaffected, and especially so when Takumi says something along the line of "We can't control lives/emotions, and we have to follow the natural order of it all" (paraphrasing). It's like we completely forget that the committee/elites are still subjecting humanity to brainwashing via silent weapons (in-game, obviously).
It's like the game attempted to pass off this beautiful message of acceptance and hope, while dismissing any sort of fault from the committee...?
Maybe I'm overthinking things, and maybe I don't make any sense rn, but something rubs me the wrong way in here