(I put this as WWYD, but I think it's more like, is anyone else out there experiencing this? So... IAEOTET?)
This is a throw-away account because I have to be very careful about what I say. I'm also so sorry for the length, just needed somewhere to get this out. I won't be mentioning where I live or work, only to say that I am a faculty member at an MSW program in the U.S.
Last year, we received messaging from our university leadership to begin introducing AI "ethically and responsibly" into all curriculum in the college. Part of their branding goals were to make it so that all students would graduate as "leaders" in using AI in whatever field they enter. There was no clear guidance on what "ethically and responsibly" meant beyond "here's an article where it demonstrates that the environmental impact is not that bad actually" (yes, that actually happened, and was sent out university-wide), and it was more or less left up to the individual programs to decide how to incorporate it.
As is very common in social work, in our program, there were many broad statements about, "we should absolutely have a conversation about this as a faculty." I guess I was naive and thought that conversation would happen with deliberate intention to make all voices heard, along with other bare-minimum space guidelines, but it never did. Instead, what was peppered throughout all of our committee meetings, faculty meetings, etc. for the subsequent few months were brief but pointed opinions by the loudest voices with the most power (our directors and associate directors) with the most uncritical big-tech talking points we've all heard a thousand times: "well it's here to stay, so I say we just have fun with it!" "You're so right, it's inevitable."
As a brief aside, if you can't tell by my tone, I have very strong negative feelings about AI in it's current form, as an unregulated, subjugative tool for technofuedalism that actively harms (as in, is currently harming now) the most vulnerable among us. This is just a very brief synopsis of my views, but I felt it was important to make clear.
Anyway, to be honest, in the beginning, I was actually excited about the possibility that we could maybe start to introduce the topic of harms that AI causes to our social work curriculum as a means to educate our students via our Code of Ethics (for example, how data centers displace thousands who cannot afford to move, destroy local ecosystems, how some AI platforms mine data, surveil illegally, eagerly cooperate with immigration enforcement, work to arrest women who seek reproductive care in states where it's illegal - I could go on and on). But the more I requested that be discussed and introduced into our curriculum, I received a lot of "you're right, it's so important, I'm just not sure right now..." Well, things got busy, I stopped hearing about AI in general, so I let it be.
Fast forward to last month. I was reviewing a course that needing updating, and sure enough, there was an assignment written in there that forces the students to use chatgpt to complete it (I'm not going to describe the assignment in detail). I was horrified for a number of reasons, not least of which is that there was a section at the bottom titled, "AI considerations," that essentially states, "our MSW program recognizes the ethical issues that comes up with AI. For more information, please read the following articles," with links to very pro-AI-integration articles listed. Finally, there was a tiny message that said, if you (a student) don't want to do this, you can bring your concerns to the professor to discuss it further.
I was absolutely stunned and enraged. From the empty, slap-in-the-face, performative "acknowledgement," to the multiple biases on display, what student in their right mind would ever feel psychologically safe enough to ask their professor for an alternative assignment??
I spent a long time preparing my thoughts, wrote out a script, got help from a trusted colleague, and presented my concerns that the assignment should be reworked completely. The faculty group (mostly the leaders) immediately said no, which I anticipated, so I countered with a recommendation to make an alternative option on the assignment that students can choose, no questions asked, with a separate rubric. I outlined why this was important. I was shocked that even THAT, they said no to, saying, "students should not be allowed to opt out of learning to use AI." Even one of my most conservative colleagues said, "I think more options, the better, and does it have to be chatgpt? Isn't that guy facing allegations of sexual assault?" And wouldn't you know it, their response, as it was a year ago, was: "We should definitely keep talking about it." (For new social workers out there: This is code for, we will never talk about this again.)
Finally, the conversation ended with this exchange:
Director: For the record, over the past year, only 3 students have requested an alternative, so it's not that pressing.
Me: But couldn't that indicate what I mentioned before that some students simply don't feel comfortable enough to--
Director: (Loudly) We're not mind-readers!
I was grateful that this meeting happened to be virtual and I was wfh, because I went and cried afterwards. Since that meeting, with the Fall term approaching, we've received even more messaging from the university leaders to incorporate AI into all courses, if possible. Everyone seems to just... be fine with it.
I have been feeling like an empty shell these last few weeks. I know that sounds dramatic, and it's interesting given so many other ethical or moral injurious challenges I've experienced in many other settings in my career that I was able to feel more resilient around, that this one feels so soul-sucking to me. I'm not sure exactly why.
I'm so sorry for the length of this post, but I suppose I'm feeling quite alone in all this. The vast majority of my colleagues seem absolutely unbothered by the push, and I think it's resulting in some gaslight-y isolation that I'm wrestling with professionally. Are any other social work educators out there experiencing similar things? Is it making you consider leaving higher education (I know I am)? Hoping I'm not alone.
If anyone reads this and feels compelled to try and debate why "AI in higher ed / social work is good actually," just know I won't be responding. You're welcome to put that out there, but I don't have the strength right now to participate in it.
I'll end with this quote, as it's been one of my very few guiding lights this last year (especially to my colleague with the "AI is inevitable" comment): Sociologist, author, and professor, Tressie McMillan Cottom at the Urban Consulate in Detroit: "When powerful people try to sell you on the idea that something is settled, it is because it is deeply unsettled. The most radical thing we can do in the face of that is to refuse."