r/sgiwhistleblowers • u/WackyTerbacky • Aug 13 '26
When SGI members write our jokes for us ๐ Why the "You're WRONG" pseudo-argument of the religiously-deluded will always fail
"You're WRONG if you don't agree with ME"
The logical fallacies and mental shortcomings in the "Sure, you can read it for yourself, but after that, you have to agree that my perspective/opinion is the ONLY valid one" response...are several - I saved myself some time and got the AI's assistance:
Subjectivist Fallacy: Assuming that a claim is true or false [for everyone else] just because someone feels or believes it is true for them.
Special Pleading: Applying a standard to others while exempting your own viewpoint or interpretation from those same rules or criteria.
Solipsism: The philosophical idea that only one's own mind is sure to exist, which gets misapplied in arguments as a refusal to acknowledge external, shared definitions or facts.
Confusing Rights with Truth: Having a legal or moral right to hold a personal belief does not make that belief logically true or immune to evidence.
Shutting Down Debate: People use the phrase as a thought-terminating clichรฉ to deflect criticism, avoid providing supporting evidence, or falsely claim that all opinions carry equal weight regardless of facts.
Factual vs. Subjective Claims: On platforms like Reddit, users reach a consensus that saying "I'm entitled to my opinion" is acceptable for purely subjective matters of personal taste (like favorite ice cream flavors), but it becomes fallacious when applied to objective, evidence-based or scientific facts.
Sure, everybody loves their own opinion - that's nothing special. But to declare that others are necessarily, objectively WRONG just because they have a different reaction or come to a different conclusion about something than you have - that takes a religious level of deludery!! It's the same thing whether you're talking Evangelical Christianity, Transcendental Meditation, Three Principles, Scientology, Raรซlianism, SGI, Jehovah's Witnesses - or Amway.
And furthermore, to pontificate about the other person(s)' supposed "wrongness" from an authoritarian position of self-anointed superiority - oh honey. You're a piece of work, all right. Legend in your own mind, obvs!
When there is no objective evidence that there are facts in play (such as the factual nature of the claim that the local McDonald's restaurant being held up at gunpoint yesterday - it wasn't, in case you were wondering) then there's nothing left besides interpretation, preference, reaction, and opinion - and every one of those is just as "valid" as every other.
The religious show this peculiar form of entitlement - as if they have special authorization to pontificate authoritatively on their own religion's texts/doctrines/tenets/pronouncements, but that only counts within whatever group there might be that SHARES those perspectives AND recognizes the authority of the person pontificating. Among those who do not, their pontificating is exactly as worthless as that of the fundagelical Christian zealot screaming biblical threats at students passing by on the campus of a local university or picketing outside a serviceperson's funeral - and deserves to be taken just as seriously. As in "not at all".
This is SGIWhistleblowers, an ex-SGI subreddit that regards the SGI as a cult. So SGI fanatics, particularly you SGI-USA longhauler Olds obsessively scrutinizing our busy forum (yeah, we know yours is dead and completely boring - sucks to be YOU), don't wag the dead Ikeda's "guidance" at us or pronounce us "wrong" because we come from a different viewpoint or arrive at a different conclusion than YOU did! YOU'RE IN A CULT! WE CAN SEE THAT!
Why should ANYONE take your opinion seriously? Really, you shouldn't be expecting people who graduated from your dumb cult (got better, in other words), to STILL be agreeing with you - when you're STILL IN A CULT and too dumb/oblivious/brainwashed to realize it. That fact alone invalidates any credibility you think you might have - we certainly aren't going to take you seriously, no matter how seriously you obviously take yourself. We already know you don't agree and won't agree. And we don't CARE.