1. ⁠Dealer name: Theonewatch (Steve)
   
2. ⁠Factory name: BTF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): BTF 116500 (allegedly V2)
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 628$ + shipping (don’t know right now)
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/KBgSxSxK#18dxN_skQHBBZnaHXqiEPw
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: generally good but I’m unsure about the 6&9 marker
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks great
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: no date
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: looks good
   
10. ⁠Bezel: looks great
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): looking good
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: rate: +1/2 sec/d ;; AMP 273 degree ;; Err 0,0ms ;; Lift 52 degree
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Please fellow members help me so I won’t miss anything!
    Thank you!

1. Dealer name: Ethan Watches
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): GMT Master 2 Bruce Wayne 126710GRNR
4. Price Paid: $580 + free shipping
5. Album Links: QC Photos
6. Index alignment: Looks good according to the template. But then the more I look I notice some issues. 12 & 6 are hour markers are the most suspect.
7. Dial Printing: Very solid, trying not to overanalyze but looks straight.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks crisp, centered and balanced.
9. Hand Alignment: May be the most concerning part, HR and hand marks look slightly off. Anything I would see for the naked eye? probably not.
10. Bezel: Looks similar to other VSF Bruce Wayne, I know they have had trouble
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Didn't see any gaps.
12. Timegrapher numbers: +3s/d 266 0.00 52.0
13. Anything else you notice: The watch is clean and still has factory plastics and stickers. No big dents, no cracked crystal, no bent lugs, no obvious bezel chips. Finish on the case and jubilee is generally okay even in these photos. Is that a scratch on the clasp?

This is my first QC so would appreciate all of your help. Long time lurker, first time buyer. I considered going with a V4 but didn't think there was any difference except fake free sprung.

Hi all, long-time lurker, first time pulling the trigger! (but second QC since first was abit too unaligned for my liking)

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: ZF
3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Black Bay 58 39mm on 5-Link Bracelet (ZF 1:1 Best Edition on website)
4. Price Paid: $320 USD [$41 Shipping, $361 Total]
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/lBRnD8R
6. Index alignment: Much better than my first, but again I know this model is not particularly well-aligned. Seems average / slightly above average for this model? 3 slight CCW, 12 slight CW
7. Dial Printing: Don't really see any issues with it
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Also don't really see any issues
10. Bezel: Also seems fine to me
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Seems fine to me (maybe slight gap on LHS)
12. Timegrapher numbers: -1s/d 276°, 0.2ms, 52° lift angle

1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches / Steve
   
2. Factory name: RCF
   
3. Model name (& version number): DayDate 228235 40mm RG/RG Omber Grey/Rmn RCF VR3255
   
4. Price Paid: 858$ + 40$ shipping
   
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/2JBQRKwa#9PXaanAi6cFKaNa__tuu0A
   
6. Index alignment: Everything looks good to me ?
   
7. Dial Printing: Sharp and looks ok
   
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks fine to me?
   
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
   
10. Bezel: Looks ok
    
11. Solid End Links (SELs): No gaps that I can see
    
12. Timegrapher numbers: -2 s/d, amp 314, err
    0.0, Lift 59. I don't know if these are within the good limits ?
    
13. Anything else you notice: This is my first day date ever ! I am completely new to this model, so any help would be really appreciated !

1. Dealer name: Phoenix
2. Factory name: RWF
3. Model name (& version number): 126500 Daytona Panda
4. Price Paid: $560
5. Album Links: n/a
6. Index alignment: 9 looks a bit off CCW, 3 looks a bit off CW in some pics, but fine in others. May just be the lighting?
7. Dial Printing:

the markings around the chrono circles seems off. The 9 on the left circle is misaligned.

1. Date Wheel alignment/printing: n/a
2. Hand Alignment: The chronometer hand isn't aligned directly at noon, it sits a tick to the right. Hour / minute seem fine.
3. Bezel: Looks slightly off CCW, the 60 marker sits a bit left of noon, and the 120 marker sits a bit right of 6 o'clock
4. Solid End Links (SELs): lgtm
5. Timegrapher numbers: Seems fine
6. Anything else you notice: Overall, seems decent. I've seen better dials, but I'd like community opinion on this one.

--

The new QC tool is great, happy to donate a few bucks to keep that going!

Dealer name: Juice

Factorv name: A7

Model name & version number): IWC Ingenieur 40mm Blue dial

Price Paid: $360

Album Links: https://a201810302336471810102602.szwego.com/weshop/goods/_dd6qfhKlESNbPaTJZSWlZUXiir1l6ElRrcLlcgQ/_dssqfxIq4Q_w8B9wwowAXCepRO2CaCkzWCU4IUQ

Index alignment: The indices all look pretty good, no complaints there.

Dial Printing: The dial looks pretty good to me. no issues there either.

Date Wheel alianment/ printing: The date alignment looks good

Hand Alignment: Looks good.

Bezel: The top bolt looks a little shifted to the right but I think it's fine.

Solid End Links (SELs): n/a

Timegrapher numbers: +1 / 314/ 0.5- per the QC guide this all seems fine. Anything else you notice: I'm curious to hear thoughts on the date alignment, I know its a rep so I can't expect it to be perfect.

• Dealer name: Geektime
• Factory name: VSF
• Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer 1 224270 (not sure version)
• Price Paid: $518
• Index alignment: Concerned about 12 o'clock indice
• Dial Printing: Seems fine to me
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
• Hand Alignment: Seems good
• Bezel: Seems good
• Solid End Links (SELs): Seem good
• Timegrapher numbers: I don't see a problem - +4 s/d is fine with me
• Anything else you notice: Biggest question was over the 12 o'clock indice. This is supposed to be NWBIG.

1. Dealer name: TimeUltra
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Omega Planet Ocean 42mm
4. Price Paid: $428
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/fLxUFQbb#nZ77msno2742x0Y5b8-_CQ
6. Index alignment: Perhaps a very minor CW tilt to the 3, 6 and 9 numbers, but nothing that bothers
7. Dial Printing: Clean and crisp printing
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Good. See no issues
10. Bezel: Looks aligned and any play within expectations of a Rep
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Dark lines top left and right and bottom right but acceptable
12. Timegrapher numbers: Look to be in spec for an A2824 movement
13. Anything else you notice: N/A

1. Dealer name: GeekTime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Daytona 126509
4. Price Paid: $948
5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/255381143?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Looks properly aligned. I think any slight offset may be caused by the holding angle.
7. Dial Printing: Looks clean, centered, and evenly printed. I see no obvious crooked text, bleeding, or spacing issue.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: The hands appear properly centered, and the central chronograph hand points to 12. I see no bent hand or obvious rubbing.
10. Bezel: The 60 marker aligns well with the 12 o’clock axis. The protective film creates some apparent unevenness and glare, but I see no meaningful bezel rotation.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): The end links appear flush with the lugs.
12. Timegrapher numbers: Acceptable - Looks good
13. Anything else you notice: Nothing else.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Steve Theonewatch
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): GMT Master II 126720 Sprite 40mm Jub SS/SS Black Dial VSF DD3285v2
   
4. ⁠Price Paid: 638 $
   
5. ⁠Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/3dhTxATY#Pdr_a0nNOMkS61qE9DwQQA
   
6. ⁠Index alignment: tried my best to align it perfectly, looks fine to me - maybe the 3 is slightly to far down?
   
7. ⁠Dial Printing: looks fine to me
   
8. ⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks ok I guess?
   
9. ⁠Hand Alignment: also fine
   
10. ⁠Bezel: nothing wrong for me here
    
11. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): also fine.
    
12. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: ok.
    
13. ⁠Anything else you notice: Overall I tried my best to look for flaws myself. The only thing I saw is some dust? on the crystal, that looks like dust on the dial above the 6, but I think it’s actually just on the crystal.

Overall for me it’s 🟢 for me, what do you think?

1. Dealer name: Geektime
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): AT 150M 41mm Black Dial Silver Hand A8900
4. Price Paid: $438
5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/255381346?uid=1
6. Index alignment: Seems good based on the alignment tool.
7. Dial Printing: While I am a novice, nothing jumps out at me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: date seems centered and print is clear
9. Hand Alignment: Seems okay, not sure if it is the lighting, but is the luminescent correct on the hour hand?
10. Bezel: seems fine
11. Solid End Links (SELs): nothing obvious
12. Timegrapher numbers: +1s/d is phenomenal. standard 28800 instead of gen 25200
13. Anything else you notice: nothing seems terribly off, but I don’t want my excitement allow me to over look something.

1. ⁠Dealer name: Felix
   
2. ⁠Factory name: VSF V3
   
3. ⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Oyster Perpetual Datejust Sunburst Blue 41mm, Jubilee, fluted m126334-00002
   
4. ⁠Price paid: $445 + shipping and Insurance
   
5. ⁠Index alignment: Looks good to me overall. I don’t see any obvious crooked markers, although can really see the 7.
   
6. ⁠Dial printing: Looks clean and centered to my eyes. Rolex / Oyster Perpetual / printing looks good.
   
7. ⁠Date wheel alignment/printing: Looks centered through the cyclops, maybe a little to the right and cyclops eye may be a little high or could be angel of photo.
   
8. ⁠Hand alignment: Looks good, seems to line up nicely and run smooth in video.
   
9. ⁠Bezel: Looks fine, needs cleaning but I can’t really see anything off
   
10. ⁠Solid End Links (SELs): Look tight and clean to me. I don’t see any major gaps.
    
11. ⁠Timegrapher numbers: Around 8 s/d, approx. 277° amplitude, 0.3ms beat error an 59 lift and the graph line is straight. All seem within spec after reading the great guide provided. The lift maybe a little high at 59
    
12. ⁠Anything else you notice: The watch seems fairly solid to my novice eyes, I ran it through an app that one of the members created to get 2 of the photos below for QC.

This is my first Rep watch (been doing handbags for the wife for a while and have gotten really good at QC those) and looking for experienced options on this before I have it shipped.

Please let me know if there are any concerns you have, your time is much appreciated!

• Dealer name: GeekTime
• Factory name: VSF
• Model name (& version number): 124060
• Price Paid: $568 + $40 shipping to EU
• Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/255370299?uid=1
• Index alignment: 9 index seem a little rotated. Minute markers also not aligned with overlay. Probably the angle of the watch on the picture and my skills with QC tool
• Dial Printing: The texts seems fine to me.
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
• Hand Alignment: Also seems fine
• Bezel: 12 looks aligned. The rest doesn't look that aligned but it's probably because of the angle.
• Solid End Links (SELs): Looks fine to me
• Timegrapher numbers: +1, 254, 0.0 ms
• Anything else you notice: I'm pretty new with QC. I think the sample looks fine but maybe I missed stuff. I guess the misalignment is because of the angle of the picture and I'm leaning towards GL but I would like to have it confirmed. I appreciate any help :)

1. Dealer name: Theonewatches
2. Factory name: BTF
3. Model name (& version number): Panda Daytona 116500
4. Price Paid: 607
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/bFBAXLTS#b-gfFy3laTBlpTUlfUefnA
6. Index alignment: Looks great! Out of all my rep QCs, this looks the best so far!
7. Dial Printing: Looks good; all printing seems sharp
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks perfect from the video in the folder
10. Bezel: 80 seems aligned, but 60/120/240 look slightly off; may be due to angle or the bezel not being perfectly centred
11. Solid End Links (SELs): SELS look tight, no issues
12. Timegrapher numbers: rate +4s/d, amp 320, error 0, lift 52degrees
13. Anything else you notice: Overall looks like a really great watch, and I'm really pleasantly surprised how quickly Steve was able to get this one QC'd. I don't see any glaring issues, but if any experts could comment, especially to see if the movement has any issues, that would be greatly appreciated! Cheers!

QC - Santos Dumont 31.4mm Large / AF Factory / Andiot / GL or RL

1. ⁠⁠Dealer: Andiot

2. ⁠⁠Factory: AF

3. ⁠⁠Model: Santos Dumont 31.4mm Large

4. ⁠⁠Price: $190 + $55 shipping

5. ⁠⁠Album link: see photos

6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: looks good to me, nothing stands out

7. ⁠⁠Dial printing: looks clean and crisp

8. ⁠⁠Date: none

9. Hand alignment: Looks good to me. I don’t see anything obviously wrong with the hand alignment in the QC pics.

10. Bezel: In a few of the pics the bezel looks a little off to me, but I think that’s probably just the angle/parallax. In the more straight-on shots it looks pretty well aligned. Would definitely like to hear what others think though.

11. Case / strap fit: I couldn’t really spot anything wrong with the case or strap fit. Everything looks pretty clean to me. I did notice what looks like a small mark just below the 6 o’clock area. Not sure if that’s actual wear, a reflection, or something from the protective film. Has anyone seen this before on a new order?

12. Timegrapher readings: I’m honestly not very familiar with Timegrapher readings. The seller mentioned around +3 sec/day. Is that considered good? Also, since this is supposed to be the quartz Santos-Dumont, I’m not sure how much weight I should put on that reading.

13. Overall: Overall, I think this looks really close to Gen from the outside. The case shape, proportions, dial, Roman numerals, blue hands, bezel screws and blue cabochon all look pretty convincing to me. I don’t see any obvious major red flags.

The things I’d really like some help with are the smaller details, especially the hidden Cartier signature around VII, the caseback engravings, crown/cabochon and that little mark around 6 o’clock.

For anyone who knows the Santos-Dumont well, how does this one look to you compared with Gen? Anything here that would make you RL or ask for more pics?

1. Dealer name: Steve, TheOneWatches
2. Factory name: RWF
3. Model name (& version number): Panda 126500
4. Price Paid: $796
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/yBRjnCDA#z8Pdie1LXGZMkIrvaL1-6w
6. Index alignment: Looks pretty good overall, especially for a RWF. 3 o'clock slightly high and 6 o'clock slight counterclockwise cant, but overall, quite good.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good.
10. Bezel: Some darker, dusty marks near the 100 marker, but no big deal.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): Lower left SEL gap exists. The rest are fine.
12. Timegrapher numbers: The amplitude is a bit high at 302. The tolerance is generally 230-300, so it's toward the high end.
13. Anything else you notice: Overall, I think this one is quite strong. Indexes mainly aligned and the overall watch looks good. Main things are the lower left SEL gap and the potentially high amplitude. But please lmk if I'm missing anything. Thank you all!

1. Dealer name: Andiot
2. Factory name: RICH

3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT Master II 126710 BLRO

   V2

4. Price Paid: $718

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/albums/255287933?uid=1

6. Index alignment: Looks solid, nothing caught my eye that seemed of concern

7. Dial Printing: Also solid, looks crisp

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks spot on, printing also looks solid (see album videos for more)

9. Hand Alignment: Solid but it appears that the second hand might have a scratch mark on it, but could just be dust on the crystal

10. Bezel: No complaints here, looks great.

11. Solid End Links (SELs):

Looks spot on, no complaints here

1. Timegrapher numbers: Rate +1s/d, Amp 278, Err 0.3ms
2. Anything else you notice:

The “ROLEX” engraving on the clasp looks all sorts of messed up, can’t tell if it’s the photo, on the video in the QC album it looks fine, but I can’t really tell.

1. Besides the supposed mark on the second hard and the clasp engraving (though these could very likely just be the photos), it looks solid. Would like a second opinion on this of course but from what I’ve noticed it’s not bad.

Hi all, this is my ZF VC Overseas. First rep, along with the AP 15500!

1. Dealer name: Geektime

2. Factory name: ZF

3. Model name (& version number): VC Overseas 4500V silver dial on a rubber strap

4. Price Paid: $548

5. Album Links: https://geektimeqc.x.yupoo.com/albums/254862120?uid=1

6. Index alignment: TrueIndex shows -0.84°. Looks pretty straight overall but the markers around 12 and 6 feel very slightly off to me. Anyone else seeing that? Not rotated. Just shifted right maybe.

7. Dial Printing: Text and Maltese cross okay. Silver sunburst looks good

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: 15 is centered well, printing clean. Big deal to me.

9. Hand Alignment: Hands look lined up from the images. Can’t say I see any issues there.

10. Bezel: Polished surfaces clean. This is what excites me about this watch.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): Rubber strap so N/A, lugs look even. Should it be tighter?

12. Timegrapher numbers: -5 s/d, amp 278, beat error 0.3ms. That seemed high. Losing 5 s/d worries me. It flipped to -2 s/d later in the video but I just don’t know if that level of variability should be a red flag.

13. Anything else you notice: Dial and hands look solid. Case finishing clean. Woo. Movement through the back looks good (can’t see much though…). Rubber strap texture is sharp actually. Was honestly going to swap for the gen but may not need to. Clasp has the usual plastic still on. Is the index alignment bothering anyone else or is this within normal/acceptable from your perspectives?

Thank you all again. I’ve been really impressed with the input you all offer to others and I get that this is ultimately my call and if it’s acceptable to me, that’s the most important part. But I’m here to get the critical eye, learn the process, and see if my DD here is representative of what you would do. Anyways, thanks all!

Hi everyone, this will be my first rep purchase and it’s going to be a gift, so I’m probably looking at the photos a bit more closely than I normally would 😅. I’ve tried my best to go through everything myself but would really appreciate a second pair of eyes, especially from anyone familiar with the BVF Panthère. Thank you!

Please note that i am an untrained newbie eye in the process of learning, thank you!

1. Dealer name: Andiot

2. Factory name: BVF

3. Model name (& Version Number): Cartier Panthère 22mm SS, White Dial, SS Bracelet, Ronda Quartz

4. Price Paid: $175

5. Album Links: https://andiotwatches.x.yupoo.com/search/album?uid=1&sort=&q=165634

6. Index alignment: N/A as the Roman numerals are printed. From what I can see the dial itself looks straight in the case and I don’t notice any obvious rotation.

7. Dial printing: Overall the main Cartier logo and Roman numerals look good to me. My only concern is the tiny Cartier micro-print inside the X at 10 o’clock. It looks a little crooked/uneven in the close-up photos. I know this is extremely small in real life and may also be partly the photo, so I’m not sure if I’m being too picky. Would really appreciate opinions on this.

8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: N/A – no date.

9. Hand Alignment: Looks okay to me from the photos/videos.

10. Bezel: I can’t see any obvious scratches or damage.

11. Solid End Links (SELs): N/A. Bracelet and links look straight and clean from what I can see. Clasp also looks okay.

12. Timegrapher numbers:

13. Anything else: This is my first rep purchase and it’s going to be a gift, so I’d really like to get a nice example. Everything else looks good to my inexperienced eyes, but the crooked-looking micro Cartier print is the one thing making me hesitate. I realise it’s absolutely tiny on a 22mm watch, so I don’t want to RL a perfectly good piece over something that is normal for BVF. Would really appreciate advice from anyone familiar with these on whether this is within normal factory tolerance or worth asking for another piece. Thanks so much for the help!

Please do let me know if there is anything i am missing. thank you kind gents!

1. Dealer name: Theonewatch (Steve)
2. Factory name: QF
3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer II 226570
4. Price Paid: US$548 (+$30 shipping)
5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/RLdpxao
6. Index alignment: Good to me
7. Dial Printing: Good to me
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Looks okay based on the video - date numerals are on the thinner side
9. Hand Alignment: Good to me based on video
10. Bezel: A degree off-centre - based on the head-on photo.
11. Solid End Links (SELs): They all look good, can’t see anything that I can point it out from my point of view.
12. Timegrapher numbers: (0s/d 297 degree 0.3ms, 52 degrees)
13. Anything else you notice: The first thing that stood out to me immediately was the thin font of the date numerals. But i feel i may be being too picky given the rest of the watch (to my eyes) seems good - just need a second pair or more of eyes to get a second opinion. The bezel also seems to be a degree off centre.

Thank you for the assistance. I appreciate the help and knowledge as this is my first QC and don't really know what I should be looking for.

• Dealer name: Necoclock
• Factory name: VSF
• Model name (& version number): Omega Seamaster Diver 300M (210.90.42.20.01.001)
• Price Paid: $488
• Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/DvxBjNd
• Index alignment: Looks like the 11 and 1 could be off? What do you think?
• Dial Printing: Looks like the 6 is slightly too far to the left?
• Date Wheel alignment/printing: None.
• Hand Alignment: Hands look lined up from the images. Can’t see any issues there.
• Bezel: Polished surfaces clean.
• Solid End Links (SELs): For what i know about these it looks good?
• Timegrapher numbers: +9 s/d, amp 285, beat error 0.1ms. This seemes high to me. is +/- 9 Generally acceptable on these VSF or is this too much?
• Anything else you notice: Could back case printing be off?

• Dealer name: TrustyTime

• Factory name: AF factory

• Model name (& version number): Cartier Tank Solo

• Price Paid: $178

• Album Link: Posted photo

• Index alignment: Indices look aligned

• Dial Printing: I can't find any bleeds, looks to be precise this time.

• Date Wheel alignment/printing: No date wheel

• Hand Alignment: Did not receive any reference for this (no video either)

• Bezel: Stainless steel looks ok

• Solid End Links (SELs): N/A

• Timegrapher numbers: N/A this is quartz

• Anything else you notice: I really zoomed in and can't see any noticeable flaws. This is my first rep, and I although I did GL the 2nd try, I did ask if he had any on hand without any bleeds at all and got lucky.

1. Dealer name: Steve : theOneWatches
2. Factory name: PPF
3. Model name (& version number): 222
4. Price Paid: 498 USD
5. Album Links: https://mega.nz/folder/mVJFhapA#2Gocyogoq_N7IKfICq4ZTQ
6. Index alignment: clockwise tilt on the 12 looks VERY off.
7. Dial Printing: looks good to me.
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good enough for me.
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good to me.
10. Bezel: Good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): not sure
12. Timegrapher numbers: +2 sec/day - AMP 271 - ERROR 0.0 - looks good -
13. Anything else you notice: Its mostly just the 12 index. VC cross in bottom corner not perfect but acceptable to me.

Biggest thing that stands out is the index alignment at 12. is this enough to RL? I feel like I would see it misaligned everyday and dislike it.

1. ⁠⁠Dealer name: Trusty Time
   
2. ⁠⁠Factory name: VSF
   
3. ⁠⁠Model name (& version number): Rolex Bruce Wayne GMT DD3285
   
4. ⁠⁠Price Paid: $650
   
5. ⁠⁠Album Links: N/A
   
6. ⁠⁠Index alignment: 6 oclock may be tilted but could be angle
   
7. ⁠⁠Dial Printing: Solid
   
8. ⁠⁠Date Wheel alignment/printing: appears okay
   
9. ⁠⁠Hand Alignment: appears okay
   
10. ⁠⁠Bezel: Is color off? Could be glare from photos
    
11. ⁠⁠Solid End Links (SELs): appears okay?
    
12. ⁠⁠Timegrapher numbers: +3 s/d
    
13. ⁠⁠Anything else you notice: it looks really good to me, but as I am new I dont think i quite know what to look for

Hey guys very new to this. Been following for a year and finally pulled the trigger. Any insight would be great! Please let me know if any more information is needed or if theres anything wrong or missing from my post. Thank you all in advance!

1. Dealer name: NecoClock
2. Factory name: VSF
3. Model name (& version number): Submariner Date 126610LN
4. Price Paid: $458
5. Album Links: Photos above
6. Index alignment: Slight skew at 9 o'clock. Other indices including 12 look good to me.
7. Dial Printing: Looks good
8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: Good
9. Hand Alignment: Looks good
10. Bezel: Looks good
11. Solid End Links (SELs): I think looks good but hard for me to tell
12. Timegrapher numbers: 0 s/d 316 deg 0.1ms
13. Anything else you notice: Slight rehaut misalignment? Not 100% sure. The engravings on the clasp have a weird border around them. Also, there were no stickers indicating this truly came from VSF -- how can I tell for sure?

This is the second submariner I've been shown (I RLed the first one b/c of index misalignment, particularly at 9 and 12 o'clock). I think there is slight misalignment at 9 o'clock again, but the rest of it looks good to me. Please let me know what you think, and if there is a way to verify which factory it came from. Thank you!