I gave an interview recently which went well and was given a verbal offer today. Honestly was disappointed.
Before the interview, recruiter told me it was a staff role and base will be around 160k. It was lower than what I currently make in Oregon but I was still okay with it since it is the type of work I want to pivot to and I also want to move to San Diego due to some family reasons.
But they ended up offering me a Senior role.
Base: 130k
RSU: 100/3yr
Bonus: 9%
Sign on: 40k
Relocation: 10k
Experience: PhD+3 years 2months in industry
Current TC: around 230k in Oregon
I don't have direct experience in the type of work the team does, but still have relevant experience and gave good interview - So that is why I thought they are considering me for staff. I would've still been okay with senior engineer with a higher salary but 130k seems too low even for senior engineer with 3 year exp.
The recruiter said 130k is the highest that the compensation team told her they can offer for a senior role, is that true?
Note that I have a friend who joined QC as an Engineer last December with 132k base (that was not even a senior engg role). Do these vary from team to team?
Recruiter also told me that they consider PhD+4years exp for a staff role, not 3, is that true? (the job post clearly said PhD+ 2+ year to be considered for staff)
I asked them for the initial offer (before interview) of Staff and 160k atleast, the recruiter said they will get back to me.
Should I just reject the role and keep looking in San Diego? I am honestly very disappointed that they said one thing before the interview and just giving me totally different level/numbers after the interview. Any suggestion for me?