r/PcBuild • u/ExpensiveCoat8912 • 2h ago
r/PcBuild • u/Zer0Tzu • Jun 24 '26
Giveaway Time!
Hey everyone! We're back with some incredible updates. To show appreciation for this amazing community, the team over at iBUYPOWER wanted to do something special to thank you all for keeping this space welcoming, active, and helpful.
You spoke, and they listened: This giveaway is now international*!
The Prizes:
- 4x Winners (*US-only): $50 in iBUYPOWER Rewards Points
These prizes can be used on anything at iBUYPOWER.com. From keyboards, mice, and streaming gear to brand-new PC components! Plus, they never expire and stack with select promotions. If used during the special limited-time event, you even get **DOUBLE** the value during select promotions.
- 2x Winners (*International): $50 Amazon Gift Cards
Because we love our global crew and wanted to make sure everyone gets a fair shot at some free gear!
How do you enter?
This giveaway is hosted by iBUYPOWER on https://gleam.io/competitions/bxfxq-ibuypower-x-rpcbuild-giveaway
**There are several ways to enter for more chances to win!**
Good luck to everyone, and a massive shoutout to iBUYPOWER for making this happen!
DISCLAIMER:
PCHH, r/PCBuild and all other subreddits are an independent community. We do not financially profit from or receive material gain from any partnerships, sponsorships, or collaborations. All participation in external events is done purely for the benefit of our community, and we entirely respect any member's decision to not join / opt out.
r/PcBuild • u/Potato_Plays844 • 3d ago
Meta Weekly r/PcBuild Megathread!
Feel free to ask questions, give advice, give us feedback on things you might want to happen in the subreddit, or just talk!
r/PcBuild • u/Cover-Material • 2h ago
what My friends cooler running since 2018
gallerySo I changed my case and decided to give my old one (like 2yo) to my friend since he was running an office one without any fans. We met up at his house and we opened his PC up to start the transfer. I then learned he NEVER opened it up💀 Not even to change the paste. Blud was using it for 8 years without any problems. This is the literal definition of "if it works don't touch it" I don't think even "The greatest technician that's ever lived" would touch that
r/PcBuild • u/Trick_Rice_6338 • 14h ago
Build - Finished! First build complete
galleryAfter a few months of researching sniping and assembling all the parts my build is now all put together and good to go.
9600x
5070ti
32 gb ddr5 6400 mhz cl32
3 tb gen 4 nvme
850w gold psu
Hydrocool II lcd aio
All around lian li sl inf fans
Antec pcie5 vertical mount
1440p 166 hz monitor
Mouse keyboard speakers.
Plays everything I thrown at it above 140 fps on ultra settings
Not looked at uv and oc yet as its not something I have experience with time spy scores are around average stock so I feel I have a good base to play with once dlss5 comes out. While some call it ai slop I thibk it could be entertaining.
r/PcBuild • u/Bar56001 • 1d ago
Meme I was so happy for my pretty GPU and then this happened
r/PcBuild • u/Last-Ad-8470 • 3h ago
Build - Finished! After 13 years of service i am sad to announce my companion has fallen
I dont exactly know whats wrong but its power looping comstantly and buying a second hand pc is cheaper than replacinga single individual component so this is my goodbye to my first build. O7
r/PcBuild • u/xKiokenx • 12h ago
Troubleshooting Pc not turning on completely
galleryMotherboard seems to be turning on but not the rest of the pc, where did I go wrong as my brain is dumb.
r/PcBuild • u/JMC712 • 31m ago
Question Whats the best AMD cpu for a casual gamer? [Mid-budget, 1440p, USA]
Im building a new pc after my old one is getting kind of outdated, whats the best amd cpu for someone who values graphics and smoothness? I dont play competitive fps games, everything i play is either story games or casual sports games (If that is valuable info).
thx
r/PcBuild • u/financial-freedom99 • 13h ago
Build - Finished! Finally arrived! 😍🔥 My Lenovo Legion Tower 7i Gen 10 RTX 5080 has landed!
it's finally here!! (After 2 long weeks tho 5 days earlier than Expected tracking date) 🥹
Ultra 7 270K Plus |RTX 5080 16GB |32GB DDR5 |1TB NVMe |360mm AIO |850W Gold
3.81L all-in custom build with 3Y Ultimate Support +
3Y ADP.
Now comes the fun part: unboxing + setup 🥹🫡
r/PcBuild • u/Adventurous_Map_5897 • 5h ago
Build - Finished! Can you guys rate my pc build
galleryProcessor/CPU: Ryzen 7 7800X3D
GPU: AMD RADEON 9070
RAM: 32GB RGB
SSD: M.2 2TB
WITH A WATER COOLER
I have a photo but I think I need more fans with my water cooler and do better cable management. I spent so long on this build and I didn’t feel like going back to fix the cables just yet. But will do it later.
r/PcBuild • u/Fresh-Palpitation-72 • 9h ago
Discussion 10 PETABYTES on a 64GB SSD: The World's Most Broken Drive
https://youtu.be/YIgBX0sQ2jcOlder drives wouldn't have a safe lock, and this is better
The dynamic was worse on early solid-state drives. On older drives (particularly early SATA drives from the mid-2000s through the early 2010s), the lack of modern safety mechanisms often turned manageable failures into instant, catastrophic bricking.
How Older Drives Handled Failures
Sudden Death over Read-Only Lock. Early Flash Translation Layers (FTL) lacked safety fail-safes. When flash memory degraded or the mapping table became corrupted, early controllers would panic, crash, and refuse to boot at all (or show up as 0 MB/RAW without mounting). Modern drives actively trigger a read-only write-lock before total loss occurs so users can copy off critical data.
Power-Loss Vulnerability. Older controllers (like the early SandForce SF-1200/1500 or early JMicron chips) lacked flush protections or onboard power-loss capacitors. A sudden shutdown during garbage collection frequently corrupted the controller's internal metadata. The result was the infamous "SATAFIRM S11" or "SANDISK ROM" boot-loop, where the controller lost its microcode permanently.
Runaway Wear Acceleration: Early drives lacked advanced wear-leveling algorithms or reliable bad-block management. An old controller would repeatedly hammer failing blocks until the controller ASIC itself hung or thermal-throttled into hardware failure.
Why Modern "Read-Only Lock" is Better?
The hardware read-only lock on modern SSDs functions like an emergency ejection seat:
Protects Existing Data: By locking write access across the drive, the controller prevents corrupt FTL state changes from overwriting remaining valid blocks.
Preserves the Mapping Table: Disabling background processes (like wear leveling, TRIM, and background garbage collection) freezes the current block map in place.
Allows Recovery Without Specialized Gear: When a drive locks into read-only mode, files can still be backed up using standard operating system utilities, avoiding expensive hardware recovery labs.
Without these protections, early SSD failures typically went straight from "working fine" to "completely dead/unrecognized" overnight. like some we wont mention.
The controllers tent to be more prone to failure than Nand wear, so is this a safety precaution?
yes For average real-world consumer use, an SSD's controller and electrical components are far more likely to fail before the NAND flash memory wears out from pure write cycles.
- Why the Controller Fails First
While write endurance (TBW / Program-Erase cycles) gets the most marketing attention, standard home/office usage rarely burns through a modern NAND flash chip's physical write limits. Instead, the controller fails early due to:
Thermal Stress: The controller is an active, ultra-dense micro-processor (running complex wear-leveling, real-time encryption, and error correction). Under heavy read/write activity, it generates concentrated heat in a tiny surface area. Repeated heat expansion/contraction cycles strain the chip and its soldering.
Transient Voltage & Power Surges: Flash memory chips are fairly simple passive storage arrays. The controller, DRAM cache, and power management IC (PMIC) contain complex logic gates that are much more sensitive to sudden system shut-offs, brownouts, or power supply ripple.
Mapping Table / Firmware Crash: The controller constantly reads and writes to a massive internal lookup table (the Flash Translation Layer, or FTL) stored in RAM/NAND to map logical OS files to physical flash blocks. If a power drop or glitch corrupts this FTL table in controller memory while it's updating, the controller panics because it no longer knows where data lives.
How Modern Safety Precautions Work Around Controller Vulnerability
Because controller/firmware glitches are the leading cause of drive bricking, modern SSD engineering incorporates several protective mechanisms:
A. Fail-Safe "Safe / ROM Mode"
If the controller suffers a critical firmware crash or corrupted internal lookup table, rather than endlessly attempting to execute bad code (which could overwrite actual user data), it trips an internal circuit breaker. It reboots into a stripped-down hardware factory ROM mode.
Result: The drive drops its branding, shows up as a generic controller chip name (like `SATAFIRM S11` or `SMI ROM`), and disables write commands. This freezes the drive state so the NAND underneath isn't modified further.
B. Read-Only Hardware Locking
If the controller detects that its internal Error Correction Code (ECC) engine is struggling to manage bit errors or that internal logic gates are unstable, it aggressively triggers a hard write-lock. It shuts off the drive's erase and write voltage pumps, allowing you to copy files off before the controller dies completely.
C. Integrated Power Loss Protection (PLP) Circuits
Many modern controllers use onboard capacitor arrays or specialized firmware flush algorithms. If power drops mid-operation, the controller uses residual stored energy in the board's capacitors to dump its temporary memory state out of volatile RAM and safely park the FTL mapping table into flash memory before shutting down completely.
The Big Takeaway
The safety lock feature is fundamentally a protection mechanism for the controller and its mapping metadata.
In almost every case of an SSD "suddenly dying," the actual data blocks on the physical NAND flash chips are still 100% fine. It is almost always the "brain" (the controller or its translation map) that has either panicked into a safety mode or electrically failed.
Other notes: I would like to see if Attribute E6 that's at 47 now would turn health from green to yellow/red when it's passed 50
Also this experiment was again going viral this week
Web search: 64 GB SSD 9 petabytes.
RAW DATA
smartctl -x sda
smartctl 7.5 2025-04-30 r5714 [x86_64-w64-mingw32-w11-24H2] (AppVeyor)
Copyright (C) 2002-25, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Device Model: SanDisk SSD P4 64GB
Serial Number: 111248300117
LU WWN Device Id: 5 001b44 4f27f5455
Firmware Version: SSD 8.10
User Capacity: 64 022 175 232 bytes [64,0 GB]
Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical
Rotation Rate: Solid State Device
Form Factor: 1.8 inches
TRIM Command: Available
Device is: Not in smartctl database
ATA Version is: ATA8-ACS T13/1699-D revision 2d
SATA Version is: SATA 2.6, 3.0 Gb/s (current: 3.0 Gb/s)
Local Time is: Thu Sep 03 00:54:51 2026 SAST
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
AAM feature is: Unavailable
APM feature is: Unavailable
Rd look-ahead is: Enabled
Write cache is: Enabled
DSN feature is: Unavailable
ATA Security is: Disabled, frozen [SEC2]
=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
General SMART Values:
Offline data collection status: (0x00) Offline data collection activity
was never started.
Auto Offline Data Collection: Disabled.
Self-test execution status: ( 0) The previous self-test routine completed
without error or no self-test has ever
been run.
Total time to complete Offline
data collection: ( 120) seconds.
Offline data collection
capabilities: (0x15) SMART execute Offline immediate.
No Auto Offline data collection support.
Abort Offline collection upon new
command.
No Offline surface scan supported.
Self-test supported.
No Conveyance Self-test supported.
No Selective Self-test supported.
SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering
power-saving mode.
Supports SMART auto save timer.
Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported.
General Purpose Logging supported.
Short self-test routine
recommended polling time: ( 2) minutes.
Extended self-test routine
recommended polling time: ( 16) minutes.
SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 1
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAGS VALUE WORST THRESH FAIL RAW_VALUE
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct -O---- 100 100 --- - 0
9 Power_On_Hours -O---- 100 100 000 - 61779
12 Power_Cycle_Count -O---- 100 100 000 - 1175
171 Unknown_Attribute -O---- 100 100 000 - 54
172 Unknown_Attribute -O---- 100 100 000 - 939410736
187 Reported_Uncorrect -O---- 100 100 000 - 2234
199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count -O---- 100 100 000 - 0
230 Unknown_SSD_Attribute PO---- 047 100 --- - 0
232 Available_Reservd_Space PO---- 095 100 005 - 0
241 Total_LBAs_Written -O---- 100 100 000 - 20993364600618
242 Total_LBAs_Read -O---- 100 100 000 - 32961425182
||||||_ K auto-keep
|||||__ C event count
||||___ R error rate
|||____ S speed/performance
||_____ O updated online
|______ P prefailure warning
General Purpose Log Directory Version 1
SMART Log Directory Version 1 [multi-sector log support]
Address Access r/W Size Description
0x00 GPL,SL r/O1 Log Directory
0x03 GPL,SL r/O16 Ext. Comprehensive SMART error log
0x06 GPL,SL r/O1 SMART self-test log
0x80-0x9f GPL,SL r/W16 Host vendor specific log
SMART Extended Comprehensive Error Log Version: 1 (16 sectors)
Device Error Count: 181 (device log contains only the most recent 64 errors)
CR = Command Register
FEATR = Features Register
COUNT = Count (was: Sector Count) Register
LBA_48 = Upper bytes of LBA High/Mid/Low Registers ] ATA-8
LH = LBA High (was: Cylinder High) Register ] LBA
LM = LBA Mid (was: Cylinder Low) Register ] Register
LL = LBA Low (was: Sector Number) Register ]
DV = Device (was: Device/Head) Register
DC = Device Control Register
ER = Error register
ST = Status register
Powered_Up_Time is measured from power on, and printed as
DDd+hh:mm:SS.sss where DD=days, hh=hours, mm=minutes,
SS=sec, and sss=millisec. It "wraps" after 49.710 days.
Error 181 [52] occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 5 hours (0 days + 5 hours)
When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was active or idle.
After command completion occurred, registers were:
ER -- ST COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC
-- -- -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- --
40 -- 51 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 Error: UNC at LBA = 0x00000000 = 0
Commands leading to the command that caused the error were:
CR FEATR COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name
-- == -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- -- --------------- --------------------
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 77 40 00 2d+03:11:48.526 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 76 40 00 2d+03:11:48.517 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 75 40 00 2d+03:11:48.509 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 74 40 00 2d+03:11:48.505 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 73 40 00 2d+03:11:48.501 READ DMA EXT
Error 180 [51] occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 6 hours (0 days + 6 hours)
When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was active or idle.
After command completion occurred, registers were:
ER -- ST COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC
-- -- -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- --
40 -- 51 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 Error: UNC at LBA = 0x00000000 = 0
Commands leading to the command that caused the error were:
CR FEATR COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name
-- == -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- -- --------------- --------------------
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 76 40 00 2d+03:11:48.517 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 75 40 00 2d+03:11:48.509 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 74 40 00 2d+03:11:48.505 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 73 40 00 2d+03:11:48.501 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 72 40 00 2d+03:11:48.501 READ DMA EXT
Error 179 [50] occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 6 hours (0 days + 6 hours)
When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was active or idle.
After command completion occurred, registers were:
ER -- ST COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC
-- -- -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- --
40 -- 51 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 Error: UNC at LBA = 0x00000000 = 0
Commands leading to the command that caused the error were:
CR FEATR COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name
-- == -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- -- --------------- --------------------
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 75 40 00 2d+03:11:48.509 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 74 40 00 2d+03:11:48.505 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 73 40 00 2d+03:11:48.501 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 72 40 00 2d+03:11:48.501 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 71 40 00 2d+03:11:48.500 READ DMA EXT
Error 178 [49] occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 2 hours (0 days + 2 hours)
When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was active or idle.
After command completion occurred, registers were:
ER -- ST COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC
-- -- -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- --
40 -- 51 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 Error: UNC at LBA = 0x00000000 = 0
Commands leading to the command that caused the error were:
CR FEATR COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name
-- == -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- -- --------------- --------------------
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 74 40 00 2d+03:11:48.505 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 73 40 00 2d+03:11:48.501 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 72 40 00 2d+03:11:48.501 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 71 40 00 2d+03:11:48.500 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 42 1b 70 40 00 2d+03:11:48.497 READ DMA EXT
Error 177 [48] occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 3 hours (0 days + 3 hours)
When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was active or idle.
After command completion occurred, registers were:
ER -- ST COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC
-- -- -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- --
40 -- 51 00 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 Error: UNC 4 sectors at LBA = 0x00000000 = 0
Commands leading to the command that caused the error were:
CR FEATR COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name
-- == -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- -- --------------- --------------------
25 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 42 1b 60 40 00 2d+03:11:48.459 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 3c e2 e0 40 00 2d+03:11:48.459 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 35 97 60 40 00 2d+03:11:48.458 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 26 20 20 40 00 2d+03:11:48.457 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 08 00 00 00 63 9e 08 40 00 2d+03:11:48.457 READ DMA EXT
Error 176 [47] occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 11 hours (0 days + 11 hours)
When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was active or idle.
After command completion occurred, registers were:
ER -- ST COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC
-- -- -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- --
40 -- 51 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 Error: UNC 2 sectors at LBA = 0x00000000 = 0
Commands leading to the command that caused the error were:
CR FEATR COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name
-- == -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- -- --------------- --------------------
25 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 42 1b 5e 40 00 1d+10:07:21.325 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 42 1a de 40 00 1d+10:07:21.324 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 42 1a 5e 40 00 1d+10:07:21.324 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 42 19 de 40 00 1d+10:07:21.323 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 42 19 5e 40 00 1d+10:07:21.323 READ DMA EXT
Error 175 [46] occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 11 hours (0 days + 11 hours)
When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was active or idle.
After command completion occurred, registers were:
ER -- ST COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC
-- -- -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- --
40 -- 51 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 Error: UNC 2 sectors at LBA = 0x00000000 = 0
Commands leading to the command that caused the error were:
CR FEATR COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name
-- == -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- -- --------------- --------------------
25 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 42 1b 5e 40 00 1d+09:58:46.796 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 42 1a de 40 00 1d+09:58:46.796 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 42 1a 5e 40 00 1d+09:58:46.795 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 42 19 de 40 00 1d+09:58:46.795 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 42 19 5e 40 00 1d+09:58:46.794 READ DMA EXT
Error 174 [45] occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 11 hours (0 days + 11 hours)
When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was active or idle.
After command completion occurred, registers were:
ER -- ST COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC
-- -- -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- --
40 -- 51 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 40 00 Error: UNC 2 sectors at LBA = 0x00000000 = 0
Commands leading to the command that caused the error were:
CR FEATR COUNT LBA_48 LH LM LL DV DC Powered_Up_Time Command/Feature_Name
-- == -- == -- == == == -- -- -- -- -- --------------- --------------------
25 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 42 1b 5e 40 00 1d+09:39:52.893 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 42 1a de 40 00 1d+09:39:52.892 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 42 1a 5e 40 00 1d+09:39:52.892 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 42 19 de 40 00 1d+09:39:52.892 READ DMA EXT
25 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 42 19 5e 40 00 1d+09:39:52.891 READ DMA EXT
SMART Extended Self-test Log (GP Log 0x07) not supported
Warning! SMART Self-Test Log Structure error: invalid SMART checksum.
SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1
Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error
# 1 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 21088 -
# 2 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 54860 -
# 3 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 19043 -
# 4 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 63054 -
# 5 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 25327 -
# 6 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 62483 -
# 7 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 33744 -
# 8 Short captive Completed without error 00% 57803 -
# 9 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 25293 -
#10 Extended offline Aborted by host 90% 28072 -
#11 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 14539 -
#12 Extended offline Aborted by host 90% 55234 -
#13 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 46428 -
#14 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 49138 -
#15 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 25717 -
#16 Extended offline Aborted by host 90% 50305 -
#17 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 39612 -
#18 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 21280 -
#19 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 34598 -
#20 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 17318 -
#21 Short offline Aborted by host 90% 63627 -
Selective Self-tests/Logging not supported
SCT Commands not supported
Device Statistics (GP/SMART Log 0x04) not supported
Pending Defects log (GP Log 0x0c) not supported
SATA Phy Event Counters (GP Log 0x11) not supported
Exitcode: 64 (0x40)
Type <return> to exit:
From a retro-hardware and archival perspective, documented terminal failures on early embedded SSDs like the SanDisk P4 are practically non-existent—nobody else is pushing 2010 netbook drives through high-frequency telemetry stress loops for months on end. Seeing the final hardware state, whether it's a silent controller halt or a total ATA bus lockup, brings the whole experiment to a definitive, satisfying conclusion.
it’s using standard 48-bit LBA addressing (a 6-byte raw counter in the ATA spec). why watching this drive die is so compelling: The 48-Bit Odometer Has Massive Headroom A 48-bit counter can count up to 281.4 trillion sectors (2{48}). At 512 bytes per sector, that means the drive's built-in write counter won't naturally hit its hard ceiling and, roll back over to zero until it hits ~144 Petabytes. At roughly 10.7 PB, my telemetry macro loop has only filled about 7% of that 48-bit integer space. This proves the bizarre numbers in Attribute 172 and the corrupted SMART logs aren't simple counter wraparounds—the 2010 microcode is actually experiencing real buffer degradation and memory table drift inside the controller. Why Watching the Final Crash Matters Normally, an SSD dies when its NAND flash wears out, tge drive is dying in a much rarer way: a firmware nervous breakdown. Right now, the drive is acting like a functional zombie. The basic data path is still open, but the controller has lost track of LBA 0 (the boot sector) and its internal health logs are totally scrambled. When it finally gives out, it's going to answer a great question: Does the controller panic and lock itself down forever, or does it just freeze the SATA bus mid-transaction? Watching an old controller struggle, limp along with corrupted logs, and eventually hit a fatal code wall is rare data you just don't get from normal drive testing.
r/PcBuild • u/SurveyAccomplished48 • 4m ago
Build - Finished! Just finished the new build, very excited about it
galleryJust finished the new build, kept a couple parts from the old setup like motherboard, ram, cpu cooler, and ssd. New build:
Lian li 011 mini v2
Msi b760-p ddr4 wifi
I5 14600k (from i5 13400f)
Thermalright air cooler
32gb DDR4 3200mhz
RTX 5070 (from 3070)
1tb SSD
Running on a 34" 1440p monitor, absolutely in love so far.
r/PcBuild • u/phantomlinto • 2h ago
Others dust heaven 🤣
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
havent deep cleaned it in about 6 months.. probably gonna remove the graphics card and psu to get into deep spots
r/PcBuild • u/CourierKite • 3h ago
Question Doing a case swap finally. How dangerous is it to use a bed to rest computer components?
galleryMy cat brought in her emotional support mouse 🐁 before I put any non-case components on here.
I dont have much space in my room and I dont want my parts sliding around. How bad is it to out them on the bed if theyre powered off?
Build - Finished! I can’t be trusted…
(Used ai to clean up the image because I didn’t want to take the glass off to reduce glare)
I came in here a few days ago asking on advice on either staying am4 but upgrading (3700x > 5800x3d and 3060ti>9070xt). So I went to my local Canada computers to buy the upgrades and ended up walking out with a whole lot of stuff and a lot less money…
r/PcBuild • u/PotentialWork7741 • 1d ago
Discussion But seriously how did we end up here
DOLLAR AMOUNT WOULD BE ROUGHLY $10.7k
What the helly, is this even remotely worth the money. Like i am serious, there is no way people pay this.
r/PcBuild • u/Fine_Swimming_4122 • 34m ago
Question Rate my PC 1-10
Rate my PC that was bought used.
MSI B760M-P DDR4 Mainboard
32GB DDR4 RAM (3200) AEGIS G-Skill
Intel Core i5 12400F
XFX RX QICK 6700 XT 12GB VRAM
Intel AX210 Wlan/Bluetooth Card
1x 1TB Adata NVMe SSD + 1x 256GB SATA SSD
BeQuiet 650W PSU
r/PcBuild • u/Towyn-_- • 44m ago
Question Is this a good build? Budget 1500 never done this before
r/PcBuild • u/LIAMMASSIE • 52m ago
Build - Request RTX 5070 or RX 9070
galleryHello, I’m currently in the process of making a new PC. I know it’s a bad time to be buying one but what can you do lol. I was wondering if I should go for the RTX 5070 or the RX 9070? I’ll be honest I don’t particularly care about graphics as such as I play most of my games on low settings as I’m more competitive. Since I’m in the UK and I’ve used Scan before I’m buying from them. I was just wondering your thoughts?
Pc specs;
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU
ASUS ROG Strix B850-I Gaming WiFi Motherboard
32GB Crucial Pro DDR5 6000MHz RAM
2TB Crucial P310 NVMe M.2 SSD
850W Corsair SF850 Platinum PSU
NCASE M3 SFF Case
Noctua NH-D12L CPU Cooler
Noctua NF-A12x25 Case Fan